, Volume 166, Issue 4, pp 1131–1142 | Cite as

Linking plant growth responses across topographic gradients in tallgrass prairie

  • Jesse B. Nippert
  • Troy W. Ocheltree
  • Adam M. Skibbe
  • Laura C. Kangas
  • Jay M. Ham
  • Kira B. Shonkwiler Arnold
  • Nathaniel A. Brunsell
Ecosystem ecology - original paper


Aboveground biomass in grasslands varies according to landscape gradients in resource availability and seasonal patterns of growth. Using a transect spanning a topographic gradient in annually burned ungrazed tallgrass prairie, we measured changes in the height of four abundant C4 grass species, LAI, biomass, and cumulative carbon flux using two closely located eddy flux towers. We hypothesized that seasonal patterns of plant growth would be similar across the gradient, but the magnitude of growth and biomass accumulation would vary by topographic position, reflecting spatial differences in microclimate, slope, elevation, and soil depth. Thus, identifying and measuring local growth responses according to topographic variability should significantly improve landscape predictions of aboveground biomass. For most of the growth variables measured, classifying topography into four positions best captured the inherent spatial variability. Biomass produced, seasonal LAI and species height increased from the upland and break positions to the slope and lowland. Similarly, cumulative carbon flux in 2008 was greater in lowland versus upland tower locations (difference of 64 g m−2 by DOY 272). Differences in growth by topographic position reflected increased production of flowering culms by Andropogon gerardii and Sorghastrum nutans in lowland. Varying growth responses by these species may be a significant driver of biomass and carbon flux differences by topographic position, at least for wet years. Using a digital elevation model to classify the watershed into topographic positions, we performed a geographically weighted regression to predict landscape biomass. The minimum and maximum predictions of aboveground biomass for this watershed had a large range (86–393 t per 40.4 ha), illustrating the drastic spatial variability in growth within this annually-burned grassland.


ANPP Flux footprint Eddy covariance LAI Mesic grassland Topography 



We thank Walter Dodds and John Blair for logistical support, and Fred Caldwell, Tyler Buck, Patrick O’Neal, Jeff Taylor, Gracie Orozco, and Teall Culbertson for technical support. Alan Knapp, Joe Craine, and anonymous reviewers provided comments that improved this manuscript. The Kansas EPSCoR Ecoforecasting Project, (EPS-0553722 and EPS-0919443), the Kansas Technology Enterprise Corporation, the Konza Prairie LTER (DEB-0823341) and the NSF-REU program (DBI-0851835) provided financial support.

Supplementary material

442_2011_1948_MOESM1_ESM.doc (515 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 515 kb)


  1. Abrams MD, Knapp AK, Hulbert LC (1986) A 10 year record of aboveground biomass in a Kansas tallgrass prairie: effects of fire and topographic position. Am J Bot 73:1509–1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartha S, Collins SL, Glenn SM, Kertesz M (1995) Fine-scale spatial organization of tallgrass prairie vegetation along a topographic gradient. Folia Geobot Phytotaxon 30:169–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borchert JR (1950) The climate of the central North American grassland. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 40:1–39Google Scholar
  4. Bremer DJ, Ham JM (2010) Net carbon fluxes over burned and unburned native tallgrass prairie. J Range Ecol Manag 63:72–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Briggs JM, Knapp AK (1995) Interannual variability in primary production in tallgrass prairie: climate, soil moisture, topographic position, and fire as determinants of aboveground biomass. Am J Bot 82:1024–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunsell NA, Ham JM, Owensby CE (2008) Assessing the multi-resolution information content of remotely sensed variables and elevation for evapotranspiration in tall-grass prairie environment. Remote Sens Environ 112:2977–2987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunsell NA, Ham JM, Arnold KA (2010) Validating remotely sensed land surface fluxes in heterogeneous terrain with large aperture scintillometry. Int J Remote Sens (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Burke IC, Kittel TGF, Lauenroth WK, Snook P, Yonker CM, Parton WJ (1991) Regional analysis of the central Great Plains. Bioscience 41:685–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Chuanyan Z, Zhongren N, Guodong C (2005) Methods for modeling of temporal and spatial distribution of air temperature at landscape scale in the southern Qilian mountains. China. Eco. Model 189:209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craine JM, Towne EG, Nippert JB (2010) Climate controls on grass culm production over a quarter century in a tallgrass prairie. Ecology 91:2132–2140. doi: 10.1890/09-1242 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epstein HE, Lauenroth WI, Burke IC, Coffin DP (1997) Productivity patterns of C3 and C4 functional types in the US Great Plains. Ecology 78:722–731Google Scholar
  13. Falge E, Baldocchi D, Olson R, Anthoni PM, Aubinet M, Bernhofer C, Burba G, Ceulemans R, Clement R, Dolman H, Granier A, Gross P, Granwald T, Hollinger D, Jenson NO, Katul GG, Keronen P, Kowalski AS, Lai CT, Law BE, Meyers T, Moncrief J, Moors EJ, Munger W, Pilegaard K, Rannik U, Rebmann C, Sukyer A, Tenhunen J, Tu K, Verma S, Vesala T, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2001) Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange. Agric For Meteorol 107:43–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freeman CC, Hulbert LC (1985) An annotated list of the vascular flora of Konza Prairie Research Natural Area, Kansas. Trans Kansas Acad Sci 88:84–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibson DJ, Hulbert LC (1987) Effects of fire, topography and year-to-year climatic variation on species composition in tallgrass prairie. Vegetatio 72:175–185Google Scholar
  16. Ham JM, Heilman JL (2003) Experimental test of density and energy balance corrections on carbon dioxide flux as measured using open-path eddy covariance. Agronomy J 95:1393–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ham JM, Knapp AK (1998) Fluxes of CO2, water vapor, and energy from a prairie ecosystem during the seasonal transition from carbon sink to carbon source. Agric For Meteorol 89:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartnett DC, Hickman KR, Walter LEF (1996) Effects of bison grazing, fire, and topography on floristic diversity in tallgrass prairie. J Range Manag 49:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayden BP (1998) Regional climate and the distribution of tallgrass prairie. In: Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Hartnett DC, Collins SL (eds) Grassland dynamics: long-term ecological research in tallgrass prairie. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 19–34Google Scholar
  20. Heisler-White JL, Blair JM, Kelly EF, Harmoney K, Knapp AK (2009) Contingent productivity responses to more extreme rainfall regimes across a grassland biome. Global Change Biol 15:2894–2904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hollinger DY, Aber J, Dail B, Davidson EA, Goltz SM, Hughes H, LeClerc MY, Lee JT, Richardson AD, Rodrigues C, Scott NA, Achuatavarier D, Walsh J (2004) Spatial and temporal variability in forest-atmosphere CO2 exchange. Global Change Biol 10:1689–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knapp AK (1985) Early season production and microclimate associated with topography in a C4 dominated grassland. Oecol Plant 6:337–346Google Scholar
  23. Knapp AK, Fahnestock JT, Hambrug SP, Statland LB, Seastedt TR, Schimel DS (1993) Landscape patterns in soil-plant water relations and primary production in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 74:549–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knapp AK, Beier C, Briske DD, Classen AT, Luo Y, Reichstein M, Smith MD, Smith SD, Bell JE, Fay PA, Heisler JL, Leavitt SW, Sherry R, Smith B, Weng E (2008) Consequences of more extreme precipitation regimes for terrestrial ecosystems. Bioscience 58:811–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lewis GM (1966) William Gilpin and the concept of the Great Plains ecoregion. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 56:33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li F, Kustas WP, Anderson MC, Prueger JH, Scott RL (2008) Effect of remote sensing spatial resolution on interpreting tower-based flux observations. Remote Sens Environ 112:337–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin JG, Bolstad PV (2009) Variation of soil respiration at three spatial scales: components within measurements, intra-site variation and patterns on the landscape. Soil Biol Biochem 41:530–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Massman WJ, Lee X (2002) Eddy covariance flux corrections and uncertainties in long-term studies of carbon and energy exchanges. Agric For Meteorol 113:121–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mennis J (2006) Mapping the results of geographically weighted regression. Cartogr J 43:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nippert JB, Knapp AK (2007) Soil water partitioning contributes to species coexistence in tallgrass prairie. Oikos 116:1017–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nippert JB, Fay PA, Knapp AK (2007) Photosynthetic traits in C3 and C4 grassland species in mesocosm and field environments. Environ Exp Bot 60:412–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nippert JB, Fay PA, Carlisle JD, Knapp AK, Smith MD (2009) Ecophysiological responses of two dominant grasses to altered temperature and precipitation regimes. Acta Oecol 35:400–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oviatt CG (1998) Geomorphology of the Konza Prairie. In: Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Hartnett DC, Collins SL (eds) Grassland dynamics: long-term ecological research in tallgrass prairie. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 35–47Google Scholar
  34. Paruelo JM, Lauenroth WK (1996) Relative abundance of plant functional types in grasslands and shrublands of North America. Ecol Appl 6:1212–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paw U KT, Baldocchi DD, Meyers TP, Wilson KB (2000) Correction of eddy-covariance measurements incorporating both advective effects and density fluxes. Bound Layer Meteorol 97:487–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Polley HW, Normal JM, Arkebauer TJ, Walter-Shea EA, Greegor DH Jr, Bramer B (1992) Leaf gas exchange of Andropogon gerardii Vitman, Panicum virgatum L., and Sorghastrum nutans (L.) nash in a tallgrass prairie. J Geophys Res 97:18837–18844Google Scholar
  37. Ransom MD, Rice CW, Todd TC, Wehmueller WA (1998) Soils and soil biota. In: Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Hartnett DC, Collins SL (eds) Grassland dynamics: long-term ecological research in tallgrass prairie. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 48–66Google Scholar
  38. Richardson AD, Hollinger DY (2005) Statistical modeling of ecosystem respiration using eddy covariance data: maximum likelihood parameter estimation, and Monte Carlo simulation of model and parameter uncertainty, applied to three simple models. Agric For Meteorol 131:191–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Risser PG (1990) Landscape processes and the vegetation of the North American Grassland. In: Collins SL, Wallace LL (eds) Fire in North American tallgrass prairies. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, pp 133–146Google Scholar
  40. Risser PG, Birney EC, Blocker HD, May SW, Parton WJ, Weins JA (1981) The true prairie ecosystem. Hutchinson Ross, Stroudsberg, PAGoogle Scholar
  41. Rossum S, Lavin S (2000) Where are the Great Plains? A cartographic analysis. Prof Geogr 52:543–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schimel DS, Kittel TGF, Knapp AK, Seastedt TR, Parton WJ, Brown VB (1991) Physiological interactions along resource gradients in a tallgrass prairie. Ecology 72:672–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schmid HP, Lloyd CR (1999) Location bias of flux measurements over inhomogeneous areas. Agric Meteorol 93:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seastedt TR, Coxwell CC, Ojima DS, Parton WJ (1994) Controls of plant and soil carbon in a semihumid temperate grassland. Ecol Appl 4:344–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sellers PJ, Heisler MD, Hall FG, Goetz SJ, Strebel DE, Verma SB Desjardins RL, Schuepp PM, MacPherson JI (1995) Effects of spatial variability in topography, vegetation cover and soil moisture on area-averaged surface fluxes: a case study using the FIFE 1989 data. J. Geophysical Res. doi: 10.1029/2007JD008781
  46. Shonkwiler Arnold, KB (2010) Eddy covariance in a tallgrass prairie: energy balance closure, water and carbon budgets, and shrub expansion. MS thesis, Kansas State University, ManhattanGoogle Scholar
  47. Suyker AE, Verma SB (2001) Year-round observations of the net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide in a native tallgrass prairie. Global Change Biol 7:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Towne EG (2002) Vascular plants of Konza Prairie Biological Station: an annotated checklist of species in a Kansas tallgrass prairie. Sida 20:269–294Google Scholar
  49. Turner CL, Kneisler JR, Knapp AK (1995) Comparative gas exchange and nitrogen responses of the dominant C4 grass Andropogon gerardii and five C3 forbs to fire and topographic position in tallgrass prairie during a wet year. Int J Plant Sci 156:216–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Turner CL, Blair JM, Schartz RJ, Neel JC (1997) Soil N and plant responses to fire, topography, and supplemental N in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 78:1832–1843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Verma SB, Kim J, Clement RJ (1992) Momentum, water vapor, and carbon dioxide exchange at a centrally located prairie site during FIFE. J Geophys Res 97:18.629–18.640Google Scholar
  52. Webb E, Pearman G, Leuning R (1980) Correction of flux for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 106:85–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Webster KL, Creed IF, Bourbonniėre RA, Beall FD (2008) Controls on the heterogeneity of soil respiration in a tolerant hardwood forest. J Geophys Res 113:G03018CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesse B. Nippert
    • 1
  • Troy W. Ocheltree
    • 1
  • Adam M. Skibbe
    • 1
  • Laura C. Kangas
    • 1
    • 5
  • Jay M. Ham
    • 2
  • Kira B. Shonkwiler Arnold
    • 3
  • Nathaniel A. Brunsell
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Department of Soils and Crop SciencesColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  3. 3.Department of Horticulture, Forestry and Recreation ResourcesKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  4. 4.Department of GeographyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  5. 5.School of Forest Resources and Environmental ScienceMichigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA

Personalised recommendations