Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 169, Issue 2, pp 395–406 | Cite as

Stable isotope analyses reveal individual variability in the trophic ecology of a top marine predator, the southern elephant seal

  • L. A. HückstädtEmail author
  • P. L. Koch
  • B. I. McDonald
  • M. E. Goebel
  • D. E. Crocker
  • D. P. Costa
Behavioral ecology - Original research

Abstract

Identifying individuals’ foraging strategies is critical to understanding the ecology of a species, and can provide the means to predict possible ecological responses to environmental change. Our study combines stable isotope analysis and satellite telemetry to study the variability in individual foraging strategies of adult female southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina). Our hypothesis is that female elephant seals from the Western Antarctica Peninsula (WAP) display individual specialization in their diets. We captured adult female elephant seals (n = 56, 2005–2009) at Livingston Island (Antarctica), and instrumented them with SMRU-CTD satellite tags. We collected blood, fur, and vibrissae samples for δ13C and δ15N analyses. The mean values for all vibrissae were −21.0 ± 0.7‰ for δ13C, and 10.4 ± 0.8‰, for δ15N. The individual variability of δ13C (60%) was more important than the within-individual variability (40%) in explaining the total variance observed in our data. For δ15N, the results showed the opposite trend, with the within-individual variability (64%) contributing more to the total variance than the individual variability (36%), likely associated with the effect that the fasting periods have on δ15N values. Most individuals were specialists, as inferred from the low intra-individual variability of δ13C values with respect to the population variability, with half the individuals utilizing 31% or less of their available niche. We found eight different foraging strategies for these animals. Female elephant seals from the WAP are a diverse group of predators with individuals utilizing only a small portion of the total available niche, with the consequent potential to expand their foraging habits to exploit other resources or environments in the Southern Ocean.

Keywords

Mirounga leonina Foraging strategies δ13δ15Telemetry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank S. Simmons, K. Goetz, B. Nickel, B. Walker, J. Lehman, L. Roland, S. Kim, D. Andreasen, A-L. Harrison, N. Teutschel, S. Peterson and Cape Shirreff field crews (2005–2009) for assisting with collection and analysis of the data. US-AMLR program, NSF, USAP, and Raytheon Polar Services provided logistic support. Funding was provided by NSF (ANT-0840375, ANT-0440687, ANT-0523332 and ANT-0838937), NOPP (N00014-05-1-0645), Marine Mammal Commission, Friends of Long Marine Lab, and CDELSI-UCSC. L.A.H.’s doctoral studies were supported by Fulbright-CONICYT (Chile).

Supplementary material

442_2011_2202_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (3.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 3346 kb)

References

  1. Araujo MS, Bolnick DI, Machado G, Giaretta AA, dos Reis SF (2007) Using δ13C stable isotopes to quantify individual-level diet variation. Oecologia 152:643–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailleul F, Authier M, Ducatez S, Roquet F, Charrassin JB, Cherel Y, Guinet C (2010) Looking at the unseen: combining animal bio-logging and stable isotopes to reveal a shift in the ecological niche of a deep diving predator. Ecography 33:709–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bearhop S, Adams CE, Waldron S, Fuller RA, Macleod H (2004) Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis. J Anim Ecol 73:1007–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell CM, Burton HR, Lea M-A, Hindell MA (2005) Growth of female southern elephant seals Mirounga leonina at Macquarie Island. Polar Biol 28:395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Fordyce JA, Yang LH, Davis JM, Hulsey CD, Forister ML (2003) The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat 161:1–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolnick DI, Svanback R, Araujo MS, Persson L (2007) Comparative support for the niche variation hypothesis that more generalized populations also are more heterogeneous. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:10075–10079PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyd IL, Walker TR, Poncet J (1996) Status of southern elephant seals at South Georgia. Antarct Sci 8:237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradshaw CJA, Hindell MA, Best NJ, Phillips KL, Wilson G, Nichols PD (2003) You are what you eat: describing the foraging ecology of southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) using blubber fatty acids. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1283–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradshaw CJA, Higgins J, Michael KJ, Wotherspoon SJ, Hindell MA (2004a) At-sea distribution of female southern elephant seals relative to variation in ocean surface properties. ICES J Mar Sci 61:1014–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradshaw CJA, Hindell MA, Sumner MD, Michael KJ (2004b) Loyalty pays: potential life history consequences of fidelity to marine foraging regions by southern elephant seals. Anim Behav 68:1349–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cherel Y, Hobson KA, Bailleul FR, Groscolas R (2005) Nutrition, physiology, and stable isotopes: New information from fasting and molting penguins. Ecology 86:2881–2888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cherel Y, Ducatez S, Fontaine C, Richard P, Guinet C (2008) Stable isotopes reveal the trophic position and mesopelagic fish diet of female southern elephant seals breeding on the Kerguelen Islands. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 370:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cherel Y, Kernaléguen L, Richard P, Guinet C (2009) Whisker isotopic signature depicts migration patterns and multi-year intra- and inter-individual foraging strategies in fur seals. Biol Lett 5:830–832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costa DP, Hückstädt LA, Crocker DE, McDonald BI, Goebel ME, Fedak MA (2010) Approaches to studying climatic change and its role on the habitat selection of Antarctic pinnipeds. Integr Comp Biol 50:1018–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalerum F, Angerbjorn A (2005) Resolving temporal variation in vertebrate diets using naturally occurring stable isotopes. Oecologia 144:647–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daneri GA, Carlini AR (2002) Fish prey of southern elephant seals, Mirounga leonina, at King George Island. Polar Biol 25:739–743Google Scholar
  17. Ducatez S, Dalloyau S, Richard P, Guinet C, Cherel Y (2008) Stable isotopes document winter trophic ecology and maternal investment of adult female southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) breeding at the Kerguelen Islands. Mar Biol 155:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eder EB, Lewis MN, Campagna C, Koch PL (2010) Evidence of demersal foraging from stable isotope analysis of juvenile elephant seals from Patagonia. Mar Mamm Sci 26:430–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Field I, Hindell M, Slip D, Michael K (2001) Foraging strategies of southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) in relation to frontal zones and water masses. Antarct Sci 13:371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goericke R, Fry B (1994) Variations in marine plankton δ13C with latitude, temperature, and dissolved CO2 in the world ocean. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 8:85–90Google Scholar
  21. Greaves DK, Hammill MO, Eddington JD, Pettipas D, Schreer JF (2004) Growth rate and shedding of vibrissae in the gray seal, Halichoerus grypus: A cautionary note for stable isotope diet analysis. Mar Mamm Sci 20:296–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall-Aspland SA, Rogers TL, Canfield RB (2005) Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis reveals seasonal variation in the diet of leopard seals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 305:249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harcourt R (1993) Individual variation in predation on fur seals by southern sea lions (Otaria byronia) in Peru. Can J Zool 71:1908–1911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harcourt RG, Bradshaw CJA, Dickson K, Davis LS (2002) Foraging ecology of a generalist predator, the female New Zealand fur seal. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 227:11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirons AC, Schell DM, Finney BP (2001a) Temporal records of δ13C and δ15N in North Pacific pinnipeds: inferences regarding environmental change and diet. Oecologia 129:591–601Google Scholar
  26. Hirons AC, Schell DM, St.Aubin DJ (2001b) Growth rates of vibrissae of harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) and Steller sea lions (Eumatopias jubatus). Can J Zool 79:1053–1061Google Scholar
  27. Hobson KA, Clark RG (1992) Assessing avian diets using stable isotopes 1. Turnover of 13C in tissues. Condor 94:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hobson KA, Alisauskas RT, Clark RG (1993) Stable-nitrogen isotope enrichment in avian tissues due to fasting and nutriotional stress: implications for isotopic analyses of diet. Condor 95:338–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hobson KA, Schell DM, Renouf D, Noseworthy E (1996) Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic fractionation between diet and tissues of captive seals: implications for dietary reconstructions involving marine mammals. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:528–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jaeger A, Connan M, Richard P, Cherel Y (2010) Use of stable isotopes to quantify seasonal changes of trophic niche and levels of population and individual specialisation in seabirds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 401:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kelly JF (2000) Stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen in the study of avian and mammalian trophic ecology. Can J Zool 78:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laws RM (1994) History and present status of southern elephant seal populations. In: LeBoeuf BJ, Laws R (eds) Elephant seals: Population ecology behavior and physiology. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 49–65Google Scholar
  33. Le Boeuf BJ, Crocker DE, Costa DP, Blackwell SB, Webb PM, Houser DS (2000) Foraging ecology of northern elephant seals. Ecol Monogr 70:353–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lea MA, Hindell M, Guinet C, Goldsworthy S (2002) Variability in the diving activity of Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella, at Iles Kerguelen. Polar Biol 25:269–279Google Scholar
  35. Lewis R, O’Connell TC, Lewis M, Carnpagna C, Hoelzel AR (2006) Sex-specific foraging strategies and resource partitioning in the southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina). Proc R Soc Lond B 273:2901–2907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCafferty DJ, Boyd IL, Walker TR, Taylor RI (1998) Foraging responses of Antarctic fur seals to changes in the marine environment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 166:285–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McConnell BJ, Fedak MA (1996) Movements of southern elephant seals. Can J Zool 74:1485–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McConnell BJ, Chambers C, Fedak MA (1992) Foraging ecology of southern elephant seals in relation to the bathymetry and productivity of the Southern Ocean. Antarct Sci 4:393–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Newland C, Field IC, Nichols PD, Bradshaw CJA, Hindell MA (2009) Blubber fatty acid profiles indicate dietary resource partitioning juvenile southern between adult and elephant seals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 384:303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Newland C, Field IC, Cherel Y, Guinet C, Bradshaw CJA, McMahon CR, Hindell MA (2011) Diet of juvenile southern elephant seals reappraised by stable isotopes in whiskers. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 424:247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Newsome SD, Koch PL, Etnier MA, Aurioles-Gambao D (2006) Using carbon and nitrogen isotope values to investigate maternal strategies in northeast Pacific otariids. Mar Mamm Sci 22:556–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Newsome SD, Etnier MA, Gifford-Gonzalez D, Phillips DL, van Tuinen M, Hadly EA, Costa DP, Kennett DJ, Guilderson TP, Koch PL (2007) The shifting baseline of northern fur seal ecology in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:9709–9714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Newsome SD, Tinker MT, Monson DH, Oftedal OT, Ralls K, Staedler MM, Fogel ML, Estes JA (2009) Using stable isotopes to investigate individual diet specialization in California sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis). Ecology 90:961–974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Newsome SD, Clementz MT, Koch PL (2010) Using stable isotope biogeochemistry to study marine mammal ecology. Mar Mamm Sci 26:509–572Google Scholar
  45. Popp BN, Trull T, Kenig F, Wakeham SG et al (1999) Controls on the carbon isotopic compositions of Southern Ocean phytoplankton. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 13:827–844Google Scholar
  46. Riedman ML, Estes JA (1988) Predation on seabirds by sea otters. Can J Zool 66:1396–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simmons SE (2008) Environmental and individual effects on the foraging success of an apex predator, the Northern Elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris). PhD dissertation, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa CruzGoogle Scholar
  48. Tremblay Y, Robinson PW, Costa DP (2009) A parsimonious approach to modeling animal movement data. PLoS ONE: e4711Google Scholar
  49. Vander Zanden MJ, Rasmussen JB (2001) Variation in δ15N and δ13C trophic fractionation: implications for aquatic food web studies. Limnol Oceanogr 46:2061–2066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Villegas-Amtmann S, Costa DP, Tremblay Y, Salazar S, Aurioles-Gamboa D (2008) Multiple foraging strategies in a marine apex predator, the Galapagos sea lion Zalophus wollebaeki. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 363:299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weise MJ, Harvey JT, Costa DP (2010) The role of body size in individual-based foraging strategies of a top marine predator. Ecology 91:1004–1015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Woo KJ, Elliott KH, Davidson M, Gaston AJ, Davoren GK (2008) Individual specialization in diet by a generalist marine predator reflects specialization in foraging behaviour. J Anim Ecol 77:1082–1091PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Worton BJ (1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70:164–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. A. Hückstädt
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. L. Koch
    • 2
  • B. I. McDonald
    • 3
  • M. E. Goebel
    • 4
  • D. E. Crocker
    • 5
  • D. P. Costa
    • 6
  1. 1.Ocean Sciences DepartmentUniversity of California Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.Earth and Planetary Sciences DepartmentUniversity of California Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA
  3. 3.Center for Marine Biotechnology and BiomedicineScripps Institution of OceanographyLa JollaUSA
  4. 4.Antarctica Ecosystem Research DivisionSouthwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAALa JollaUSA
  5. 5.Department of BiologySonoma State UniversityRohnert ParkUSA
  6. 6.Ecology and Evolutionary Biology DepartmentUniversity of California Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations