Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 176, Issue 1, pp 171–182 | Cite as

Woody plant phylogenetic diversity mediates bottom–up control of arthropod biomass in species-rich forests

  • Andreas Schuldt
  • Martin Baruffol
  • Helge Bruelheide
  • Simon Chen
  • Xiulian Chi
  • Marcus Wall
  • Thorsten Assmann
Community ecology - Original research

Abstract

Global change is predicted to cause non-random species loss in plant communities, with consequences for ecosystem functioning. However, beyond the simple effects of plant species richness, little is known about how plant diversity and its loss influence higher trophic levels, which are crucial to the functioning of many species-rich ecosystems. We analyzed to what extent woody plant phylogenetic diversity and species richness contribute to explaining the biomass and abundance of herbivorous and predatory arthropods in a species-rich forest in subtropical China. The biomass and abundance of leaf-chewing herbivores, and the biomass dispersion of herbivores within plots, increased with woody plant phylogenetic diversity. Woody plant species richness had much weaker effects on arthropods, but interacted with plant phylogenetic diversity to negatively affect the ratio of predator to herbivore biomass. Overall, our results point to a strong bottom–up control of functionally important herbivores mediated particularly by plant phylogenetic diversity, but do not support the general expectation that top–down predator effects increase with plant diversity. The observed effects appear to be driven primarily by increasing resource diversity rather than diversity-dependent primary productivity, as the latter did not affect arthropods. The strong effects of plant phylogenetic diversity and the overall weaker effects of plant species richness show that the diversity-dependence of ecosystem processes and interactions across trophic levels can depend fundamentally on non-random species associations. This has important implications for the regulation of ecosystem functions via trophic interaction pathways and for the way species loss may impact these pathways in species-rich forests.

Keywords

BEF China Biodiversity Ecosystem function Herbivores Predators Species richness Trophic interactions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the administration of the Gutianshan National Nature Reserve and members of the BEF China consortium for support, Stefan Michalski and Walter Durka for providing woody plant phylogenetic data, and Daria Golub, Merle Noack, and Friederike Rorig for help with arthropod sampling. Comments of two anonymous reviewers greatly helped to improve the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge funding by the German Research Foundation (DFG FOR 891/1 and 891/2),the Sino-German Centre for Research Promotion in Beijing (GZ 524, 592, 698, 699, 785, and 1,020), and the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC 30710103907 and 30930005).

Supplementary material

442_2014_3006_MOESM1_ESM.docx (441 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 440 kb)

References

  1. Baraloto C et al (2012) Using functional traits and phylogenetic trees to examine the assembly of tropical tree communities. J Ecol 100:690–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baruffol M et al (2013) Biodiversity promotes tree growth during succession in subtropical forest. PLoS ONE 8:e81246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernays EA, Bright KL, Gonzalez N, Angel J (1994) Dietary mixing in a generalist herbivore: tests of two hypotheses. Ecology 75:1997–2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Tilman D (2012) Plant diversity controls arthropod biomass and temporal stability. Ecol Lett 15:1457–1464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Botta-Dukát Z (2005) Rao’s quadratic entropy as a measure of functional diversity based on multiple traits. J Veg Sci 16:533–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruelheide H et al (2011) Community assembly during secondary forest succession in a Chinese subtropical forest. Ecol Monogr 81:25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campos RI, Vasconcelos HL, Ribeiro SP, Neves FS, Soares JP (2006) Relationship between tree size and insect assemblages associated with Anadenanthera macrocarpa. Ecography 29:442–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cardinale BJ et al (2011) The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am J Bot 98:572–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cardinale BJ et al (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carmona D, Fornoni J (2013) Herbivores can select for mixed defensive strategies in plants. New Phytol 197:576–585PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castagneyrol B, Jactel H (2012) Unraveling plant–animal diversity relationships: a meta-regression analysis. Ecology 93:2115–2124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PVA, Kembel SW (2009) The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett 12:693–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coley PD, Barone JA (1996) Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:305–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dinnage R (2013) Phylogenetic diversity of plants alters the effect of species richness on invertebrate herbivory. PeerJ 1:e93PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dinnage R, Cadotte MW, Haddad NM, Crutsinger GM, Tilman D (2012) Diversity of plant evolutionary lineages promotes arthropod diversity. Ecol Lett 15:1308–1317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dyer LA et al (2007) Host specificity of Lepidoptera in tropical and temperate forests. Nature 448:696–699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dyer LA, Letourneau DK, Chavarria GV, Amoretti DS (2010) Herbivores on a dominant understory shrub increase local plant diversity in rain forest communities. Ecology 91:3707–3718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eichenberg D, Ristok C, Kröber W, Bruelheide H (2014) Plant polyphenols––implications of different sampling, storage and sample processing in biodiversity–ecosystem functioning experiments. Chem Ecol. doi: 10.1080/02757540.2014.894987 Google Scholar
  20. Futuyma DJ, Agrawal AA (2009) Macroevolution and the biological diversity of plants and herbivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:18054–18061PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geißler C, Kühn P, Böhnke M, Bruelheide H, Shi X, Scholten T (2012) Splash erosion potential under tree canopies in subtropical SE China. Catena 91:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gotelli NJ, Rohde K (2002) Co-occurrence of ectoparasites of marine fishes: a null model analysis. Ecol Lett 5:86–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haddad NM, Crutsinger GM, Gross K, Haarstad J, Knops JMH, Tilman D (2009) Plant species loss decreases arthropod diversity and shifts trophic structure. Ecol Lett 12:1029–1039PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hardy OJ (2008) Testing the spatial phylogenetic structure of local communities: statistical performances of different null models and test statistics on a locally neutral community. J Ecol 96:914–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hódar JA (1996) The use of regression equations for estimation of arthropod biomass in ecological studies. Acta Oecol 17:421–433Google Scholar
  26. Hooper DU et al (2012) A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486:105–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Howe GA, Jander G (2008) Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:41–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hu Z, Yu M (2008) Study on successions sequence of evergreen broad-leaved forest in Gutian Mountain of Zhejiang, Eastern China: species diversity. Front Biol China 3:45–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kembel SW et al (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26:1463–1464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koricheva J, Mulder CPH, Schmid B, Joshi J, Huss-Danell K (2000) Numerical responses of different trophic groups of invertebrates to manipulations of plant diversity in grasslands. Oecologia 125:271–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Legendre P et al (2009) Partitioning beta diversity in a subtropical broad-leaved forest of China. Ecology 90:663–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mason NWH, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB (2005) Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos 111:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nadrowski K, Wirth C, Scherer-Lorenzen M (2010) Is forest diversity driving ecosystem functioning and service? Curr Opin Envir Sus 2:75–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Naeem S, Duffy JE, Zavaleta E (2012) The functions of biological diversity in an age of extinction. Science 336:1401–1406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Novotny V et al (2010) Guild-specific patterns of species richness and host specialization in plant–herbivore food webs from a tropical forest. J Anim Ecol 79:1193–1203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Novotny V et al (2012) Insects on plants: explaining the paradox of low diversity within specialist herbivore guilds. Am Nat 179:351–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ødegaard F, Diserud OH, Østbye K (2005) The importance of plant relatedness for host utilization among phytophagous insects. Ecol Lett 8:612–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paine CET et al (2012) Phylogenetic density dependence and environmental filtering predict seedling mortality in a tropical forest. Ecol Lett 15:34–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parker JD, Burkepile DE, Lajeunesse MJ, Lind EM (2012) Phylogenetic isolation increases plant success despite increasing susceptibility to generalist herbivores. Divers Distrib 18:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pellissier L et al (2013) Turnover of plant lineages shapes herbivore phylogenetic beta diversity along ecological gradients. Ecol Lett 16:600–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perner J et al (2005) Effects of plant diversity, plant productivity and habitat parameters on arthropod abundance in montane European grasslands. Ecography 28:429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pinheiro J, Bates D, Debroy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2014) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-117. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. Last accessed 26 May 2014
  43. Plath M, Dorn S, Riedel J, Barrios H, Mody K (2012) Associational resistance and associational susceptibility: specialist herbivores show contrasting responses to tree stand diversification. Oecologia 169:477–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reiss J, Bailey RA, Perkins DM, Pluchinotta A, Woodward G (2011) Testing effects of consumer richness, evenness and body size on ecosystem functioning. J Anim Ecol 80:1145–1154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Root RB (1973) Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol Monogr 43:95–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rudolf VHW (2012) Seasonal shifts in predator body size diversity and trophic interactions in size-structured predator–prey systems. J Anim Ecol 81:524–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rzanny M, Kuu A, Voigt W (2013) bottom–up and top–down forces structuring consumer communities in an experimental grassland. Oikos 122:967–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saint-Germain M et al (2007) Should biomass be considered more frequently as a currency in terrestrial arthropod community analyses? J Appl Ecol 44:330–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schemske DW, Mittelbach GG, Cornell HV, Sobel JM, Roy K (2009) Is there a latitudinal gradient in the importance of biotic interactions? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:245–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scherber C et al (2010) bottom–up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature 468:553–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schleuter D, Daufresne M, Massol F, Argillier C (2010) A user’s guide to functional diversity indices. Ecol Monogr 80:469–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schuldt A et al (2010) Tree diversity promotes insect herbivory in subtropical forests of south-east China. J Ecol 98:917–926PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schuldt A et al (2012) Plant traits affecting herbivory on tree recruits in highly diverse subtropical forests. Ecol Lett 15:732–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schuldt A et al (2014a) Functional and phylogenetic diversity of woody plants drive herbivory in a highly diverse forest. New Phytol 202:864–873PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schuldt A, Bruelheide H, Durka W, Michalski SG, Purschke O, Assmann T (2014b) Tree diversity promotes functional dissimilarity and maintains functional richness despite species loss in predator assemblages. Oecologia 174:533–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sobek S, Scherber C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2009a) Sapling herbivory, invertebrate herbivores and predators across a natural tree diversity gradient in Germany’s largest connected deciduous forest. Oecologia 160:279–288PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sobek S, Steffan-Dewenter I, Scherber C, Tscharntke T (2009b) Spatiotemporal changes of beetle communities across a tree diversity gradient. Divers Dstrib 15:660–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Srivastava DS, Lawton JH (1998) Why more productive sites have more species: An experimental test of theory using tree-hole communities. Am Nat 152:510–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Srivastava DS, Cadotte MW, MacDonald AAM, Marushia RG, Mirotchnick N (2012) Phylogenetic diversity and the functioning of ecosystems. Ecol Lett 15:637–648PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Srivastava DS, Vellend M (2005) Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: is it relevant to conservation? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:267–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Strutzenberger P, Brehm G, Fiedler K (2011) DNA barcoding-based species delimitation increases species count of Eois (Geometridae) moths in a well-studied tropical mountain forest by up to 50%. Insect Sci 18:349–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Terborgh J (2012) Enemies maintain hyperdiverse tropical forests. Am Nat 179:303–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thebault E, Huber V, Loreau M (2007) Cascading extinctions and ecosystem functioning: contrasting effects of diversity depending on food web structure. Oikos 116:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Unsicker SB, Baer N, Kahmen A, Wagner M, Buchmann N, Weisser WW (2006) Invertebrate herbivory along a gradient of plant species diversity in extensively managed grasslands. Oecologia 150:233–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vehviläinen H, Koricheva J, Ruohomaki K (2007) Tree species diversity influences herbivore abundance and damage: meta-analysis of long-term forest experiments. Oecologia 152:287–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vehviläinen H, Koricheva J, Ruohomaki K (2008) Effects of stand tree species composition and diversity on abundance of predatory arthropods. Oikos 117:935–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wardhaugh CW (2013) Estimation of biomass from body length and width for tropical rainforest canopy invertebrates. Aust J Entomol 52:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wardhaugh CW, Stork NE, Edwards W (2012) Feeding guild structure of beetles on Australian tropical rainforest trees reflects microhabitat resource availability. J Anim Ecol 81:1086–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Weiblen GD, Webb CO, Novotny V, Basset Y, Miller SE (2006) Phylogenetic dispersion of host use in a tropical insect herbivore community. Ecology 87:S62–S75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Whitfeld TJS, Novotny V, Miller SE, Hrcek J, Klimes P, Weiblen GD (2012) Predicting tropical insect herbivore abundance from host plant traits and phylogeny. Ecology 93:S211–S222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang Y, Adams J (2011) top–down control of herbivores varies with ecosystem types. J Ecol 99:370–372Google Scholar
  73. Zvereva E, Lanta V, Kozlov M (2010) Effects of sap-feeding insect herbivores on growth and reproduction of woody plants: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Oecologia 163:949–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Schuldt
    • 1
  • Martin Baruffol
    • 2
  • Helge Bruelheide
    • 3
    • 4
  • Simon Chen
    • 5
  • Xiulian Chi
    • 6
  • Marcus Wall
    • 7
  • Thorsten Assmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of EcologyLeuphana University LüneburgLüneburgGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental StudiesUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical GardenUniversity of HalleHalleGermany
  4. 4.German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  5. 5.Magdalene CollegeCambridgeUK
  6. 6.Department of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of Ministry of EducationPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  7. 7.Natural History CollectionsUniversity of HalleHalleGermany

Personalised recommendations