Oecologia

, Volume 170, Issue 2, pp 517–528

Direct versus indirect effects of habitat fragmentation on community patterns in experimental landscapes

Community ecology - Original research

Abstract

Habitat area and fragmentation are confounded in many ecological studies investigating fragmentation effects. We thus devised an innovative experiment founded on fractal neutral landscape models to disentangle the relative effects of habitat area and fragmentation on arthropod community patterns in red clover (Trifolium pratense). The conventional approach in experimental fragmentation studies is to adjust patch size and isolation to create different landscape patterns. We instead use fractal distributions to adjust the overall amount and fragmentation of habitat independently at the scale of the entire landscape, producing different patch properties. Although habitat area ultimately had a greater effect on arthropod abundance and diversity in this system, we found that fragmentation had a significant effect in clover landscapes with ≤40 % habitat. Landscapes at these lower habitat levels were dominated by edge cells, which had fewer arthropods and lower richness than interior cells. Fragmentation per se did not have a direct effect on local-scale diversity, however, as demonstrated by the lack of a broader landscape effect (in terms of total habitat area and fragmentation) on arthropods within habitat cells. Fragmentation—through the creation of edge habitat—thus had a strong indirect effect on morphospecies richness and abundance at the local scale. Although it has been suggested that fragmentation should be important at low habitat levels (≤20–30 %), we show that fragmentation per se is significant only at intermediate (40 %) levels of habitat, where edge effects were neither too great (as at lower levels of habitat) nor too weak (as at higher levels of habitat).

Keywords

Arthropods Community similarity Diversity Edge effects Habitat loss Insects Species–area relationship 

Supplementary material

442_2012_2325_MOESM1_ESM.doc (38 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 38 kb)

References

  1. Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolger DT, Suarez AV, Crooks KR, Morrison SA, Case TJ (2000) Arthropods in urban habitat fragments in southern California: area, age and edge effects. Ecol Appl 10:1230–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Debinski DM, Holt RD (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol 14:342–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ewers RM, Thorpe S, Didham RK (2007) Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape. Ecology 88:96–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fagan WF, Cantrell RS, Cosner C (1999) How habitat edges change species interactions. Am Nat 153:165–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fahrig L (1997) Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J Wildl Manag 61:603–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:487–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fletcher RJ Jr, Ries L, Battin J, Chalfoun AD (2007) The role of habitat area and edge in fragmented landscapes: definitively distinct or inevitably intertwined? Can J Zool 85:1017–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gardner RH, Milne BT, Turner MG, O’Neill RV (1987) Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landsc Ecol 1:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Henderson PA, Seaby RMH (2007) Community Analysis Package 4.0. Pisces Conservation, LymingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Laurance WF (2002) Hyperdynamism in fragmented habitats. J Veg Sci 13:595–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lawton JH (1999) Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  15. McGarigal K, Cushman SA (2002) Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecol Appl 12:335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Öckinger E, Schweiger O, Crist TO, Debinski DM, Krauss J, Kuussaari M, Petersen JD, Pöyry J, Settele J, Summerville KS, Bommarco R (2010) Life-history traits predict species responses to habitat area and isolation: a cross-continental synthesis. Ecol Lett 13:969–979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Olson D, Andow D (2008) Patch edges and insect populations. Oecologia 155:549–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Prugh LR, Hodges KE, Sinclair ARE, Breshares JS (2008) Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:20770–20775PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Seaby RM, Henderson PA (2006) Species diversity and richness, Version 4. Pisces Conservation, LymingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. Thies C, Tscharntke T (1999) Landscape structure and biological control in agroecosystems. Science 285:893–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Thies C (2002a) Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: a mini-review. Ecol Res 17:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Thies C (2002b) Contribution of small habitat fragments to conservation of insect communities of grassland-cropland landscapes. Ecol Appl 12:354–363Google Scholar
  23. van Nouhuys S (2005) Effects of habitat fragmentation at different trophic levels in insect communities. Ann Zool Fenn 42:433–447Google Scholar
  24. With KA (1997) The application of neutral landscape models in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 11:1069–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. With KA, King AW (1997) The use and misuse of neutral landscape models in ecology. Oikos 79:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. With KA, King AW (1999a) Extinction thresholds for species in fractal landscapes. Conserv Biol 13:314–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. With KA, King AW (1999b) Dispersal success in fractal landscapes: a consequence of lacunarity thresholds. Landsc Ecol 14:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. With KA, Pavuk DM (2011) Habitat area trumps fragmentation effects on arthropods in an experimental landscape system. Landsc Ecol 26:1035–1048Google Scholar
  29. With KA, Pavuk DM, Worchuck JL, Oates RK, Fisher JL (2002) Threshold effects of landscape structure on biological control in agroecosystems. Ecol Appl 12:52–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations