Phenotypic and genetic differences in a perennial herb across a natural gradient of CO2 concentration
The atmospheric CO2 concentration [CO2] has been increasing markedly since the industrial revolution and is predicted to reach 500–1,000 μmol mol−1 by the end of this century. Although the short-term and acclimatory responses to elevated [CO2] have been well studied, much less is understood about evolutionary responses to high [CO2]. We studied phenotypic and genetic differences in Plantago asiatica populations around a natural CO2 spring, where [CO2] has been consistently high over an evolutionary time scale. Our common-garden experiment revealed that plants transferred from habitats with higher [CO2] had higher relative growth rates, greater leaf to root ratios, lower photosynthetic rates, and lower stomatal conductance. The habitat-dependent differences were partly heritable because a similar trend of leaf to root ratio was found among their offsprings. Genetic analyses indicated that selfing or biparental inbreeding might promote local adaptation in areas with high [CO2] despite substantial gene flow across the [CO2] gradient. These results indicate that phenotypic and genetic differences have occurred between high and normal [CO2] populations.
KeywordsAdaptation to elevated CO2 concentration CO2 spring Evolutionary response Plant function Plantago
We thank Yudonosan-shrine, the landowner of the CO2 spring, for permission for the study. We thank Yayoi Koizumi, Risako Akita, Tomomi Kojima and Soichiro Nagano for technical support and Roger Butlin for comments on an early draft. The study was supported in part by KAKENHI (16687001, 19370008, 20677001, 21114009), Global Environment Research Fund (D-0904) and Global COE program (J03).
- Andalo C, Goldringer I, Godelle B (2001) Inter- and intergenotypic competition under elevated carbon dioxide in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology 82:157–164Google Scholar
- Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinfo Online 1:47–50Google Scholar
- Hewitt EJ, Smith TA (1975) Plant mineral nutrition. English University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Körner C, Bazzaz FA (1996) Carbon dioxide, populations, and communities. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Osada N, Onoda Y, Hikosaka K (2010) Effects of atmospheric CO2 concentration, irradiance and soil nitrogen availability on leaf photosynthetic traits on Polygonum sachalinense around the natural CO2 springs in northern Japan. Oecologia 164:41–52Google Scholar
- Pfanz H, Vodnik D, Wittman C, Aschan G, Raschi A (2004) Plants and geothermal CO2 exhalations. Survival in and adaptation to a high CO2 environment. Prog Bot 65:499–537Google Scholar
- Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE (1989) Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 975:384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Raschi A, Miglietta F, Tognetti R, van Gardingen PR (1999) Plant responses to elevated CO2. Evidence from natural springs. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
- Shitaka Y, Hirose T (1998) Effects of shift in flowering time on the reproductive output of Xanthium canadense in a seasonal environment. Oecologia 114:361–367Google Scholar
- Wilson JB (1988) A review of evidence on the control of shoot: root ratio, in relation to models. Ann Bot 61:433–449Google Scholar