Parental resource and offspring liability: the influence of extrafloral nectar on oviposition by a leaf-mining moth
- 348 Downloads
For many insect herbivores, maternal host selection is a critical determinant of offspring survival; however, maternal fitness is also affected by adult resources such as food availability. Consequently, adult resources may promote oviposition in sub-optimal locations when measured in terms of offspring performance. We tested whether oviposition site preference is primarily shaped by proximity to adult food resources or offspring performance in the aspen leaf miner (Phyllocnistis populiella). Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) produce extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) on a subset of their leaves. EFN expression on leaves is associated with decreased P. populiella damage and larval performance; however, P. populiella adults feed from EFNs. We reduced extrafloral nectar availability on entire aspen ramets and excluded crawling predators in a full factorial experiment at two sites in interior Alaska, USA. Patterns of egg deposition by P. populiella appeared to be primarily affected by offspring survival rather than adult resource availability. While oviposition was unaffected by nectar availability, adult moths laid fewer eggs on leaves with than without EFNs. By avoiding leaves with EFNs, moths increased offspring survival. Both moths and predators distinguished between leaves with and without EFNs even when nectar and visual cues were obscured, and therefore may respond to chemical cues associated with EFN expression.
KeywordsIndirect defense Tritrophic interactions Biotic defense Ant–plant protection Plant–animal interactions
We extend our gratitude to S. Wilbur for assistance in data collection, D. Sikes for assistance in arthropod identification, and the Life Sciences Informatics program at the Institute of Arctic Biology for computing services. This paper was improved thanks to comments by members of the Iowa State University Plant Group and B. Allman. Funding was provided by a National Science Foundation award (DEB 0543632) to D. Wagner and P. Doak.
- Atanassov A, Shearer PW (2005) Peach extrafloral nectar impacts life span and reproduction of adult Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J Agric Urban Entomol 22:41–47Google Scholar
- Beach RM, Todd JW, Baker SH (1985) Nectaried and nectariless cotton cultivars as nectar sources for the adult soybean looper. J Entomol Sci 20:233–236Google Scholar
- Hering M (1951) Biology of the leaf miners. Junk, The HagueGoogle Scholar
- Honda K (1995) Chemical basis of differential oviposition by lepidopterous insects. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 30:1–23Google Scholar
- Lukefahr MJ (1960) Effects of nectariless cottons on populations of three lepidopterous insects. J Econ Entomol 53:242–244Google Scholar
- Maafo IKA (1983) Factors affecting the relative abundance of arthropods on nectaried and nectariless cotton. Environ Entomol 12:349–352Google Scholar
- Mathews CR, Brown MW, Bottrell DG (2007) Leaf extrafloral nectaries enhance biological control of a key economic pest, Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in peach (Rosales: Rosaceae). Environ Entomol 36:383–389. doi:10.1603/0046-225x(2007)36[383:lenebc]2.0.co;2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Forest Service (2003) Forest health protection report: Forest insect and disease conditions in Alaska—2002. U.S. Forest Service, Alaska Region R10-TP-113Google Scholar
- U.S. Forest Service (2010) Forest health conditions in Alaska—2009: A forest health protection report. U.S. Forest Service, Alaska Region R10-PR-21Google Scholar
- Wäckers FL, van Rijn PCJ, Bruin J (2005) Plant-provided food for carnivorous insects: a protective mutualism and its applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Yukon Forest Management (2011) 2010 Forest health report. Government of Yukon, Whitehorse CanadaGoogle Scholar