Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 173, Issue 1, pp 203–212 | Cite as

A faecal index of diet quality that predicts reproductive success in a marsupial folivore

  • Hannah R. WindleyEmail author
  • Ian R. Wallis
  • Jane L. DeGabriel
  • Ben D. Moore
  • Christopher N. Johnson
  • William J. Foley
Plant-animal interactions - Original research

Abstract

Estimating the nutritional value of a herbivore’s diet is difficult because it requires knowing what the animal eats, the relative quality of each component and how these components interact in relation to animal physiology. Current methods are cumbersome and rely on many assumptions that are hard to evaluate. We describe a new method for estimating relative diet quality directly from faeces that avoids the problems inherent in other methods. We combine this method with near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to analyse many samples and thus provide a technique with immense value in ecological studies. The method stems from the correlation between the concentrations of dietary and faecal nitrogen in herbivores eating a tannin-free diet, but a weaker relationship in browsers that ingest substantial amounts of tannins, which form complexes with proteins. These complexes reduce the availability of nitrogen and may increase faecal nitrogen concentrations. Using the tannin-binding compound, polyethylene glycol, we showed that tannin-bound nitrogen is a significant and variable part of faecal nitrogen in wild common brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). We developed a technique to measure faecal available nitrogen and found that it predicted the reproductive success of female brushtail possums in northern Australia. Faecal available nitrogen combined with NIRS provides a powerful tool for estimating the relative nutritional value of the diets of browsing herbivores in many ecological systems. It is a better indicator of diet quality than other commonly used single-nutrient measures such as faecal nitrogen and foliage analysis paired with observed feeding behaviour.

Keywords

Nutrition Tannins Available nitrogen PEG Browser 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank R. and E. Fryer, Australian Wildlife Conservancy, and other land owners for permission to use their land. We thank Elesha Curran for assistance with field and laboratory work. Funding was provided by grants from the Australian Research Council to C.N. Johnson and W.J. Foley and the Ecological Society of Australia and Royal Zoological Society of N.S.W. to J.L. DeGabriel.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

The procedures were approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee of the Australian National University and conform to the Guiding Principles in the Care and Use of Animals. Experiments comply with the current laws of Australia.

References

  1. American Society for Testing and Materials (1995) Standard practices for infrared, multivariate, quantitative analysis (Designation: E1655-94). American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayres MP, Clausen TP, McLean SFJ, Redman AM, Reichard PB (1997) Diversity of structure and antiherbivore activity in condensed tannins. Ecology 78:1696–1712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bilgener M (1988) Chemical components of howler monkey (Alouatta palliata) food choice and kinetics of tannin binding with natural polymers. PhD dissertation, Boston University, BostonGoogle Scholar
  4. Braithwaite LW, Turner J, Kelly J (1984) Studies on the arboreal marsupial fauna of eucalypt forests being harvested for pulpwood at Eden, N.S.W. III. Relationships between faunal densities, eucalypt occurrence and foliage nutrients, and soil parent materials. Aust Wildl Res 11:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braithwaite LW, Binns DL, Nowlan RD (1988) The distribution of arboreal marsupials in relation to eucalypt forest types in the Eden (N.S.W.) woodchip concession area. Aust Wildl Res 15:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Bjorndal KA, Onderdonk DA (2002) Application of protein-to-fiber ratios to predict colobine abundance on different spatial scales. Int J Primatol 23:283–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Naughton-Treves L, Lawes MJ, McDowell LR (2004) Predicting folivorous primate abundance: validation of a nutritional model. Am J Primatol 62:55–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cork SJ, Catling PC (1996) Modelling distributions of arboreal and ground-dwelling mammals in relation to climate, nutrients, plant chemical defences and vegetation structure in the eucalypt forests of southeastern Australia. For Ecol Manag 85:163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeGabriel JL, Wallis IR, Moore BD, Foley WJ (2008) A simple, integrative assay to quantify nutritional quality of browses for herbivores. Oecologia 156:107–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeGabriel JL, Moore BD, Foley WJ, Johnson CN (2009) The effects of plant defensive chemistry on nutrient availability predict reproductive success in a mammal. Ecology 90:711–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fashing PJ, Dierenfeld ES, Mowry CB (2007) Influence of plant and soil chemistry on food selection, ranging patterns, and biomass of Colobus guereza in Kakamega Forest, Kenya. Int J Primatol 28:673–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foley WJ, McIlwee A, Lawler I, Aragones L, Woolnough AP, Berding N (1998) Ecological applications of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy a tool for rapid, cost-effective prediction of the composition of plant and animal tissues and aspects of animal performance. Oecologia 116:293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hagerman AE, Robbins CT, Weerasuriya Y, Wilson TC, McArthur C (1992) Tannin chemistry in relation to digestion. J Range Manag 45:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hobbs NT (1987) Fecal indices to dietary quality—a critique. J Wildl Manag 51:317–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hodgeman TP, Davitt BB, Nelson JR (1996) Monitoring mule deer diet quality and intake with fecal indices. J Range Manag 49:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. How RA, Hillcox SJ (2000) Brushtail possum, Trichosurus vulpecula, populations in south-western Australia: demography, diet and conservation status. Wildl Res 27:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson CN, Clinchy M, Taylor AC, Krebs CJ, Jarman PJ, Payne A, Ritchie EG (2001) Adjustment of offspring sex ratios in relation to the availability of resources for philopatric offspring in the common brushtail possum. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2001–2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kamler J, Homolka M (2005) Faecal nitrogen: a potential indicator of red and roe deer diet quality in forest habitats. Folia Zool 54:89–98Google Scholar
  19. Kohn MH, Wayne RK (1997) Facts from faeces revisited. Tr Ecol Evol 12:223–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krockenberger A (2003) Meeting the energy demands of reproduction in female koalas, Phascolarctos cinereus: evidence for energetic compensation. J Comp Physiol B 173:531–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kucera TE (1997) Fecal indicators, diet and population parameters in mule deer. J Wildl Manag 61:550–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leslie DM, Starkey EE (1987) Fecal indices to dietary quality: a reply. J Wildl Manag 51:321–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leslie DM, Bowyer RT, Jenks JA (2008) Facts from faeces: nitrogen still measures up as a nutritional index for mammalian herbivores. J Wildl Manag 72:1420–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Makkar HPS (2003) Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effects of feeding tannin-rich feeds. Small Ruminant Res 49:241–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marsh KJ, Wallis IR, Foley WJ (2003) The effect of inactivating tannins on the intake of Eucalyptus foliage by a specialist Eucalyptus folivore (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) and a generalist herbivore (Trichosurus vulpecula). Aust J Zool 51:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mason VC (1969) Some observations on the distribution and origin of nitrogen in sheep faeces. J Agric Sci 73:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McArt SH, Spalinger DE, Collins WB, Schoen ER, Stevenson T, Bucho M (2009) Summer dietary nitrogen availability as a potential bottom-up constraint on moose in south-central Alaska. Ecology 90:1400–1411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Milton K, Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB (1980) Digestive efficiencies of wild howler monkeys. Physiol Zool 53:402–409Google Scholar
  29. Moore BD, Wallis IR, Wood JT, Foley WJ (2004) Foliar nutrition, site quality, and temperature influence foliar chemistry of tallowwood (Eucalyptus microcorys). Ecol Monogr 74:553–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oates JF, Whitesides GH, Davies AG, Waterman PG, Green SM, Dasilva GL, Mole S (1990) Determinants of variation in tropical forest primate biomass—new evidence from West-Africa. Ecology 71:328–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Provenza FD, Pfister JA, Cheny CD (1992) Mechanisms of learning in diet selection with reference to phytotoxicosis in herbivores. J Range Manag 45:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Provenza FD, Villalba JJ, Cheney CD, Werner SJ (1998) Self-organization of foraging behaviour: from simplicity to complexity without goals. Nutr Res Rev 11:199–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Provenza FD, Kimball BA, Villalba JJ (2000) Roles of odor, taste, and toxicity in the food preferences of lambs: implications for mimicry in plants. Oikos 88:424–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Putman RJ (1984) Facts from faeces. Mammal Rev 14:79–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robbins CT, Hanley TA, Hagerman AE, Hjeljord O, Baker DL, Schwartz CC, Mautz WW (1987) Role of tannins in defending plants against ruminants: reduction in protein availability. Ecology 68:1606–1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwarm A, Schweigert M, Ortmann S, Hummel J, Janssens G, Streich W, Clauss M (2008) No easy solution for the fractionation of faecal nitrogen in captive wild herbivores: results of a pilot study. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 93:596–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shrestha R, Wegge P (2006) Determining the composition of herbivore diets in the trans-Himalayan rangelands: a comparison of field methods. Rangel Ecol Manag 59:512–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Verheyden H, Aubry L, Merlet J, Petibon P, Chauveau-Duriot B, Guillon N, Duncan P (2011) Faecal nitrogen, an index of diet quality in roe deer Capreolus capreolus? Wildl Biol 17:166–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wallis IR, Watson ML, Foley WJ (2002) Secondary metabolites in Eucalyptus melliodora: field distribution and laboratory feeding choices by a generalist herbivore, the common brushtail possum. Aust J Zool 50:507–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wasserman MD, Chapman CA (2003) Determinants of colobine monkey abundance: the importance of food energy, protein and fibre content. J Anim Ecol 72:650–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. White TCR (1993) The inadequate environment: nitrogen and the abundance of animals. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zera AJ, Harshman LG (2001) The physiology of life history trade-offs in animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:95–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hannah R. Windley
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ian R. Wallis
    • 1
  • Jane L. DeGabriel
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ben D. Moore
    • 2
    • 4
  • Christopher N. Johnson
    • 2
    • 5
  • William J. Foley
    • 1
  1. 1.Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of BiologyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.School of Marine and Tropical BiologyJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  3. 3.Landscapes and Ecosystems Conservation BranchOffice of Environment and HeritageSydney SouthAustralia
  4. 4.Hawkesbury Institute for the EnvironmentUniversity of Western SydneyPenrithAustralia
  5. 5.School of ZoologyUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations