Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 178, Issue 3, pp 795–806 | Cite as

Belowground bud bank response to grazing under severe, short-term drought

  • Benjamin L. VanderWeideEmail author
  • David C. Hartnett
Community ecology - Original research

Abstract

While the effects of drought and grazing are often studied separately, these disturbances co-occur in grasslands worldwide and interactively influence population, community, and ecosystem processes. The effects of drought and grazing on the belowground bud bank may dictate the trajectory of community recovery because new shoots arise from belowground buds after disturbance in perennial grasslands. We therefore investigated the separate and interactive effects of severe drought and grazing on the belowground bud bank and aboveground vegetation in the tallgrass prairie of northeast Kansas, USA. Contrary to our expectations, we observed changes in community structure and declines in species richness both above and below ground in response to drought and grazing. We also hypothesized that drought would reduce bud bank density of all taxonomic groups, but found that grass bud and shoot densities remained constant across all drought and grazing treatment combinations. While sedge and forb bud and shoot densities were reduced by drought, only sedge bud density declined to a greater extent when grazed under drought conditions. Live rhizome biomass did not vary by treatment and was highly correlated with bud bank density, suggesting that bud demography is tightly linked to the production and senescence of rhizomes. Despite the effects of drought and grazing on aboveground net primary productivity and community structure, our work suggests that grasses stabilize tallgrass prairie plant communities because their rhizomes and associated buds persist through co-occurring disturbances.

Keywords

Climate change Ecological stability Herbivory Water stress Tallgrass prairie 

Notes

Author contribution statement

BV and DH designed the study. BV executed the experiments, performed analyses, and wrote the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Anita Dille, Carolyn Ferguson, and Tony Joern for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for critical comments that improved the manuscript. We thank Kathryn Sebes for assistance with field work, Leigh Murray for statistical advice, and John Blair for access to additional rain interception shelters. During this project, B.L.V. was supported by Konza Prairie Long Term Ecological Research Station, Kansas State University Division of Biology, US National Science Foundation GK-12 Fellowship DGE-0841414. The experiments comply with the current laws of the United States where they were performed.

Supplementary material

442_2015_3249_MOESM1_ESM.docx (683 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 683 kb)

References

  1. Albertson FW, Weaver JE (1942) History of the native vegetation of western Kansas during seven years of continuous drought. Ecol Monogr 12:25–51. doi:10.2307%2F1948421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson RC (2006) Evolution and origin of the Central Grassland of North America: climate, fire, and mammalian grazers. J Torrey Bot Soc 133:626–647. doi:10.3159/1095-5674(2006)133[626:EAOOTC]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Augustine DJ, McNaughton SJ (1998) Ungulate effects on the functional species structure of plant communities: herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance. J Wildl Manag 62:1165–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benson EJ, Hartnett DC (2006) The role of seed and vegetative reproduction in plant recruitment and demography in tallgrass prairie. Plant Ecol 187:163–177. doi: 10.1007/s11258-005-0975-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beschta RL, Donahue DL, DellaSala DA, Rhodes JJ, Karr JR, O’Brien MH, Fleischner TL, Deacon Williams C (2013) Adapting to climate change on western public lands: addressing the ecological effects of domestic, wild, and feral ungulates. Environ Manag 51:474–491. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9964-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biondini ME, Patton BD, Nyren PE (1998) Grazing intensity and ecosystem processes in a northern mixed-grass prairie, USA. Ecol Appl 8:469–479. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0469:GIAEPI]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:325–349. doi: 10.2307/1942268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Busso CA, Mueller RJ, Richards JH (1989) Effects of drought and defoliation on bud viability of two caespitose grasses. Ann Bot 63:477–485Google Scholar
  9. Carter DL, VanderWeide BL, Blair JM (2012) Drought-mediated shoot and below-ground bud dynamics in restored grasslands. Appl Veg Sci 15:470–478. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.(2012)01200.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Curtin C, Western D (2008) Grasslands, people, and conservation: over-the-horizon learning exchanges between African and American pastoralists. Conserv Biol 22:870–877. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00945.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dalgleish HJ, Hartnett DC (2006) Below-ground bud banks increase along a precipitation gradient of the North American Great Plains: a test of the meristem limitation hypothesis. New Phytol 171:81–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01739.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalgleish HJ, Hartnett DC (2009) The effects of fire frequency and grazing on tallgrass prairie productivity and plant structure are mediated through bud bank demography. Plant Ecol 201:411–420. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2798-6_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frank DA, Groffman PM (1998) Ungulate vs. landscape control of soil C and N processes in grasslands of Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 79:2229–2241. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2229:UVLCOS]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hartnett DC, Hickman KR, Walter LEF (1996) Effects of bison grazing, fire, and topography on floristic diversity in tallgrass prairie. J Range Manag 49:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayes DC, Seastedt TR (1987) Root dynamics of tallgrass prairie in wet and dry years. Can J Bot 65:787–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hendrickson JR, Briske DD (1997) Axillary bud banks of two semiarid perennial grasses: occurrence, longevity, and contribution to population persistence. Oecologia 110:584–591. doi: 10.1007/s004420050199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Illius AW, O’Connor TG (1999) On the relevance of nonequilibrium concepts to arid and semiarid grazing systems. Ecol Appl 9:798–813. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0798:OTRONC]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koerner SE, Collins SL, Blair JM, Knapp AK, Smith MD (2013) Rainfall variability has minimal effects on grassland recovery from repeated grazing. J Veg Sci. doi: 10.1111/jvs.12065 Google Scholar
  19. Legendre P, Gallagher ED (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271–280. doi: 10.1007/s004420100716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McNaughton SJ (1993) Grasses and grazers, science and management. Ecol Appl 3:17–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McSherry ME, Ritchie ME (2013) Effects of grazing on grassland soil carbon: a global review. Glob Change Biol 19:1347–1357. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Min SK, Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Hegerl GC (2011) Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature 470:378–381. doi: 10.1038/nature09763 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mullahey JJ, Waller SS, Moser LE (1990) Defoliation effects on production and morphological development of little bluestem. J Range Manag 43:497–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mullahey JJ, Waller SS, Moser LE (1991) Defoliation effects on yield and bud and tiller numbers of two Sandhills grasses. J Range Manag 44:241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. N’Guessan M, Hartnett DC (2011) Differential responses to defoliation frequency in little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium) in tallgrass prairie: implications for herbivory tolerance and avoidance. Plant Ecol 212:1275–1285. doi: 10.1007/s11258-011-9904-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nilsson P, Tuomi J, Astrom M (1996) Bud dormancy as a bet-hedging strategy. Am Nat 147:269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. NOAA National Climate Data Center (2013) www.ncdc.noaa.gov. Accessed June 2013
  28. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2013) vegan: community ecology Package. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. R package version 2.0.7
  29. Ott JP, Hartnett DC (2012) Contrasting bud bank dynamics of two co-occurring grasses in tallgrass prairie: implications for grassland dynamics. Plant Ecol 213:1437–1448. doi: 10.1007/s11258-012-0102-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Patricola CM, Cook KH (2013) Mid-twenty-first century warm season climate change in the central United States. part we: regional and global model predictions. Clim Dyn 40:551–568. doi: 10.1007/s00382-012-1605-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2013) R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
  32. Rogers WE, Hartnett DC (2001) Temporal vegetation dynamics and recolonization mechanisms on different-sized soil disturbances in tallgrass prairie. Am J Bot 88:1634–1642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Samson F, Knopf F (1994) Prairie conservation in North America. Bioscience 44:418–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seastedt TR (1985) Maximization of primary and secondary productivity by grazers. Am Nat 126:559–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Towne EG (2002) Vascular plants of Konza Prairie Biological Station: an annotated checklist of species in a Kansas tallgrass prairie. SIDA Contr Bot 20:269–294Google Scholar
  36. Towne EG, Hartnett DC, Cochran RC (2005) Vegetation trends in tallgrass prairie from bison and cattle grazing. Ecol Appl 15:1550–1559. doi: 10.1890/04-1958 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tucker SS, Craine JM, Nippert JB (2011) Physiological drought tolerance and the structuring of tallgrass prairie assemblages. Ecosphere 2:art48 doi:  10.1890/ES11-00023.1
  38. Tuomi J, Nilsson P, Astrom M (1994) Plant compensatory responses: bud dormancy as an adaptation to herbivory. Ecology 75:1429–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. VanderWeide BV (2013) Grazing and drought in tallgrass prairie: the role of belowground bud banks in vegetation dynamics. PhD dissertation, Kansas State University, ManhattanGoogle Scholar
  40. VanderWeide BV, Hartnett DC, Carter DL (2014) Belowground bud banks of tallgrass prairie are insensitive to multi-year, growing season drought. Ecosphere 5:art103. doi:  10.1890/ES14-00058.1
  41. Vinton MA, Hartnett DC (1992) Effects of bison grazing on Andropogon gerardii and Panicum virgatum in burned and unburned tallgrass prairie. Oecologia 90:374–382. doi: 10.1007/BF00317694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vinton MA, Hartnett DC, Finck EJ, Briggs JM (1993) Interactive effects of fire, bison (Bison bison) grazing and plant community structure in tallgrass prairie. Am Midl Nat 129:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Volaire F, Seddaiu G, Ledda L, Lelievre F (2009) Water deficit and induction of summer dormancy in perennial Mediterranean grasses. Ann Bot 103:1337–1346. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp080 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Warton DI, Duursma RA, Falster DS, Taskinen S (2012) Smatr 3–an R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines. Methods Ecol Evol 3:257–259. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00153.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weaver JE, Albertson FW (1936) Effects of the great drought on the prairies of Iowa, Nebraska, and Kansas. Ecology 17:567–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weaver JE, Hougen V (1939) Effect of frequent clipping on plant production in prairie and pasture. Am Midl Nat 21:396–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yahdjian L, Sala OE (2002) A rainout shelter design for intercepting different amounts of rainfall. Oecologia 133:95–101. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-1024-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zwicke M, Alessio GA, Thiery L, Falcimagne R, Baumont R, Rossignol N, Soussana JF, Picon-Cochard C (2013) Lasting effects of climate disturbance on perennial grassland above-ground biomass production under two cutting frequencies. Glob Change Biol 19:3435–3448. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12317 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations