Oecologia

, Volume 167, Issue 4, pp 889–892 | Cite as

Commentary: Do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? Back to basics and toward a unifying framework

Views and Comments

Abstract

After decades of misusing the term diversity in community ecology, over the last 5 years some papers have offered important advances toward developing a more rigorous mathematical background, which allows us to achieve more clarity in the terminology for the vast range of biological phenomena that have been placed under the umbrella of this term. Some points have been clearly stated in previous papers of this Views and Comments section, and new terms have even been proposed for specific cases, but other issues, such as the need for the prefix true have not been discussed. Our aim is to clarify some of the terms and concepts, the proper use of which appears still to remain unclear, and to provide biologists with a simplified version of the general framework resulting from recent contributions, with an emphasis on identifying points of consensus in the field. We also comment on the possibility of extending the basics of this general framework to other facets of the broad term biodiversity, such as functional or phylogenetic diversity.

Keywords

Alpha diversity Beta diversity Gamma diversity Species richness Species turnover 

Notes

Acknowledgments

CEM thanks colleagues and students for spending time in fruitful discussions about species diversity, and Bianca Delfosse for improving the English. This contribution is a result of projects 95828 FOMIX CONACYT–HIDALGO and 84127 SEP–CONACYT Basic Science. We declare that our study complies with the current laws of Mexico, and that no experiments were performed.

References

  1. Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders NJ, Cornell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Kraft NJB, Stegen JC, Swenson NG (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chao A, Ch-H Chiu, Jost L (2010) Phylogenetic diversity measures based on Hill numbers. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 365:3599–3609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ellison AM (2010) Partitioning diversity. Ecology 91:1962–1963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hill MO (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jost L (2007) Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88:2427–2439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jost L (2009) Mismeasuring biological diversity: response to Hoffmann and Hoffmann (2008). Ecol Econ 68:925–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jost L (2010) The relation between evenness and diversity. Diversity 2:207–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jurasinski G, Retzer V, Beierkuhnlein C (2009) Inventory, differentiation, and proportional diversity: a consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity. Oecologia 159:15–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. MacArthur RH (1965) Patterns of species diversity. Biol Rev 40:510–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moreno CE, Rodríguez P (2010) A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity? Oecologia 163:279–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tuomisto H (2010a) A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity? Yes, it does exist. Oecologia 164:853–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tuomisto H (2010b) A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography 33:2–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tuomisto H (2010c) A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 2. Quantifying beta diversity and related phenomena. Ecography 33:23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vellend M (2001) Do commonly-used indices of beta diversity measure species turnover? J Veg Sci 12:545–552Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas Universidad Autónoma del Estado de HidalgoPachucaMexico
  2. 2.Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la BiodiversidadMexicoMexico

Personalised recommendations