Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 173, Issue 4, pp 1283–1294 | Cite as

Females better face senescence in the wandering albatross

  • Deborah Pardo
  • Christophe Barbraud
  • Henri Weimerskirch
Population ecology - Original research

Abstract

Sex differences in lifespan and aging are widespread among animals. Since investment in current reproduction can have consequences on other life-history traits, the sex with the highest cost of breeding is expected to suffer from an earlier and/or stronger senescence. This has been demonstrated in polygynous species that are highly dimorphic. However in monogamous species where parental investment is similar between sexes, sex-specific differences in aging patterns of life-history traits are expected to be attenuated. Here, we examined sex and age influences on demographic traits in a very long-lived and sexually dimorphic monogamous species, the wandering albatross (Diomedea exulans). We modelled within the same model framework sex-dependent variations in aging for an array of five life-history traits: adult survival, probability of returning to the breeding colony, probability of breeding and two measures of breeding success (hatching and fledging). We show that life-history traits presented contrasted aging patterns according to sex whereas traits were all similar at young ages. Both sexes exhibited actuarial and reproductive senescence, but, as the decrease in breeding success remained similar for males and females, the survival and breeding probabilities of males were significantly more affected than females. We discuss our results in the light of the costs associated to reproduction, age-related pairing and a biased operational sex-ratio in the population leading to a pool of non-breeders of potentially lower quality and therefore more subject to death or breeding abstention. For a monogamous species with similar parental roles, the patterns observed were surprising and when placed in a gradient of observed age/sex-related variations in life-history traits, wandering albatrosses were intermediate between highly dimorphic polygynous and most monogamous species.

Keywords

Breeding success Breeding probability Capture–mark–recapture Diomedea exulans Seabird Senescence Sexual dimorphism Survival 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work, carried out at Ile de la Possession, was supported by the Institut Paul Emile Victor (IPEV program no. 109), Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises, Zone Atelier de Recherches sur l’Environnement Antarctique et Subantarctique (CNRS-INEE), and has been approved by the ethics committee of IPEV and by the Comité de l’Environnement Polaire. We are very grateful to all the field workers involved in the monitoring program over the past 50 years on the wandering albatrosses at Ile de la Possession. We thank Dominique Besson and Karine Delord for the data management. We thank Christophe Bonenfant, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Matthieu Authier and members of D.P.s PhD committee: Emmanuelle Cam, Daniel Oro and Michael Schaub for constructive discussions, Christophe Guinet for giving access to fast computers, and Roger Pradel for help in designing the transition matrices. We also thank two anonymous referees for very constructive comments on a previous version of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

442_2013_2704_MOESM1_ESM.doc (286 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 286 kb)

References

  1. Angelier F, Shaffer SA, Weimerskirch H, Chastel O (2006) Effect of age, breeding experience and senescence on corticosterone and prolactin levels in a long-lived seabird: the wandering albatross. Gen Comp Endocrinol 149:1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbraud C, Weimerskirch H (2001) Emperor penguins and climate change. Nature 411:183–186Google Scholar
  3. Barbraud C, Weimerskirch H (2012) Estimating survival and reproduction in a quasi biennally breeding seabird with uncertain and unobservable states. J Ornithol 152:605–615Google Scholar
  4. Barbraud C, Tuck GN, Thomson R, Delord K, Weimerskirch H (2013) Fisheries bycatch as an inadvertent human-induced evolutionary mechanism. PLoS ONE 8(4):e60353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060353 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell G (1980) The costs of reproduction and their consequences. Am Nat 116:45–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonduriansky R, Maklakov A, Zajitschek F, Brooks R (2008) Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and life span. Funct Ecol 22:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouwhuis S, Sheldon BC, Verhulst S, Charmantier A (2009) Great tits growing old: selective disappearance and the partitioning of senescence to stages within the breeding cycle. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:2769–2777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouwhuis S, Choquet R, Sheldon BC, Verhulst S (2012) The forms and fitness cost of senescence: age-specific recapture, survival, reproduction and reproductive value in a wild bird population. Am Nat 179:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cam E, Hines JE, Monnat JY, Nichols JD, Danchin E (1998) Are adult nonbreeders prudent parents? The Kittiwake model. Ecology 79:2917–2930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carey JR (2003) Longevity: the biology and demography of life span. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  11. Catry P, Phillips RA, Phalan B, Croxall JP (2006) Senescence effects in an extremely long-lived bird: the grey-headed albatross, Thalassarche chrysostoma. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1625–1630Google Scholar
  12. Choquet R, Rouan L, Pradel R (2008) Program E-SURGE: a software application for fitting multi event models. Environ Ecol Stat 3:845–866Google Scholar
  13. Choquet R, Lebreton JD, Gimenez O, Reboulet AM, Pradel R (2009) U CARE: Utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulating CAptureûREcapture data. Ecography 32:1071–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  15. Clutton-Brock TH, Isvaran K (2007) Sex differences in ageing in natural populations of vertebrates. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:3097–3104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Converse SJ, Kendall WL, Doherty PF, Ryan PG (2009) Multistate models for estimation of survival and reproduction in the grey-headed albatross (Thalassarche chrysostoma). Auk 126:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crespin L, Harris MP, Lebreton JD, Frederiksen M, Wanless S (2006) Recruitment to a seabird population depends on environmental factors and on population size. J Anim Ecol 75:228–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gauthier G, Milot E, Weimerskirch H (2010) Small-scale dispersal and survival in a long-lived seabird, the wandering albatross. J Anim Ecol 79:879–887Google Scholar
  19. Hamilton WD (1966) The moulding of senescence by natural selection. J Theor Biol 12:12–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunter CM, Caswell H (2009) Rank and redundancy of multistate mark-recapture models for seabird populations with unobservable states. In: Thomson DL, Cooch EG, Conroy MJ (eds) Modeling demographic processes in marked populations. Springer, New York, 324–333Google Scholar
  21. Inchausti P, Weimerskirch H (2002) Dispersal and metapopulation dynamics of an oceanic seabird, the wandering albatross, and its consequences for its response to long-line fisheries. J Anim Ecol 71:765–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jenouvrier S, Barbraud C, Weimerskirch H (2005) Long-term contrasted responses to climate of two Antarctic seabird species. Ecology 86:2889–2903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jouventin P, Lequette B (1990) The dance of the wandering albatross Diomedea exulans. Emu 90:122–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jouventin P, Lequette B, Dobson FS (1999) Age-related mate choice in the wandering albatross. Anim Behav 57:1099–1106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lecomte VJ, Sorci G, Cornet S, Jaeger A, Faivre B, Arnoux E, Gaillard M, Trouvé CBD, Chastel O, Weimerskirch H (2010) Patterns of aging in the long-lived wandering albatross. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:6370–6375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loison A, Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard JM, Jorgenson JT, Jullien JM (1999) Age-specific survival in five populations of ungulates: evidence of senescence. Ecology 80:2539–2554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McElligott AG, Altwegg R, Hayden TJ (2002) Age-specific survival and reproductive probabilities: evidence for senescence in male fallow deer (Dama dama). Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1129–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Monaghan P, Charmantier A, Nussey DH, Ricklefs RE (2008) The evolutionary ecology of senescence. Funct Ecol 22:371–378Google Scholar
  29. Nevoux M, Weimerskirch H, Barbraud C (2007) Environmental variation and experience-related differences in the demography of the long-lived black-browed albatross. J Anim Ecol 76:159–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nussey DH, Kruuk LE, Morris A, Clements MN, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH (2009) Inter- and intrasexual variation in aging patterns across reproductive traits in a wild red deer population. Am Nat 174:342–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Owens IPF, Bennett PM (1994) Mortality costs of parental care and sexual dimorphism in birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 257:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pardo D, Weimerskirch H, Barbraud C (2013) When celibacy matters: incorporating non-breeders improves demographic parameter estimates. PLoS ONE 8(3):e60389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060389 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pollock KH (1982) A capture-recapture design robust to unequal probability of capture. J Wildl Manag 46:752–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pradel R, Maurin Bernier L, Gimenez O, Genovart M, Choquet R, Oro D (2008) Estimation of sex specific survival with uncertainty in sex assessment. Can J Stat 36:29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Preston BT, Jalme MS, Hingrat Y, Lacroix F, Sorci G (2011) Sexually extravagant males age more rapidly. Ecol Lett 14:1017–1024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Promislow DEL (1992) Costs of sexual selection in natural populations of mammals. Proc R Soc Lond B 247:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reznick D (1992) Measuring the costs of reproduction. Trends Ecol Evol 7:42–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shaffer SA, Weimerskirch H, Costa DP (2001) Functional significance of sexual dimorphism in Wandering Albatrosses, Diomedea exulans. Funct Ecol 15:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Tavecchia G, Pradel R, Boy V, Johnson AR, Cézilly F (2001) Sex- and age-related variation in survival and cost of first reproduction in greater flamingos. Ecology 82:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Toïgo C, Gaillard JM (2003) Causes of sex-biased adult survival in ungulates: sexual size dimorphism, mating tactic or environment harshness? Oikos 101:376–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van de Pol M, Verhulst S (2006) Age dependent traits: a new statistical model to separate within and between individual effects. Am Nat 167:766–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vaupel JW, Yashin AI (1985) Heterogeneity´s ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. Am Stat 39:176–185Google Scholar
  44. Vaupel JW, Manton KG, Stallard E (1979) The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography 16:439–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vinogradov AE (1998) Male reproductive strategy and decreased longevity. Acta Biotheor 46:157–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weimerskirch H (1992) Reproductive effort in long-lived birds: age-specific patterns of condition, reproduction and survival in the wandering albatross. Oikos 64:464–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weimerskirch H (1995) Regulation of foraging trips and incubation routine in male and female wandering albatrosses. Oecologia 102:37–43Google Scholar
  48. Weimerskirch H, Brothers N, Jouventin P (1997a) Population dynamics of wandering albatross Diomedea exulans and Amsterdam albatross D. amsterdamensis in the Indian Ocean and their relationships with long-line fisheries: conservation implications. Biol Conserv 79:257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weimerskirch H, Cherel Y, Cuenot-Chaillet F, Ridoux V (1997b) Alternative foraging strategies and resource allocation by male and female wandering albatrosses. Ecology 78:2051–2063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weimerskirch H, Barbraud C, Lys P (2000) Sex differences in parental investment and chick growth in wandering albatrosses: fitness consequences. Ecology 81:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weimerskirch H, Jouventin P (1987) Population dynamics of the wandering albatross Diomedea exulans of the Crozet Islands: causes and consequences of the population decline. Oikos 49:315–322Google Scholar
  52. Weimerskirch H, Lallemand J, Martin J (2005) Population sex ratio variation in a monogamous long-lived bird, the wandering albatross. Ecology 74:285–291Google Scholar
  53. Williams GC (1966) Natural selection, the cost of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack’s principle. Am Nat 100:687–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah Pardo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christophe Barbraud
    • 1
  • Henri Weimerskirch
    • 1
  1. 1.CEBC-CNRS UPR 1934Villiers-en-BoisFrance
  2. 2.British Antarctic SurveyCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations