Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 171, Issue 1, pp 93–104 | Cite as

Direct and trans-generational responses to food deprivation during development in the Glanville fritillary butterfly

  • M. SaastamoinenEmail author
  • N. Hirai
  • S. van Nouhuys
Physiological Ecology - Original Research

Abstract

Life history characteristics and resulting fitness consequences manifest not only in an individual experiencing environmental conditions but also in its offspring via trans-generational effects. We conducted a set of experiments to assess the direct and trans-generational effects of food deprivation in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Food availability was manipulated during the final stages of larval development and performance was assessed during two generations. Direct responses to food deprivation were relatively minor. Food-deprived individuals compensated, via increased development time, to reach a similar mass as adults from the control group. Delayed costs of compensatory growth were observed, as food-deprived individuals had either reduced fecundity or lifespan depending on the type of feeding treatment they had experienced (intermittent vs. continuous). Female food deprivation did not directly affect her offspring’s developmental trajectory, but the way the offspring coped with food deprivation. Offspring of mothers from control or intermittent starvation treatments reached the size of those in the control group via increased development time when being starved. In contrast, offspring of mothers that had experienced 2 days of continuous food deprivation grew even larger than control animals, when deprived of food themselves. Offspring of food-deprived Glanville fritillary initially showed poor immune response to parasitism, but not later on in development.

Keywords

Cotesia melitaearum Global change Immunity Life history Maternal effect Melitaea cinxia Resource availability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Lea Heikkinen, Terhi Lahtinen, Linda Peltola and Suvi Ikonen for their assistance in the experiments. We thank Ilkka Hanski, Klaus Fischer, and two anonymous referees for their useful comments on the manuscript. This research was funded by the Academic Academy of Finland Grants (Nos. 132697 to M.S., and 213547 and 130958 to S.v.N.) and by the European Research Council Advanced Grant (232826 to I. Hanski).

Supplementary material

442_2012_2412_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary Appendix A (DOCX 15 kb)
442_2012_2412_MOESM2_ESM.docx (21 kb)
Supplementary Appendix B (DOCX 21 kb)

References

  1. Agrawal AA (2002) Herbivory and maternal effects: mechanisms and consequences of transgenerational induced plant resistance. Ecology 83:3408–3415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal AA, Laforsch C, Tollrian R (1999) Transgenerational induction of defenses in animals and plants. Nature 401:60–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alleyne M, Wiedenmann RN (2001) Encapsulation and hemocyte numbers in three lepidopteran stemborers parasitized by Cotesia flavipes-complex endoparasitoids. Entomol Exp Appl 100:279–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldal EA, Brakefield PM, Zwaan BJ (2006) Multitrait evolution in lines of Drosophila melanogaster selected for increased starvation resistance: the role of metabolic rate and implications for the evolution of longevity. Evolution 60:1435–1444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett ELB, Hunt J, Moore AJ, Moore PJ (2009) Separate and combined effects of nutrition during juvenile and sexual development on female life-history trajectories: the thrifty phenotype in a cockroach. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:3257–3264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bashey F (2006) Cross-generational environmental effects and the evolution of offspring size in the Trinidadian guppy Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 60:348–361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauer E, Trenczek T, Dorn S (1998) Instar-dependent hemocyte changes in Pieris brassicae after parasitization by Cotesia glomerata. Entomol Exp Appl 88:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bauerfeind SS, Fischer K (2005a) Effects of adult-deprived carbohydrates, amino acids and micronutrients on female reproduction in a fruit-feeding butterfly. J Insect Physiol 51:545–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bauerfeind SS, Fischer K (2005b) Effects of food stress and density in different life stages on reproduction in a butterfly. Oikos 111:514–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beckage NE, Thompson SA, Federici BA (eds) (1993) Parasites and pathogens of insects. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Bishop NA, Guarente L (2007) Genetic links between diet and lifespan:shared mechanisms from yeast to humans. Nat Rev Genet 8:835–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boggs CL (2009) Understanding insect life histories and senescence through a resource allocation lens. Funct Ecol 23:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boggs CL, Freeman KD (2005) Larval food limitation in butterflies: effects of adult resource allocation and fitness. Oecologia 144:353–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boggs CL, Ross CL (1993) The effect of adult food limitation on the life-history traits in Speyeria mormonia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Ecology 74:433–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bradshaw AD (1965) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv Genet 13:115–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bukovinszky T et al (2009) Consequences of constitutive and induced variation in plant nutritional quality for immune defence of a herbivore against parasitism. Oecologia 160:299–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Criscuolo F, Monaghan P, Nasir L, Metcalfe NB (2008) Early nutrition and phenotypic development: “catch-up” growth leads to elevated metabolic rate in adulthood. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:1565–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dmitriew C, Rowe L (2007) Effects of early resource limitation and compensatory growth on lifetime fitness in the ladybird beetle (Harmonia axyridis). J Evol Biol 20:1298–1310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dmitriew C, Rowe L (2011) The effects of larval nutrition on reproductive performance in a food-limited adult environment. PLoS One 6:e17399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Esperk T, Tammaru T (2010) Size compensation in moth larvae: attention to larval instars. Physiol Entomol 35:222–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fox CW, Mousseau TA (1998) Maternal effects as adaptations for transgenerational phenotypic plasticity in insects. In: Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 159–177Google Scholar
  22. Fox CW, Czesak ME, Savalli UM (1999) Environmentally-based maternal effects on development time in the seed beetle, Stator pruininus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): consequences of larval density. Environ Entomol 28:217–223Google Scholar
  23. Garcia-Barros E (2000) Body size, egg size, and their interspecific relationships with ecological and life history traits in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea, Hesperioidea). Biol J Linn Soc 70:251–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghalambor CK, McKay JK, Carroll SP, Reznick DN (2007) Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct Ecol 21:394–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gillespie JP, Kanost MR, Trenczek T (1997) Biological mediators of insect immunity. Annu Rev Entomol 42:611–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hafer N, Ebil S, Uller T, Pike N (2011) Transgenerational effects of food availability on age at maturity and reproductive output in an asexual collembolan species. Biol Lett 7:755–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanski I, Meyke E (2005) Large-scale dynamics if the Glanville fritillary butterfly: landscape structure, population processes, and weather. Ann Zool Fenn 42:379–395Google Scholar
  28. Hanski I, Saastamoinen M, Ovaskainen O (2006) Dispersal-related life history trade-offs in a butterfly metapopulation. J Anim Ecol 75:91–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harbison ST, Chang S, Kamdar KP, Mackay TFC (2005) Quantitative genomics of starvation stress resistance in Drosophila. Genome Biol 6:R36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hector KL, Nakagawa S (2012) Quantitative analysis of compensatory and catch-up growth in diverse taxa. J Anim Ecol. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01942.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Helle H, Koskela E, Mappes T (2012) Life in varying environments: experimental evidence for delayed effects of juvenile environment on adult life history. J Anim Ecol. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01937.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hellmann J (2002) The effect of an environmental change on mobile butterfly larvae and the nutritional quality of their hosts. J Anim Ecol 71:925–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jimenez-Perez A, Wang Q (2004) Effect of body weight on reproductive performance in Cnephasia jactatana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J Insect Behav 17:511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kankare M, Stefanescu C, Van Nouhuys S, Shaw MR (2005) Host specialization by Cotesia wasps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) parasitizing species-rich Melitaeini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) communities in north-eastern Spain. Biol J Linn Soc 86:45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krug P, Zimmer R (2000) Developmental dimorphism: consequences for larval behavior and dispersal potential in a marine gastropod. J Exp Biol 203:1741–1754PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kuussaari M, Singer M, Hanski I (2000) Local specialization and landscape-level influence on host use in a herbivorous insect. Ecology 81:2177–2187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuussaari M, van Nouhuys S, Hellmann J, Singer M (2004) Larval biology. In: Ehrlich PR, Hanski I (eds) On the wings of checkerspots: a model system for population biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 138–160Google Scholar
  38. Lackie AM (1988) Haemocyte behavior. Adv Insect Physiol 21:85–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Laurentz M, Reudler JH, Mappes J, Friman V, Ikonen S, Lindstedt C (2012) Diet quality can play a critical role in defence efficacy against parasitoids and pathogens in the Glanville fritillary (Melitaea cinxia). J Chem Ecol 38(1):116–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lavine MD, Strand MR (2002) Insect hemocytes and their role in immunity. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 32:1295–1309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lei GC, Vikberg V, Nieminen M, Kuussaari M (1997) The parasitoid complex attacking the Finnish populations of Glanville fritillary Melitaea cinxia (Lep: Nymphalidae), an endangered butterfly. J Nat Hist 31:635–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liefting M, Hoffmann AA, Ellers J (2009) Plasticity versus environmental canalization: population differences in thermal responses along a latitudinal gradient in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 63:1954–1963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lopez-Maury L, Marguerat S, Bähler J (2008) Tuning gene expression to changing environments: from rapid responses to evolutionary adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 9:583–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marshall DJ (2008) Transgenerational plasticity in the sea: context-dependent maternal effects across the life history. Ecology 89:418–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marshall DJ, Uller T (2007) When is a maternal effect adaptive? Oikos 116:1957–1963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McNamara JM, Houston AI (1996) State-dependent life histories. Nature 380:215–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P (2001) Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends Ecol Evol 16:254–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Meyers LA, Bull JJ (2002) Fighting change with change: adaptive variation in an uncertain world. Trends Ecol Evol 17:551–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Monaghan P (2008) Early growth conditions, phenotypic development and environmental change. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 363:1635–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Monaghan P, Heidinger BJ, D’Alba L, Evans NP, Spencer KA (2011) For better or worse: reduced adult lifespan following early-life stress is transmitted to breeding partners. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:709–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moret Y, Schmid-Hempel P (2000) Survival for immunity: the price of immune system activation for bumblebee workers. Science 290:1166–1168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mousseau TA, Dingle H (1991) Maternal effects in insect life histories. Annu Rev Entomol 36:511–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mousseau TA, Fox CW (1998) The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol Evol 13:403–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Brien DM, Boggs CL, Fogel ML (2004) Making eggs from nectar: the role of life history and dietary carbon turnover in butterfly reproductive resource allocation. Oikos 105:279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Okech SHO, Overholt WA (1996) Comparative biology of Cotesia chilonis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on selected African gramineous stemborers. Biocontrol Sci Technol 6:595–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds) (2007) IPCC, Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  57. Pakarinen S (2011) Host-parasitoid relationship in different Cotesia melitaearum and Melitaea cinxia populations around the Baltic Sea. MSc thesis, University of Helsinki, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  58. Parsons PA (1993) Evolutionary adaptations and stress: energy budgets and habitats preferred. Behav Genet 23:231–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic plasticity: beyond nature and nurture. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  60. Rantala MJ, Roff DA (2005) An analysis of trade-offs in immune function, body size and development time in the Mediterranean Field Cricket, Grylluis bimaculatus. Funct Ecol 19:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Räsänen K, Kruuk LEB (2007) Maternal effects and evolution at ecological time-scales. Funct Ecol 21:408–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Saastamoinen M (2007) Life-history, genotypic, and environmental correlates of clutch size in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Ecol Entomol 32:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Saastamoinen M, van Nouhuys S, Nieminen M, O’Hara B, Suomi J (2007) Development and survival of a specialist herbivore, Melitaea cinxia, on host plants producing high and low concentrations of iridoid glycosides. Ann Zool Fenn 44:70–80Google Scholar
  64. Saastamoinen M, Ikonen S, Hanski I (2009) Significant effects of Pgi genotype and body reserves on lifespan in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:1313–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Saastamoinen M, van der Sterren D, Vastenhout N, Zwaan BJ, Brakefield PM (2010) Predictive adaptive responses: condition-dependent impact of adult nutrition and flight in the tropical butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Am Nat 176:686–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Salinas S, Munch SB (2011) Thermal legacies: transgenerational effects of temperature on growth in a vertebrate. Ecol Lett 15:159–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schmid-Hempel P (2003) Variation in immune defence as a question of evolutionary ecology. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:357–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schmidt O, Theopold U, Strand M (2001) Innate immunity and its evasion and suppression by hymenopteran endoparasitoids. Bioessays 23:344–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Strand MR (2008) The insect cellular immune response. Insect Sci 15:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. van Nouhuys S, Hanski I (2005) Metacommunities of butterflies, their host plants and their parasitoids. In: Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (eds) Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 99–121Google Scholar
  71. van Nouhuys S, Laine A-L (2008) Population dynamics and sex ratio of a parasitoid altered by fungal-infected diet of host butterfly. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:787–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. van Nouhuys S, Lei GC (2004) Parasitoid-host metapopulation dynamics: the causes and consequences of phenological asynchrony. J Anim Ecol 73:526–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. van Nouhuys S, Punju E (2010) Coexistence of competing parasitoids: which is the fugitive and where does it hide? Oikos 119:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. van Nouhuys S, Singer M, Nieminen M (2003) Spatial and temporal patterns of caterpillar performance and the suitability of two host plant species. Ecol Entomol 28:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vet LEM, Lewis WJ, Papaj DR, van Lenteren JC (1990) A variable response model for parasitoid foraging behavior. J Insect Behav 31:471–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vinson SB (1976) Host selection by insect parasitoids. Annu Rev Entomol 21:109–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yoder JA, Tank JL, Rellinger EJ (2006) Evidence of a maternal effect that protects against water stress in larvae of the American dog tick, Dermacentor variabilis (Acari: Ixodidae). J Insect Physiol 52:1034–1042PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiosciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.Division of Environmental Sciences and TechnologyOsaka Prefecture UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations