Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 169, Issue 3, pp 845–852 | Cite as

Unexpected patterns of sensitivity to drought in three semi-arid grasslands

  • Karie CherwinEmail author
  • Alan Knapp
Global change ecology - Original research

Abstract

Global climate models forecast an increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, including severe droughts. Based on multi-year relationships between precipitation amount and aboveground annual net primary production (ANPP), semi-arid grasslands are projected to be among the most sensitive ecosystems to changes in precipitation. To assess sensitivity to drought, as well as variability within the shortgrass steppe biome, we imposed moderate and severe rainfall reductions for two growing seasons in three undisturbed grasslands that varied in soil type and climate. We predicted strong drought-induced reductions in ANPP at all sites and greater sensitivity to drought in sites with lower average precipitation, consistent with continental-scale patterns. Identical experimental infrastructure at each site reduced growing season rainfall events by 50 or 80%, and significantly reduced average soil moisture in both years (by 21 and 46% of control levels, respectively). Despite reductions in soil moisture, ANPP responses varied unexpectedly—from no reduction in ANPP to a 51% decrease. Although sensitivity to drought was highest in the semi-arid grassland with lowest mean annual precipitation, patterns in responses to drought across these grasslands were also strongly related to rainfall event size. When growing season rainfall patterns were dominated by many smaller events, ANPP was significantly reduced by drought but not when rainfall patterns were characterized by large rain events. This interaction between drought sensitivity and rainfall event size suggests that ANPP responses to future droughts may be reduced if growing season rainfall regimes also become more extreme.

Keywords

Climate change Rain event size Precipitation patterns Shortgrass steppe Aboveground annual net primary productivity (ANPP) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the numerous research assistants who spent countless hours in the field and laboratory. In addition, we thank Phillip Chapman and Timothy Seastedt for insightful advice on our experimental design. Funding for this research was provided by the Colorado Agricultural Experimental Station (AES) and the Southern Plains Inventory and Monitoring Network (SOPN) of the National Park Service. We are also grateful to Banner Rebar Inc. and James Barger from Pacific Custom Pools Inc. for generous material donations.

References

  1. Collins SL (1992) Fire frequency and community heterogeneity in tallgrass prairie vegetation. Ecology 73:2001–2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Daubenmire RF (1959) A canopy-coverage method of vegetational analysis. Northwest Sci 33:43–66Google Scholar
  3. Fay PA, Carlisle JD, Knapp AK, Blair JM, Collins SL (2000) Altering rainfall timing and quantity in a mesic grassland ecosystem: design and performance of rainfall manipulations shelters. Ecosystems 3:308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gilgen AK, Buchmann N (2009) Response of temperate grasslands at different altitudes to simulated summer drought differed but scaled with annual precipitation. Biogeosciences 6:2525–2539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gill R, Burke IC, Milchunas DG, Lauenroth WK (1999) Relationship between root biomass and soil organic matter pools in the shortgrass steppe of eastern Colorado. Ecosystems 2:226–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hanson PJ, Wullschleger SD (eds) (2003) North American temperate deciduous forest responses to changing precipitation regimes. Springer, New York, p 421Google Scholar
  7. Heisler JL, Knapp AK (2008) Coherence of aboveground net primary productivity in mesic grasslands. Ecography 31:408–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heisler-White JL, Knapp AK, Kelly EF (2008) Increasing precipitation event size increases aboveground net primary productivity in a semi-arid grassland. Oecologia 158:129–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heisler-White JL, Blair JM, Kelly EF, Harmoney K, Knapp AK (2009) Contingent productivity responses to more extreme rainfall regimes across a grassland biome. Glob Change Biol 15:2894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huxman TE, Smith MD, Fay PA, Knapp AK, Shaw MR, Loik ME, Smith SD, Tissue DT, Zak JC, Weltzin JF, Pockman WT, Sala OE, Haddad BM, Harte J, Koch GW, Schwinning S, Small EE, Williams DG (2004) Convergence across biomes to a common rain-use efficiency. Nature 429:651–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M and Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelly EF, Yonker CM, Blecker SW, Olson CG (2008) Soil development and distribution in the shortgrass steppe ecosystem. In: Lauenroth WK, Burke IC (eds) Ecology of the shortgrass steppe: a long-term perspective. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 30-54Google Scholar
  13. Knapp AK, Smith MD (2001) Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science 291:481–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Knapp AK, Beier C, Briske DD, Classen AT, Luo Y, Reichstein M, Smith MD, Smith SD, Bell JE, Fay PA, Heisler JL, Leavitt SW, Sherry R, Smith B, Weng E (2008) Consequences of more extreme precipitation regimes for terrestrial ecosystems. Bioscience 58:811–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lauenroth WK, Burke IC (eds) (2008) Ecology of the shortgrass steppe: A long-term perspective. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Lauenroth WK, Sala OE (1992) Long-term forage production of the North American shortgrass steppe. Ecol Appl 2:397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leuzinger S, Körner C (2010) Rainfall distribution is the main driver of runoff under future CO2-concentration in a temperate deciduous forest. Glob Change Biol 16:246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nippert JB, Knapp AK, Briggs JM (2006) Intra-annual rainfall variability and grassland productivity: can the past predict the future? Plant Ecol 184:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Noy-Meir I (1973) Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:25–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oesterheld M, Loreti J, Semmartin M, Sala OE (2001) Inter-annual variation in primary production of a semi-arid grassland related to previous-year production. J Veg Sci 12:137–142Google Scholar
  21. Ray AJ, Barsugli JJ, Averyt KB, Wolter K, Hoerling M, Doesken N, Udall B, and Webb RS (2008) Climate change in Colorado: A synthesis to support water resources management and adaptation. A report by the western water assessment for the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB). CU-NOAA Western Water AssessmentGoogle Scholar
  22. Sala OE, Lauenroth WK (1982) Small rainfall events: an ecological role in semiarid regions. Oecologia 53:301–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sala OE, Parton WJ, Joyce LA, Lauenroth WK (1988) Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology 69:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sala OE, Lauenroth WK, Parton WJ (1992) Long-term soil water dynamics in the shortgrass steppe. Ecology 73:1175–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stubbendieck J, Willson GD (1987) Prairie resources of national park units in the Great Plains. Nat Area J 7:100–106Google Scholar
  26. Webb WL, Szarek S, Lauenroth WK, Kinerson RB, Smith M (1978) Primary productivity and water use in native forest, grassland and desert ecosystems. Ecology 59:1230–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weltzin JF, Loik ME, Schwinning S, Williams DG, Fay PA, Haddad BM, Harte J, Huxman TE, Knapp AK, Lin G, Pockman WT, Shaw MR, Small EE, Smith MD, Smith SD, Tissue DT, Zak JC (2003) Assessing the response of terrestrial ecosystems to potential changes in precipitation. Bioscience 53:941–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wiegand T, Snyman HA, Kellner K, Paruelo JM (2004) Do grasslands have a memory: modeling phytomass production of a semi-arid South African grassland. Ecosystems 7:243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yahdjian L, Sala OE (2002) A rainout shelter design for intercepting different amounts of rainfall. Oecologia 133:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Graduate Degree Program in EcologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations