, Volume 166, Issue 3, pp 671–680 | Cite as

Temporal stability of pollinator preference in an alpine plant community and its implications for the evolution of floral traits

Plant-Animal interactions - Original Paper


A traditional view of diverse floral traits is that they reflect differences in foraging preferences of pollinators. The role of pollinators in the evolution of floral traits has been questioned recently by broad community surveys, especially studies concerning variation in pollinator assemblages and visitation frequency, which suggest a diminished role of pollinators in floral evolution. Here, we investigate the relationships between six categories of floral traits of 29 species and 10 pollinator functional groups in an alpine meadow in the Hengduan Mountains of China, over three consecutive years. Simpson’s diversity index was used to estimate the level of pollinator generalization of each plant species by considering both pollinator groups and their relative visitation frequencies. Multivariate analyses indicated that eight of the ten pollinator groups showed constant preferences for at least two floral traits, leading to a relatively stable level of ecological generalization for most floral traits (two out of three categories), despite the fact that the level of generalization of the entire community varied across years. Shape preferences of butterflies, honeybees and beeflies varied such that open flowers exhibited a lower level of ecological generalization in 2007 than closed flowers, in contrast with the other 2 years. These results suggest that temporally stabilized preferences of diverse pollinators may contribute to the evolution of specialized versus generalized floral traits; however, their role may be moderated by variation in community structure, including both the composition and abundance of plants and pollinators.


Floral traits Temporal variation Ecological generalization level Generalization and specialization Visitation frequency 

Supplementary material

442_2011_1910_MOESM1_ESM.doc (294 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 294 kb)


  1. Alarcón R, Waser NM, Ollerton J (2008) Year-to-year variation in the topology of a plant–pollinator interaction network. Oikos 117:1796–1807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46Google Scholar
  3. Anderson MJ (2003) XMATRIX: a FORTRAN computer program for calculating design matrices for terms in ANOVA designs in a linear model. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson MJ (2004) DISTLM v.5: a FORTRAN computer program to calculate a distance-based multivariate analysis for a linear model. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  5. Armbruster WS, Fenster CB, Dudash MR (2000) Pollination “principles” revisited: specialization, pollination syndromes, and the evolution of flowers. Det Nor Vidensk Acad I Mat Natur Kl Skr Ny Ser 39:179–200Google Scholar
  6. Arnold SEJ, Savolainen V, Chittka L (2009) Flower colours along an alpine altitude gradient, seen through the eyes of fly and bee pollinators. Arthropod Plant Interact 3:27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosch J, Retana J, Cerdá X (1997) Flowering phenology, floral traits and pollinator composition in an herbaceous Mediterranean plant community. Oecologia 109:583–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dicks LV, Corbet SA, Pywell RF (2002) Compartmentalization in plant–insect flower visitor webs. J Anim Ecol 71:32–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dupont YL, Padrón B, Olesen JM, Petanidou T (2009) Spatio-temporal variation in the structure of pollination networks. Oikos 118:1261–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eckhart VM (1992) Spatio-temporal variation in abundance and variation in foraging behavior of the pollinators of gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Oikos 64:573–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Endress PK (2001) Evolution of floral symmetry. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4:86–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology, 3rd edn. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Fenster CB, Dudash MR (2001) Spatiotemporal variation in the role of hummingbirds as pollinators of Silene virginica. Ecology 82:844–851Google Scholar
  14. Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD (2004) Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:375–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gong Y-B, Huang S-Q (2009) Floral symmetry: pollinator-mediated stabilizing selection on flower size in bilateral species. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:4013–4020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harder LD, Thomson JD (1989) Evolutionary options for maximizing pollen dispersal of animal pollinated plants. Am Nat 133:323–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herrera CM (1988a) Variation in mutualisms: the spatiotemporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage. Biol J Linn Soc 35:95–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herrera J (1988b) Pollination relationships in southern Spanish Mediterranean shrublands. J Ecol 76:274–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herrera CM (1995) Microclimate and individual variation in pollinator: flowering plants are more than their flower. Ecology 76:1516–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herrera CM (2005) Plant generalization on pollinators: species property or local phenomenon? Am J Bot 92:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hingston AB, McQuillan PB (2000) Are pollination syndromes useful predictors of floral visitors in Tasmania? Austral Ecol 25:600–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson SD, Steiner KE (2000) Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends Ecol Evol 15:140–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lázaro A, Hegland SJ, Totland Ø (2008) The relationships between floral traits and specificity of pollination systems in three Scandinavian plant communities. Oecologia 157:249–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lázaro A, Rebekka L, Totland Ø (2009) Co-flowering neighbors influence the diversity and identity of pollinator groups visiting plant species. Oikos 118:691–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lloyd DG, Yates JMA (1982) Intrasexual selection and the segregation of pollen and stigmas in hermaphroditic plants, exemplified by Wahlenbergia albomarginata (Campanulaceae). Evolution 36:903–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCall C, Primack RB (1992) Influence of flower characteristics, weather, time of day, and season on insect visitation rates in three plant communities. Am J Bot 79:434–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McDonald JH (2008) Handbook of biological statistics. Sparky House, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  28. Momose K, Yumoto T, Nagamitsu T, Kato M, Nagamasu H, Sakai S, Harrison RD, Itioka T, Hamid AA, Inoue T (1998) Pollination biology of a lowland dipterocarp forest. I. Characteristics of the plant–pollinator community in a lowland dipterocarp forest. Am J Bot 85:1477–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nakano C, Washitani I (2003) Variability and specialization of plant–pollinator systems in a northern maritime grassland. Ecol Res 18:221–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ne’eman G, Jürgens A, Newstrom-Lloyd L, Potts SG, Dafni A (2010) A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency. Biol Rev 85:435–451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Olesen JM, Bascompte J, Elberling H, Jordano P (2008) Temporal dynamics in a pollination network. Ecology 89:1573–1582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ollerton J, Watts S (2000) Phenotype space and floral typology: towards an objective assessment of pollination syndromes. Det Nor Vidensk Acad I Mat Natur Kl Skr Ny Ser 39:149–159Google Scholar
  33. Ollerton J, Killick A, Lamborn E, Watts S, Whiston M (2007) Multiple meanings and modes: on the many ways to a generalist flower. Taxonomy 56:717–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ollerton J, Alarcón R, Waser NM, Price MV, Watts S, Cranmer L, Hingston A, Peter CI, Rotenberry J (2009) A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis. Ann Bot 103:1471–1480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pauw A, Stofberg J, Waterman RJ (2009) Flies and flowers in Darwin’s race. Evolution 63:268–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pellmyr O (2002) Pollination by animals. In: Herrera CM, Pellmyr O (eds) Plant–animal interactions: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 157–184Google Scholar
  37. Petanidou T, Kallimanis AS, Tzanopoulos J, Sgardelis SP, Pantis JD (2008) Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. Ecol Lett 11:564–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pettersson MW (1991) Pollination by a guild of fluctuating moth populations: option for unspecialization in Silene vulgaris. J Ecol 79:594–604Google Scholar
  39. Reynolds RJ, Fenster CB (2008) Point and interval estimation of pollinator importance: a study using pollination data of Silene caroliniana. Oecologia 156:325–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reynolds RJ, Westbrook MJ, Rhode AS, Cridland JM, Fenster CB, Dudash MR (2009) Pollinator specialization and pollination syndromes of three related North American Silene. Ecology 90:2077–2087PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reynolds RJ, Dudash MR, Fenster CB (2010) Multiyear study of multivariate linear and nonlinear phenotypic selection on floral traits of hummingbird-pollinated Silene virginica. Evolution 64:358–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sahli HF, Conner JK (2006) Characterizing ecological generalization in plant–pollination systems. Oecologia 148:365–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schemske DW, Bradshaw HD (1999) Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:11910–11915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schemske DW, Horvitz CC (1989) Temporal variation in selection on a floral character. Evolution 43:461–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Strauss SY, Whittall JB (2006) Non-pollinator agents of selection on floral traits. In: Harder LD, Barrett SCH (eds) Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 120–138Google Scholar
  47. Sun J-F, Gong Y-B, Renner SS, Huang S-Q (2008) Multifunctional bracts in the dove tree Davidia involucrata (Nyssaceae: Cornales): rain protection and pollinator attraction. Am Nat 171:119–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ter Braak CJF (1994) Canonical community ordination. Part I. Basic theory and linear methods. Ecoscience 1:127–140Google Scholar
  49. Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  50. Waser NM (2006) Specialization and generalization in plant–pollinator interaction: a historical perspective. In: Waser NM, Ollerton J (eds) Plant–pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 3–17Google Scholar
  51. Waser NM, Chittka L, Price MV, Williams NM, Ollerton J (1996) Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilson P, Thomson JD (1991) Heterogeneity among floral visitors leads to discordance between removal and deposition of pollen. Ecology 72:1503–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wolfe LM, Sowell DR (2006) Do pollination syndromes partition the pollinator community? A test using four sympatric morning glory species. Int J Plant Sci 167:1169–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Life SciencesWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations