Oecologia

, 167:1

Herbivore-induced resource sequestration in plants: why bother?

Concepts, Reviews and Syntheses

Abstract

Herbivores can cause numerous changes in primary plant metabolism. Recent studies using radioisotopes, for example, have found that insect herbivores and related cues can induce faster export from leaves and roots and greater partitioning into tissues inaccessible to foraging herbivores. This process, termed induced resource sequestration, is being proposed as an important response of plants to cope with herbivory. Here, we review the evidence for resource sequestration and suggest that associated allocation and ecological costs may limit the benefit of this response because resources allocated to storage are not immediately available to other plant functions or may be consumed by other enemies. We then present a conceptual model that describes the conditions under which benefits might outweigh costs of induced resource sequestration. Benefits and costs are discussed in the context of differences in plant life-history traits and biotic and abiotic conditions, and new testable hypotheses are presented to guide future research. We predict that intrinsic factors related to life history, ontogeny and phenology will alter patterns of induced sequestration. We also predict that induced sequestration will depend on certain external factors: abiotic conditions, types of herbivores, and trophic interactions. We hope the concepts presented here will stimulate more focused research on the ecological and evolutionary costs and benefits of herbivore-induced resource sequestration.

Keywords

Defense Plant–herbivore interactions Storage Tolerance Resource allocation 

References

  1. Abrams MD (2003) Where has all the white oak gone? Bioscience 53:927–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal AA (2000) Specificity of induced resistance in wild radish: causes and consequences for two specialist and two generalist caterpillars. Oikos 89:493–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal AA, Karban R (1999) Why induced defenses may be favored over constitutive strategies in plants. In: Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 45–61Google Scholar
  4. Aide TM (1988) Herbivory as a selective agent on the timing of leaf production in a tropical understory community. Nature 336:574–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anten NP, Martínez-Ramos M, Ackerly DD (2003) Defoliation and growth in an understory palm: quantifying the contributions of compensatory responses. Ecology 84:2905–2918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babst BA et al (2005) Jasmonic acid induces rapid changes in carbon transport and partitioning in Populus. New Phytol 167:63–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Babst BA, Ferrieri RA, Thorpe MR, Orians CM (2008) Lymantria dispar herbivory induces rapid changes in carbon transport and partitioning in Populus nigra. Entomol Exp Appl 128:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baldwin IT, Gorham D, Schmelz EA, Lewandowski CA, Lynds GY (1998) Allocation of nitrogen to an inducible defense and seed production in Nicotiana attenuata. Oecologia 115:541–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bardgett RD, Wardle DA, Yeates GW (1998) Linking above-ground and below-ground interactions: how plant responses to foliar herbivory influence soil organisms. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1867–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beardmore T, Wetzel S, Kalous M (2000) Interactions of airborne methyl jasmonate with vegetative storage protein gene and protein accumulation and biomass partitioning in Populus plants. Can J For Res 30:1106–1113Google Scholar
  11. Björkman C, Bengtsson B, Häggström H (2000) Localized outbreak of a willow leaf beetle: plant vigor or natural enemies? Popul Ecol 42:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blossey B, Hunt-Joshi TR (2003) Belowground herbivory by insects: influence on plants and aboveground herbivores. Annu Rev Entomol 48:521–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boege K, Marquis RJ (2005) Facing herbivory as you grow up: the ontogeny of resistance in plants. Trends Ecol Evol 20:441–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boege K, Dirzo R, Siemens D, Brown P (2007) Ontogenetic switches from plant resistance to tolerance: minimizing costs with age? Ecol Lett 10:177–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Briggs MA, Schultz JC (1990) Chemical defense production in Lotus corniculatus L. II. Trade-offs among growth, reproduction and defense. Oecologia 83:32–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bultman TL, Faeth SH (1986) Selective oviposition by a leaf miner in response to temporal variation in abscission. Oecologia 69:117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Canham CD, Kobe RK, Latty EF, Chazdon RL (1999) Interspecific and intraspecific variation in tree seedling survival: effects of allocation to roots versus carbohydrate reserves. Oecologia 121:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carson WP, Root RB (2000) Herbivory and plant species coexistence: community regulation by an outbreaking phytophagous insect. Ecol Monogr 70:73–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cipollini DF, Purrington CB, Bergelson J (2003) Costs of induced responses in plants. Basic Appl Ecol 4:79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coley PD, Barone JA (1996) Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:305–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dalin P (2006) Habitat difference in abundance of willow leaf beetle Phratora vulgatissima (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): plant quality or natural enemies. Bull Entomol Res 96:629–635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. de Boer NJ (1999) Pyrrolizidine alkaloid distribution in Senecio jacobaea rosettes minimises losses to generalist feeding. Entomol Exp Appl 91:169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Denno RF, McClure MS (eds) (1983) Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Dicke M (2009) Behavioural and community ecology of plants that cry for help. Plant Cell Environ 32:654–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eber S (2004) Bottom-up density regulation in the holly leaf-miner Phytomyza ilicis. J Anim Ecol 73:948–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fenner M, Hanley ME, Lawrence R (1999) Comparison of seedling and adult palatability in annual and perennial plants. Funct Ecol 13:546–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fritz RS, Hochwender CG, Lewkiewicz D, Bothwell S, Orians CM (2001) Seedling herbivory by slugs in a willow hybrid system: developmental changes in damage, chemical defense, and plant performance. Oecologia 129:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frost CJ, Hunter MD (2008) Herbivore-induced shifts in carbon and nitrogen allocation in red oak seedlings. New Phytol 178:835–845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geiger DR, Servaites JC (1991) Carbon allocation and response to stress. In: Mooney HA, Winner WE, Pell EJ (eds) Responses of plants to multiple stresses. Academic Press, New York, pp 123–127Google Scholar
  30. Giordanengo P, Brunissen L, Rusterucci C, Vincent C, van Bel A, Dinant S, Girousse C, Faucher M, Bonnemain JL (2010) Compatible plant-aphid interactions: how aphids manipulate plant responses. C R Biol 333:516–523Google Scholar
  31. Giron D, Kaiser W, Imbault N, Casas J (2007) Cytokinin-mediated leaf manipulation by a leafminer caterpillar. Biol Lett 3:340–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gómez S, Ferrieri RA, Schueller M, Orians CM (2010) Methyl jasmonate elicits rapid changes in carbon and nitrogen dynamics in tomato. New Phytol 188:835–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes and ecosystem properties, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, UKGoogle Scholar
  34. Henkes GJ, Thorpe MR, Minchin PEH, Schurr U, Röse USR (2008) Jasmonic acid treatment to part of the root system is consistent with simulated leaf herbivory, diverting recently assimilated carbon towards untreated roots within an hour. Plant Cell Environ 31:1229–1236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henry F, Vestergard M, Christensen S (2008) Evidence for a transient increase of rhizodeposition within one and a half day after a severe defoliation of Plantago arenaria grown in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1264–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Holland JN, Cheng W, Crossley DA Jr (1996) Herbivore-induced changes in plant carbon allocation: assessment of below-ground C fluxes using carbon-14. Oecologia 107:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hopkins RJ, van Dam NM, van Loon JJA (2009) Role of glucosinolates in insect-plant relationships and multitrophic interactions. Annu Rev Entomol 54:57–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hunter AF (1991) Traits that distinguish outbreaking and nonoutbreaking macrolepidoptera feeding on northern hardwood trees. Oikos 60:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jones RE (1987) Ants, parasitoids, and the cabbage butterfly Pieris rapae. J Anim Ecol 56:739–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaplan I, Halitschke R, Kessler A, Rehill BJ, Sardanelli S, Denno RF (2008) Physiological integration of roots and shoots in plant defense strategies links above- and belowground herbivory. Ecol Lett 11:841–851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaplan I, Sardanelli S, Denno RF (2009) Field evidence for indirect interactions between foliar-feeding insect and root-feeding nematode communities on Nicotiana tabacum. Ecol Entomol 34:262–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  43. Kobe RK (1997) Carbohydrate allocation to storage as a basis of interspecific variation in sapling survivorship and growth. Oikos 80:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kobe RK, Iyer M, Walters MB (2010) Optimal partitioning theory revisited: nonstructural carbohydrates dominate root mass responses to nitrogen. Ecology 91:166–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kosola KR, Dickmann DI, Paul EA, Parry D (2001) Repeated insect defoliation effects on growth, nitrogen acquisition, carbohydrates, and root demography of poplars. Oecologia 129:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Larsson S, Björkman C, Kidd NA (1993) Outbreaks in diprionid sawflies: why some species and not others? In: Wagner MR KFR (eds) Sawfly life history adaptations to woody plants. Academic, San Diego, pp 453–483Google Scholar
  47. Macel M, Vrieling K (2003) Pyrrolizidine alkaloids as oviposition stimulants for the cinnabar moth, Tyria jacobaeae. J Chem Ecol 29:1435–1446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Masters GJ, Brown VK, Gange AC (1993) Plant mediated interactions between above-and below-ground insect herbivores. Oikos 66:148–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McKey D (1974) Adaptive patterns in alkaloid physiology. Am Nat 108:305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Meuriot F, Noquet C, Avice J-C, Volenec JJ, Cunningham SM, Sors TG, Caillot S, Ourry A (2004) Methyl jasmonate alters N partitioning, N reserves accumulation and induces gene expression of a 32-kDa vegetative storage protein that possesses chitinase activity in Medicago sativa taproots. Physiol Plant 120:113–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mooney HA, Winner WE (1991) Responses of plants to multiple stresses. In: Mooney HA, Winner WE, Pell EJ (eds) Partitioning responses of plants to stress. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U, Steinger T (2004) Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends Ecol Evol 9:417–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Myers JA, Kitajima K (2007) Carbohydrate storage enhances seedling shade and stress tolerance in a neotropical forest. J Ecol 95:383–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nichols-Orians CM (1991) Environmentally induced differences in plant traits: consequences for suscetptibility to a leaf-cutter ant. Ecology 72:1609–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nichols-Orians CM, Schultz JC (1990) Interactions among leaf toughness, chemistry, and harvesting by attine ants. Ecol Entomol 15:311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nothnagle PJ, Schultz JC (1987) What is a forest pest? In: Barbosa P, Schultz JC (eds) Insect outbreaks. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 59–80Google Scholar
  57. Orians CM, Björkman C (2009) Associational resistance to a tropical leaf-miner: does neighbour identity matter? J Trop Ecol 25:551–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Orians CM, Lower S, Fritz RS, Roche BM (2003) The effects of plant genetic variation and soil nutrients on secondary chemistry and growth in a shrubby willow, Salix sericea: patterns and constraints on the evolution of resistance traits. Biochem Syst Ecol 31:233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Orians CM, Hochwender CG, Fritz RS, Snäll T (2010) Growth and chemical defenses in willow seedlings: trade-offs are transient. Oecologia 163:283–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Paula S, Pausas JG (2011) Root traits explain different foraging strategies between resprouting life histories. Oecologia 165:321–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schwachtje J, Baldwin IT (2008) Why does herbivore attack reconfigure primary metabolism? Plant Physiol 146:845–851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schwachtje J, Minchin PEH, Jahnke S, van Dongen JT, Schittko U, Baldwin IT (2006) SNF1-related kinases allow plants to tolerate herbivory by allocating carbon to roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12935–12940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shaw B, TT H, Cooke DT (2002) Responses of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) to drought and nutrient deficiency stress. Plant Growth Regul 37:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sosnová M, Klimešová J (2009) Life-history variation in the short-lived herb Rorippa palustris: the role of carbon storage. Acta Oecol 35:691–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tejeda-Sartorius M, de la Vega OM, Delano-Frier JP (2008) Jasmonic acid influences mycorrhizal colonization in tomato plants by modifying the expression of genes involved in carbohydrate partitioning. Physiol Plant 133:339–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tiffin P (2000) Mechanisms of tolerance to herbivore damage: what do we know? Evol Ecol 14:523–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Trumble JT, Kolodnyhirsch DM, Ting IP (1993) Plant compensation for arthropod herbivory. Annu Rev Entomol 38:93–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tschaplinksi TJ, Blake TJ (1989a) Photosynthetic reinvigoration of leaves following shoot decapitation and accelerated growth of coppice shoots. Physiol Plant 75:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tschaplinksi TJ, Blake TJ (1989b) The role of sink demand in carbon partitioning and photsynthetic reinvigoration following shoot decapitation. Physiol Plant 75:166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. van Dam NM, de Jong TJ, Iwasa Y, Kubo T (1996) Optimal defence distribution within rosette plants of Cynoglossum officinale L.: are plants smart investors? Funct Ecol 10:128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Van Dam NM, Horn M, Mares M, Baldwin IT (2001) Ontogeny constrains systemic protease inhibitor response in Nicotiana attenuata. J Chem Ecol 27:547–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Van der Putten WH, Vet LEM, Harvey JA, Wackers FL (2001) Linking above- and belowground multitrophic interactions of plants, herbivores, pathogens, and their antagonists. Trends Ecol Evol 16:547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wainhouse D, Staley JT, Jinks R, Morgan G (2009) Growth and defence in young pine and spruce and the expression of resistance to a stem-feeding weevil. Oecologia 158:641–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Walling LL (2000) The myriad plant reponses to herbivores. J Plant Growth Regul 19:195–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Walling LL (2008) Avoiding effective defenses: strategies employed by phloem-feeding insects. Plant Physiol 146:859–866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Walls R, Appel H, Cipollini M, Schultz J (2005) Fertility, root reserves and the cost of inducible defenses in the perennial plant Solanum carolinense. J Chem Ecol 31:2263–2288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Whitham TG (1983) Host manipulation of parasites: within–plant variation as a defense against rapidly evolving pests. In: Denno RF, McClure MS (eds) Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic, New York, pp 15–41Google Scholar
  78. Zavala JA, Patankar AG, Gase K, Baldwin IT (2004) Constitutive and inducible trypsin proteinase inhibitor production incurs large fitness costs in Nicotiana attenuata. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:1607–1612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin M. Orians
    • 1
  • Alexandra Thorn
    • 1
  • Sara Gómez
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyTufts UniversityMedfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA

Personalised recommendations