, Volume 178, Issue 1, pp 261–273 | Cite as

Null model approaches to evaluating the relative role of different assembly processes in shaping ecological communities

  • Akira S. Mori
  • Saori Fujii
  • Ryo Kitagawa
  • Dai Koide
Community ecology - Original research


Various local processes simultaneously shape ecological assemblages. β-diversity is a useful metric for inferring the underlying mechanisms of community assembly. However, β-diversity is not independent of γ-diversity, which may mask the local mechanisms that govern community processes across regions. Recent approaches that rely on an abundance-based null model could solve this sampling issue. However, if abundance varies widely across a region, the relative roles of deterministic and stochastic processes may be substantially misestimated. Furthermore, there is additional uncertainty as to whether null models used to correct γ-dependence in β-diversity should be independent of the observed patterns of species abundance distributions or whether the models should reflect these patterns. Here, we aim to test what null models with various constraints imply about the underlying processes shaping β-diversity. First, we found that an abundance-driven sampling effect could substantially influence the calculation of γ-corrected β-diversity. Second, we found that the null models that preserve the species abundance patterns could better reflect empirical patterns of spatial organization of individuals. The different implications generated from different applications of the null model approach therefore suggest that there are still frontiers regarding how local processes that shape species assemblages should be quantified. Carefully exploring each facet within different assembly processes is important.


Abundance β-diversity Community assembly Biogeographical gradient Species abundance distributions 



The authors acknowledge those who contributed to the collection of data for the data sets used here. We thank T. Shiono for his critical comments on the earlier draft. Our original data were collected through studies under the budgetary support of the Sumitomo Foundation, the Japan Securities Scholarship Foundation, the Global COE Program (E03) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), and the Graduate School of Environment and Information Science, Yokohama National University (Category B). The study was partly supported by a JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (Category A). We appreciate further constructive comments from D. Laughlin and the two reviewers. The experiments comply with the current laws of the country (Japan) in which the experiments were performed.

Supplementary material

442_2014_3170_MOESM1_ESM.doc (134 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 134 kb)


  1. Aiba M, Takafumi H, Hiura T (2012) Interspecific differences in determinants of plant species distribution and the relationships with functional traits. J Ecol 100:950–957Google Scholar
  2. Alonso D, Ostling A, Etienne RS (2008) The implicit assumption of symmetry and the species abundance distribution. Ecol Lett 11:93–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders NJ, Cornell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Kraft NJ, Stegen JC, Swenson NG (2010) Navigating the multiple meanings of beta diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baraloto C, Hardy OJ, Paine CET, Dexter KG, Cruaud C, Dunning LT, Gonzalez MA, Molino JF, Sabatier D, Savolainen V, Chave J (2012) Using functional traits and phylogenetic trees to examine the assembly of tropical tree communities. J Ecol 100:690–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baselga A (2010) Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck J, Holloway JD, Schwanghart W, Orme D (2013) Undersampling and the measurement of beta diversity. Methods Ecol Evol 4:370–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belote RT, Jones RH, Hood SM, Wender BW (2008) Diversity-invasibility across an experimental disturbance gradient in Appalachian Forests. Ecology 89:183–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Carstensen DW, Lessard J-P, Holt BG, Krabbe Borregaard M, Rahbek C (2013) Introducing the biogeographic species pool. Ecography 36:1310–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caruso T, Chan Y, Lacap DC, Lau MC, McKay CP, Pointing SB (2011) Stochastic and deterministic processes interact in the assembly of desert microbial communities on a global scale. ISME J 5:1406–1413CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Caruso T, Taormina M, Migliorini M (2012) Relative role of deterministic and stochastic determinants of soil animal community: a spatially explicit analysis of oribatid mites. J Anim Ecol 81:214–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Carvalho JC, Cardoso P, Gomes P (2012) Determining the relative roles of species replacement and species richness differences in generating beta-diversity patterns. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:760–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chao A, Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Shen T-J (2005) A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecol Lett 8:148–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chase JM (2010) Stochastic community assembly causes higher biodiversity in more productive environments. Science 328:1388–1391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chase JM, Myers JA (2011) Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scales. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 366:2351–2363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chave J (2004) Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chave J, Muller-Landau HC, Levin SA (2002) Comparing classical community models: theoretical consequences for patterns of diversity. Am Nat 159:1–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Condit R, Ashton PS, Baker P, Bunyavejchewin S, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N, Hubbell SP, Foster RB, Itoh A, LaFrankie JV, Lee HS, Losos E, Manokaran N, Sukumar R, Yamakura T (2000) Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. Science 288:1414–1418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. de Bello F (2012) The quest for trait convergence and divergence in community assembly: are null-models the magic wand? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:312–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Cáceres M, Legendre P, Valencia R, Cao M, Chang L-W, Chuyong G, Condit R, Hao Z, Hsieh C-F, Hubbell S, Kenfack D, Ma K, Mi X, Supardi Noor MN, Kassim AR, Ren H, Su S-H, Sun IF, Thomas D, Ye W, He F (2012) The variation of tree beta diversity across a global network of forest plots. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:1191–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flynn DF, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T, Molinari N, Richers BT, Lin BB, Simpson N, Mayfield MM, DeClerck F (2009) Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol Lett 12:22–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Frund J, Dormann CF, Holzschuh A, Tscharntke T (2013) Bee diversity effects on pollination depend on functional complementarity and niche shifts. Ecology 94:2042–2054CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuhrman JA, Steele JA, Hewson I, Schwalbach MS, Brown MV, Green JL, Brown JH (2008) A latitudinal diversity gradient in planktonic marine bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:7774–7778CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fukami T, Nakajima M (2011) Community assembly: alternative stable states or alternative transient states? Ecol Lett 14:973–984CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gotelli NJ (2000) Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81:2606–2621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gotelli NJ, Ulrich W (2012) Statistical challenges in null model analysis. Oikos 121:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gotzenberger L, de Bello F, Brathen KA, Davison J, Dubuis A, Guisan A, Leps J, Lindborg R, Moora M, Partel M, Pellissier L, Pottier J, Vittoz P, Zobel K, Zobel M (2012) Ecological assembly rules in plant communities–approaches, patterns and prospects. Biol Rev 87:111–127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hardy OJ (2008) Testing the spatial phylogenetic structure of local communities: statistical performances of different null models and test statistics on a locally neutral community. J Ecol 96:914–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  29. Karp DS, Rominger AJ, Zook J, Ranganathan J, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC (2012) Intensive agriculture erodes beta-diversity at large scales. Ecol Lett 15:963–970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kohyama T (1993) Size-structured tree populations in gap-dynamic forest—the forest architecture hypothesis for the stable coexistence of species. J Ecol 81:131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kohyama T, Takada T (2009) The stratification theory for plant coexistence promoted by one-sided competition. J Ecol 97:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kraft NJB, Comita LS, Chase JM, Sanders NJ, Swenson NG, Crist TO, Stegen JC, Vellend M, Boyle B, Anderson MJ, Cornell HV, Davies KF, Freestone AL, Inouye BD, Harrison SP, Myers JA (2011) Disentangling the drivers of beta diversity along latitudinal and elevational gradients. Science 333:1755–1758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Laliberté E, Paquette A, Legendre P, Bouchard A (2009) Assessing the scale-specific importance of niches and other spatial processes on beta diversity: a case study from a temperate forest. Oecologia 159:377–388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Li L, Huang Z, Ye W, Cao H, Wei S, Wang Z, Lian J, Sun IF, Ma K, He F (2009) Spatial distributions of tree species in a subtropical forest of China. Oikos 118:495–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lindo Z, Winchester NN (2009) Spatial and environmental factors contributing to patterns in arboreal and terrestrial oribatid mite diversity across spatial scales. Oecologia 160:817–825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. McGill BJ, Etienne RS, Gray JS, Alonso D, Anderson MJ, Benecha HK, Dornelas M, Enquist BJ, Green JL, He F, Hurlbert AH, Magurran AE, Marquet PA, Maurer BA, Ostling A, Soykan CU, Ugland KI, White EP (2007) Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecol Lett 10:995–1015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mori AS, Shiono T, Koide D, Kitagawa R, Ota AT, Mizumachi E (2013) Community assembly processes shape an altitudinal gradient of forest biodiversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:878–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mori AS, Ota AT, Fujii S, Seino T, Kabeya D, Okamoto T, Ito MT, Kaneko N, Hasegawa M (2014) Biotic homogenization and differentiation of soil faunal communities in the production forest landscape: taxonomic and functional perspectives. Oecologia. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3111-7
  39. Motomura I (1932) A statistical treatment of associations (in Japanese). Jpn J Zool 44:379–383Google Scholar
  40. Myers JA, Chase JM, Jimenez I, Jorgensen PM, Araujo-Murakami A, Paniagua-Zambrana N, Seidel R (2013) Beta-diversity in temperate and tropical forests reflects dissimilar mechanisms of community assembly. Ecol Lett 16:151–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Preston FW (1948) The commonness, and rarity of species. Ecology 29:254–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Preston MI, Harestad AS (2007) Community and species responses by birds to group retention in a coastal temperate forest on Vancouver Island, British Columbia. For Ecol Manage 243:156–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Purschke O, Schmid BC, Sykes MT, Poschlod P, Michalski SG, Durka W, Kuhn I, Winter M, Prentice HC (2013) Contrasting changes in taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity during a long-term succession: insights into assembly processes. J Ecol 101:857–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Qian H, Wang X, Zhang Y (2012) Comment on “Disentangling the drivers of beta diversity along latitudinal and elevational gradients”. Science 335:1573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Qian H, Chen S, Mao L, Ouyang Z (2013) Drivers of β-diversity along latitudinal gradients revisited. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:659–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Questad EJ, Foster BL (2008) Coexistence through spatio-temporal heterogeneity and species sorting in grassland plant communities. Ecol Lett 11:717–726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ranjard L, Dequiedt S, Chemidlin Prevost-Boure N, Thioulouse J, Saby NP, Lelievre M, Maron PA, Morin FE, Bispo A, Jolivet C, Arrouays D, Lemanceau P (2013) Turnover of soil bacterial diversity driven by wide-scale environmental heterogeneity. Nat Commun 4:1434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ricklefs RE, Renner SS (2012) Global correlations in tropical tree species richness and abundance reject neutrality. Science 335:464–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Rodrigues JL, Pellizari VH, Mueller R, Baek K, Jesus Eda C, Paula FS, Mirza B, Hamaoui GS Jr, Tsai SM, Feigl B, Tiedje JM, Bohannan BJ, Nusslein K (2013) Conversion of the Amazon rainforest to agriculture results in biotic homogenization of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:988–993CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rosindell J, Hubbell SP, He F, Harmon LJ, Etienne RS (2012) The case for ecological neutral theory. Trends Ecol Evol 27:203–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Shipley B, Paine CET, Baraloto C (2012) Quantifying the importance of local niche-based and stochastic processes to tropical tree community assembly. Ecology 93:760–769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Stegen JC, Freestone AL, Crist TO, Anderson MJ, Chase JM, Comita LS, Cornell HV, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Hurlbert AH, Inouye BD, Kraft NJB, Myers JA, Sanders NJ, Swenson NG, Vellend M, Evans K (2013) Stochastic and deterministic drivers of spatial and temporal turnover in breeding bird communities. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:202–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Swenson JE, Erickson DL, Mi X, Bourg NA, Forero-Montana J, Ge X, Howe R, Lake JK, Liu X, Ma K, Pei N, Thompson J, Uriarte M, Wolf A, Wright SJ, Ye W, Zhang J, Zimmermann JK, Kress WJ (2012a) Phylogenetic and functional alpha and beta diversity in temperate and tropical tree communities. Ecology 93:S112–S125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Swenson NG, Stegen JC, Davies SJ, Erickson DL, Forero-Montana J, Hurlbert AH, Kress WJ, Thompson J, Uriarte M, Wright SJ, Zimmerman JK (2012b) Temporal turnover in the composition of tropical tree communities: functional determinism and phylogenetic stochasticity. Ecology 93:490–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Tilman D (2004) Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:10854–10861CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K (2012) Comment on “Disentangling the drivers of beta diversity along latitudinal and elevational gradients”. Science 335:1573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Ulrich W, Gotelli NJ (2010) Null model analysis of species associations using abundance data. Ecology 91:3384–3397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang Z, Brown JH, Tang Z, Fang J (2009) Temperature dependence, spatial scale, and tree species diversity in eastern Asia and North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:13388–13392CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Weiher E, Freund D, Bunton T, Stefanski A, Lee T, Bentivenga S (2011) Advances, challenges and a developing synthesis of ecological community assembly theory. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 366:2403–2413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yen JD, Thomson JR, Mac Nally R (2013) Is there an ecological basis for species abundance distributions? Oecologia 171:517–525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akira S. Mori
    • 1
  • Saori Fujii
    • 1
  • Ryo Kitagawa
    • 1
  • Dai Koide
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Environment and Information SciencesYokohama National UniversityHodogayaJapan

Personalised recommendations