Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 174, Issue 2, pp 327–338 | Cite as

Do climatic conditions affect host and parasite phenotypes differentially? A case study of magpies and great spotted cuckoos

  • Juan J. SolerEmail author
  • Liesbeth De Neve
  • David Martín-Gálvez
  • Mercedes Molina-Morales
  • Tomás Pérez-Contreras
  • Magdalena Ruiz-Rodríguez
Physiological ecology - Original research

Abstract

Climatic conditions, through their effects on resource availability, may affect important life history strategies and trade-offs in animals, as well as their interactions with other organisms such as parasites. This impact may depend on species-specific pathways of development that differ even among species with similar resource requirements (e.g., avian brood parasites and their hosts). Here we explore the degree of covariation between environmental-climatic conditions and nestling phenotypes (i.e., tarsus length, body mass, immune response to phytohemagglutinin injection) and ectoparasite loads of great spotted cuckoos (Clamator glandarius) and those of their magpie (Pica pica) hosts, both within and among 11 study years (1997–2011). Our main results were that (1) nestling phenotypes differed among years, but differently for great spotted cuckoos and magpies; (2) nestling phenotypes showed significant among-year covariation with breeding climatic conditions (temperature and precipitation); and (3) these associations differed for cuckoos and magpies for some phenotypic traits. As the average temperature at the beginning of the breeding season (April) increased, body mass and tarsus length increased only for cuckoos, but not for magpie hosts, while immune response decreased in both species. Finally, (4) the strength of the within-year relationships between the probability of ectoparasitism by Carnus hemapterus flies and laying date (used as an estimate of the within-year variation in climatic conditions) was negatively affected by the annual accumulated precipitation in April. These results strongly suggest that variation in climatic conditions would result in asymmetric effects on different species with respect to the probability of ectoparasitism, immunity and body size. Such asymmetric effects may affect animal interactions in general and those of brood parasites and their hosts in particular.

Keywords

Brood parasitism Carnus hemapterus Immunity Laying date Nestling growth 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Anders Pape Møller, Manuel Soler, Gustavo Tomás and three anonymous reviewers for comments on previous versions of the manuscript that greatly improved the quality and clarity of the final version. Juan Manuel Peralta, Juan Gabriel Martínez and Gustavo Tomás helped at different stages of the field work. Funding was provided by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and European funds (FEDER) (CGL2010-19233-C03-01). Permission for sampling magpie nests and nestlings was obtained from the Junta de Andalucía (Spanish regional government of Andalucia).

Supplementary material

442_2013_2772_MOESM1_ESM.doc (97 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 97 kb)

References

  1. Avilés JM, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Møller AP (2007) Environmental conditions influence egg color of reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus and their parasite, the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:475–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birkhead TR (1991) The magpies. The ecology and behaviour of black-billed and yellow-billed magpies. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Boggs CL, Inouye DW (2012) A single climate driver has direct and indirect effects on insect population dynamics. Ecol Lett 15:502–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calero-Torralbo MA, Václav R, Valera F (2013) Intra-specific variability in life-cycle synchronization of an ectoparasitic fly to its avian host. Oikos 122:274–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen WH, Sun LT, Tsai CL, Song YL, Chang CF (2002) Cold-stress induced the modulation of catecholamines, cortisol, immunoglobulin M, and leukocyte phagocytosis in tilapia. Gen Comp Endocrinol 126:90–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cichon M, Dubiec A (2005) Cell-mediated immunity predicts the probability of local recruitment in nestling blue tits. J Evol Biol 18:962–966PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds, and others cheats. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. De Neve L, Soler JJ, Soler M, Pérez-Contreras T (2004) Differential maternal investment counteracts for late breeding in magpies Pica pica: an experimental study. J Avian Biol 35:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Neve L, Soler JJ, Ruiz-Rodríguez M, Martín-Gálvez D, Pérez-Contreras T, Soler M (2007) Habitat-specific effects of a food supplementation experiment on immunocompetence in Eurasian magpie Pica pica nestlings. Ibis 149:763–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Del Grosso S, Parton W, Stohlgren T, Zheng DL, Bachelet D, Prince S, Hibbard K, Olson R (2008) Global potential net primary production predicted from vegetation class, precipitation, and temperature. Ecology 89:2117–2126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Douglas DJT, Newson SE, Leech DI, Noble DG, Robinson RA (2010) How important are climate-induced changes in host availability for population processes in an obligate brood parasite, the European cuckoo? Oikos 119:1834–1840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gordo O, Sanz JJ (2006) Climate change and bird phenology: a long-term study in the Iberian Peninsula. Glob Change Biol 12:1993–2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grim T, Honza M (1997) Differences in parental care of reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) to its own nestlings and parasitic cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) chicks. Folia Zool 46:135–142Google Scholar
  14. Krüger O, Davies NB (2002) The evolution of cuckoo parasitism: a comparative analysis. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:375–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kutz SJ, Hoberg EP, Polley J, Jenskins EJ (2005) Global warming is changing the dynamics of Arctic host–parasite systems. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:2571–2576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martínez J, Merino S (2011) Host-parasite interactions under extreme climatic conditions. Curr Zool 57:390–405Google Scholar
  17. Martínez JG, Soler M, Soler JJ, Paracuellos M, Sánchez J (1992) Alimentación de los pollos de urraca (Pica pica) en relacion con la edad y disponibilidad de presas. Ardeola 39:35–48Google Scholar
  18. Martín-Gálvez D, Soler JJ, Martínez JG, Krupa AP, Soler M, Burke T (2007) Cuckoo parasitism and productivity in different magpie subpopulations predict frequencies of the 457 bp allele: a mosaic of coevolution at a small geographic scale. Evolution 61:2340–2348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martín-Gálvez D, De Neve L, Pérez-Contreras T, Soler M, Martínez JG, Soler JJ (2012) Manipulation of hunger levels affects great spotted cuckoo and magpie host nestlings differently. J Avian Biol 43:531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Merino S, Møller AP (2010) Host-parasite interactions and climate change. In: Møller AP, Fiedler W, Berthold P (eds) Birds and climate change. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 213–226Google Scholar
  21. Merino S, Møller AP, de Lope F (2000) Seasonal changes in cell-mediated immunocompetence and mass gain in nestling barn swallows: a parasite-mediated effect? Oikos 90:327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Møller AP, Saino N (2004) Immune response and survival. Oikos 104:299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Møller AP, Arriero E, Lobato E, Merino S (2009) A meta-analysis of parasite virulence in nestling birds. Biol Rev 84:567–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Møller AP, Saino N, Adamík P, Ambrosini R, Antonov A, Campobello D, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Lehikoinen E, Martin-Vivaldi M, Moksnes A, Moskat C, Røskaft E, Rubolini D, Schulze-Hagen K, Soler M, Shykoff JA (2010) Rapid change in host use of the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus linked to climate change. Proc R Soc Lond B 278(106):733–738Google Scholar
  25. Moreno J, Merino S, Sanz J, Arriero E, Morales J, Tomás G (2005) Nestling cell-mediated immune response, body mass and hatching date as predictors of local recruitment in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. J Avian Biol 36:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ndong D, Chen YY, Lin YH, Vaseeharan B, Chen JC (2007) The immune response of tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus and its susceptibility to Streptococcus iniae under stress in low and high temperatures. Fish Shellfish Immunol 22:686–694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ots I, Kerimov AB, Ivankina EV, Ilyina TA, Hõrak P (2001) Immune challenge affects basal metabolic activity in wintering great tits. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1175–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Payne RB (1973) Individual laying histories and the clutch size and number of eggs of parasitic cuckoos. Condor 75:414–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Price PW (1980) Evolutionary biology of parasites. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  30. Råberg L, Nilsson JA, Ilmonen P, Stjernman M, Hasselquist D (2000) The cost of an immune response: vaccination reduces parental effort. Ecol Lett 3:382–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roldán M, Soler M (2011) Parental-care parasitism: how do unrelated offspring attain acceptance by foster parents? Behav Ecol 22:679–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saino N, Calza S, Møller AP (1998) Effects of a dipteran ectoparasite on immune response and growth trade-offs in barn swallow, Hirundo rustica, nestlings. Oikos 81:217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saino N, Rubolini D, Lehikoinen E, Sokolov LV, Bonisoli-Alquati A, Ambrosini R, Boncoraglio G, Møller AP (2009) Climate change effects on migration phenology may mismatch brood parasitic cuckoos and their hosts. Biol Lett 5:539–541PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sala OE, Gherardi LA, Reichmann L, Jobbagy E, Peters D (2012) Legacies of precipitation fluctuations on primary production: theory and data synthesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 367:3135–3144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sinclair JA, Lochmiller RL (2000) The winter immunoenhancement hypothesis: associations among immunity, density, and survival in prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) populations. Can J Zool 78:254–264Google Scholar
  36. Soler JJ (1999) Brood parasites: the advantages of being different species. In: Adams NJ, Slotow R (eds) Proceedings of the 22nd international Ornithological Congress, Durban. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg, pp 3098–3106Google Scholar
  37. Soler M, Soler JJ (1991) Growth and development of great spotted cuckoos and their magpie host. Condor 93:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Soler JJ, Soler M (2000) Brood-parasite interactions between great spotted cuckoos and magpies: a model system for studying coevolutionary relationships. Oecologia 125:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Soler M, Martínez JG, Soler JJ, Møller AP (1995) Preferential allocation of food by magpie Pica pica to great spotted cuckoo Clamator glandarius chicks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Soler M, Martínez JG, Soler JJ (1996) Effects of brood parasitism by the great spotted cuckoo on the breeding success of the magpie host: an experimental study. Ardeola 43:87–96Google Scholar
  41. Soler JJ, Møller AP, Soler M, Martínez JG (1999) Interactions between a brood parasite and its host in relation to parasitism and immune defence. Evol Ecol Res 1:189–210Google Scholar
  42. Soler JJ, Martínez JG, Soler M, Møller AP (2001) Coevolutionary interactions in a host-parasite system. Ecol Lett 4:470–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Soler JJ, De Neve L, Pérez-Contreras T, Soler M, Sorci G (2003) Trade-off between immunocompetence and growth in magpies: an experimental study. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sorci G, Soler JJ, Møller AP (1997) Reduced immunocompetence of nestlings in replacement clutches of the european magpie (Pica pica). Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1593–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Statsoft Inc. (2011) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. www.statsoft.com
  46. Studds CE, Marra PP (2011) Rainfall-induced changes in food availability modify the spring departure programme of a migratory bird. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278:3437–3443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Svensson E (1997) Natural selection on avian breeding time: casuality, fecundity- dependent, and fecundity-independent selection. Evolution 51:1276–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Václav R, Calero-Torralbo MA, Valera F (2008) Ectoparasite load is linked to ontogeny and cell-mediated immunity in an avian host system with pronounced hatching asynchrony. Biol J Linn Soc 94:463–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Valera F, Casas-Criville A, Calero-Torralbo MA (2006) Prolonged diapause in the ectoparasite Carnus hemapterus (Diptera: Cyclorrhapha, Acalyptratae) - how frequent is it in parasites? Parasitology 133:179–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Verboven N, Visser ME (1998) Seasonal variation in local recruitment of great tits: the importance of being early. Oikos 81:511–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. White TCR (2008) The role of food, weather and climate in limiting the abundance of animals. Biol Rev 83:227–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yang C, Stokke BG, Antonov A, Cai Y, Shi S, Moksnes A, Roskaft E, Møller AP, Liang W, Grim T (2013) Host selection in parasitic birds: are open-cup nesting insectivorous passerines always suitable cuckoo hosts? J Avian Biol 44:216–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zahraa HA (2008) Effects of commutative heat stress on immunoresponses in broiler chickens reared in closed system. Int J Poult Sci 7:964–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan J. Soler
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Liesbeth De Neve
    • 3
  • David Martín-Gálvez
    • 1
  • Mercedes Molina-Morales
    • 4
  • Tomás Pérez-Contreras
    • 4
  • Magdalena Ruiz-Rodríguez
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de Ecología Funcional y EvolutivaEstación Experimental de Zonas Áridas, CSICAlmeríaSpain
  2. 2.Grupo Coevolución, Unidad Asociada al CSICUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain
  3. 3.Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Department of BiologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  4. 4.Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations