Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 173, Issue 3, pp 837–847 | Cite as

Long-term density-dependent changes in habitat selection in red deer (Cervus elaphus)

  • F. J. Pérez-Barbería
  • R. J. Hooper
  • I. J. Gordon
Population ecology - Original research

Abstract

Understanding how habitat selection changes with population density is a key concept in population regulation, community composition and managing impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services. At low density, it is expected that individuals select habitats in terms of their preference, but as population density increases, the availability of resources per individual declines on preferred habitats, leading to competition which forces some individuals to exploit less preferred habitats. Using spatial information of Scottish red deer (Cervus elaphus) winter counts, carried out in 110 areas across Scotland between 1961 and 2004 (a total of 1,206,495 deer observations), we showed how winter habitat niche breadth in red deer has widened with increasing population density. Heather moorland and montane habitats were most and least preferred for deer, respectively. Increasing density favoured the selection of grassland, to the detriment of the selection of heather moorland. The selection of heather and grassland decreased when temperature increased, while the selection of montane and peatland habitats increased. These findings are important for understanding how habitat use, density and population are likely to be affected by weather, and allow us to predict habitat impacts by large mammal herbivory and climate.

Keywords

Habitat use Niche breadth Population dynamics Spatial analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

To the memory of our colleague Dr. Simon Thirgood, who died in his beloved Africa when working on conservation projects. María Antón digitised the dataset and was funded by the European Commission Leonardo da Vinci Programme. Thanks to: Alessandro Gimona, Janine B Illian, Colin Beale, and Jack Lennon for comments on the analysis; Douglas Morris, Glenn Iason, Alison Hester, Pete Goddard, Scot Ramsay and Burt Kotler for comments on the manuscript; Deepayan Sarkar and Adrian Baddeley for advice on the programming code; and The Deer Commission for Scotland and the Highland Council Archive for access to the dataset. The work was funded by the Scottish Government Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate (RERAD).

Supplementary material

442_2013_2686_MOESM1_ESM.docx (33 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 33 kb)

References

  1. Albon SD, Brewer MJ, O’Brien S, Nolan AJ, Cope D (2007) Quantifying the grazing impacts associated with different herbivores on rangelands. J Appl Ecol 44:1176–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews J, Miller G, Armstrong H (2000) The effects of mammalian herbivores on natural regeneration of upland, native woodland. Information and Advisory Note 115. Scottish Natural Heritage, BattlebyGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong HM, Gordon IJ, Grant SA, Hutchings NJ, Milne JA, Sibbald AR (1997a) A model of the grazing of hill vegetation by sheep in the UK. 1. The prediction of vegetation biomass. J Appl Ecol 34:166–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong HM, Gordon IJ, Hutchings NJ, Illius AW, Milne JA, Sibbald AR (1997b) A model of the grazing of hill vegetation by sheep in the UK. 2. The prediction of offtake by sheep. J Appl Ecol 34:186–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armsworth PR (2009) Conditional dispersal, clines, and the evolution of dispersiveness. Theor Ecol 2:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM (2008) Mixed-effects modelling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang 59:390–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baddeley A, Turner R (2005) spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J Stat Softw 12:1–42Google Scholar
  8. Bailey DW, Gross JE, Laca EA, Rittenhouse LR, Coughenour MB, Swift DM, Sims PL (1996) Mechanisms that result in large herbivore grazing distribution patterns. J Range Manag 49:386–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ball JP, Nordengren C, Wallin K (2001) Partial migration by large ungulates: characteristics of seasonal moose Alces alces ranges in northern Sweden. Wildl Biol 7:39–47Google Scholar
  10. Bates D, Maechler M (2009) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-31Google Scholar
  11. Bell RHV (1970) The use of the herb layer by grazing ungulates in the Serengeti. In: Watson A (ed) Animal populations in relation to their food resources. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 111–123Google Scholar
  12. Beyer HL (2004) Hawth’s analysis tools for ArcGIS. http://www.spatialecology.com/htools
  13. Britton AJ, Fisher JM (2007) Interactive effects of nitrogen deposition, fire and grazing on diversity and composition of low-alpine prostrate Calluna vulgaris heathland. J Appl Ecol 44:125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buckland ST, Ahmadi S, Stainess BW, Gordon IJ, Youngson RW (1996) Estimating the minimum population size that allows a given number of mature red deer stags to be culled. J Appl Ecol 33:118–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bunnefeld N, Hoshino E, Milner-Gulland EJ (2011) Management strategy evaluation: a powerful tool for conservation? Trends Ecol Evol 26(9):441–447 (abstract)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christakos G (2001) Modern spatiotemporal geostatistics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD (1989) Red deer in the Highlands. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Clutton-Brock TH, Iason GR, Guinness FE (1987) Sexual segregation and density-related changes in habitat use in male and female red deer (Cervus elaphus). J Zool 211:275–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clutton-Brock TH, Coulson T, Milner JM (2004) Red deer stocks in the Highlands of Scotland. Nature 429:261–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coulson T, Albon S, Guinness F, Pemberton J, Clutton-Brock TH (1997) Population substructure, local density, and calf winter survival in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Ecology 78:852–863Google Scholar
  21. Dawson TJ, Ellis BA (1996) Diets of mammalian herbivores in Australian arid, hilly shrublands: seasonal effects on overlap between euros (hill kangaroos), sheep and feral goats, and on dietary niche breadths and electivities. J Arid Environ 34:491–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ESRI (2009) ArcMap 9.3. Environmental Systems Resource Institute, Redlands Google Scholar
  23. Forestry Commission (2001) National inventory of woodland and trees: Scotland. Forestry Commission Inventory Report. Forestry Commission, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  24. Forsyth DM (2000) Habitat selection and coexistence of the Alpine chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) and Himalayan tahr (Hemitragus jemlahicus) in the eastern Southern Alps, New Zealand. J Zool 252:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fretwell SD, Lucas HL (1969) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds part 1 theoretical development. Acta Biotheor 19:16–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fryxell JM, Wilmshurst JF, Sinclair ARE (2004) Predictive models of movement by Serengeti grazers. Ecology 85:2429–2435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gates DM (1980) Biophysical ecology. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gill RMA (1992) A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 1. Deer. Forestry 65:145–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gordon IJ (1989a) Vegetation community selection by ungulates on the isle of rhum.1. food-supply. J Appl Ecol 26:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gordon IJ (1989b) Vegetation community selection by ungulates on the isle of rhum.2. vegetation community selection. J Appl Ecol 26:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gordon IJ, Hester AJ, Festa-Bianchet M (2004) Review: the management of wild large herbivores to meet economic, conservation and environmental objectives. J Appl Ecol 41:1021–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gwynne MD, Bell RHV (1968) Selection of vegetation components by grazing ungulates in the Serengeti National Park. Nature 220:390–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hester AJ, Baillie GJ (1998) Spatial and temporal patterns of heather use by sheep and red deer within natural heather/grass mosaics. J Appl Ecol 35:772–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hester AJ, Gordon IJ, Baillie GJ, Tappin E (1999) Foraging behaviour of sheep and red deer within natural heather grass mosaics. J Appl Ecol 36:133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hobbs NT, Baker DL, Gill RB (1983) Comparative nutritional ecology of montane ungulates during winter. J Wildl Manag 47:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Holdo RM, Holt RD, Coughenour MB, Ritchie ME (2007) Plant productivity and soil nitrogen as a function of grazing, migration and fire in an African savanna. J Ecol 95:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Holland JP, Morgan-Davies C, Waterhouse T, Thomson S, Midgley A, Barnes A (2011) An analysis of the impact on the natural heritage of the decline in hill farming in Scotland. Commissioned Report No. 454, Scottish Natural Heritage, BattlebyGoogle Scholar
  38. Houseal GA, Olson BE (1995) Cattle use of microclimates on a northern latitude winter range. Can J Anim Sci 75:501–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huang FC, Ogata Y (1999) Improvements of the maximum pseudo-likelihood estimators in various spatial statistical models. J Comput Graph Stat 8:510–530Google Scholar
  40. Illian J, Penttinen A, Stoyan H, Stoyan D (2008) Statistical analysis and modelling of spatial point patterns. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  41. Irvine RJ, Fiorini S, Yearley S, McLeod JE, Turner A, Armstrong H, White PCL, van der Wal R (2009) Can managers inform models? Integrating local knowledge into models of red deer habitat use. J Appl Ecol 46:344–352Google Scholar
  42. Jayakody S, Sibbald A, Mayes R, Hooper R, Gordon I, Lambin X (2011) Effects of human disturbance on the diet composition of wild red deer (Cervus elaphus). Eur J Wildl Res 57:939–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kie JG, Bowyer RT (2000) Sexual segregation in white-tailed deer: density-dependent changes in use of space, habitat selection, and dietary niche. J Mammal 80:1004–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lamoot I, Meert C, Hoffmann M (2005) Habitat use of ponies and cattle foraging together in a coastal dune area. Biol Conserv 122:523–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Latham J, Staines BW, Gorman ML (1999) Comparative feeding ecology of red (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Scottish plantation forests. J Zool 247:409–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lundberg J, Moberg F (2003) Mobile link organisms and ecosystem functioning: implications for ecosystem resilience and management. Ecosystems 6:0087–0098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mackey EC, Shewry MC, Tudor GJ (1999) Land cover change: Scotland from the 1940s to the 1980s. Report 1-12. Scottish Natural Heritage, BattlebyGoogle Scholar
  48. MacMillan D, Phillip S (2010) Can economic incentives resolve conservation conflict: the case of wild deer management and habitat conservation in the Scottish Highlands. Hum Ecol 38:485–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Matthysen E (2005) Density-dependent dispersal in birds and mammals. Ecography 28:403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McLoughlin PD, Gaillard JM, Boyce MS, Bonenfant C, Messier F, Duncan P, Delorme D, Van Moorter B, Said S, Klein F (2007) Lifetime reproductive success and composition of the home range in a large herbivore. Ecology 88:3192–3201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McLoughlin P, Coulson T, Clutton-Brock T (2008) Cross-generational effects of habitat and density on life history in red deer. Ecology 89:3317–3326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McNaughton SJ (1984) Grazing lawns—animals in herds, plant form, and coevolution. Am Nat 124:863–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mcpeek MA, Holt RD (1992) The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. Am Nat 140:1010–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Medina-Roldán E, Paz-Ferreiro J, Bardgett RD (2012) Grazing exclusion affects soil and plant communities, but has no impact on soil carbon storage in an upland grassland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 149:118–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Milinski M, Parker GA (1991) Competition for resources. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 137–168Google Scholar
  56. Mitchell B, Staines BW, Welch D (1977) Ecology of red deer: a research review relevant to their management in Scotland. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  57. MLURI (1992) The land cover of Scotland 1988. In: Birnie R (ed) Digital dataset release 2, 1:25,000. The Macaulay Institute, AberdeenGoogle Scholar
  58. MLURI (1993) The land cover of Scotland 1988. Final report. The Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, AberdeenGoogle Scholar
  59. Mobaek R, Mysterud A, Loe LE, Holand O, Austrheim G (2009) Density dependent and temporal variability in habitat selection by a large herbivore; an experimental approach. Oikos 118:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Morellet N, Gaillard JM, Hewison AJM, Ballon P, Boscardin Y, Duncan P, Klein F, Maillard D (2007) Indicators of ecological change: new tools for managing populations of large herbivores. J Appl Ecol 44:634–643Google Scholar
  61. Morris DW (1988) Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure. Evol Ecol 2:253–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Morris DW (2003a) Shadows of predation: habitat-selecting consumers eclipse competition between coexisting. Evol Ecol 17:393–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Morris DW (2003b) Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection. Oecologia 136:1–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Murray MG, Brown D (1993) Niche separation of grazing ungulates in the Serengeti—an experimental test. J Anim Ecol 62:380–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mysterud A (2000) Diet overlap among ruminants in Fennoscandia. Oecologia 124:130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mysterud A, Pérez-Barbería FJ, Gordon IJ (2001) The effect of season, sex and feeding style on home range area versus body mass scaling in temperate ruminants. Oecologia 127:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nicholson MC, Bowyer RT, Kie JG (2006) Forage selection by mule deer: does niche breadth increase with population density? J Zool 269:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pérez-Barbería FJ, Olivan M, Osoro K, Nores C (1997) Sex, seasonal and spatial differences in the diet of Cantabrian chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica parva. Acta Theriol 42:37–46Google Scholar
  69. Pettorelli N, Weladji RB, Holand O, Mysterud A, Breie H, Stenseth NC (2005) The relative role of winter and spring conditions: linking climate and landscape-scale plant phenology to alpine reindeer body mass. Biol Lett 1:24–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pielou EC (1975) Ecological diversity. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D (2009) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-94Google Scholar
  73. Prins HHT, de Boer WF, van Oeveren H, Correia A, Mafuca J, Olff H (2006) Co-existence and niche segregation of three small bovid species in southern Mozambique. Afr J Ecol 44:186–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ramp D, Coulson G (2002) Density dependence in foraging habitat preference of eastern grey kangaroos. Oikos 98:393–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Robertson BA, Hutto RL (2006) A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology 87:1075–1085PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sakamoto Y, Ishiguro M, Kitagawa G (1986) Akaike information criterion statistics. Reidel, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  78. Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Singh NJ, Borger L, Dettki H, Bunnefeld N, Ericsson G (2012) From migration to nomadism: movement variability in a northern ungulate across its latitudinal range. Ecol Appl 22:2007–2020PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Skarpe C, Hester AJ (2008) Plant traits, browsing and gazing herbivores, and vegetation dynamics. In: Gordon IJ, Prins HHT (eds) The ecology of browsing and grazing. Springer, Berlin, pp 217–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Smith D (1972) Carbohydrate reserves of grasses. In: Youngner VB, McKell CM (eds) The biology and utilization of grasses. Academic, New York, pp 318–331Google Scholar
  82. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  83. Staines BW (1969) Digestion of heather by red deer. Proc Nutr Soc 28:21–22Google Scholar
  84. Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Kie JG, Cimon NJ, Johnson BK (2002) Temporospatial distributions of elk, mule deer, and cattle: resource partitioning and competitive displacement. J Mammal 83:229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Dick BL, Johnson BK, Kie JG (2005) Density-dependent effects on physical condition and reproduction in North American elk: an experimental test. Oecologia 143:85–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. The Red Deer Commission (1961) Annual report for 1959–1960, The Red deer Commission for Scotland. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  87. Tipper R, McGhee W (2005) Climate change and Scotland’s forestry strategy. Topic paper no 1. Centre for Carbon Management, Edinburgh, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  88. Tremblay JP, Hester A, Mcleod J, Huot J (2004) Choice and development of decision support tools for the sustainable management of deer-forest systems. For Ecol Manag 191:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Trivedi MR, Berry PM, Morecroft MD, Dawson TP (2008) Spatial scale affects bioclimate model projections of climate change impacts on mountain plants. Glob Change Biol 14:1089–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Usher MB, Thompson DBA (1993) Variation in the upland Heathlands of Great-Britain—conservation importance. Biol Conserv 66:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Welch D, Scott D, Mitchell R, Elston DA (2006) Slow recovery of heather [Calluna vulgaris L. (Hull)] in Scottish moorland after easing of heavy grazing pressure from red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Bot J Scotl 58:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wieren SE, Bakker JP (2008) The impact of browsing and grazing herbivores on biodiversity. In: Gordon IJ, Prins HHT (eds) The ecology of browsing and grazing. Springer, Berlin, pp 263–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. J. Pérez-Barbería
    • 1
  • R. J. Hooper
    • 1
  • I. J. Gordon
    • 1
  1. 1.The James Hutton InstituteAberdeenScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations