, Volume 169, Issue 1, pp 23–31 | Cite as

Dietary protein restriction impairs growth, immunity, and disease resistance in southern leopard frog tadpoles

  • Matthew D. Venesky
  • Travis E. Wilcoxen
  • Michelle A. Rensel
  • Louise Rollins-Smith
  • Jacob L. Kerby
  • Matthew J. Parris
Physiological ecology - Original Paper


The immune system is a necessary, but potentially costly, defense against infectious diseases. When nutrition is limited, immune activity may consume a significant amount of an organism’s energy budget. Levels of dietary protein affect immune system function; high levels can enhance disease resistance. We exposed southern leopard frog [Lithobates sphenocephalus (=Rana sphenocephala)] tadpoles to high and low protein diets crossed with the presence or absence of the pathogenic amphibian chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis; Bd) and quantified: (1) tadpole resistance to Bd; (2) tadpole skin-swelling in response to phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) injection (a measure of the T cell-mediated response of the immune system); (3) bacterial killing ability (BKA) of tadpole blood (a measure of the complement-mediated cytotoxicity of the innate immune system); and (4) tadpole growth and development. Tadpoles raised on a low-protein diet were smaller and less developed than tadpoles on a high-protein diet. When controlled for developmental stage, tadpoles raised on a low-protein diet had reduced PHA and BKA responses relative to tadpoles on a high-protein diet, but these immune responses were independent of Bd exposure. High dietary protein significantly increased resistance to Bd. Our results support the general hypothesis that host condition can strongly affect disease resistance; in particular, fluctuations in dietary protein availability may change how diseases affect populations in the field.


Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis BKA Chytridiomycosis Nutrition PHA 


  1. Alaux C, Ducloz F, Crauser D, Le Conte Y (2010) Diet effects on honeybee immunocompetence. Biol Lett 6:562–565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altig R, Whiles MR, Taylor CL (2007) What do tadpoles really eat? Assessing the trophic status of an understudied and imperiled group of consumers in freshwater habitats. Freshw Biol 52:386–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behringer DC, Butler MJ, Shields JD (2006) Ecology: avoidance of disease by social lobsters. Nature 441:421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger L, Speare R, Daszak P, Green DE, Cunningham AA, Goggin CL, Slocombe R, Ragan MA, Hyatt AD, McDonald KR, Hines HB, Lips KR, Marantelli G, Parkes H (1998) Chytridiomycosis causes amphibian mortality associated with population declines in the rain forests of Australia and Central America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:9031–9036PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaustein AR, Johnson PTJ (2003) Explaining frog deformities. Sci Am 288:60–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blaustein AR, Romansic JM, Scheessele EA, Han BA, Pessier AP, Longcore JE (2005) Interspecific variation in susceptibility of frog tadpoles to the pathogenic fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Conserv Biol 19:1460–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borel MJ, Buchowski MS, Turner EA, Peeler BB, Goldstein RE, Flakoll PJ (1998) Alterations in basal nutrient metabolism increase resting energy expenditure in sickle cell disease. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 274:E357–E364Google Scholar
  8. Boyle DG, Boyle DB, Olsen V, Morgan JAT, Hyatt AD (2004) Rapid quantitative detection of chytridiomycosis (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) in amphibian samples using real-time Taqman PCR assay. Dis Aquat Org 60:141–148Google Scholar
  9. Carey C, Cohen N, Rollins-Smith LA (1999) Amphibian declines: an immunological perspective. Dev Comp Immunol 23:459–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins JP, Storfer A (2003) Amphibian declines: sorting the hypotheses. Divers Distrib 9:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coop RL, Kyriazakis I (2001) Influence of host nutrition on the development and consequences of nematode parasitism in ruminants. Trends Parasitol 17:325–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crespi EJ, Denver RJ (2005) Roles of stress hormones in food intake regulation in anuran amphibians throughout the life cycle. Comp Biochem Physiol A 141:381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD (2003) Infectious disease and amphibian population declines. Divers Distrib 9:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demas GE (2004) The energetic of immunity: a neuroendocrine link between energy balance and immune function. Horm Behav 45:173–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fellers GM, Green DE, Longcore JE (2001) Oral chytridiomycosis in the mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa). Copeia 2001:945–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garner TWJ, Walker S, Bosch J, Leech S, Rowcliffe M, Cunningham AA, Fisher MC (2009) Life history tradeoffs influence mortality associated with the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Oikos 118:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190Google Scholar
  18. Houdijk JGM, Kyriazakis I, Jackson F, Huntley JF, Coop RL (2000) Can an increased intake of metabolized protein affect the periparturient relaxation in immunity against Teladorsagia circumcinta in sheep? Vet Parasitol 91:43–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Janeway CA, Medzhitov R (2002) Innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol 20:197–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson ML, Speare R (2003) Survival of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in water: quarantine and disease control implications. Emerg Infect Dis 9:922–925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ledon-Rettig CC, Pfennig DW, Crespi EJ (2009) Stress hormones and the fitness consequences associated with the transition to a novel diet in larval amphibians. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:10092–10097Google Scholar
  22. Lee KP, Cory JS, Wilson K, Raubenheimer D, Simpson SJ (2006) Flexible diet choice offsets protein costs of pathogen resistance in a caterpillar. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:823–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lips KR, Burrowes PA, Mendelson JR, Parra-Olea G (2005) Amphibian population declines in Latin America: a synthesis. Biotropica 37:222–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lochmiller RL, Vestey MR, Boren JC (1993) Relationship between protein nutritional status and immunocompetence in northern bobwhite chicks. Auk 110:503–510Google Scholar
  25. Longcore JE, Pessier AP, Nichols DK (1999) Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis gen. et sp. Nov., a chytrid pathogenic to amphibians. Mycologia 91:219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Millet S, Bennett J, Lee KA, Hau M, Klasing KC (2007) Quantifying and comparing constitutive immunity across avian species. Dev Comp Immunol 31:188–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parris MJ, Cornelius TO (2004) Fungal pathogen causes competitive and developmental stress in larval amphibian communities. Ecology 85:3385–3395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peck MD, Babcock GF, Alexander JW (1992) The role of protein and calorie restriction in outcome from Salmonella infection in mice. J Parenter Enter Nutr 16:561–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pessier AP, Nichols DK, Longcore JE, Fuller MS (1999) Cutaneous chytridiomycosis in poison dart frogs (Dendrobates spp.) and White’s tree frogs (Litoria caerulea). J Vet Diagn Investig 11:194–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Povey S, Cotter SC, Simpson SJ, Lee KP, Wilson K (2008) Can the protein costs of bacterial resistance be offset by altered feeding behavior? J Anim Ecol 78:437–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pryor GS (2003) Growth rates and digestive abilities of bullfrog tadpoles (Rana catesbeiana) fed algal diets. J Herpetol 37:560–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rachowicz LJ, Vredenburg VT (2004) Transmission of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis within and between amphibian life stages. Dis Aquat Organ 61:75–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramsey JP, Reinert LK, Harper LK, Woodhams DC, Rollins-Smith LA (2010) Immune defenses against Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, a fungus linked to global amphibian declines, in the South African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis. Infect Immun 78:3981–3992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Richmond JQ, Savage AE, Zamudio KR, Rosenblum EB (2009) Toward immunogenetic studies of amphibian chytridiomycosis: linking innate and acquired immunity. Bioscience 59:311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rohr JR, Swan A, Raffel TR, Hudson PJ (2009) Parasites, info-disruption, and the ecology of fear. Oecologia 159:447–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rollins-Smith LA (1998) Metamorphosis and the amphibian immune system. Immunol Rev 166:221–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rollins-Smith LA (2001) Neuroendocrine-immune system interactions in amphibians: implications for understanding global amphibian declines. Immunol Res 23:273–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rollins-Smith LA (2009) The role of amphibian antimicrobial peptides in protection of amphibians from pathogens linked to global amphibian declines. Biochim Biophys Acta 1788:1593–1599Google Scholar
  39. Rollins-Smith LA, Conlon JM (2005) Antimicrobial peptide defenses against chytridiomycosis, an emerging infectious disease of amphibian populations. Dev Comp Immunol 29:589–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rollins-Smith LA, Barker KS, Davis T (1997) Involvement of glucocorticoids in the reorganization of the amphibian immune system at metamorphosis. Dev Immunol 5:145–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmid-Hempel P (2003) Variation in immune defence as a question of evolutionary ecology. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:357–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skerratt LF, Berger L, Speare R, Cashins S, McDonald KR, Phillott AD, Hines HB, Kenyon N (2007) Spread of chytridiomycosis has caused the rapid global decline and extinction of frogs. EcoHealth 4:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischman DL, Waller RW (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306:1783–1786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Townsend AK, Clark AB, McGowan KJ, Miller AD, Buckles EL (2010) Condition, innate immunity, and disease mortality of inbred crows. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:2875–2883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Venesky MD, Parris MJ, Storfer A (2009) Impacts of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection on tadpole foraging performance. EcoHealth 6:565–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Venesky MD, Wassersug RJ, Parris MJ (2010) Fungal pathogen changes the feeding kinematics of larval anurans. J Parasitol 96:552–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Voyles J, Young S, Berger L, Campbell C, Voyles WF, Dinudom A, Cook D, Webb R, Alford RA, Skerratt LF, Speare R (2009) Pathogenesis of chytridiomycosis, a cause of catastrophic amphibian declines. Science 326:582–585PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Voyles J, Rosenblum EB, Berger L (2011) Interactions between Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and its amphibian hosts: a review of pathogenesis and immunity. Microbes Infect 13:25–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilcoxen TW, Boughton RK, Schoech SJ (2010) Selection on innate immunology and body condition in Florida scrub-jays throughout an epidemic. Biol Lett 6:552–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Woodhams DC, Ardipradja K, Alford RA, Marantelli G, Reinert LK, Rollins-Smith LA (2007) Resistance to chytridiomycosis varies among amphibian species and is correlated with skin peptide defenses. Anim Conserv 10:409–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew D. Venesky
    • 1
    • 4
  • Travis E. Wilcoxen
    • 1
    • 5
  • Michelle A. Rensel
    • 1
    • 6
  • Louise Rollins-Smith
    • 2
  • Jacob L. Kerby
    • 3
  • Matthew J. Parris
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesThe University of MemphisMemphisUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Microbiology and Immunology, Pediatrics, and Biological SciencesVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of South DakotaVermillionUSA
  4. 4.Department of Integrative BiologyThe University of South FloridaTampaUSA
  5. 5.Department of BiologyMilikin UniversityDecaturUSA
  6. 6.Department of Integrative Biology and PhysiologyUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations