, Volume 168, Issue 3, pp 797–806 | Cite as

Addition of species abundance and performance predicts community primary production of macroalgae

  • Robert J. Miller
  • Shannon Harrer
  • Daniel C. Reed
Community ecology - Methods Paper


Understory plant assemblages are important sources of primary production in both terrestrial and marine environments, and they may exhibit different dynamics than their overstory counterparts. For example, production within dense upper canopies is typically light-limited by shading, whereas such canopy architecture effects are likely unimportant in low-light environments, such as those inhabited by sparser understory assemblages. In these assemblages, light saturation of understory production may be common as species become limited by their photosynthetic capacity, which is adapted to low-light levels. Here we show that a simple model relating species-specific light use relationships measured in the laboratory to biomass and light levels measured in nature accurately predicts community gross primary production (GPP) in a marine understory algal community. We validate the model by comparing GPP measured in situ in enclosed chambers with model estimates for the same incubations. Model estimates of GPP explained 70% of the variation in the measured estimates. The results show that GPP was accurately estimated by simple addition of the photosynthetic capacity of each species in the community based on their biomass and the available light. The difference between modeled and measured GPP did not show any relationship with community biomass or diversity, and the results suggest that diversity does not significantly affect productivity in this system. This type of model should be applicable in other environments where canopy architecture does not play a significant role in limiting photosynthesis.


Understory Ecosystem function Diversity Productivity Light 



We thank T. Cody, N. Diebolt, B. Goodridge, S. Honig, S. Heidelberger, C. Nelson, C. Santschi, and M. Silbert for field and laboratory assistance. R. Zimmerman and M. Brzezinski provided helpful discussion. This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Long Term Ecological Research program under Grant numbers OCE 9982105 and OCE 0620276.


  1. Airoldi L, Cinelli F (1997) Effects of sedimentation on subtidal macroalgal assemblages: an experimental study from a Mediterranean rocky shore. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 215:269–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alaback PB (1982) Dynamics of understory biomass in sitka spruce-western hemlock forests of southeast Alaska. Ecology 63(6):1932–1948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baird ME, Walker SJ, Wallace BB, Webster IT, Parslow JS (2003) The use of mechanistic descriptions of algal growth and zooplankton grazing in an estuarine eutrophication model. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 56:685–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg PH, Roy F, Jannsen V, Meyer BB, Jorgensen M, Huettel M, De Beer D (2003) Oxygen uptake by aquatic sediments measured with a novel non-invasive eddy-correlation technique. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 261:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Binzer T, Middelboe AL (2005) From thallus to communities: scale effects and photosynthetic performance in macroalgae communities. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 287:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Binzer T, Sand-Jensen K (2002a) Importance of structure and density of kelp communities (Fucus serratus) for photosynthetic production and light utilization. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 235:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Binzer T, Sand-Jensen K (2002b) Production in aquatic macrophyte communities: a theoretical and empirical study of the influence of spatial light distribution. Limnol Oceanogr 47:1742–1750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Binzer T, Sand-Jensen K, Middelboe AL (2006) Community photosynthesis of aquatic macrophytes. Limnol Oceanogr 51:2722–2733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brinkhuis BH (1977a) Comparison of salt-marsh fucoid production estimated from three different indices. J Phycol 13:328–335Google Scholar
  10. Brinkhuis BH (1977b) Seasonal variations in salt-marsh macroalgae photosynthesis. I. Ascophyllum nodosum ecad scorpioides. Mar Biol 44:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brinkhuis BH (1977c) Seasonal variations in salt-marsh macroalgae photosynthesis II. Fucus vesiculosus and Ulva lactuca. Mar Biol 44:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruno J, Boyer K, Duffy J, Lee S, Kertesz J (2005) Effects of macroalgal species identity and richness on primary production in benthic marine communities. Ecol Lett 8:1165–1174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruno J, Lee S, Kertesz J, Carpenter R, Long Z, Duffy J (2006) Partitioning effects of algal species identity and richness on benthic marine primary production. Oikos 115:170–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burd AB, Dunton KH (2001) Field verification of a light-driven model of biomass changes in the seagrass Halodule wrightii. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 209:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carrington E (1990) Drag and dislodgment of an intertidal macroalga: consequences of morphological variation in Mastocarpus papillatus (Kutzing). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 139:185–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cebrian J (1999) Patterns in the fate of production in plant communities. Am Nat 154:449–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cebrian J (2004) Role of first-order consumers in ecosystem carbon flow. Ecol Lett 7:232–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chapman RO, Johnson CR (1990) Disturbance and organization of macroalgal assemblages in the north-west Atlantic. Hydrobiologia 192:77–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chazdon RL, Pearcy RW (1991) The importance of sunflecks for forest understory plants. Bioscience 41:760–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Copertino M, Connell SD, Cheshire A (2005) The prevalence and productivity of turf-forming algae on a temperate subtidal coast. Phycologia 44:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dayton PK, Tegner MJ (1984) Catastrophic storms, El Niño, and patch stability in a Southern California kelp community. Science 224:283–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dayton P, Currie V, Gerodette T, Keller B, Rosenthal R, Ven Tresca D (1984) Patch dynamics and stability of some California kelp communities. Ecol Monogr 54:253–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DeLucia EH, Turnbull MH, Walcroft AS, Griffin KL, Tissue DT, Glenny D, McSeveny TM, Whitehead D (2003) The contribution of bryophytes to the carbon exchange for a temperate rainforest. Glob Change Biol 9:1158–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Denny M, Gaylord B, Cowen E (1997) Flow and flexibility. II. The roles of size and shape in determining wave forces on the bull kelp Nereocystis luetkeana. J Exp Biol 200:3165–3183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dromgoole FI (1988) Light fluctuations and the photosynthesis of marine algae. II. Photosynthetic response to frequency, phase ratio and amplitude. Funct Ecol 2:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Duarte P (1995) A mechanistic model of the effects of light and temperature on algal primary productivity. Ecol Model 82:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Duarte P, Ferreira J (1993) A methodology for parameter estimation in seaweed productivity modelling. Hydrobiologia 260(261):183–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Duarte P, Ferreira J (1995) Seasonal adaptation and short-term metabolic responses of Gelidium esquipedale to varying light and temperature. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 121:289–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Duarte P, Ferreira J (1997) A model for the simulation of macroalgal population dynamics and productivity. Ecol Model 98:199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Elkalay K, Frangoulis C, Skliris N, Goffart A, Gobert S, Lepoint G, Hecq J (2003) A model of the seasonal dynamics of biomass and production of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica in the Bay of Calvi (Northwestern Mediterranean). Ecol Model 167:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Enríquez S, Merino M, Iglesias-Prieto R (2002) Variation in the photosynthetic performance along the leaves of the tropical seagrass Thalassia testudinum. Mar Biol 140:891–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ford ED, Diggle PJ (1981) Competition for light in a plant monoculture modeled as a spatial stochastic process. Ann Bot 48:481–500Google Scholar
  33. Gagnon P, Johnson LE, Himmelman JH (2005) Kelp patch dynamics in the face of intense herbivory: stability of Agarum clathratum (Phaeophyta) stands and associated flora on urchin barrens. J Phycol 41:498–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gerard VA (1984) The light environment in a giant kelp forest: influence of Macrocystis pyrifera on spatial and temporal variability. Mar Biol 84:189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gower S, Kucharik C, Norman J (1999) Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, fAPAR and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems. Rem Sens Environ 70:29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gower S, Krankina O, Olson RJ, Apps M, Linder S, Wang C (2001) Net primary production and carbon allocation patterns of boreal forest ecosystems. Ecol App 11:1395–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greene RM, Gerard VA (1990) Effects of high frequency light fluctuations on growth and photoacclimation of the red alga, Chondrus crispus. Mar Biol 105:337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harrer S (2010) Abundance-derived estimates of understory macroalgal community standing biomass and net primary production. MSc thesis. University of California Santa Barbara, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  39. Hart S, Chen H (2006) Understory vegetation dynamics of North American boreal forests. Crit Rev Plant Sci 25:381–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hatcher BG (1990) Coral reef primary productivity: a hierarchy of pattern and process. Trends Ecol Evol 5:149–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hesketh J, Baker D (1967) Light and carbon assimilation by plant communities. Crop Sci 7:285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hilker T, Coops N, Wulder M, Black A, Guy R (2008) The use of remote sensing in light use efficiency based models of gross primary production: a review of current status and future requirements. Sci Tot Environ 404:411–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hillebrand H, Blenckner T (2002) Regional and local impact on species diversity—from pattern to processes. Oecologia 132:479–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. House I, Archer S, Breshears D, Scholes R (2003) Conundrums in mixed woody-herbaceous plant systems. J Biogeogr 30:1763–1777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jackson GA (1987) Modelling the growth and harvest yield of the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera. Mar Biol 95:611–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jassby AD, Platt T (1976) Mathematical formulation of the relationship between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 21:540–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Koehl MAR, Alberte RS (1988) Flow, flapping, and photosynthesis of Nereocystis luetkeana: a functional comparison of undulate and flat blade morphologies. Mar Biol 99:435–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kübler JE, Raven JA (1996) Inorganic carbon acquisition by red seaweeds grown under dynamic light regimes. Hydrobiologia 326(327):401–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kudo, G, Takashi Y Ida, Tomokazu T (2008) Linkages between phenology, pollination, photosynthesis, and reproduction in deciduous forest understory plants. Ecology 89:321–331Google Scholar
  50. Laffoley D, Grimsditch G (2009) The management of coastal carbon sinks. International Union for Conservation of Nature, GlandGoogle Scholar
  51. Laws E (1997) Mathematical methods for oceanographers. Wiley, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Legendre L, Legendre P (1983) Numerical ecology. Developments in environmental modelling, 3rd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  53. Littler MM (1980) Morphological form and photosynthetic performances of marine macroalgae: test of a functional/form hypothesis. Bot Mar 22:161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Littler MM, Arnold KE (1980) Sources of variability in macroalgal primary productivity: sampling and interpretative problems. Aquat Bot 8:141–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  56. McCree KJ (1972) The action spectrum absorptance and quantum yield of photosynthesis in crop plants. Agric Meteorol 9:191–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Middelboe A, Binzer T (2004) Importance of canopy structure on photosynthesis in single- and multi-species assemblages of marine macroalgae. Oikos 107:422–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Middleboe A, Sand-Jensen K, Binzer T (2006) Highly predictable photosynthetic production in natural macroalgal communities from incoming and absorbed light. Oecologia 150:464–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Miller RJ, Reed DC, Brzezinski MA (2009) Community structure and productivity of subtidal turf and foliose algal assemblages. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 388:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Miller RJ, Reed DC, Brzezinski MA (2011) Partitioning of primary production among giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera), understory macroalgae and phytoplankton on a temperate reef. Limnol Oceanogr 56:119–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mumby PJ, Foster NL, Glynn FahyE (2005) The patch dynamics of coral reef macroalgae under chronic and acute disturbance. Coral Reefs 24:681–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nilsson MC, Wardle DA (2005) Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest. Front Ecol Environ 3:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pearcy RW (1987) Photosynthetic gas exchange responses of Australian tropical forest trees in canopy, gap and understorey micro-environments. Func Ecol 1:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pearcy RW (1990) Sunflecks and photosynthesis in plant canopies. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 41:421–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reed DC, Foster MS (1984) The effects of canopy shading on algal recruitment and growth of a giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) forest. Ecology 65:937–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reed DC, Rassweiler A, Arkema KK (2009) Density derived estimates of standing crop and net primary production in the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera. Mar Biol 156:2077–2083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rosenberg GD, Littler S, Littler MM, Oliveira EC (1995) Primary production and photosynthetic quotients of seaweeds from Sao Paulo state. Brazil Bot Mar 38:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ryel R, Barnes P, Beyschlag W, Caldwell M, Flint S (1990) Plant competition for light analyzed with a multispecies canopy model I. Model development and influence of enhanced UV-B conditions on photosynthesis in mixed wheat and wild oat canopies. Oecologia 82:304–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sakai T, Akiyama T (2005) Quantifying the spatio-temporal variability of net primary production of the understory species, Sasa senanensis, using multipoint measuring techniques. Agric Meterol 134:60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sand-Jensen K, Krause-Jensen D (1997) Broad-scale comparison of photosynthesis in terrestrial and aquatic plant communities. Oikos 80:203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sand-Jensen K, Binzer T, Middelboe AL (2007) Scaling of photosynthetic production of aquatic macrophytes—a review. Oikos 116:280–294Google Scholar
  72. Santelices B, Ojeda FP (1984) Effects of canopy removal on the understory algal community structure of coastal forests of Macrocystis pyrifera from southern South America. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 14:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shears NT, Babcock RC (2003) Continuing trophic cascade effects after 25 years of no-take marine reserve protection. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 246:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stachowicz JJ, Bruno JF, Duffy JE (2007) Understanding the effects of marine biodiversity on communities and ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 38:739–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Suchar VA, Crookston NL (2010) Understory cover and biomass indices predictions for forest ecosystems of the Northwestern United States. Ecol Indic 10:602–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tait LW, Schiel DR (2011) Dynamics of productivity in naturally structured macroalgal assemblages: importance of canopy structure on light-use efficiency. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 421:97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Westberry TK, Behrenfeld MJ, Siegel DA, Boss E (2008) Carbon-based primary productivity modeling with vertically resolved photoacclimation. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 22:GB2024. doi: 10.1029/2007GB003078
  78. Westphalen G, Cheshire AC (1997) Quantum efficiency and photosynthetic production of a temperate turf algal community. Aust J Bot 45:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wierman CA, Oliver CD (1979) Crown stratification by species in even-aged mixed stands of douglas-fir-western hemlock. Can J Res 9:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wing SR, Patterson MR (1993) Effects of wave-induced lightflecks in the intertidal zone on photosynthesis in the macroalgae Postelsia palmaeformis and Hedophyllum sessile (Phaeophyceae). Mar Biol 116:519–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wing SR, Leichter JJ, Denny MW (1993) A dynamic model for wave-induced light fluctuations in a kelp forest. Limnol Oceanogr 38:396–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Young DR, Smith WK (1980) Influence of sunlight on photosynthesis, water relations, and leaf structure in the understory species Arnica cordifolia. Ecology 61:1380–1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zimmerman R (2003) A bio-optical model of irradianced distribution and photosynthesis in seagrass canopies. Limnol Oceanogr 48:568–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. Miller
    • 1
  • Shannon Harrer
    • 1
  • Daniel C. Reed
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine Science InstituteUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations