, Volume 165, Issue 4, pp 1109–1117 | Cite as

Functional consequences of climate change-induced plant species loss in a tallgrass prairie

  • Joseph M. CraineEmail author
  • Jesse B. Nippert
  • E. Gene Towne
  • Sally Tucker
  • Steven W. Kembel
  • Adam Skibbe
  • Kendra K. McLauchlan
Global change ecology - Original Paper


Future climate change is likely to reduce the floristic diversity of grasslands. Yet the potential consequences of climate-induced plant species losses for the functioning of these ecosystems are poorly understood. We investigated how climate change might alter the functional composition of grasslands for Konza Prairie, a diverse tallgrass prairie in central North America. With species-specific climate envelopes, we show that a reduction in mean annual precipitation would preferentially remove species that are more abundant in the more productive lowland positions at Konza. As such, decreases in precipitation could reduce productivity not only by reducing water availability but by also removing species that inhabit the most productive areas and respond the most to climate variability. In support of this prediction, data on species abundance at Konza over 16 years show that species that are more abundant in lowlands than uplands are preferentially reduced in years with low precipitation. Climate change is likely to also preferentially remove species from particular functional groups and clades. For example, warming is forecast to preferentially remove perennials over annuals as well as Cyperaceae species. Despite these predictions, climate change is unlikely to unilaterally alter the functional composition of the tallgrass prairie flora, as many functional traits such as physiological drought tolerance and maximum photosynthetic rates showed little relationship with climate envelope parameters. In all, although climatic drying would indirectly alter grassland productivity through species loss patterns, the insurance afforded by biodiversity to ecosystem function is likely to be sustained in the face of climate change.


Climate change Grasslands Functional traits Konza Prairie Biogeography 



The authors thank Valerie Wright and other volunteers for collecting phenology data. J.M.C. was supported by an NSF grant (DEB-0816629). The Konza Prairie LTER dataset analyzed is the plant cover dataset (PVC02) and the climate data (ATP01). Data collection and archival was supported by National Science Foundation grants to the Konza Prairie LTER program.


  1. Axelrod DI (1985) Rise of the grassland biome, central North America. Bot Rev 51:163–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey AW, Poulton CE (1968) Plant communities and environmental interrelationships in a portion of Tillamook Burn Northwestern Oregon. Ecology 49:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaumont LJ, Gallagher RV, Thuiller W, Downey PO, Leishman MR, Hughes L (2009) Different climatic envelopes among invasive populations may lead to underestimations of current and future biological invasions. Divers Distrib 15:409–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blomberg SP, Garland JT, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Borchert JR (1950) The climate of the Central North American grassland. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 40:1–39Google Scholar
  6. Cadotte MW, Cavender-Bares J, Tilman D, Oakley TH (2009) Using phylogenetic, functional and trait diversity to understand patterns of plant community productivity. Plos One 4Google Scholar
  7. Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PVA, Kembel SW (2009) The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett 12:693–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held I, Jones R, Kolli RK, Kwon W-T, Laprise R, Magaña Rueda V, Mearns CGM L, Räisänen J, Rinke A, Sarr A, Whetton P (2007) Regional climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Craine JM, Towne EG (2011) High leaf tissue density grassland species consistently more abundant across topographic and disturbance contrasts in a North American tallgrass prairie. Plant Soil (in press)Google Scholar
  10. Craine JM, Joern A, Towne EG, Hamilton RG (2009) Consequences of climate variability for the performance of bison in tallgrass prairie. Global Change Biol 15:772–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craine JM, Towne EG, Nippert JB (2010) Climate controls on grass culm production over a quarter century in a tallgrass prairie. Ecology 91:2132–2140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cross MS, Harte J (2007) Compensatory responses to loss of warming-sensitive plant species. Ecology 88:740–748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Deyn GB, Cornelissen JHC, Bardgett RD (2008) Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes. Ecol Lett 11:516–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Debinski DM, Wickham H, Kindscher K, Caruthers JC, Germino M (2010) Montane meadow change during drought varies with background hydrologic regime and plant functional group. Ecology 91:1672–1681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diaz S, Lavorel S, de Bello F, Quetier F, Grigulis K, Robson M (2007) Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:20684–20689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards EJ, Still CJ, Donoghue MJ (2007) The relevance of phylogeny to studies of global change. Trends Ecol Evol 22:243–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eviner VT (2004) Plant traits that influence ecosystem processes vary independently among species. Ecology 85:2215–2229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fay PA et al (2002) Altered rainfall patterns, gas exchange, and growth in grasses and forbs. Int J Plant Sci 163:549–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischlin A et al (2007) Ecosystems, their properties, goods, and services. In: Parry OFC ML, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 211–272Google Scholar
  20. Glenn SM, Collins SL (1992) Effects of scale and disturbance on rates of immigration and extinction of species in prairies. Oikos 63:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hodgson JG et al (2005) A functional method for classifying European grasslands for use in joint ecological and economic studies. Basic Appl Ecol 6:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kahmen A, Perner J, Buchmann N (2005) Diversity-dependent productivity in semi-natural grasslands following climate perturbations. Funct Ecol 19:594–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelly AE, Goulden ML (2008) Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11823–11826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Hartnett DC, Collins SL (1998) Grassland dynamics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Knapp AK et al (2002) Rainfall variability, carbon cycling, and plant species diversity in a mesic grassland. Science 298:2202–2205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lesica P, McCune B (2004) Decline of arctic-alpine plants at the southern margin of their range following a decade of climatic warming. J Veg Sci 15:679–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luck GW et al (2009) Quantifying the contribution of organisms to the provision of ecosystem services. Bioscience 59:223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morris WF et al (2008) Longevity can buffer plant and animal populations against changing climatic variability. Ecology 89:19–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nippert JB, Fay PA, Carlisle JD, Knapp AK, Smith MD (2009) Ecophysiological responses of two dominant grasses to altered temperature and precipitation regimes. Acta Oecol 35:400–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peterson AT, Stewart A, Mohamed KI, Araujo MB (2008) Shifting global invasive potential of European plants with climate change. PLoS One 3Google Scholar
  32. Sala OE et al (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sherry RA et al (2007) Divergence of reproductive phenology under climate warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:198–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sherry RA et al (2008) Lagged effects of experimental warming and doubled precipitation on annual and seasonal aboveground biomass production in a tallgrass prairie. Global Change Biol 14:2923–2936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith MD, Knapp AK, Collins SL (2009) A framework for assessing ecosystem dynamics in response to chronic resource alterations induced by global change. Ecology 90:3279–3289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas JA et al (2004) Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303:1879–1881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Towne EG (2002) Vascular plants of Konza Prairie Biological Station: an annotated checklist of species in a Kansas tallgrass prairie. SIDA (Contributions to Botany) 20:269–294Google Scholar
  38. Trabucco A, Zomer RJ (2009) Global Aridity Index (Global-Aridity) and Global Potential Evapo-Transpiration (Global-PET) Geospatial Database. CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information. Published online, available from the CGIAR-CSI GeoPortal at: (2009). Global Aridity Index (Global-Aridity) and Global Potential Evapo-Transpiration (Global-PET) Geospatial Database. In. CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information
  39. Travers S et al (2010) Variation in gene expression of Andropogon gerardii in response to altered environmental conditions associated with climate change. J Ecol 98:374–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tucker SS, Craine JM, Nippert JB (2011) Physiological drought tolerance and the structuring of tallgrass assemblages. Ecosphere (in review)Google Scholar
  41. Walther GR et al (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Warner RR, Chesson PL (1985) Coexistence mediated by recruitment fluctuations: a field guide to the storage effect. Am Nat 125:769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weaver JE (1968) Prairie plants and their environment: a fifty year study in the Midwest. University of Nebraska Press, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  44. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW (2008) Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics 24:2098–2100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wedin DA, Tilman D (1996) Influence of nitrogen loading and species composition on the carbon balance of grasslands. Science 274:1720–1723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wells PV (1970) Historical factors controlling vegetation patterns and floristic distributions in the Central Great Plains region of North America. University of Kansas Press, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  47. Williams JW, Jackson ST (2007) Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Frontiers Ecol Environ 5:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Willis CG, Ruhfel B, Primack RB, Miller-Rushing AJ, Davis CC (2008) Phylogenetic patterns of species loss in Thoreau’s woods are driven by climate change. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105:17029–17033PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph M. Craine
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jesse B. Nippert
    • 1
  • E. Gene Towne
    • 1
  • Sally Tucker
    • 1
  • Steven W. Kembel
    • 2
  • Adam Skibbe
    • 1
  • Kendra K. McLauchlan
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Center for Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA
  3. 3.Department of GeographyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations