, Volume 178, Issue 3, pp 723–732 | Cite as

Trade-offs between growth and maturation: the cost of reproduction for surviving environmental extremes

Population ecology - Original research


Life-history trade-offs and the costs of reproduction are central concepts in evolution and ecology. Episodic climatic events such as drought and extreme temperatures provide strong selective pressures that can change the balance of these costs and trade-offs. We used size-structured matrix models parameterized from field and laboratory studies to examine the effect of periodic drought on two species of aquatic salamanders (greater siren, Siren lacertina; lesser siren, Siren intermedia) that differ in size at reproduction and maximum body size. Post-drought body size distributions of the larger species (S. lacertina) are consistent with size-dependent mortality. Smaller individuals were extirpated from the population during each drought while large animals persisted, a pattern that contrasted with that seen in several ectotherms. This appears to be largely explained by estivation proficiency and a positive relationship between body size and estivation potential. Increased body size, however, may come at the cost of fecundity and maturation rate compared to a closely related congener. The cost of somatic allocation in this case may manifest itself via reduced per-capita competitive ability, which (at least in simulation studies) allows the smaller, fast-maturing species to outcompete the larger, slow-maturing species when drought is minimal or nonexistent.


Body size Life-history strategy Reproductive allocation Estivation Drought Size structure 



R. Semlitsch, S. Pittman, T. Meckley, and G. Connette provided helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. A. Tucker provided data from 1993 sampling of greater sirens. K. McCleod, and R. Lide provided wetland data. J. W. Gibbons, T. Tuberville, K. Buhlmann, S. Poppy, and the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory provided lab space, academic support, and materials used during parameter data collection. R. Cocroft and the IBM Model Class of 2010 at the University of Missouri provided suggestions and help during initial model development. The Trans-World Airlines Scholarship and Life Sciences Fellowship at the University of Missouri provided financial support to TML during the course of model development. This material is based on work supported by the American Museum of Natural History’s Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Fund (to TML), and by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-FC09-07SR22506 to the University of Georgia Research Foundation.

Supplementary material

442_2015_3270_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (556 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 555 kb)


  1. Bårdsen BJ, Henden JA, Fauchald P, Tveraa T, Stien A (2011) Plastic reproductive allocation as a buffer against environmental stochasticity–linking life history and population dynamics to climate. Oikos 120:245–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18597.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blueweiss L, Fox H, Kudzma V, Nakashima D, Peters R, Sams S (1978) Relationships between body size and some life history parameters. Oecologia 37:257–272. doi: 10.1007/bf00344996 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brose U, Dunne JA, Montoya JM, Petchey OL, Schneider FD, Jacob U (2012) Climate change in size-structured ecosystems. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 367:2903–2912. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown CR, Brown MB (1998) Intense natural selection on body size and wing and tail asymmetry in cliff swallows during severe weather. Evolution 52:1461–1475. doi: 10.2307/2411315
  5. Brown JH, Sibly RM (2006) Life-history evolution under a production constraint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:17595–17599. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608522103
  6. Buhlmann KA, Congdon JD, Gibbons JW, Greene JL (2009) Ecology of chicken turtles (Deirochelys reticularia) in a seasonal wetland ecosystem: exploiting resource and refuge environments. Herpetologica 65:39–53. doi: 10.1655/08-028R1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM (2004) Soay sheep: dynamics and selection in an island population. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511550669
  9. Congdon JD, Dunham AE, Van Loben Sels RC (1994) Demographics of common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina): implications for conservation and management of long-lived organisms. Am Zool 34:397–408. doi: 10.1093/icb/34.3.397 Google Scholar
  10. Davis WB, Knapp FT (1953) Notes on the salamander Siren intermedia. Copeia 1953:119–121. doi: 10.2307/1440144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dobson GP, Headrick JP (1995) Bioenergetic scaling: metabolic design and body-size constraints in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:7317–7321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.16.7317
  12. Etheridge K (1990) The energetics of estivating sirenid salamanders (Siren lacertina and Pseudobranchus striatus). Herpetologica 46:407–414Google Scholar
  13. Frese PW, Mathis A, Wilkinson R (2003) Population characteristics, growth, and spatial activity of Siren intermedia in an intensively managed wetland. Southwest Nat 48:534–542. doi:  10.1894/0038-4909(2003)048<0534:PCGASA>2.0.CO;2
  14. Gehlbach FR, Kennedy SE (1978) Population ecology of a highly productive aquatic salamander (Siren intermedia). Southwest Nat 23:423–429. doi: 10.2307/3670250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gehlbach FR, Gordon R, Jordan JB (1973) Aestivation of the salamander, Siren intermedia. Am Midl Nat 89:455–463. doi: 10.2307/2424051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gibbons JW, Semlitsch RD, Greene JL, Schubauer JP (1981) Variation in age and size at maturity of the slider turtle (Pseudemys scripta). Am Nat 117:841–845. doi: 10.1086/283774 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibbons JW, Greene JL, Congdon JD (1983) Drought-related responses of aquatic turtle populations. J Herpetol 17:242–246. doi: 10.2307/1563826 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goin CJ (1947) Notes on the eggs and early larvae of three Florida salamanders. Chic Acad Sci Nat Hist Misc 10:1–4Google Scholar
  19. Hanlin HG, Mount RH (1978) Reproduction and activity of the greater siren, Siren lacertina (Amphibia: Sirenidae), in Alabama. J Ala Acad Sci 49:31–39Google Scholar
  20. Holdo RM, Fryxell JM, Sinclair ARE, Dobson A, Holt RD (2011) Predicted impact of barriers to migration on the Serengeti wildebeest population. PLoS One 6:e16370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016370 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kingsolver JG, Pfennig DW (2004) Individual-level selection as a cause of Cope’s rule of phyletic size increase. Evolution 58:1608–1612. doi: 10.1554/04-003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindstedt SL, Boyce MS (1985) Seasonality, fasting, endurance, and body size in mammals. Am Nat 125:873–878. doi: 10.1086/284385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luhring TM (2008) Population ecology of greater siren, Siren lacertina. M.S. thesis. University of Georgia, AthensGoogle Scholar
  24. Luhring TM (2009) Using PIT tags to evaluate non-individual-specific marks under field conditions: a case study with greater siren (Siren lacertina). Herpetol Rev 40:170–173Google Scholar
  25. Luhring TM, Jennison CA (2008) A new stratified aquatic sampling technique for aquatic vertebrates. J Freshw Ecol 23:445–450. doi: 10.1080/02705060.2008.9664222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luhring TM, Todd BD (2010) Siren intermedia (lesser siren). Drought survival. Herpetol Rev 41:60Google Scholar
  27. Luhring TM, Willson JD, Winne CT (2011) Nerodia fasciata (banded watersnake). Inter-wetland movement. Herpetol Rev 42:100–101Google Scholar
  28. Nagel L, Schluter D (1998) Body size, natural selection, and speciation in sticklebacks. Evolution 52:209–218. doi: 10.2307/2410936 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nakaoka M (1998) Optimal resource allocation of the marine bivalve Yoldia notabilis: the effects of size-limited reproductive capacity and size-dependent mortality. Evol Ecol 12:347–361Google Scholar
  30. Overpeck J, Udall B (2010) Dry times ahead. Science 328:1642–1643. doi: 10.1126/science.1186591 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pearl R, Miner JR (1935) Experimental studies on the duration of life. XIV. The comparative mortality of certain lower organisms. Q Rev Biol 10:60–79. doi: 10.1086/394476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511608551 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Schalk CM, Luhring TM (2010) Vagility of aquatic salamanders: implications for wetland connectivity. J Herpetol 44:104–109. doi: 10.1670/08-312.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sever DM, Rania LC, Krenz JD (1996) Reproduction of the salamander Siren intermedia Le Conte with especial reference to oviducal anatomy and mode of fertilization. J Morphol 227:335–348. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4687(199603)227:3<335:AID-JMOR5>3.0.CO;2-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sheridan JA, Bickford D (2011) Shrinking body size as an ecological response to climate change. Nat Clim Change 1:401–406. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shine R (1988) The evolution of large body size in females: a critique of Darwin’s “fecundity advantage” model. Am Nat 131:124–131. doi: 10.1086/284778 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snodgrass JW, Ackerman JW, Bryan ALJ, Burger J (1999) Influence of hydroperiod, isolation, and heterospecifics on the distribution of aquatic salamanders (Siren and Amphiuma) among depression wetlands. Copeia 1999:107–113. doi: 10.2307/1447391 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stearns SC (1976) Life-history tactics: a review of the ideas. Q Rev Biol 51:3–47. doi: 10.1086/409052 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taborsky B, Dieckmann U, Heino M (2003) Unexpected discontinuities in life-history evolution under size-dependent mortality. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 270:713–721. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walls SC, Barichivich WJ, Brown ME (2013) Drought, deluge and declines: the impact of precipitation extremes on amphibians in a changing climate. Biology 2:399–418. doi: 10.3390/biology2010399 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wells KD (2007) The ecology and behavior of amphibians. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226893334.001.0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Werner EE (1986) Amphibian metamorphosis: growth rate, predation risk, and the optimal size at transformation. Am Nat 128:319–341. doi: 10.1086/284565 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wikelski M, Trillmich F (1997) Body size and sexual size dimorphism in marine iguanas fluctuate as a result of opposing natural and sexual selection: an island comparison. Evolution 51:922–936. doi: 10.2307/2411166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams GC (1966) Natural selection costs of reproduction and a refinement of Lack’s principle. Am Nat 169:673–683. doi: 10.1086/282461 Google Scholar
  46. Willson JD, Winne CT, Dorcas ME, Gibbons JW (2006) Post-drought responses of semi-aquatic snakes inhabiting an isolated wetland: insights on different strategies for persistence in a dynamic habitat. Wetlands 26:1071–1078. doi: 10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[1071:prossi]2.0.co;2
  47. Winne CT, Willson JD, Gibbons JW (2010) Drought survival and reproduction impose contrasting selection pressures on maximum body size and sexual size dimorphism in a snake, Seminatrix pygaea. Oecologia 162:913–922. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1513-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Withers PC (1993) Metabolic depression during aestivation in the Australian frogs, Neobatrachus and Cyclorana. Aust J Zool 41:467–473. doi: 10.1071/zo9930467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Woodward G, Brown LE, Edwards FK, Hudson LN, Milner AM, Reuman DC, Ledger ME (2012) Climate change impacts in multispecies systems: drought alters food web size structure in a field experiment. Philos Trans Roy Soc B Biol Sci 367:2990–2997. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Savannah River Ecology LaboratoryAikenUSA
  3. 3.Fisheries and WildlifeMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations