, Volume 173, Issue 4, pp 1271–1282 | Cite as

Decline of an arctic top predator: synchrony in colony size fluctuations, risk of extinction and the subpolar gyre

  • Sébastien DescampsEmail author
  • Hallvard Strøm
  • Harald Steen
Population ecology - Original research


Analysis of synchrony in population fluctuations is a central topic in ecology. It can help identify factors that regulate populations, and also the scales at which these factors exert their influence. Using long-term data from seven Brünnich’s guillemot colonies in Svalbard, Norway, we determined that year to year population fluctuations were synchronized in six of the seven colonies. The seventh colony was located farther away and in a different oceanographic system. Moreover, all seven colonies have declined significantly since the late 1990s following a very similar pattern. If the rate of population decline does not change, Brünnich’s guillemots in Svalbard have a high probability of becoming quasi-extinct within the next 50 years. The high synchrony between the different colonies could further increase this risk of extinction. Our results indicate that environmental forcing plays a role in the colony size fluctuation of Brünnich’s guillemot (i.e., a Moran effect). These fluctuations are well explained by changes in the subpolar gyre in the region where Brünnich’s guillemots overwinter. This subpolar gyre weakened in the mid-1990s, leading to a warming of the North Atlantic. Our study indicates that this basin-scale shift in the subpolar gyre is closely related to the decline in Brünnich’s guillemot in Svalbard. Our results suggest that the causal mechanism linking changes in oceanographic conditions in the North Atlantic and Brünnich’s guillemot population dynamics are likely mediated, at least partly, by changes in recruitment.


Moran effect Regime shift Svalbard Subpolar gyre Synchrony Uria lomvia 



This study was funded by programs MOSJ ( and SEAPOP ( We are indebted to Fridtjof Mehlum and Vidar Bakken, who established the monitoring program in Svalbard, to all summer field assistants who participated to the study and counted Brünnich’s guillemots in Svalbard since 1988, to Anders Skoglund for making maps and to Kjell-Einar Erikstad, Christopher Johnson and two anonymous referees for very useful comments on a first version. Thanks to Peter and Marie Fast for English editing and to Helge Drange for providing and explaining the subpolar gyre data.

Supplementary material

442_2013_2701_MOESM1_ESM.docx (504 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 504 kb)


  1. Bjørnstad ON, Ims RA, Lambin X (1999) Spatial population dynamics: analyzing patterns and processes of population synchrony. Trends Ecol Evol 14:427–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolker BM et al (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caswell H (2000) Prospective and retrospective perturbation analyses: their roles in conservation biology. Ecology 81:619–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Descamps S et al (2010) Detecting population heterogeneity in effects of North Atlantic Oscillations on seabird body condition: get into the rhythm. Oikos 119:1526–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. deYoung B et al (2008) Regime shifts in marine ecosystems: detection, prediction and management. Trends Ecol Evol 23:402–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Earn DJD, Levin SA, Rohani P (2000) Coherence and conservation. Science 290:1360–1364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engen S, Lande R, Saether BE, Bregnballe T (2005) Estimating the pattern of synchrony in fluctuating populations. J Anim Ecol 74:601–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fort J et al (2013) Energetic consequences of contrasting winter migratory strategies in a sympatric Arctic seabird duet. J Avian Biol 44:001–008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frederiksen M, Harris MP, Daunt F, Rothery P, Wanless S (2004) Scale-dependent climate signals drive breeding phenology of three seabird species. Glob Change Biol 10:1214–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fuglei E, Oritsland NA, Prestrud P (2003) Local variation in arctic fox abundance on Svalbard, Norway. Polar Biol 26:93–98Google Scholar
  11. Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Loison A, Toïgo C (2000) Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 31:367–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaston AJ (2003) Synchronous fluctuations of thick-billed murre (Uria lomvia) colonies in the eastern Canadian arctic suggest population regulation in winter. Auk 120:362–370Google Scholar
  13. Gaston AJ, Deforest LN, Donaldson G, Noble DG (1994) Population parameters of thick-billed Murres at Coats Island, Northwest-Territories, Canada. Condor 96:935–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gremillet D, Charmantier A (2010) Shifts in phenotypic plasticity constrain the value of seabirds as ecological indicators of marine ecosystems. Ecol Appl 20:1498–1503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grenfell BT et al (1998) Noise and determinism in synchronized sheep dynamics. Nature 394:674–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hatun H, Sando AB, Drange H, Hansen B, Valdimarsson H (2005) Influence of the Atlantic subpolar gyre on the thermohaline circulation. Science 309:1841–1844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hatun H et al (2009) Large bio-geographical shifts in the north-eastern Atlantic Ocean: from the subpolar gyre, via plankton, to blue whiting and pilot whales. Prog Oceanogr 80:149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heino M, Kaitala V, Ranta E, Lindstrom J (1997) Synchronous dynamics and rates of extinction in spatially structured populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 264:481–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hurrell JW, Dickson RR (2004) Climate variability over the North Atlantic. In: Stenseth NC, Ottersen G, Hurrell JW, Belgrano A (eds) Marine ecosystems and climate variation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 15–31Google Scholar
  20. Hurrell JW, Kushnir Y, Visbeck M (2001) The North Atlantic Oscillation. Science 291:603–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ims RA, Steen H (1990) Geographical synchrony in microtine population-cycles—A theoretical evaluation of the role of nomadic avian predators. Oikos 57:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Irons DB et al (2008) Fluctuations in circumpolar seabird populations linked to climate oscillations. Glob Change Biol 14:1455–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jenouvrier S, Barbraud C, Cazelles B, Weimerskirch H (2005) Modelling population dynamics of seabirds: importance of the effects of climate fluctuations on breeding proportions. Oikos 108:511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson DM, Liebhold AM, Bjornstad ON, McManus ML (2005) Circumpolar variation in periodicity and synchrony among gypsy moth populations. J Anim Ecol 74:882–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kosmelj K, Blejec A, Cedilnik A (2005) Interval estimate for specific points in polynomial regression. J Comput Informat Theory 4:287–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kålås JA et al. (2010) Norwegian Red List for SpeciesGoogle Scholar
  27. Lande R, Engen S, Sæther B-E (2003) Stochastic population dynamics in ecology and conservation. Oxford University press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liebhold A, Koenig WD, Bjornstad ON (2004) Spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:467–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loeng H (1991) Features of the physical oceanographic conditions of the Barents Sea. Polar Res 10:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lohmann K, Drange H, Bentsen M (2009) A possible mechanism for the strong weakening of the North Atlantic subpolar gyre in the mid-1990s. Geophys Res Lett 36:L15602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moran PAP (1953) The statistical analysis of the Canadian lynx cycle. II. Synchronization and meteorology. Aust J Zool 1:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nussey DH, Wilson AJ, Brommer JE (2007) The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations. J Evol Biol 20:831–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palmqvist E, Lundberg P (1998) Population extinctions in correlated environments. Oikos 83:359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paradis E, Baillie SR, Sutherland WJ, Gregory RD (2000) Spatial synchrony in populations of birds: effects of habitat, population trend, and spatial scale. Ecology 81:2112–2125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Post E, Forchhammer MC (2002) Synchronization of animal population dynamics by large-scale climate. Nature 420:168–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing (, Vienna, Austria
  37. Ranta E, Kaitala V, Lundberg P (1998) Population variability in space and time: the dynamics of synchronous population fluctuations. Oikos 83:376–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sæther B-E, Bakke Ø (2000) Avian life history variation and contribution of demographic traits to the population growth rate. Ecology 81:642–653Google Scholar
  39. Sandvik H, Erikstad KE, Barrett RT, Yoccoz NG (2005) The effect of climate on adult survival in five species of North Atlantic seabirds. J Anim Ecol 74:817–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Steen H, Lorentzen E, Strøm H (2013) Winter distribution of guillemots (Uria spp.) in the Barents Sea. Norwegian Polar Institute Report Series, 141Google Scholar
  41. Steiner UK, Gaston AJ (2005) Reproductive consequences of natal dispersal in a highly philopatric seabird. Behav Ecol 16:634–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Strøm H (2006a) Brünnich’s guillemot. In: Kovacs KM, Lydersen C (eds) Birds and mammals of svalbard. Norwegian Polar Institute, TromsøGoogle Scholar
  43. Strøm H (2006b) Glaucous gull. In: Kovacs KM, Lydersen C (eds) Birds and mammals of svalbard. Norwegian Polar Institute, TromsøGoogle Scholar
  44. Svendsen H et al (2002) The physical environment of Kongsfjorden-Krossfjorden, an Arctic fjord system in Svalbard. Polar Res 21:133–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Toms JD, Lesperance ML (2003) Piecewise regression: a tool for identifying ecological thresholds. Ecology 84:2034–2041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Votier SC et al (2005) Oil pollution and climate have wide-scale impacts on seabird demographics. Ecol Lett 8:1157–1164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walsh PM, Halley DJ, Harris MP, del Nevo A, Sim IMW, Tasker ML (1995) Seabird monitoring handbook for Britain and Ireland: a compilation of methods for survey and monitoring of breeding seabirds. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Royal Society of the Protection of Birds, Institute of terrestrial Ecology, Seabird Group, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sébastien Descamps
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hallvard Strøm
    • 1
  • Harald Steen
    • 1
  1. 1.Norwegian Polar InstituteFram CentreTromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations