Oecologia

, Volume 175, Issue 3, pp 1019–1027 | Cite as

Loss of migration and urbanization in birds: a case study of the blackbird (Turdus merula)

  • Anders Pape Møller
  • Jukka Jokimäki
  • Piotr Skorka
  • Piotr Tryjanowski
Global change ecology - Original research

Abstract

Many organisms have invaded urban habitats, although the underlying factors initially promoting urbanization remain poorly understood. Partial migration may facilitate urbanization because such populations benefit from surplus food in urban environments during winter, and hence enjoy reduced fitness costs of migratory deaths. We tested this hypothesis in the European blackbird Turdus merula, which has been urbanized since the 19th century, by compiling information on timing of urbanization, migratory status, and population density for 99 cities across the continent. Timing of urbanization was spatially auto-correlated at scales up to 600 km. Analyses of timing of urbanization revealed that urbanization occurred earlier in partially migratory and resident populations than in migratory populations of blackbirds. Independently, this effect was most pronounced in the range of the distribution that currently has the highest population density, suggesting that urbanization facilitated population growth. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that timing of urbanization is facilitated by partial migration, resulting in subsequent residency and population growth.

Keywords

European blackbird Migration Residency Spatial autocorrelation Urbanization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

B. Chapman and T. Laaksonen provided constructive criticism. Numerous ornithologists answered our emails about information on the timing of urbanization. We would particularly like to thank Prof. S. Ulfstrand for his never-tiring efforts to find more data.

Supplementary material

442_2014_2953_MOESM1_ESM.doc (252 kb)
Summary information on year of urbanization of the European blackbird for different cities, including information on population density, migration status (0 - resident, 1 - partial migrant, 2 - migrant), latitude, longitude and source. The table also contains information on auto-regressive terms for year of urbanization, log population density and migration status (DOC 252 kb).

References

  1. Bailey TC, Gatrell AC (1995) Interactive spatial data analysis. Addison Wesley Longman, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  2. Balbontín J, Møller AP, Hermosell IG, Marzal A, Reviriego M, de Lope F (2009) Geographic patterns of natal dispersal in barn swallows Hirundo rustica from Denmark and Spain. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1197–1205. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0752-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belliure J, Sorci G, Møller AP, Clobert J (2000) Dispersal distances predict subspecies richness in birds. J Evol Biol 13:480–487. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00178.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berthold P (2001) Bird migration: a novel theory of the evolution, the control and the adaptability of bird migration. J Ornithol 142:148–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonaparte C-L (1828) Ornithologie comparé de Rome et de Philadelphie. RomeGoogle Scholar
  6. Burfield I, van Bommel F (2004) Birds in Europe. BirdLife International, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapman BB, Brönmark C, Nilsson JÅ, Hansson LA (2011) The ecology and evolution of partial migration. Oikos 120:1764–1775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Commission European (2006) Urban sprawl in Europe. European Environmental Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  10. Cramp S (ed) (1988) The birds of the Western Palearctic, vol 5. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Croci S, Le Quilliec P, Clergeau P (2007) Geographical range as predictor of spatial expansion of invading birds. Biodiv Cons 16:511–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis MA (2009) Invasion biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Díaz M, Møller AP, Flensted-Jensen E, Grim T, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Jokimäki J, Markó G, Tryjanowski P (2013) The geography of fear: a latitudinal gradient in anti-predator escape distances of birds across Europe. PLoS One 8(5):e64634. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064634 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diniz-Filho JAF, Rangel TFLVB, Bini LM (2008) Model selection and information theory in geographical ecology. Global Ecol Biogeogr 17:479–488. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00395.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dorman CF, McPherson JM, Araújo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Davies RG, Hirzel A, Jetz W, Kissling WD, Kühn I, Ohlemüller R, Peres-Neto PR, Reineking B, Schröder B, Schurr FM, Wilson R (2007) Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distribution data: a review. Ecography 30:609–628. doi:10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dyrcz A (1963) Comparative studies on the avifauna of wood and park. Acta Ornithol 12:177–208Google Scholar
  17. Evans KL, Gaston KJ, Frantz AC, Simeoni M, Sharp SP, McGowan A, Dawson DA, Walasz K, Partecke J, Burke T, Hatchwell Ben J (2009) Independent colonization of multiple urban centres by a formerly forest specialist bird species. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:2403–2410. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1712 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evans KL, Chamberlain DE, Hatchwell BJ, Gregory RD, Gaston KJ (2010a) What makes an urban bird? Global Change Biol 17:32–44. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02247.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans KL, Hatchwell BJ, Parnell M, Gaston KJ (2010b) A conceptual framework for the colonization of urban areas: the blackbird Turdus merula as a case study. Biol Rev 85:643–667PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Francis RA, Chadwick MA (2013) Urban ecosystems: understanding the human environment. Routledge, PadstowGoogle Scholar
  21. Gliwicz J, Goszczynski J, Luniak M (1994) Characteristic features of animal populations under synurbanization: the case of the Blackbirds and the striped field mouse. Mem Zool 49:237–244Google Scholar
  22. Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM (eds) (1988) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, vol 1. AULA-Verlag, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  23. Graczyk R (1974) The experiment of settling of urbanized population of Poznan blackbird (Turdus merula L.) to Kiev (USSR) and examination of certain elements of innate behaviour. Rocz Akad Roln Pozn 65:49–64Google Scholar
  24. Handwerk D (2008) Half of humanity will live in cities by year’s end http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/03/080313-cities.html
  25. Högberg V (1863) Örebrotraktens Foglar. Akademisk afhandling. Uppsala University, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  26. Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jerzak L (2001) Synurbanization of the magpie in the Palearctic. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Boston, pp 403–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jokimäki J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M-L (2012) The role of residential habitat type on the temporal variation of wintering bird assemblages in northern Finland. Ornis Fenn 89:20–33Google Scholar
  29. Klausnitzer B (1989) Verstädterung von Tieren. Neue Brehm-Bücherei, Wittenberg-LutherstadtGoogle Scholar
  30. Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lichtstein JW, Simons TR, Shriner SA, Franzreb KE (2002) Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecology 72:445–463. doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0445:SAAAMI]2.0.CO;2
  32. Luniak M, Mulsow R, Walasz K (1990) Urbanization of the European blackbird: expansion and adaptations of urban population. In: Urban ecological studies in Central and Eastern Europe. Ossolineum, Warsaw, pp 87–199Google Scholar
  33. Møller AP (2008) Flight distance of urban birds, predation and selection for urban life. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:63–75. doi:10.1007/s00265-008-0636-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Møller AP (2009) Successful city dwellers: a comparative study of the ecological characteristics of urban birds in the Western Palearctic. Oecologia 159:849–858. doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1259-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Møller AP (2010) Interspecific variation in fear responses predicts urbanization in birds. Behav Ecol 21:365–371. doi:10.1093/beheco/arp199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Møller AP (2013) Behavioral and ecological predictors of urbanization. In: Gil D, Brumm H (eds) Avian urban ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 54–68Google Scholar
  37. Møller AP, Fiedler W, Berthold P (eds) (2010) Birds and climate change. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Møller AP, Diaz M, Flensted-Jensen E, Grim T, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Jokimäki J, Mänd R, Markó G, Tryjanowski P (2012) High urban population density of birds reflects their timing of urbanization. Oecologia 170:867–875. doi:10.1007/s00442-012-2355-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Newton I (2008) The migration ecology of birds. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Paradis E, Baillie SR, Sutherland WJ, Gregory RD (1998) Patterns of natal and breeding dispersal in birds. J Anim Ecol 67:518–536. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1998.00215.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Partecke J, Gwinner E (2007) Increased sedentariness in European blackbirds following urbanization: a consequence of local adaptation? Ecology 88:882–890. doi:10.1890/06-1105 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Partecke J, Gwinner E, Bensch S (2004) Is urbanisation of European blackbirds (Turdus merula) associated with genetic differentiation? J Ornithol 147:549–552. doi:10.1007/s10336-006-0078-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pulido F (2012) Evolutionary genetics of partial migration—the threshold model of migration revis(it)ed. Oikos 120:1776–1783. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19844.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pulido F, Berthold P, van Noordwijk AJ (1996) Frequency of migrants and migratory activity are genetically correlated in a bird population: evolutionary implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:14642–14647PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pulliainen E (1963) On the history, ecology and ethology of the mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) overwintering in Finland. Ornis Fenn 40:45–66Google Scholar
  46. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rangel TFLVB, Diniz-Filho AF, Bini LM (2010) SAM: a comprehensive application for spatial analysis in macroecology. Ecography 33:46–50. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06299.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schneider A, Friedl MA, Potere D (2009) A new map of global urban extent from MODIS satellite data. Environ Res Lett 4(4):044003. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seto KC, Fragkias M, Güneralp B, Reilly MK (2011) A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS One 6(8):e23777. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023777 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stephan B (1985) Die Amsel. Neue Brehm-Bücherei, Wittenberg-LutherstadtGoogle Scholar
  51. Quantum GIS Development Team (2012) Quantum GIS Geographic Information System. Open Sources Geospatial Foundation ProjectGoogle Scholar
  52. Tomialojć L (1976) The urban population of the woodpigeon Columba palumbus Linnaeus, 1758, in Europe: its origin, increase and distribution. Acta Zool Crac 21:585–632Google Scholar
  53. United Nations (2007) World urbanization prospects: The 2007 revisions. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2011) World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision, Highlights and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.220Google Scholar
  55. Väisänen RA (2003) Regional population trends of 33 common bird species in Finland during 27 winters. Linnut-vuosikirja 2003:41–62 (in Finnish with English summary)Google Scholar
  56. Valkama J, Vepsäläinen V, Lehikoinen A (2011) The Third Finnish Breeding Bird Atlas. Finnish Museum of Natural History and Ministry of Environment, Helsinki. http://atlas3.lintuatlas.fi/english
  57. Veltman CJ, Nee S, Crawley MJ (1996) Correlates of introduction success in exotic New Zealand birds. Am Nat 147:542–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. von Haartman L (1968) The evolution of urban resident versus migratory habit in birds: some considerations. Ornis Fenn 45:1–6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anders Pape Møller
    • 1
  • Jukka Jokimäki
    • 2
  • Piotr Skorka
    • 3
  • Piotr Tryjanowski
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Ecologie, Systématique et EvolutionCNRS UMR 8079, Université Paris-SudOrsay CedexFrance
  2. 2.Nature Inventory and EIA-services, Arctic Centre, University of LaplandRovaniemiFinland
  3. 3.Institute of ZoologyPoznan University of Life SciencesPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations