Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 173, Issue 4, pp 1551–1561 | Cite as

What controls plant nutrient use in high elevation ecosystems?

  • S. C. CastleEmail author
  • J. C. Neff
Ecosystem ecology - Original research

Abstract

The importance of rock-derived mineral nutrients (P, K, Mn, Mg, and Ca) in plant physiological function is well established. However, one important and relatively unexplored question is whether or not the same rules of plant nutrient use efficiency apply to these essential elements even if they are not limiting to primary production. We examined conifer growth and nutrient use dynamics across sites with contrasting geologies (sedimentary and volcanic) that vary in both rock-derived mineral nutrient and N availability. Differences in bedrock geochemistry generally corresponded to differences in available soil nutrients, such that the volcanic site tended to have greater available nutrients. Foliar nutrient concentrations reflected both differences in bedrock chemistry and indices of available soil nutrients for P, K, and Mn. Aboveground biomass production did not follow expected patterns and was greater for trees growing on low nutrient sites, but only with respect to the annual woody increment. Fine litter production did not differ between sites. Finally, we found evidence for trade-offs between two commonly examined components of nutrient use efficiency (NUE): nutrient productivity (A n) and mean residence time of nutrients. However, we did not find evidence for higher plant NUE in soils with lower nutrient availability for N or rock-derived nutrients.

Keywords

NUE Mineral nutrition Spruce-fir Conifer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the assistance with laboratory and fieldwork provided by C. Lawrence, D. Fernandez, J. Carrasco, C. Flagg, and Z. Seligman. We would like to thank W. Bowman, N. Barger, T. Zelikova, M. Keville, and B. Sullivan for their comments and advice on an early version of this manuscript. This work was support by an A. W. Mellon Foundation grant made to J. C. Neff.

Supplementary material

442_2013_2695_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (211 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 210 kb)

References

  1. Aerts R (1990) Nutrient use efficiency in evergreen and deciduous species from heathlands. Oecologia 84:391–397Google Scholar
  2. Aerts R (1996) Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: are there general patterns? J Ecol 84:597–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aerts R, Chapin F III (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 30:1–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aerts R, de Caluwe H (1994) Effects of nitrogen supply on canopy structure and leaf nitrogen distribution in Carex species. Ecology 75:1482–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arthur M, Fahey T (1991) Biomass and nutrients in an Engelmann spruce—subalpine fir forest in north central Colorado: pools, annual production, and internal cycling. Can J For Res 22:315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berendse F, Aerts R (1987) Nitrogen-use-efficiency: a biologically meaningful definition? Funct Ecol 1:293–296Google Scholar
  7. Blair (1996) The western San Juan mountains: their geology, ecology and human history. University Press of Colorado, NiwotGoogle Scholar
  8. Boerner R (1984) Foliar nutrient dynamics and nutrient use efficiency of four deciduous tree species in relation to site fertility. J Appl Ecol 21:1029–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brady N, Weil R (2008) The nature and properties of soils, 14th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  10. Castle S, Neff J (2009) Plant response to nutrient availability across variable bedrock geologies. Ecosystems 12:101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapin F III (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapin F III, Kendrowski R (1983) Seasonal changes in nitrogen and phosphorus fractions and autumn retranslocation in evergreen and deciduous taiga trees. Ecology 64:376–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapin F III, Matson P, Mooney H (2002) Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark D, Brown S, Kicklighter D, Chambers J, Thomlinson F, Ni J (2001) Measuring net primary production in forests: concepts and field methods. Ecol Appl 11:356–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cole D, Rapp M (1981) Elemental cycling in forest ecosystems. In: Reichle D (ed) Dynamic properties of forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 341–409Google Scholar
  16. Eckstein R, Karlsson P (2001) Variation in nitrogen-use efficiency among and within subarctic graminoids and herbs. New Phytol 150:641–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gillman G (1979) A proposed method for the measurement of exchange properties of highly weathered soils. Aust J Soil Res 17:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray J, Schlesinger W (1983) Nutrient use by evergreen and deciduous shrubs in southern California: II. Experimental investigations of the relationship between growth, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen availability. J Ecol 71:43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hiremath A, Ewel J, Cole T (2002) Nutrient use efficiency in three fast-growing tropical trees. For Sci 48:662–672Google Scholar
  20. Johnson R (2007) Ground water flow modeling with sensitivity analyses to guide field data collection in a mountain watershed. Ground Water Monit Rem 27:75–83Google Scholar
  21. Keeland B, Young P (2005) Construction and installation of dendrometer bands for periodic tree-growth measurements. U.S. Geological Survey, National Wetlands Research Center, Lafayette. http://www.nwrc.usgs.gov/Dendrometer. Accessed September, 2012
  22. Killingbeck K (1984) Nitrogen and phosphorus resorption dynamics of five tree species in a Kansas gallery forest. Am Midl Nat 111:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Killingbeck K (1996) Nutrients in senesced leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology 77:1716–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lambers H, Chapin III F, Pons T (2008) Plant physiological ecology, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Landis T, Mogren E (1975) Tree strata biomass of subalpine spruce-fir stands in southwestern Colorado. For Sci 21:9–12Google Scholar
  26. Lawrence C, Painter T, Landry C, Neff J (2010) Contemporary geochemical composition and flux of aeolian dust to the San Juan Mountains, Colorado, United States. J Geophys Res 115Google Scholar
  27. Litton C, Raich J, Ryan M (2007) Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 13:2089–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pastor J, Aber J, McClaugherty C, Melillo J (1984) Aboveground production and N and P cycling along a nitrogen mineralization gradient on Blackhawk Island, Wisconsin. Ecology 65:256–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prescott C, Corbin J, Parkinson D (1989) Biomass, productivity, and nutrient-use efficiency of aboveground vegetation in four Rocky Mountain coniferous forests. Can J For Res 19:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prescott C, Corbin J, Parkinson D (1992) Immobilization and availability of N and P in the forest floors of fertilized Rocky Mountain coniferous forests. Plant Soil 143:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reich P, Walters M, Ellsworth D (1997) From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:13730–13734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richardson S, Peltzer D, Allen R, McGlone M (2005) Resorption proficiency along a chronosequence: responses among communities and within species. Ecology 86:20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaver G, Melillo J (1984) Nutrient budgets of marsh plants: efficiency concepts and relation to availability. Ecology 65:1491–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Silla F, Escudero A (2004) Nitrogen-use efficiency: tradeoffs between N productivity and mean residence time at organ, plant and population levels. Funct Ecol 18:511–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Silver W (1994) Is nutrient availability related to plant nutrient use in humid tropical forests? Oecologia 98:336–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Underwood A (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Vitousek P (1982) Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. Am Nat 119:553–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vitousek P, Howarth R (1991) Nitrogen limitation on land and in sea: how can it occur? Biogeochemistry 13:87–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson D, Maguire D (2009) Environmental basis of soil-site productivity relationships in ponderosa pine. Ecol Monogr 79:595–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yager D, Bove D (2002) Generalized geologic map of part of the upper Animas River watershed and vicinity, Silverton, Colorado. In: Services USGS (ed) Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2377, Denver, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  41. Yuan Z, Liu W, Niu S, Wan S (2007) Plant nitrogen dynamicsand nitrogen-use strategies under altered nitrogen seasonalityand competition. Ann Bot 100:821–830Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecosystem and Conservation SciencesUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geological SciencesUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  3. 3.Environmental Studies ProgramUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations