Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 168, Issue 2, pp 415–424 | Cite as

Bird predation enhances tree seedling resistance to insect herbivores in contrasting forest habitats

  • Brice GiffardEmail author
  • Emmanuel Corcket
  • Luc Barbaro
  • Hervé Jactel
Plant-Animal interactions - Original Paper

Abstract

According to the associational resistance hypothesis, neighbouring plants are expected to influence both the insect herbivore communities and their natural enemies. However, this has rarely been tested for the effects of canopy trees on herbivory of seedlings. One possible mechanism responsible for associational resistance is the indirect impact of natural enemies on insect herbivory, such as insectivorous birds. But it remains unclear to what extent such trophic cascades are influenced by the composition of plant associations (i.e. identity of ‘associated’ plants). Here, we compared the effect of bird exclusion on insect leaf damage for seedlings of three broadleaved tree species in three different forest habitats. Exclusion of insectivorous birds affected insect herbivory in a species-specific manner: leaf damage increased on Betula pendula seedlings whereas bird exclusion had no effect for two oaks (Quercus robur and Q. ilex). Forest habitat influenced both the extent of insect herbivory and the effect of bird exclusion. Broadleaved seedlings had lower overall leaf damage within pine plantations than within broadleaved stands, consistent with the resource concentration hypothesis. The indirect effect of bird exclusion on leaf damage was only significant in pine plantations, but not in exotic and native broadleaved woodlands. Our results support the enemies hypothesis, which predicts that the effects of insectivorous birds on insect herbivory on seedlings are greater beneath non-congeneric canopy trees. Although bird species richness and abundance were greater in broadleaved woodlands, birds were unable to regulate insect herbivory on seedlings in forests of more closely related tree species.

Keywords

Tritrophic interactions Insectivorous birds Resource concentration hypothesis Natural enemies hypothesis Seedling herbivory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Fabrice Vetillard and Pierre Menassieu for their help with constructing cages and the set-up of field experiments and Paul Tourneur and Amandine Blanc for assistance in the field. The authors declare that the experiments performed in this study comply with the current laws of France. Brice Giffard was supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Higher Education and Research. We thank Eckehard G. Brockerhoff, Christopher J. Whelan and one anonymous reviewer for invaluable comments on previous versions of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

442_2011_2089_MOESM1_ESM.doc (128 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 128 kb)

References

  1. Atlegrim O (1989) Exclusion of birds from bilberry stands—impact on insect larval density and damage to the bilberry. Oecologia 79:136–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbaro L, Pontcharraud L, Vetillard F, Guyon D, Jactel H (2005) Comparative responses of bird, carabid, and spider assemblages to stand and landscape diversity in maritime pine plantation forests. Ecoscience 12:110–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbaro L, van Halder I (2009) Linking bird, carabid beetle and butterfly life-history traits to habitat fragmentation in mosaic landscapes. Ecography 32:321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber NA, Marquis RJ (2009) Spatial variation in top-down direct and indirect effects on white oak (Quercus alba L.). Am Midl Nat 162:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbosa P, Hines J, Kaplan I, Martinson H, Szczepaniec A, Szendrei Z (2009) Associational resistance and associational susceptibility: having right or wrong neighbors. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batzer HO, Benzie JW, Popp MP (1987) Spruce budworm damage in aspen/balsam fir stands affected by cutting methods. North J Appl For 4:73–75Google Scholar
  7. Björkman M, Hambäck PA, Hopkins RJ, Rämert B (2010) Evaluating the enemies hypothesis in a clover-cabbage intercrop: effects of generalist and specialist natural enemies on the turnip root fly (Delia floralis). Agric For Entomol 12:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bock CE, Bock JH, Grant MC (1992) Effects of bird predation on grasshopper densities in an Arizona grassland. Ecology 73:1706–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis, 1st edn. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bridgeland WT, Beier P, Kolb T, Whitham TG (2010) A conditional trophic cascade: birds benefit faster growing trees with strong links between predators and plants. Ecology 91:73–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brockerhoff EG, Jactel H, Parrota JA, Quine CP, Sayer J (2008) Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodivers Conserv 17:925–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS III (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crawley MJ (1989) Insect herbivores and plant-population dynamics. Annu Rev Entomol 34:531–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dial R, Roughgarden J (1995) Experimental removal of insectivores from rain forest canopy: direct and indirect effects. Ecology 76:1821–1834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Finch S, Collier RH (2000) Host-plant selection by insects—a theory based on ‘appropriate/inappropriate landings’ by pest insects of cruciferous plants. Entomol Exp Appl 96:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forkner RE, Hunter MD (2000) What goes up must come down? Nutrient addition and predation pressure on oak herbivores. Ecology 81:1588–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giertych MJ, Karolewski P, Zytkowiak R, Oleksyn J (2006) Differences in defence strategies against herbivores between two pioneer tree species: Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. and Betula pendula. Roth. Pol J Ecol 54:181–187Google Scholar
  18. Glen DM (2004) Birds as predators of lepidopterous larvae. In: Van Emden HF, Rothschild M (eds) Insect and Bird Interactions. Intercept, Andover, pp 89–108Google Scholar
  19. González-Gómez P, Estades CF, Simonetti JA (2006) Strengthened insectivory in a temperate fragmented forest. Oecologia 148:137–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenberg R, Bichier P, Angon AC, MacVean C, Perez R, Cano E (2000) The impact of avian insectivory on arthropods and leaf damage in some Guatemalan coffee plantations. Ecology 81:1750–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenberg R, Bichier P, Angon AC, Reitsma R (1997) Bird populations in shade and sun coffee plantations in Central Guatemala. Conserv Biol 11:448–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hedges LV, Olkin I (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Holmes RT (1990) Ecological and evolutionary impacts of bird predation on forest insects: an overview. Stud Avian Biol 13:6–13Google Scholar
  24. Holmes RT, Schultz JC, Nothnagle P (1979) Bird predation on forest insects: an exclosure experiment. Science 206:462–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jactel H, Brockerhoff EG (2007) Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. Ecol Lett 10:835–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaitaniemi P, Riihimaki J, Koricheva J, Vehvilainen H (2007) Experimental evidence for associational resistance against the European pine sawfly in mixed tree stands. Silva Fenn 41:259–268Google Scholar
  27. Kalka MB, Smith AR, Kalko EKV (2008) Bats limit arthropods and herbivory in a tropical forest. Science 320:71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karban R (2010) Neighbors affect resistance to herbivory—a new mechanism. New Phytol 186:564–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keenan R, Lamb D, Sexton G (1995) Experience with mixed species rainforest plantations in North Queensland. Commonw For Rev 74:315–321Google Scholar
  30. Lemen C (1981) Elm trees and elm leaf beetles—patterns of herbivory. Oikos 36:65–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Low C, Connor EF (2003) Birds have no impact on folivorous insect guilds on a montane willow. Oikos 103:579–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maetô K, Fukuyama K (1997) Mature tree effect of Acer mono on seedling mortality due to insect herbivory. Ecol Res 12:337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mäntylä E, Alessio GA, Blande JD, Heijari J, Holopainen JK, Laaksonen T, Piirtola P, Klemola T (2008) From plants to birds: higher avian predation rates in trees responding to insect herbivory. Plos ONE 3:e2832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mäntylä E, Klemola T, Laaksonen T (2011) Birds help plants: a meta-analysis of top-down trophic cascades caused by avian predators. Oecologia 165:143–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marquis RJ, Whelan CJ (1994) Insectivorous birds increase growth of white oak through consumption of leaf-chewing insects. Ecology 75:2007–2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marquis RJ, Whelan CJ (1996) Plant morphology and recruitment of the third trophic level: subtle and little-recognized defenses? Oikos 75:330–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mazía CN, Thomas K, Enrique JC (2004) Interannual changes in folivory and bird insectivory along a natural productivity gradient in northern Patagonian forests. Ecography 27:29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mooney KA, Gruner DS, Barber NA, Van Bael SA, Philpott SM, Greenberg R (2010) Interactions among predators and the cascading effects of vertebrate insectivores on arthropod communities and plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:7335–7340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC (2007) Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 82:591–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Norghauer JM, Grogan J, Malcolm JR, Felfili JM (2010) Long-distance dispersal helps germinating mahogany seedlings escape defoliation by a specialist caterpillar. Oecologia 162:405–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pace ML, Cole JJ, Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1999) Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 14:483–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perfecto I, Vandermeer JH, Bautista GL, Nuñez GI, Greenberg R, Bichier P, Langridge S (2004) Greater predation in shaded coffee farms: the role of resident neotropical birds. Ecology 85:2677–2681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Philpott SM, Soong O, Lowenstein JH, Pulido AL, Lopez DT, Flynn DFB, DeClerck F (2009) Functional richness and ecosystem services: bird predation on arthropods in tropical agroecosystems. Ecol Appl 19:1858–1867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pigot AL, Leather SR (2008) Invertebrate predators drive distance-dependent patterns of seedling mortality in a temperate tree Acer pseudoplatanus. Oikos 117:521–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pinheiro J, Bates D (2004) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, McPheron BA, Thompson JN, Weis AE (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:41–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. V, Austria, ISBN:3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org
  48. Riihimäki J, Kaitaniemi P, Koricheva J, Vehviläinen H (2005) Testing the enemies hypothesis in forest stands: the important role of tree species composition. Oecologia 142:90–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robinson SK, Holmes RT (1984) Effects of plant-species and foliage structure on the foraging behavior of forest birds. Auk 101:672–684Google Scholar
  50. Root RB (1973) Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol Monogr 43:95–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosenberg MS, Adams DC, Gurevitch J (2000) Metawin: statistical software for meta-analysis, version 2.0. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  52. Russell EP (1989) Enemies hypothesis: a review of the effect of vegetational diversity on predatory insects and parasitoids. Environ Entomol 18:590–599Google Scholar
  53. Schuldt A, Baruffol M, Böhnke M, Bruelheide H, Härdtle W, Lang AC, Nadrowski K, Von Oheimb G, Voigt W, Zhou H, Assmann T (2010) Tree diversity promotes insect herbivory in subtropical forests of south-east China. J Ecol 98:917–926PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sipura M (1999) Tritrophic interactions: willows, herbivorous insects and insectivorous birds. Oecologia 121:537–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sobek S, Scherber C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2009) Sapling herbivory, invertebrate herbivores and predators across a natural tree diversity gradient in Germany’s largest connected deciduous forest. Oecologia 160:279–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Bael SA, Philpott SM, Greenberg R, Bichier P, Barber NA, Mooney KA, Gruner DS (2008) Birds as predators in tropical agroforestery systems. Ecology 89:928–934PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. van Halder I, Barbaro L, Corcket E, Jactel H (2008) Importance of semi-natural habitats for the conservation of butterfly communities in landscapes dominated by pine plantations. Biodivers Conserv 17:1149–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vásquez PA, Grez AA, Bustamante RO, Simonetti JA (2007) Herbivory, foliar survival and shoot growth in fragmented populations of Aristotelia chilensis. Acta Oecol 31:48–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vehviläinen H, Koricheva J, Ruohomäki K (2007) Tree species diversity influences herbivore abundance and damage: meta-analysis of long-term forest experiments. Oecologia 152:287–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vehviläinen H, Koricheva J, Ruohomäki K (2008) Effects of stand tree species composition and diversity on abundance of predatory arthropods. Oikos 117:935–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vehviläinen H, Koricheva J, Ruohomäki K, Johansson T, Valkonen S (2006) Effects of tree stand species composition on insect herbivory of silver birch in boreal forests. Basic Appl Ecol 7:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Whelan CJ (2001) Foliage structure influences foraging of insectivorous forest birds: an experimental study. Ecology 82:219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whelan CJ, Wenny DG, Marquis RJ (2008) Ecosystem services provided by birds. Ann NY Acad Sci 1134:25–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. White JA, Whitham TG (2000) Associational susceptibility of cottonwood to a box elder herbivore. Ecology 81:1795–1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brice Giffard
    • 1
    • 2
  • Emmanuel Corcket
    • 2
  • Luc Barbaro
    • 1
  • Hervé Jactel
    • 1
  1. 1.UMR1202, BIOGECOINRACestasFrance
  2. 2.UMR1202, BIOGECOUniversité de BordeauxTalenceFrance

Personalised recommendations