Oecologia

, Volume 177, Issue 3, pp 861–874 | Cite as

Net carbon flux of dead wood in forests of the Eastern US

  • C. W. Woodall
  • M. B. Russell
  • B. F. Walters
  • A. W. D’Amato
  • S. Fraver
  • G. M. Domke
Global change ecology - Original research

Abstract

Downed dead wood (DDW) in forest ecosystems is a C pool whose net flux is governed by a complex of natural and anthropogenic processes and is critical to the management of the entire forest C pool. As empirical examination of DDW C net flux has rarely been conducted across large scales, the goal of this study was to use a remeasured inventory of DDW C and ancillary forest attributes to assess C net flux across forests of the Eastern US. Stocks associated with large fine woody debris (diameter 2.6–7.6 cm) decreased over time (−0.11 Mg ha−1 year−1), while stocks of larger-sized coarse DDW increased (0.02 Mg ha−1 year−1). Stocks of total DDW C decreased (−0.14 Mg ha−1 year−1), while standing dead and live tree stocks both increased, 0.01 and 0.44 Mg ha−1 year−1, respectively. The spatial distribution of DDW C stock change was highly heterogeneous with random forests model results indicating that management history, live tree stocking, natural disturbance, and growing degree days only partially explain stock change. Natural disturbances drove substantial C transfers from the live tree pool (≈−4 Mg ha−1 year−1) to the standing dead tree pool (≈3 Mg ha−1 year−1) with only a minimal increase in DDW C stocks (≈1 Mg ha−1 year−1) in lower decay classes, suggesting a delayed transfer of C to the DDW pool. The assessment and management of DDW C flux is complicated by the diversity of natural and anthropogenic forces that drive their dynamics with the scale and timing of flux among forest C pools remaining a large knowledge gap.

Keywords

Downed dead wood Detritus Stand dynamics Random forests model Decay classes 

Supplementary material

442_2014_3171_MOESM1_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)

References

  1. Aakala T (2011) Temporal variability of deadwood volume and quality in boreal old-growth forests. Silva Fenn 45:969–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett TM (2014) Storage and flux of carbon in live trees, snags, and logs in the Chugach and Tongass National Forests. USDA Forest Service general technical report PNW-889. USDA, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  3. Bechtold WA, Patterson PL (Eds) (2005) The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program—national sampling design and estimation procedures. USDA Forest Service general technical report SRS-80. USDA, Asheville, NCGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker DR, Skog K, Hellman A, Halvorsen KE, Mace T (2009) An outlook for sustainable forest bioenergy production in the Lake States. Energy Policy 37:5687–5693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benjamin JG, Lilieholm RJ, Coup CE (2010) Forest biomass harvesting in the northeast: a special-needs operation? North J Appl For 27:45–49Google Scholar
  6. Berger AL, Palik B, D’Amato AW, Fraver S, Bradford JB, Nislow K, King D, Brooks RT (2013) Ecological impacts of energy-wood harvests: lessons from whole-tree harvesting and natural disturbance. J For 111:139–153Google Scholar
  7. Bond-Lamberty B, Gower ST (2008) Decomposition and fragmentation of coarse woody debris: revisiting a boreal black spruce chronosequence. Ecosystems 11:831–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradford MA, Warren RJ II, Baldrian P, Crowther TW, Maynard DS, Oldfield EE, Wieder WR, Wood SA, King JR (2014) Climate fails to predict wood decomposition at regional scales. Nat Clim Change 4:625–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Breimen L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornwell WK et al (2009) Plant traits and wood fates across the globe. Glob Change Biol 15:2431–2449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cutler DR, Edwards TC, Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler JJ (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Domke GM, Woodall CW, Smith JE (2011) Accounting for density reduction and structural loss in standing dead trees: implications for forest biomass and carbon stock estimates in the US. Carbon Balance Manage 6:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forrester JA, Mladenoff DJ, Gower ST, Stoffel JL (2012) Interactions of temperature and moisture with respiration from coarse woody debris in experimental forest canopy gaps. For Ecol Manage 265:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fraver S, Wagner RG, Day M (2002) Dynamics of coarse woody debris following gap harvesting in the Acadian forest of central Maine, USA. Can J For Res 32(12):2094–2105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friend AD, Lucht W, Rademacher TT, Keribin R, Betts R, Cadule P, Ciais P, Clark DB, Dankers R, Falloon PD, Ito A, Kahana R, Kleidon A, Lomas MR, Nishina K, Ostberg S, Pavlick R, Peylin P, Schaphoff S, Vuichard N, Warszawski L, Wilshire AM, Woodward FI (2014) Carbon residence time dominates uncertainty in terrestrial vegetation responses to future climate and atmospheric CO2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:3280–3285CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gough CM, Vogel CS, Kazanski C, Nagel L, Flower CE, Curtis PS (2007) Coarse woody debris and the carbon balance of a north temperate forest. For Ecol Manage 244:60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray AN, Whittier TR (2014) Carbon stocks and changes on Pacific Northwest national forests and the role of disturbance, management, and growth. For Ecol Manage 328:167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromack K Jr, Cummins KW (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 15:133–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harmon ME, Woodall CW, Fasth B, Sexton J (2008) Woody detritus density and density reduction factors for tree species in the US: a synthesis. General technical report 29. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research StationGoogle Scholar
  20. Harmon ME, Bond-Lamberty B, Tang J, Vragas R (2011a) Heterotrophic respiration in disturbed forests: a review with examples from North America. J Geophys Res 116:G00K04Google Scholar
  21. Harmon ME, Woodall CW, Fasth B, Sexton J, Yatkov M (2011b) Differences between standing and downed dead tree wood density reduction factors: a comparison across decay classes and tree species. Research paper 15. Northern Research Station, USDA Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurteau MD, Hungate BA, Koch GW, North MP, Smith GR (2013) Aligning ecology and markets in the forest carbon cycle. Front Ecol Environ 11:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA (2003) National scale biomass estimators for US tree species. For Sci 49:12–35Google Scholar
  24. Jönsson MT, Fraver S, Jonsson BG (2011) Spatio-temporal variation of coarse woody debris input in woodland key habitats in central Sweden. Silva Fenn 45:957–967Google Scholar
  25. Joyce LA, Running SW, Breshears DD, Dale VH, Malmsheimer RW, Sampson RN, Sohngen B, Woodall CW (2014) National climate assessment of US 2014. Ch 7: forests. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) Climate change impacts in the US: the third national climate assessment. US Global Change Research Program, pp 175–194Google Scholar
  26. Krankina ON, Harmon ME (1995) Dynamics of the dead wood carbon pool in northwestern Russian boreal forests. Water Air Soil Pollut 82:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee PC, Crites S, Nietfeld M, Nguyen HV, Stelfox JB (1997) Characteristics and origins of deadwood material in aspen-dominated boreal forests. Ecol Appl 7:691–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2:18–22Google Scholar
  29. Lippke B, Oneil E, Harrison R, Skog K, Gustavsson L, Sathre R (2011) Life cycle impacts of forest management and wood utilization on carbon mitigation: knowns and unknowns. Carbon Manage 2:303–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malmsheimer RW, Heffernan P, Brink S, Crandall D, Deneke F, Galik C, Gee E, Helms JA, McClure N, Mortimer M, Ruddell S, Smith M, Stewart J (2008) Forest management solutions for mitigating climate change in the US. J For 106:115–171Google Scholar
  31. Malmsheimer RW, Bowyer JL, Fried JS, Gee E, Izlar RL, Miner RA, Munn IA, Oneil E, Stewart WC (2011) Managing forests because carbon matters: integrating energy, products, and land management policy. J For 109:S7–S50Google Scholar
  32. McKinley DC, Ryan MG, Birdsey RA, Giardina CP, Harmon ME, Heath LS, Houghton RA, Jackson RB, Morrison JF, Murray BC, Pataki DE, Skog KE (2011) A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the US. Ecol Appl 21:1902–1924CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Miles PD, Smith WB (2009) Specific gravity and other properties of wood and bark for 156 tree species found in North America. Research note NRS-38. Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Newtown Square, PAGoogle Scholar
  34. Nepal P, Wear DN, Skog KE (2014) Net change in carbon emissions with increased wood energy use in the US. GCB Bioenergy (in press)Google Scholar
  35. Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) Forest stand dynamics.Update edition. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Rehfeldt GE (2006) A spline model of climate for the western US. General technical report RMRS-165. USDA Forest Service Google Scholar
  37. Russell MB, Woodall CW, Fraver S, D’Amato AW, Domke GM, Skog KE (2014a) Residence times and decay rates of downed woody debris biomass/carbon in Eastern US forests. Ecosystems 17:765–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Russell MB, Woodall CW, D’Amato AW, Fraver S, Bradford JB (2014b) Technical note: Linking climate change and downed woody debris decomposition across forests of the eastern United States. Biogeosciences (in press) Google Scholar
  39. SAS Institute (2011) SAS/STAT(R) 9.3 user’s guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  40. Sathre R, Gustavsson L (2011) Time-dependent climate benefits of using forest residues to substitute fossil fuels. Biomass Bioenery 35:2506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schlamadinger B, Spitzer J, Kohlmaier GH, Ludeke M (1995) Carbon balance of bioenergy from logging residues. Biomass Bioenergy 8:221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith WB, Miles PD, Perry CH, Pugh SA (2009) Forest resources of the US, 2007. General technical report WO-GTR-78. US Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
  43. Stokland JN, Siitonen J, Jonsson BG (2012) Biodiversity in dead wood. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sturtevant BR, Bissonette JA, Long JN, Roberts DW (1997) Coarse woody debris as a function of age, stand structure, and disturbance in boreal Newfoundland. Ecol Appl 7:702–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. USDA Forest Service (2007) Forest inventory and analysis national core field guide, vol I: field, data collection procedures for phase 2 plots, version 4.0. USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis, Washington, DC. URL: http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/. Accessed December 2010
  46. USDA Forest Service (2007) Forest inventory and analysis phase 3 guide—downed woody materials, version 4.0. USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis, Washington, DC. URL: http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/. Accessed January 2011
  47. USDA Forest Service (2014) Forest inventory and analysis national program—data and tools–FIA data mart, FIADB version 5.1. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. http://apps.fs.fed.us/fiadb-downloads/datamart.html . Accessed 24 June 2014
  48. Wang C, Bond-Lamberty B, Gower ST (2002) Environmental controls on carbon dioxide flux from black spruce coarse woody debris. Oecologia 132:374–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Westfall JA, Woodall CW (2007) Measurement repeatability of a large-scale inventory of forest fuels. For Ecol Manage 253:171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Westfall JA, Woodall CW, Hatfield MA (2013) A statistical power analysis of woody carbon flux from forest inventory data. Clim Change 118:919–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilson BT, Woodall CW, Griffith D (2013) Imputing forest carbon stock estimates from inventory plots to a nationally continuous coverage. Carbon Balance Manage 8:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Woodall CW (2010) Carbon flux of down woody materials in forests of the north central US. Int J For Res 2010:413703Google Scholar
  53. Woodall CW, Liknes GC (2008) Climatic regions as an indicator of forest coarse and fine woody carbon stocks in the US. Carbon Balance Manage 3:5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Woodall CW, Monleon VJ (2008) Sampling, estimation, and analysis procedures for the down woody materials indicator. General technical report NRS-22. USDA Forest Service, Newtown Square, PAGoogle Scholar
  55. Woodall CW, Westfall JA (2009) Relationships between the stocking levels of live trees and dead tree attributes in forests of the US. For Ecol Manage 258:2602–2608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Woodall CW, Miles PD, Vissage JS (2005) Determining maximum stand density index in mixed species stands for strategic-scale stocking assessments. For Ecol Manage 216:367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Woodall CW, Conkling BL, Amacher MC, Coulston JW, Jovan S, Perry CH, Schulz B, Smith GC, Will-Wolf S (2010) The forest inventory and analysis database version 4.0: description and users manual for phase 3. General technical report NRS-61. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PAGoogle Scholar
  58. Woodall CW, LS Heath, G Domke, M Nichols (2011a) Methods and equations for estimating volume, biomass, and carbon for trees in the US forest inventory, 2010. General technical report NRS-GTR-88. US Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
  59. Woodall CW, Amacher MC, Bechtold WA, Coulston JW, Jovan S, Perry CH, Randolph KC, Schulz BK, Smith GC, Tkacz B, Will-Wolf S (2011b) Status and future of the forest health indicators program of the US. Environ Monit Assess 177:419–436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Woodall CW, Domke GM, MacFarlane DW, Oswalt CM (2012) Comparing field- and model-based standing dead tree carbon stock estimates across forests of the US. Forestry 85:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Woodall CW, Walters BF, Oswalt SN, Domke GM, Toney C, Gray AN (2013) Biomass and carbon attributes of downed woody materials in forests of the US. For Ecol Manage 305:48–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Woudenberg SW, Conkling BL, O’Connell BM, LaPoint EB, Turner JA, Waddell KL (2010) The forest inventory and analysis database: database description and users manual version 4.0 for phase 2. General technical report RMRS-GTR-245. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, COGoogle Scholar
  63. Zanchi G, Pena N, Bird N (2012) Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel. GCB Bioenergy 4:761–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhao M, Running SW (2010) Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net production from 2000 to 2009. Science 329:940–943CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (outside the USA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. W. Woodall
    • 1
  • M. B. Russell
    • 2
  • B. F. Walters
    • 1
  • A. W. D’Amato
    • 2
  • S. Fraver
    • 3
  • G. M. Domke
    • 1
  1. 1.Forest Service, Northern Research StationUS Department of AgricultureSt PaulUS
  2. 2.Department of Forest ResourcesUniversity of MinnesotaSaint PaulUS
  3. 3.School of Forest ResourcesUniversity of MaineOronoUS

Personalised recommendations