Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 169, Issue 2, pp 307–317 | Cite as

Measuring carbon gains from fungal networks in understory plants from the tribe Pyroleae (Ericaceae): a field manipulation and stable isotope approach

  • Nicole A. HynsonEmail author
  • Stefania Mambelli
  • Anthony S. Amend
  • Todd E. Dawson
Physiological ecology - Original research

Abstract

Partial mycoheterotrophy, a newly discovered form of mixotrophy in plants, has been described in at least two major lineages of angiosperms, the orchids and ericaceous plants in the tribe Pyroleae. Partial mycoheterotrophy entails carbon gains both directly from photosynthesis and via symbiotic mycorrhizal fungi, but determining the degree of plant dependence on fungal carbon is challenging. The purpose of this study was to determine if two chlorophyllous species of Pyroleae, Chimaphila umbellata and Pyrola picta, were receiving carbon via mycorrhizal networks and, if so, if their proportional dependency on fungal carbon gains increased under reduced light conditions. This was accomplished by a field experiment that manipulated light and plants’ access to mycorrhizal networks, and by using the stable carbon isotope composition (δ13C) of leaf soluble sugars as a marker for the level of mycoheterotrophy. Based on leaf soluble sugars δ13C values, we calculated a site-independent isotope enrichment factor as a measure of fungal contributions to plant C. We found that, under each treatment and over time, the two test species demonstrated different isotopic responses caused by their different intrinsic physiologies. Our data, along with previously published studies, suggest that Chimaphila umbellata is primarily an autotrophic understory plant, while Pyrola picta may be capable of partial mycoheterotrophy. However, in this study, a 50% decrease in light availability did not significantly change the relative dependency of P. picta on carbon gains via mycoheterotrophy.

Keywords

Mycoheterotrophy Mixotrophy Soluble sugars 13Pyroleae Mycorrhizae 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the following people for assistance with the sample processing for this project: Alexandra Grote, Olga Lastovetskaya, Celia Jeanningros and Joyce Lee. We would also like to acknowledge Marc-André Selosse and other anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback on previous versions of this manuscript. Professor Gerhard Gebauer, Professor Thomas D. Bruns, and Dr. Katja Preiss also provided critical insights during the development and execution of this study. N.A. Hynson would like to thank the UC Dissertation-Year fellowship, Sonoma Mycological Society and the San Francisco Mycological Society for their support of this research. The stable isotope analyses were supported by the Center for Stable Isotope Biogeochemisty at UC Berkeley.

Supplementary material

442_2011_2198_MOESM1_ESM.eps (461 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 1 Mean δ13C values of leaf soluble sugars between treatments at each sampling, Pyrola picta (dark gray bars), Chimaphila umbellata (light gray bars), reference plants from P. picta plots (black bars), autotrophic reference plants from C. umbellata plots (open bars), error bars represent one standard error. Treatment A = 50% shade screen, treatment B = 50% shade screen and 0.7 m deep trench, treatment C = 0.7 m deep trench, treatment D = control, treatment E = 50% shade screen applied to a neighboring conifer seedling no taller than 0.5 m. Each graph corresponds to one of four sampling times: a) day 0; b) day 16; c) day 31; d) day 44. Letters that are different per Pyroleae species and corresponding reference plants and within a sampling time are significant at α ≤ 0.05 (EPS 461 kb)
442_2011_2198_MOESM2_ESM.eps (440 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 2 Change in mean percent nitrogen in Pyrola picta (a) and Chimaphila umbellata (b) from sampling time 0 (prior to treatment) to sampling time 3 (44 days of treatment) in treatments AE. Treatment A = 50% shade screen, treatment B = 50% shade screen and 0.7 m deep trench, treatment C = 0.7 m deep trench, treatment D = control, treatment E = 50% shade screen applied to a neighboring conifer seedling. Open bars represent percent leaf nitrogen at time 0 and black bars represent time 3. Different letters signify significant differences between percent leaf N at time 0 versus time 3 at ∝≤0.05. Error bars are one standard error (EPS 439 kb)

References

  1. Abadie JC, Püttsepp U, Gebauer G, Faccio A, Bonfante P, Selosse M-A (2006) Cephalanthera longifolia (Neottieae, Orchidaceae) is mixotrophic: a comparative study between green and nonphotosynthetic individuals. Can J Bot 84:1462–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battles JJ, Shlisky AJ, Barrett RH, Heald RC, Allen-Diaz BH (2001) The effects of forest management on plant species diversity in a Sierran conifer forest. For Ecol Manag 146:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry SC, Varney GT, Flanagan LB (1997) Leaf delta C-13 in Pinus resinosa trees and understory plants: variation associated with light and CO2 gradients. Oecologia 109:499–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bidartondo MI (2005) The evolutionary ecology of myco-heterotrophy. New Phytol 167:335–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bidartondo MI, Burghardt B, Gebauer G, Bruns TD, Read DJ (2004) Changing partners in the dark: isotopic and molecular evidence of ectomycorrhizal liaisons between forest orchids and trees. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1799–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brugnoli E, Farquhar GD (2000) Photosynthetic fractionation of carbon isotopes. In: Leegood RC, Sharkey TD, von Caemmerer S (eds) Photosynthesis: physiology metabolism. Kluwer, The Netherlands, pp 399–434Google Scholar
  7. Brugnoli E, Hubick KT, Von Caemmerer S, Wong SC, Farquhar GD (1988) Correlation between the carbon isotope discrimination in leaf starch and sugars of C-3 plants and the ratio of intercellular and atmospheric partial pressures of carbon-dioxide. Plant Physiol 88:1418–1424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchmann N, Kao WY, Ehleringer J (1997) Influence of stand structure on carbon-13 of vegetation, soils, and canopy air within deciduous and evergreen forests in Utah, United States. Oecologia 110:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cernusak LA, Tcherkez G, Keitel C, Cornwell WK, Santiago LS, Knohl A, Barbour MM, Williams DG, Reich PB, Ellsworth DS, Dawson TE, Griffiths HG, Farquhar GD, Wright IJ (2009) Viewpoint: Why are non-photosynthetic tissues generally C-13 enriched compared with leaves in C-3 plants? Review and synthesis of current hypotheses. Funct Plant Biol 36:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chazdon RL (1988) Sunflecks and their importance to forest understorey plants. Adv Ecol Res 18:1–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coomes DA, Grubb PJ (2000) Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments. Ecol Monogr 70:171–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dawson TE, Mambelli S, Plamboeck AH, Templer PH, Tu KP (2002) Stable isotopes in plant ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:507–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehleringer JR, Field CB, Lin ZF, Kuo CY (1986) Leaf carbon isotope and mineral-composition in subtropical plants along an irradiance cline. Oecologia 70:520–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehleringer JR, Phillips SL, Schuster WSF, Sandquist DR (1991) Differential utilization of summer rains by desert plants. Oecologia 88:430–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Emmett BA, Kjönaas OJ, Gundersen P, Koopmans C, Tietema A, Sleep D (1998) Natural abundance of 15N in forests across a nitrogen deposition gradient. For Ecol Manag 101:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:503–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freudenstein JV (1999) Relationships and character transformation in Pyroloideae (Ericaceae) based on ITS sequences, morphology, and development. Syst Bot 24:398–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fry B (2006) Stable isotope ecology. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gebauer G, Meyer M (2003) 15N and 13C natural abundance of autotrophic and myco-heterotrophic orchids provides insight into nitrogen and carbon gain from fungal association. New Phytol 160:209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gleixner G, Danier HJ, Werner RA, Schmidt HL (1993) Correlations between the C-13 content of primary and secondary plant-products in different cell compartments and that in decomposing Basidiomycetes. Plant Physiol 102:1287–1290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Göttlicher S, Knohl A, Wanek W, Buchmann N, Richter A (2006) Short-term changes in carbon isotope composition of soluble carbohydrates and starch: from canopy leaves to the root system. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 20:653–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Högberg P, Plamboeck AH, Taylor AFS, Fransson PMA (1999) Natural C-13 abundance reveals trophic status of fungi and host-origin of carbon in mycorrhizal fungi in mixed forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:8534–8539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hynson NA, Preiss K, Gebauer G, Bruns TD (2009) Isotopic evidence of full and partial myco-heterotrophy in the plant tribe Pyroleae (Ericaceae). New Phytol 182:719–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Julou T, Burghardt B, Gebauer G, Berveiller D, Damesin C, Selosse M-A (2005) Mixotrophy in orchids: insights from a comparative study of green individuals and nonphotosyntheti individuals of Cephalanthera damasonium. New Phytol 166:639–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leake JR (1994) Tansley review No. 69. The biology of myco-heterotrophic (‘saprophytic’) plants. New Phytol 127:171–216Google Scholar
  26. Leake JR, Cameron DD (2010) Physiological ecology of mycoheterotrophy. New Phytol 185:601–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liebel HT, Bidartondo MI, Preiss K, Segreto R, Stockel M, Rodda M, Gebauer G (2010) C and N stable isotope signatures reveal constraints to nutritional modes in orchids from the Mediterranean and macaronesia. Am J Bot 97:903–912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu ZW, Zhou J, Liu ED, Peng H (2010) A molecular phylogeny and a new classification of pyrola (Pyroleae, Ericaceae). Taxon 59:1690–1700Google Scholar
  29. Lloyd J, Syvertsen JP, Kriedemann PE, Farquhar GD (1992) Low conductances for CO2diffusion from stomata to the sites of carboxylation in leaves of woody species. Plant Cell Environ 15:873–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Massicotte HB, Melville LH, Tackaberry LE, Peterson RL (2008) A comparative study of mycorrhizas in several genera of Pyroleae (Ericaceae) from western Canada. Botany 86:610–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mayor JR, Schuur EAG, Henkel TW (2009) Elucidating the nutritional dynamics of fungi using stable isotopes. Ecol Lett 12:171–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKendrick SL, Leake JR, Read DJ (2000) Symbiotic germination and development of myco-heterotrophic plants in nature: Transfer of carbon from ectomycorrhizal Salix repens and Betula pendula to the orchid Corallorhiza trifida through shared hyphal connections. New Phytol 145:539–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Merckx V, Bidartondo MI, Hynson NA (2009) Myco-heterotrophy: when fungi host plants. Ann Bot 104:1255–1261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Michelsen A, Jonasson S, Sleep D, Havstrom M, Callaghan TV (1996) Shoot biomass, delta C-13, nitrogen and chlorophyll responses of two arctic dwarf shrubs to in situ shading, nutrient application and warming simulating climatic change. Oecologia 105:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mortazavi B, Chanton JP, Prater JL, Oishi AC, Oren R, Katul G (2005) Temporal variability in C-13 of respired CO2 in a pine and a hardwood forest subject to similar climatic conditions. Oecologia 142:57–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pearcy RW, Pfitsch WA (1991) Influence of sunflecks on the delta-C-13 of Adenocaulon bicolor plants occurring in contrasting forest understory microsites. Oecologia 86:457–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Preiss K, Gebauer G (2008) A methodological approach to improve estimates of nutrient gains by partially myco-heterotrophic plants. Isot Environ Health Stud 44:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Preiss K, Adam IKU, Gerhard G (2010) Irradiance governs exploitation of fungi: fine-tuning of carbon gain by two partially myco-heterotrophic orchids. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:1333–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Selosse M-A, Roy M (2009) Green plants that feed on fungi: facts and questions about mixotrophy. Trends Plant Sci 14:64–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Selosse M-A, Martos F, Perry B, Maj P, Roy M, Pailler T (2010) Saprotrophic fungal symbionts in tropical achlorophyllous orchids: Finding treasures among the ‘molecular scraps’? Plant Signal Behav 5:349–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simard SW, Perry DA, Smith JE, Molina R (1997) Effects of soil trenching on occurrence of ectomycorrhizas on Pseudotsuga menziesii seedlings grown in mature forests of Betula papyrifera and Pseudotsuga menziesii. New Phytol 136:327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Taylor AFS, Fransson PM, Hogberg P, Hogberg MN, Plamboeck AH (2003) Species level patterns in C-13 and N-15 abundance of ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungal sporocarps. New Phytol 159:757–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tedersoo L, Pellet P, Koljalg U, Selosse M-A (2007) Parallel evolutionary paths to mycoheterotrophy in understorey Ericaceae and Orchidaceae: ecological evidence for mixotrophy in Pyroleae. Oecologia 151:206–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Teste FP, Karst J, Jones MD, Simard SW, Durall DM (2006) Methods to control ectomycorrhizal colonization: effectiveness of chemical and physical barriers. Mycorrhiza 17:51–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trudell SA, Rygiewicz PT, Edmonds RL (2003) Nitrogen and carbon stable isotope abundances support the myco-heterotrophic nature and host-specificity of certain achlorophyllous plants. New Phytol 160:391–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wardlaw IF (1990) Tansley Review No. 27:The control of carbon partitioning in plants. New Phytol 116:341–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Whigham D (2004) Ecology of woodland herbs in temperate deciduous forests. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:583–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wingate L, Ogée J, Burlett R, Bosc A, Devaux M, Grace J, Loustau D, Gessler A (2010) Photosynthetic carbon isotope discrimination and its relationship to the carbon isotope signals of stem, soil and ecosystem respiration. New Phytol 188:576–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zimmer K, Hynson NA, Gebauer G, Allen EB, Allen MF, Read DJ (2007) Wide geographical and ecological distribution of nitrogen and carbon gains from fungi in pyroloids and monotropoids (Ericaceae) and in orchids. New Phytol 175:166–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zimmerman JK, Ehleringer JR (1990) Carbon isotope ratios are correlated with irradiance levels in the Panamanian orchid Catasetum viridiflavum. Oecologia 83:247–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole A. Hynson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stefania Mambelli
    • 2
  • Anthony S. Amend
    • 1
  • Todd E. Dawson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of Hawai‘i at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of California BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations