Addition of species abundance and performance predicts community primary production of macroalgae
- 329 Downloads
Understory plant assemblages are important sources of primary production in both terrestrial and marine environments, and they may exhibit different dynamics than their overstory counterparts. For example, production within dense upper canopies is typically light-limited by shading, whereas such canopy architecture effects are likely unimportant in low-light environments, such as those inhabited by sparser understory assemblages. In these assemblages, light saturation of understory production may be common as species become limited by their photosynthetic capacity, which is adapted to low-light levels. Here we show that a simple model relating species-specific light use relationships measured in the laboratory to biomass and light levels measured in nature accurately predicts community gross primary production (GPP) in a marine understory algal community. We validate the model by comparing GPP measured in situ in enclosed chambers with model estimates for the same incubations. Model estimates of GPP explained 70% of the variation in the measured estimates. The results show that GPP was accurately estimated by simple addition of the photosynthetic capacity of each species in the community based on their biomass and the available light. The difference between modeled and measured GPP did not show any relationship with community biomass or diversity, and the results suggest that diversity does not significantly affect productivity in this system. This type of model should be applicable in other environments where canopy architecture does not play a significant role in limiting photosynthesis.
KeywordsUnderstory Ecosystem function Diversity Productivity Light
We thank T. Cody, N. Diebolt, B. Goodridge, S. Honig, S. Heidelberger, C. Nelson, C. Santschi, and M. Silbert for field and laboratory assistance. R. Zimmerman and M. Brzezinski provided helpful discussion. This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Long Term Ecological Research program under Grant numbers OCE 9982105 and OCE 0620276.
- Brinkhuis BH (1977a) Comparison of salt-marsh fucoid production estimated from three different indices. J Phycol 13:328–335Google Scholar
- Ford ED, Diggle PJ (1981) Competition for light in a plant monoculture modeled as a spatial stochastic process. Ann Bot 48:481–500Google Scholar
- Harrer S (2010) Abundance-derived estimates of understory macroalgal community standing biomass and net primary production. MSc thesis. University of California Santa Barbara, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
- Kudo, G, Takashi Y Ida, Tomokazu T (2008) Linkages between phenology, pollination, photosynthesis, and reproduction in deciduous forest understory plants. Ecology 89:321–331Google Scholar
- Laffoley D, Grimsditch G (2009) The management of coastal carbon sinks. International Union for Conservation of Nature, GlandGoogle Scholar
- Laws E (1997) Mathematical methods for oceanographers. Wiley, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
- Legendre L, Legendre P (1983) Numerical ecology. Developments in environmental modelling, 3rd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Sand-Jensen K, Binzer T, Middelboe AL (2007) Scaling of photosynthetic production of aquatic macrophytes—a review. Oikos 116:280–294Google Scholar
- Westberry TK, Behrenfeld MJ, Siegel DA, Boss E (2008) Carbon-based primary productivity modeling with vertically resolved photoacclimation. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 22:GB2024. doi: 10.1029/2007GB003078