, Volume 166, Issue 1, pp 273–282 | Cite as

Enhanced isoprene-related tolerance of heat- and light-stressed photosynthesis at low, but not high, CO2 concentrations

  • Danielle A. WayEmail author
  • Jörg-Peter Schnitzler
  • Russell K. Monson
  • Robert B. Jackson
Global change ecology - original paper


The principal function of isoprene biosynthesis in plants remains unclear, but emission rates are positively correlated with temperature and light, supporting a role for isoprene in maintaining photosynthesis under transient heat and light stress from sunflecks. Isoprene production is also inversely correlated with CO2 concentrations, implying that rising CO2 may reduce the functional importance of isoprene. To understand the importance of isoprene in maintaining photosynthesis during sunflecks, we used RNAi technology to suppress isoprene production in poplar seedlings and compared the responses of these transgenic plants to wild-type and empty-vector control plants. We grew isoprene-emitting and non-emitting trees at low (190 ppm) and high (590 ppm) CO2 concentrations and compared their photosynthetic responses to short, transient periods of high light and temperature, as well as their photosynthetic thermal response at constant light. While there was little difference between emitting and non-emitting plants in their photosynthetic responses to simulated sunflecks at high CO2, isoprene-emitting trees grown at low CO2 had significantly greater photosynthetic sunfleck tolerance than non-emitting plants. Net photosynthesis at 42°C was 50% lower in non-emitters than in isoprene-emitting trees at low CO2, but only 22% lower at high CO2. Dark respiration rates were significantly higher in non-emitting poplar from low CO2, but there was no difference between isoprene-emitting and non-emitting lines at high CO2. We propose that isoprene biosynthesis may have evolved at low CO2 concentrations, where its physiological effect is greatest, and that rising CO2 will reduce the functional benefit of isoprene in the near future.


Poplar Photosynthesis Carbon gain Sunflecks 



We wish to thank Will Cook and the Duke Phytotron staff for helping to maintain the experiment. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript. Financial support was given to D.W. by a post-doctoral fellowship from NSERC, to J.P.S. and R.M. by the Human Frontier Science Program (Strasbourg, France), and to R.J. from the DOE (PER #64242-0012346) and NSF (DEB #0717191). This experiment complied with the laws of the United States.


  1. Affek HP, Yakir D (2002) Protection by isoprene against singlet oxygen in leaves. Plant Physiol 129:269–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behnke K, Ehlting B, Teuber M, Bauerfeind M, Louis S, Hänsch R, Polle A, Bohlmann J, Schnitzler JP (2007) Transgenic, non-isoprene emitting poplars don’t like it hot. Plant J 51:485–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behnke K, Kleist E, Uerlings R, Wildt J, Rennenberg H, Schnitzler JP (2009) RNAi-mediated suppression of isoprene biosynthesis in hybrid poplar impacts ozone tolerance. Tree Physiol 29:725–736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Behnke K, Loivamäki M, Zimmer I, Rennenberg H, Schnitzler JP, Louis S (2010) Isoprene emission protects photosynthesis in sunfleck exposed grey poplar. Photosynth Res 104:5–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bilger W, Björkman O (1990) Role of the xanthophyll cycle in photoprotection elucidated by measurements of light-induced absorbance changes, fluorescence and photosynthesis in leaves of Hedera canariensis. Photosynth Res 25:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlton AG, Wiedinmyer C, Kroll JH (2009) A review of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene. Atmos Chem Phys 9:4987–5005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowling SA, Sage RF (1998) Interactive effects of low atmospheric CO2 and elevated temperature on growth, photosynthesis and respiration in Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Cell Environ 21:427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fuentes JD, Lerdau M, Atkinson R, Baldocchi D, Bottenheim JW, Ciccioli P, Lamb B, Geron C, Gu L, Guenther A, Sharkey TD, Stockwell W (2000) Biogenic hydrocarbons in the atmospheric boundary layer: a review. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81:1537–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Genty B, Wonders J, Baker NR (1990) Non-photochemical quenching of F0 in leaves is emission wavelength dependent: consequences for quenching analysis and its interpretation. Photosynth Res 26:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffin KL, Anderson OR, Gastrich MD, Lewis JD, Lin G, Schuster W, Seemann JR, Tissue DT, Turnbull MH, Whitehead D (2001) Plant growth in elevated CO2 alters mitochondrial number and chloroplast fine structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:2473–2478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harley P, Lerdau M, Monson RK (1999) Ecological and evolutionary aspects of isoprene emission. Oecologia 118:109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hills AJ, Fall R, Monson RK (1991) Methods for the analysis of isoprene emission from leaves. In: Liskin H, Jackson J (eds) Plant toxin analysis. Modern methods of plant analysis, new series, volume 13. Springer, Berlin, pp 297–313Google Scholar
  13. Jansen E, Overpeck J, Briffa KR, Duplessy JC, Joos F, Masson-Delmotte V, Olago D, Otto-Bliesner B, Peltier WR, Rahmstorf S, Ramesh R, Raynaud D, Rind D, Solomina O, Villalba R, Zhang D (2007) Palaeoclimate. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 433–498Google Scholar
  14. Loreto F, Schnitzler JP (2010) Abiotic stresses and induced BVOCs: a review. Trends Plant Sci 15:154–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Loreto F, Velikova V (2001) Isoprene produced by leaves protects the photosynthetic apparatus against ozone damage, quenches ozone products, and reduces lipid peroxidation of cellular membranes. Plant Physiol 127:1781–1787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Loreto F, Centritto M, Barta C, Calfapietra C, Fares S, Monson RK (2007) The relationship between isoprene emission rate and dark respiration rate in white poplar (Populus alba L.) leaves. Plant Cell Environ 30:662–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Magel E, Mayrhofer S, Müller A, Zimmer I, Hampp R, Schnitzler JP (2006) Photosynthesis and substrate supply for isoprenoid biosynthesis in poplar leaves. Atmos Environ 40:S138–S151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Monson RK, Fall R (1989) Isoprene emission from aspen leaves—influence of environment and relation to photosynthesis and photorespiration. Plant Physiol 90:267–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Monson RK, Holland E (2001) Biospheric trace gas fluxes and their control over tropospheric chemistry. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:547–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Monson RK, Harley PC, Litvak ME, Wildermuth M, Guenther AB, Zimmerman PR, Fall R (1994) Environmental and developmental control over the seasonal pattern of isoprene emission from aspen leaves. Oecologia 99:260–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Monson RK, Wilkinson MJ, Monson ND, Trahan N, Lee S, Rosenstiel TN, Fall R (2009) Biochemical controls of the CO2 response of leaf isoprene emission: an alternative view of Sanadze’s double carboxylation scheme. Ann Agrar Sci 7:21–29Google Scholar
  22. Niinemets U, Tenhunen JD, Harley PC, Steinbrecher R (1999) A model of isoprene emission based on energetic requirements for isoprene synthesis and leaf photosynthetic properties for Liquidambar and Quercus. Plant Cell Environ 22:1319–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Niinemets U, Loreto F, Reichstein M (2004) Physiological and physico-chemical controls on foliar volatile organic compound emissions. Trends Plant Sci 9:180–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peñuelas J, Llusià J, Asensio D, Munné-Bosch S (2005) Linking isoprene with plant thermotolerance, antioxidants and monoterpene emissions. Plant Cell Environ 28:278–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Petit JR, Jouzel J, Raynaud D, Barkov NI, Barnola JM, Basile I, Bender M, Chappellaz J, Davis M, Delaygue G, Delmotte M, Kotlyakov VM, Legrand M, Lipenkov VY, Lorius C, Pepin L, Ritz C, Saltzman E, Stievenard M (1999) Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420, 000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica. Nature 399:429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Petron G, Harley P, Greenberg J, Guenther AB (2001) Seasonal temperature variations influence isoprene emission. Geophys Res Lett 28:1707–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Plaxton WC, Podesta FE (2006) The functional organization and control of plant respiration. Crit Rev Plant Sci 25:159–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosenstiel TN, Potosnak MJ, Griffin KL, Fall R, Monson RK (2003) Increased CO2 uncouples growth from isoprene emission in an agriforest ecosystem. Nature 421:256–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosenstiel TN, Ebbets AL, Khatri WC, Fall R, Monson RK (2004) Induction of poplar leaf nitrate reductase: a test of extrachloroplastic control of isoprene emission rate. Plant Biol 6:12–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sage RF, Kubien DS (2007) The temperature response of C3 and C4 photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 30:1086–1106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sanadze GA (1964) Light-dependent excretion of isoprene by plants. Photosynth Res 2:701–707Google Scholar
  32. Schnitzler JP, Zimmer I, Bachl A, Arend M, Fromm J, Fischbach RJ (2005) Biochemical properties of isoprene synthase from poplar (Populus×canescens). Planta 222:777–786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sharkey TD, Singsaas EL (1995) Why plants emit isoprene. Nature 374:769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sharkey TD, Yeh S (2001) Isoprene emission from plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52:407–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sharkey TD, Singsaas EL, Lerdau MT, Geron CD (1999) Weather effects on isoprene emission capacity and applications in emissions algorithms. Ecol Appl 9:1132–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharkey TD, Yeh S, Wiberley AE, Falbel TG, Gong D, Fernandez DE (2005) Evolution of the isoprene biosynthetic pathway in kudzu. Plant Physiol 137:700–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Siegenthaler U, Stocker TF, Monnin E, Lüthi D, Schwander J, Stauffer B, Raynaud D, Barnola J-M, Fischer H, Masson-Delmotte V, Jouzel J (2005) Stable carbon cycle-climate relationship during the late Pleistocene. Science 310:1313–1317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Singsaas EL, Sharkey TD (2000) Regulation of isoprene synthesis during high temperature stress. Plant Cell Environ 23:751–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singsaas EL, Lerdau M, Winter K, Sharkey TD (1997) Isoprene increases thermotolerance of isoprene-emitting leaves. Plant Physiol 115:1413–1420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Singsaas EL, Laporte MM, Shi JZ, Monson RK, Bowling DR, Johnson K, Lerdau M, Jasentuliytana A, Sharkey TD (1999) Leaf temperature fluctuations affect isoprene emission from red oak (Quercus rubra) leaves. Tree Physiol 19:917–924PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Siwko ME, Marrink SJ, de Vries AH, Kozubek A, Uitercamp AJMS, Mark A (2007) Does isoprene protect plant membranes from thermal shock? A molecular dynamics study. Biochim Biophys Acta 1768:198–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tipple BJ, Pagani M (2007) The early origins of terrestrial C4 photosynthesis. Annu Rev Earth Plan Sci 35:435–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Velikova V, Edreva A, Loreto F (2004) Endogenous isoprene protects Phragmites australis against singlet oxygen. Physiol Plant 122:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vickers CE, Possell M, Cojocariu CI, Laothawornkitkul J, Ryan A, Mullineaux PM, Hewitt CN (2009) Isoprene synthesis protects tobacco plants from oxidative stress. Plant Cell Environ 32:520–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang X, Lewis JD, Tissue DT, Seemann JR, Griffin KL (2001) Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on leaf dark respiration of Xanthium strumarium in light and in darkness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:2479–2484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Way DA, Sage RF (2008) Thermal acclimation of photosynthesis in black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.). Plant Cell Environ 31:1250–1262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilkinson MJ, Monson RK, Trahan N, Lee S, Brown E, Jackson RB, Polley HW, Fay PA, Fall R (2009) Leaf isoprene emission rate as a function of atmospheric CO2 concentration. Glob Change Biol 15:1189–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zachos J, Pagani M, Sloan L, Thomas E, Billups K (2001) Trends, rhythms and aberrations in global climate 65 MA to present. Science 292:686–696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danielle A. Way
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jörg-Peter Schnitzler
    • 2
    • 5
  • Russell K. Monson
    • 3
  • Robert B. Jackson
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of BiologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-IFU)Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyGarmisch-PartenkirchenGermany
  3. 3.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental SciencesUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  4. 4.Nicholas School of the Environment and Center on Global ChangeDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  5. 5.Department of Environmental Engineering, Institute of Biochemical Plant PathologyNeuherbergGermany

Personalised recommendations