, Volume 173, Issue 2, pp 375–385 | Cite as

Photosynthetic benefits of ultraviolet-A to Pimelea ligustrina, a woody shrub of sub-alpine Australia

  • Tarryn L. Turnbull
  • Alexandra M. Barlow
  • Mark A. Adams
Physiological ecology - Original research


The definition of photosynthetically active radiation (Q) as the visible waveband (λ 400–700 nm) is a core assumption of much of modern plant biology and global models of carbon and water fluxes. On the other hand, much research has focused on potential mutation and damage to leaves caused by ultraviolet (UV) radiation (280–400 nm), and anatomical and physiological adaptations that help avoid such damage. Even so, plant responses to UV-A are poorly described and, until now, photosynthetic utilization of UV-A has not been elucidated under full light conditions in the field. We found that the UV-A content of sunlight increased photosynthetic rates in situ by 12 % in Pimelea ligustrina Labill., a common and indigenous woody shrub of alpine ecosystems of the Southern Hemisphere. Compared to companion shrubs, UV-A-induced photosynthesis in P. ligustrina resulted from reduced physical and chemical capacities to screen UV-A at the leaf surface (illustrated by a lack of cuticle and reduced phenol index) and the resulting ability of UV-A to excite chlorophyll (Chl) a directly, and via energy provided by the carotenoid lutein. A screening of 55 additional sub-alpine species showed that 47 % of the plant taxa also display Chl a fluorescence under UV-A. If Chl a fluorescence indicates potential for photosynthetic gain, continued exclusion of UV-A from definitions of Q in this ecosystem could result in underestimates of measured and modeled rates of photosynthesis and miscalculation of potential for carbon sequestration. We suggest that carbon gain for alpine environs across the globe could be similarly underestimated given that UV-A radiation increases with altitude and that the frequently dominant herb and grass life-forms often transmit UV-A through the epidermis.


Photosynthetically active radiation spectrum Ultraviolet radiation Chlorophyll a fluorescence Ultraviolet-A-induced photosynthesis 

Supplementary material

442_2013_2640_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (40 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 40 kb)


  1. Ålenius CM, Vogelmann TC, Bornman JF (1995) A three-dimensional representation of the relationship between penetration of UV-B radiation and UV-screening pigments in leaves of Brassica napus. New Phytol 131:297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amthor JS (2010) Tansley review: from sunlight to phytomass: on the potential efficiency of converting solar radiation to phyto-energy. New Phytol 188:939–995. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03505.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2003) Standard tables for reference solar spectral irradiances: direct normal and hemispherical on 37 tilted surface. Standard G173-03. American Society for Testing and Materials, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes PW et al (2000) Non-invasive measurements of leaf epidermal transmittance of UV radiation using chlorophyll fluorescence: field and laboratory studies. Physiol Plant 109:274–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes PW et al (2008) Diurnal changes in epidermal UV transmittance of plants in naturally high UV environments. Physiol Plant 133:363–372. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01084.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bidel LPR et al (2007) Responses of epidermal phenolic compounds to light acclimation: in vivo qualitative and quantitative assessment using chlorophyll fluorescence excitation spectra in leaves of three woody species. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 88:163–179. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2007.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bilger W, Veit M, Schreiber L, Schreiber U (1997) Measurement of leaf epidermal transmittance of UV radiation by chlorophyll fluorescence. Physiol Plant 101:754–763. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.1997.1010411.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bilger W, Rolland M, Nybakken L (2006) UV screening in higher plants induced by low temperature in the absence of UV-B radiation. Photochem Photobiol Sci 6:190–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blumthaler M, Ambach W, Ellinger R (1997) Increase in solar UV radiation with altitude. J Photochem Photobiol B 39:130–134. doi:10.1016/S1011-1344(96)00018-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bornman JF, Vogelmann TC (1988) Leaf adaptation and penetration of blue and UV radiation measured by fiber optics in spruce and fir needles. Physiol Plant 72:699–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cadet E, Samson G (2011) Detection and discrimination of nutrient deficiencies in sunflower by blue-green and chlorophyll-a fluorescence imaging. J Plant Nutr 34:2114–2126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caffarri S, Croce R, Breton J, Bassi R (2001) The major antenna complex of photosystem II as a xanthophyll binding site not involved in light harvesting. J Biol Chem 267:35924–35933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caldwell MM (1968) Ultraviolet radiation as an ecological factor for alpine plants. Ecol Monogr 38:243–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caldwell MM, Robberecht R, Flint SD (1983) Internal filters: prospects for UV-acclimation in higher plants. Physiol Plant 58:445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cerovic ZG, Ounis A, Cartelat A, Latouche G, Goulas Y, Meyer S, Moya I (2002) The use of chlorophyll fluorescence excitation spectra for the non-destructive in situ assessment of UV-absorbing compounds in leaves. Plant Cell Environ 25:1663–1676. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00942.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen M et al (2010) A red-shifted chlorophyll. Science 329:1318–1319. doi:10.1126/science.1191127 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Connelly JP, Muller MG, Bassi R, Croce R, Holzwarth AR (1997) Femtosecond transient absorption study of carotenoid to chlorophyll energy transfer in the light-harvesting complex II of photosystem II. Biochemistry 36:281–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cork SJ, Krockenberger AK (1991) Methods and pitfalls of extracting condensed tannins and other phenolics from plants: insights from investigations on Eucalyptus leaves. J Chem Ecol 17:123–134. doi:10.1007/BF00994426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Croce R, Muller MG, Bassi R, Holzwarth AR (2001) Carotenoid-to-chlorophyll energy transfer in recombinant major light-harvesting complex (LHCII) of higher plants. I. Femtosecond transient absorption measurements. Biophys J 80:901–915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Day TA, Vogelmann TC, DeLucia EH (1992) Are some plant life forms more effective than others in screening out ultraviolet-B radiation? Oecologia 92:513–519. doi:10.1007/BF00317843 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Day TA, Howells BW, Ruhland CT (1996) Changes in growth and pigment concentrations with leaf age in pea under modulated UV-B radiation field treatments. Plant Cell Environ 19:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Demotes-Mainard S et al (2008) Indicators of nitrogen status for ornamental woody plants based on optical measurements of leaf epidermal polyphenol and chlorophyll contents. Sci Hortic 115:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flint SD, Caldwell MM (2003a) A biological spectral weighting function for ozone depletion research with higher plants. Physiol Plant 117:137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flint SD, Caldwell MM (2003b) Field testing of UV biological spectral weighting functions for higher plants. Physiol Plant 117:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flint SD, Jordan PW, Caldwell MM (1985) Plant protective response to enhanced UV-B radiation under field conditions: leaf optical properties and photosynthesis. Photochem Photobiol 41:95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Furuya M, Galston AW (1965) Flavonoid complexes in Pisum sativum L. I. Nature and distribution of the major components. Phytochemistry 4:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grammatikopoulos G, Petropoulou Y, Manetas Y (1999) Site-dependent differences in transmittance and UV-B-absorbing capacity of isolated leaf epidermis and mesophyll in Urginea maritime LL. Baker. J Exp Bot 50:517–521Google Scholar
  28. Halldal P (1964) Ultraviolet action spectra of photosynthesis and photosynthetic inhibition in a green and a red alga. Physiol Plant 17:414–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Inada K (1976) Action spectra for photosynthesis in higher plants. Plant Cell Physiol 17:355–365Google Scholar
  30. Johnson GA, Day TA (2002) Enhancement of photosynthesis in Sorghum bicolor by ultraviolet radiation. Physiol Plant 116:554–562. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1160415.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Karabourniotis G et al (1992) Ultraviolet-B radiation absorbing capacity of leaf hairs. Physiol Plant 86:414–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kolb C et al (2001) Effects of natural intensities of visible and ultraviolet radiation on epidermal ultraviolet screening and photosynthesis in grape leaves. Plant Physiol 127:863–875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krause GH, Weis E (1991) Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 42:313–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krause GH et al (2003) Capacity of protection against ultraviolet radiation in sun and shade leaves of tropical forest plants. Funct Plant Biol 30:533–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lang M, Lichtenthaler HK (1991) Changes in the blue-green and red fluorescence-emission spectra of beech leaves during the autumnal chlorophyll breakdown. J Plant Physiol 138:550–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lenk S, Buschmann C (2005) Distribution of UV-shielding of the epidermis of sun and shade leaves of the beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) as monitored by multi-colour fluorescence imaging. J Plant Physiol 163:1273–1283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liakoura V, Bornman JF, Karabourniotis G (2003) The ability of abaxial and adaxial epidermis of sun and shade leaves to attenuate UV-A and UV-B radiation in relation to the UV absorbing capacity of the whole leaf methanolic extracts. Physiol Plant 117:33–43. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.1170104.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lichtenthaler HK, Barschmann C (2001) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV–VIS spectroscopy. Curr Protoc Food Analyt Chem, F4.3.1–F4.3.8Google Scholar
  39. Lichtenthaler HK, Miehé JA (1997) Fluorescence imaging as a diagnostic tool for plant stress. Trends Plant Sci 2:316–320. doi:10.1016/S1360-1385(97)89954-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Louis J et al (2009) Seasonal changes in optically assessed epidermal phenolic compounds and chlorophyll contents in leaves of sessile oak (Quercus petraea): towards signatures of phonological stage. Funct Plant Biol 36:732–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lubin D, Jensen EH, Gies HP (1998) Global surface ultraviolet radiation climatology from TOMS and ERBE data. J Geophys Res 103:26061–26091. doi:10.1029/98JD02308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mantha SV, Johnson GA, Day TA (2001) Evidence from action and fluorescence spectra that UV-induced violet–blue–green fluorescence enhances leaf photosynthesis. Photochem Photobiol 73:249–256. doi:10.1562/0031-8655(2001)073<0249:EFAAFS>2.0.CO;2 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Markstädter C et al (2001) Epidermal transmission of leaves of Vicia faba for UV radiation as determined by two different methods. Photosynth Res 67:17–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McCree KJ (1972a) The action spectrum, absorptance and quantum yield of photosynthesis in crop plants. Agric Meteorol 9:191–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCree KJ (1972b) Test of current definitions of photosynthetically active radiation against leaf photosynthesis data. Agric Meteorol 10:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCree KJ (1981) Photosynthetically active radiation. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Physiological plant ecology I. Springer, Berlin, pp 41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McCree KJ, Keener ME (1974) Effect of atmospheric turbidity on the photosynthetic rates of leaves. Agric Meteorol 13:349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McKenzie RL et al (1993) First Southern Hemisphere intercomparison of measured solar UV spectra. Geophys Res Lett 20:2223–2226. doi:10.1029/93GL02359 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McLeod GC, Kanwisher J (1962) The quantum efficiency of photosynthesis in ultraviolet light. Physiol Plant 15:581–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miyashita H et al (1996) Chlorophyll d as a major pigment. Nature 383:402. doi:10.1038/383402a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Morales LO et al (2011) Temporal variation in epidermal flavonoids due to altered solar UV radiation is moderated by the leaf position in Betula pendula. Physiol Plant 143:261–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Niinemets Ü, Tenhunen JD (1997) Carbon gain along light gradients for the shade-tolerant species Acer saccharum. Plant Cell Environ 20:845–866. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-133.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nybakken L, Aubert S, Bilger W (2004) Epidermal UV-screening of arctic and alpine plants along a latitudinal gradient in Europe. Polar Biol 27:391–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ounis A et al (2001) Dual-excitation FLIDAR for the estimation of epidermal UV absorption in leaves and canopies. Remote Sens Environ 76:33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pettai H, Oja V, Freiberg A, Laisk A (2005) The long-wavelength limit of plant photosynthesis. FEBS Lett 579:4017–4019. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2005.04.088 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pfündel EE et al (2007) Investigating UV screening in leaves by two different types of portable UV fluorimeters reveals in vivo screening by anthocyanins and carotenoids. Photosynth Res 93:205–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ren W et al (2010) UV light spectral response of photosynthetic photochemical efficiency in alpine mosses. J Plant Ecol 3:17–24. doi:10.1093/jpe/rtp029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Robberecht R, Caldwell MM (1978) Leaf epidermal transmittance of ultraviolet radiation and its implications for plant sensitivity to ultraviolet-radiation induced injury. Oecologia 32:277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Robberecht R, Caldwell MM, Billings WD (1980) Leaf ultraviolet optical properties along a latitudinal gradient in the arctic-alpine life zone. Ecology 61:612–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Robinson N (1966) Solar radiation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 171, 177Google Scholar
  61. Takahashi S et al (2010) The solar action spectrum of photosystem II damage. Plant Physiol 153:988–993. doi:10.1104/pp.110.155747 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Turcsányi E, Vass I (2000) Inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport by UV-A radiation targets the photosystem II complex. Photochem Photobiol 72:513–520. doi:10.1562/0031-8655(2000)072<0513:IOPETB>2.0.CO;2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vass I, Turcsányi E, Touloupakis E, Ghanotakis D, Petrouleas V (2002) The mechanism of UV-A radiation-induced inhibition of photosystem II electron transport studied by EPR and chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochemistry 41:10200–10208. doi:10.1021/bi020272 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vogelmann TC, Björn LO (1984) Measurement of light gradients and spectral regime in plant tissue with a fiber optic probe. Physiol Plant 60:361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wagner H, Gilbert M, Wilhelm C (2003) Longitudinal leaf gradients of UV-absorbing screening pigments in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Physiol Plant 117:383–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wargent JJ, Elfadly EM, Moore JP, Paul ND (2011) Increased exposure to UV-B radiation during early development leads to enhanced photoprotection and improved long-term performance in Lactuca sativa. Plant Cell Environ 34:1401–1412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wollenweber E, Dietz VH (1981) Occurrence and distribution of free flavonoid aglycones in plants. Phytochemistry 20:869–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tarryn L. Turnbull
    • 1
  • Alexandra M. Barlow
    • 1
  • Mark A. Adams
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Agriculture and EnvironmentThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations