Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 176, Issue 4, pp 1047–1059 | Cite as

Decreased emergence of emerald ash borer from ash treated with methyl jasmonate is associated with induction of general defense traits and the toxic phenolic compound verbascoside

  • Justin G. A. Whitehill
  • Chad Rigsby
  • Don Cipollini
  • Daniel A. Herms
  • Pierluigi Bonello
Plant-microbe-animal interactions - Original research

Abstract

The emerald ash borer (EAB; Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) is causing widespread mortality of ash (Fraxinus spp.) in North America. To date, no mechanisms of host resistance have been identified against this pest. Methyl jasmonate was applied to susceptible North American and resistant Asian ash species to determine if it can elicit induced responses in bark that enhance resistance to EAB. In particular, phenolic compounds, lignin, and defense-related proteins were quantified, and compounds associated with resistance were subsequently tested directly against EAB larvae in bioassays with artificial diet. MeJA application decreased adult emergence in susceptible ash species, comparable to levels achieved by insecticide application. Concentration of the phenolic compound verbascoside sharply increased after MeJA application to green and white ash. When incorporated in an artificial diet, verbascoside decreased survival and growth of EAB neonates in a dose-dependent fashion. Lignin and trypsin inhibitors were also induced by MeJA, and analogs of both compounds reduced growth of EAB larvae in artificial diets. We conclude that the application of MeJA prior to EAB attack has the ability to enhance resistance of susceptible ash trees by inducing endogenous plant defenses, and report evidence that induction of verbascoside is a mechanism of resistance to EAB.

Keywords

Agrilus planipennis Biological invasions Fraxinus Induced resistance Plant–herbivore interactions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Bailey Nurseries, Inc (St. Paul, MN, USA) and Jennifer Koch (USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Delaware, OH, USA) provided trees used in this study. We thank David S. Bienemann, Municipal Arborist, City of Bowling Green, Ohio, USA for providing the site for the ash plantation, and for his assistance with establishing and maintaining the trees. We thank Bryant Chambers, Diane Hartzler, other members of the Herms Lab, and Ohio State University Extension Master Gardeners for their help planting the trees. We also thank Bryant Chambers for making the insecticide applications, and Karla Medina-Ortega, Nathan Kleczewski, Gerardo Suazo and Dan Davis for technical assistance. Dr. Brian McSpadden-Gardener provided help with statistical analyses and guidance on aspects dealing with the experimental design. We also thank Scott Williams for help in the implementation and execution of the experiment as well as processing and analyses of samples. EAB eggs for diet bioassays were supplied by Jonathan Lelito (USDA APHIS PPQ) and artificial diet was provided by Melody Keena (USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Center for Forest Health Research, Northern Research Station in Hamden, CT, USA). This project was funded by the Tree Research and Education Endowment Fund, the Horticultural Research Institute, Ohio Plant Biotechnology Consortium, USDA APHIS Accelerated Emerald Ash Borer Research Program, USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, and by state and federal funds appropriated to the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, and Wright State University. We are also grateful to two anonymous reviewers for suggesting ways to improve the clarity of the paper.

Supplementary material

442_2014_3082_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (150 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 150 kb)
442_2014_3082_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (203 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 203 kb)
442_2014_3082_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (142 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 142 kb)

References

  1. Bai X, Rivera-Vega L, Mamidala P, Bonello P, Herms DA, Mittapalli O (2011) Transcriptomic signatures of ash (Fraxinus spp.) phloem. PLoS ONE 6(1):e16368PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballare CL (2011) Jasmonate-induced defenses: a tale of intelligence, collaborators and rascals. Trends Plant Sci 16(5):249–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black CA, Karban R, Godfrey LD, Granett J, Chaney WE (2003) Jasmonic acid: a vaccine against leafminers (Diptera: Agromyzidae) in celery. Environ Entomol 32(5):1196–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonello P, Storer AJ, Gordon TR, Wood DL (2003) Systemic effects of Heterobasidion annosum on ferulic acid glucoside and lignin of presymptomatic ponderosa pine phloem, and potential effects on bark-beetle-associated fungi. J Chem Ecol 29(5):1167–1182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borg-Karlson AK, Nordlander G, Mudalige A, Nordenhem H, Unelius CR (2006) Antifeedants in the feces of the pine weevil Hylobius abietis: identification and biological activity. J Chem Ecol 32(5):943–957PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broadway RM, Duffey SS (1986) Plant proteinase-inhibitors—mechanism of action and effect on the growth and digestive physiology of larval Heliothis zea and Spodoptera exigua. J Insect Physiol 32(10):827–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cappaert D, McCullough DG, Poland TM, Siegert N (2005) Emerald ash borer in North America: a research and regulatory challenge. Am Entomol 51:152–165Google Scholar
  8. Chen H, Wilkerson CG, Kuchar JA, Phinney BS, Howe GA (2005) Jasmonate-inducible plant enzymes degrade essential amino acids in the herbivore midgut. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(52):19237PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y, Whitehill JGA, Bonello P, Poland TM (2011) Wood-boring emerald ash borer larval feeding changes black ash foliar phytochemistry. Phytochemistry 72:1990–1998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cipollini D, Heil M (2010) Costs and benefits of induced resistance to herbivores and pathogens in plants. Plant Sci Rev 5:1–25Google Scholar
  11. Cipollini D, Enright S, Traw MS, Bergelson J (2004) Salicylic acid inhibits jasmonic acid induced resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana to Spodoptera exigua. Mol Ecol 13(6):1643–1653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cipollini D, Wang Q, Whitehill J, Powell J, Bonello P, Herms D (2011) Distinguishing defensive characteristics in the phloem of ash species resistant and susceptible to emerald ash borer. J Chem Ecol 37:450–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engelberth J, Alborn HT, Schmelz EA, Tumlinson JH (2004) Airborne signals prime plants against insect herbivore attack. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(6):1781–1785PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Erbilgin N, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Zeneli G, Gershenzon J (2006) Exogenous application of methyl jasmonate elicits defenses in Norway spruce (Picea abies) and reduces host colonization by the bark beetle Ips typographus. Oecologia 148(3):426–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eyles A, Jones W, Riedl K, Herms DA, Cipollini D, Schwartz S, Chan K, Bonello P (2007) Comparative phloem chemistry of Manchurian (F. mandshurica) and two North American ash species (F. americana and F. pennsylvanica). J Chem Ecol 33:1430–1448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farmer EE, Ryan CA (1990) Interplant communication—airborne methyl jasmonate induces synthesis of proteinase-inhibitors in plant leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87(19):7713–7716PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farmer EE, Ryan CA (1992) Octadecanoid precursors of jasmonic acid activate the synthesis of wound-inducible proteinase-inhibitors. Plant Cell 4(2):129–134PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T (2005) Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytol 167(2):353–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Green TR, Ryan CA (1972) Wound-induced proteinase inhibitor in plant leaves: a possible defense mechanism against insects. Science 175:776–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gundlach H, Muller MJ, Kutchan TM, Zenk MH (1992) Jasmonic acid is a signal transducer in elicitor-induced plant cell cultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(6):2389–2393PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herms DA, McCullough DG (2014) Emerald ash borer invasion of North America: history, biology, ecology, impact and management. Annu Rev Entomol 59:13–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Howe GA, Jander G (2008) Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:41–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kammerer B, Kahlich R, Biegert C, Gleiter CH, Heide L (2005) HPLC–MS/MS analysis of willow bark extracts contained in pharmaceutical preparations. Phytochem Anal 16(6):470–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karban R, Agrawal AA, Mangel M (1997) The benefits of induced defenses against herbivores. Ecology 78(5):1351–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keena MA, Gould J, Bauer LS (2009) Factors that influence emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) adult longevity and oviposition under laboratory conditions. In: McManus KA, Gottschalk (eds). Proceedings 20th US department of agriculture interagency research forum on invasive species 2009: USDA Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
  26. King JN, Alfaro RI, Lopez MG, Van Akker L (2011) Resistance of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) to white pine weevil (Pissodes strobi Peck): characterizing the bark defence mechanisms of resistant populations. Forestry 84(1):83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klooster WS, Herms DA, Knight KS, Herms CP, McCullough DG, Smith AS, Gandhi KJK, Cardina J (2014) Ash (Fraxinus spp.) mortality, regeneration, and seed bank dynamics in mixed hardwood forests following invasion by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). Biol Invasions 16:859–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koo AJK, Howe GA (2009) The wound hormone jasmonate. Phytochemistry 70(13–14):1571–1580PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kovacs KF, Haight RG, McCullough DG, Mercader RJ, Siegert NW, Liebhold AM (2010) Cost of potential emerald ash borer damage in US communities, 2009–2019. Ecol Econ 69(3):569–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lyon GD, Reglinski T, Newton AC (1995) Novel disease control compounds: the potential to ‘immunize’ plants against infection. Plant Pathol 44(3):407–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCullough DG, Poland TM, Anulewicz AC, Lewis P, Cappaert D (2011) Evaluation of Agrilus planipennis control provided by emamectin benzoate and two newnicotinoid insecticides, one and two seasons after treatment. J Econ Entomol 104:1599–1612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller B, Madilao LL, Ralph S, Bohlmann J (2005) Insect-induced conifer defense. White pine weevil and methyl jasmonate induce traumatic resinosis, de novo formed volatile emissions, and accumulation of terpenoid synthase and putative octadecanoid pathway transcripts in Sitka spruce. Plant Physiol 137(1):369–382PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mittapalli O, Bai XD, Mamidala P, Rajarapu SP, Bonello P, Herms DA (2010) Tissue-specific transcriptomics of the exotic invasive insect pest emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). PLoS ONE 5(10):e0013708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Muilenburg VL, Herms DA (2012) A review of bronze birch borer (Agrilus anxius, Coleoptera: Buprestidae) life history, ecology, and management. Environ Entomol 41:1372–1385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Munoz E, Lamilla C, Marin JC, Alarcon J, Cespedes CL (2013) Antifeedant, insect growth regulatory and insecticidal effects of Calceolaria talcana (Calceolariaceae) on Drosophila melanogaster and Spodoptera frugiperda. Ind Crop Prod 42:137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rebek EJ, Herms DA, Smitley DR (2008) Interspecific variation in resistance to emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) among North American and Asian ash (Fraxinus spp.). Environ Entomol 37(1):242–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rodriguez-Saona C, Poland TM, Miller JR, Stelinski LL, Grant GG, de Groot P, Buchan L, MacDonald L (2006) Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis, to induced volatiles of Manchurian ash, Fraxinus mandshurica. Chemoecology 16(2):75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rohwer C, Erwin J (2008) Horticultural applications of jasmonates: a review. J Hortic Sci Biotech 83:283–304Google Scholar
  39. Ryan CA (1990) Protease inhibitors in plants—genes for improving defenses against insect and pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 28:425–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ryan C, Farmer EE. Method of inducing plant defense mechanisms. US Patent 528,956, 25 May 1990Google Scholar
  41. Saimaru H, Orihara Y (2010) Biosynthesis of acteoside in cultured cells of Olea europaea. J Natl Med 64(2):139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smitely DR, Doccola JJ, Cox DL (2010) Multiple-year protection of ash tres from emerald ash borer with single trunk injection of emamectin benzoate, and single-year protection with an imidacloprid basal drench. Arboric Urb For 36:206–211Google Scholar
  43. Strack D (1997) Phenolic metabolism. In: PM D, JB H (eds). Plant biochemistry. Academic, New York, pp 387–416Google Scholar
  44. Tanis SR, McCullough DG (2012) Differential persistence of blue ash and white ash following emerald ash borer invasion. Can J For Res 42:1542–1550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thaler JS, Farag MA, Parve PW, Dicke M (2002) Jasmonate deficient plants have reduced direct and indirect defences against herbivores. Ecol Lett 5(6):764–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wainhouse D, Cross DJ, Howell RS (1990) The role of lignin as a defense against the spruce bark beetle Dendroctonus micans—effect on Larvae and Adults. Oecologia 85(2):257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wallander E (2008) Systematics of Fraxinus (Oleaceae) and evolution of dioecy. Plant Syst Evol 273:25–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang Q (2010) Constitutive and jasmonate-inducible defenses in phloem of two North American and two Asian ash species grown in a common garden. Masters thesis, Wright State University, DaytonGoogle Scholar
  49. Wei X, Reardon R, Wu Y, Sun JH (2004) Emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), in China: a review and distribution survey. Acta Entomol Sin 47:679–685Google Scholar
  50. Whitehill JGA, Popova-Butler A, Green-Church KB, Koch JL, Herms DA, Bonello P (2011) Interspecific proteomic comparisons reveal ash phloem genes potentially involved in constitutive resistance to the emerald ash borer. PLoS ONE 6(9):e24863PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Whitehill JGA, Opiyo S, Koch J, Herms D, Cipollini D, Bonello P (2012) Interspecific comparison of constitutive ash phloem phenolic chemistry reveals compounds unique to Manchurian ash, a species resistant to emerald ash borer. J Chem Ecol 38(5):499–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yasuda T, Fukui M, Nakazawa T, Hoshikawa A, Ohsawa K (2006) Metabolic fate of fraxin administered orally to rats. J Natl Prod 69(5):755–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zavala JA, Patankar AG, Gase K, Baldwin IT (2004) Constitutive and inducible trypsin proteinase inhibitor production incurs large fitness costs in Nicotiana attenuata. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(6):1607–1612PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhao T, Borg-Karlson AK, Erbilgin N, Krokene P (2011) Host resistance elicited by methyl jasmonate reduces emission of aggregation pheromones by the spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus. Oecologia 167:691–699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Justin G. A. Whitehill
    • 1
    • 4
  • Chad Rigsby
    • 2
  • Don Cipollini
    • 2
  • Daniel A. Herms
    • 3
  • Pierluigi Bonello
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological Sciences and Environmental SciencesWright State UniversityDaytonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Entomology, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development CenterThe Ohio State UniversityWoosterUSA
  4. 4.Michael Smith LaboratoriesThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations