Oecologia

, Volume 165, Issue 4, pp 847–854 | Cite as

Flight metabolic rate has contrasting effects on dispersal in the two sexes of the Glanville fritillary butterfly

  • Kristjan Niitepõld
  • Anniina L. K. Mattila
  • Philip J. Harrison
  • Ilkka Hanski
Physiological ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

Evolution of dispersal is affected by context-specific costs and benefits. One example is sex-biased dispersal in mammals and birds. While many such patterns have been described, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here, we study genetic and phenotypic traits that affect butterfly flight capacity and examine how these traits are related to dispersal in male and female Glanville fritillary butterflies (Melitaea cinxia). We performed two mark–recapture experiments to examine the associations of individuals’ peak flight metabolic rate (MRpeak) and Pgi genotype with their dispersal in the field. In a third experiment, we studied tethered flight in the laboratory. MRpeak was negatively correlated with dispersal distance in males but the trend was positive in females, and the interaction between MRpeak and sex was significant for long-distance dispersal. A similar but nonsignificant trend was found in relation to molecular variation at Pgi, which encodes a glycolytic enzyme: the genotype associated with high MRpeak tended to be less dispersive in males but more dispersive in females. The same pattern was repeated in the tethered flight experiment: the relationship between MRpeak and flight duration was positive in females but negative in males. These results suggest that females with high flight capacity are superior in among-population dispersal, which facilitates the spatial spreading of their reproductive effort. In contrast, males with high flight capacity may express territorial behaviour, and thereby increase the number of matings, whereas inferior males may be forced to disperse. Thus, flight capacity has opposite associations with dispersal rate in the two sexes.

Keywords

Insect Mate location Sex-biased dispersal Mobility Phosphoglucose isomerase 

References

  1. Becker BJ (1994) Combining significance levels. In: Cooper HJ, Hedges LV (eds) The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 215–230Google Scholar
  2. Bergman M, Wiklund C (2009) Differences in mate location behaviours between residents and nonresidents in a territorial butterfly. Anim Behav 78:1161–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergman M, Gotthard K, Berger D, Olofsson M, Kemp DJ, Wiklund C (2007) Mating success of resident versus non-resident males in a territorial butterfly. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:1659–1665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berwaerts K, Van Dyck H, Aerts P (2002) Does flight morphology relate to flight performance? An experimental test with the butterfly Pararge aegeria. Funct Ecol 16:484–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berwaerts K, Matthysen E, Van Dyck H (2008) Take-off flight performance in the butterfly Pararge aegeria relative to sex and morphology: a quantitative genetic assessment. Evolution 62:2525–2533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies NB (1978) Territorial defence in speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria)—resident always wins. Anim Behav 26:138–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greenwood PJ (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav 28:1140–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gros A, Hovestadt T, Poethke HJ (2008) Evolution of sex-biased dispersal: the role of sex-specific dispersal costs, demographic stochasticity, and inbreeding. Ecol Modell 219:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haag CR, Saastamoinen M, Marden JH, Hanski I (2005) A candidate locus for variation in dispersal rate in a butterfly metapopulation. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:2449–2456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanski I, Saccheri I (2006) Molecular-level variation affects population growth in a butterfly metapopulation. Plos Biol 4:719–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanski I, Peltonen A, Kaski L (1991) Natal dispersal and social dominance in the common shrew Sorex araneus. Oikos 62:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanski I, Erälahti C, Kankare M, Ovaskainen O, Sirén H (2004) Variation in migration propensity among individuals maintained by landscape structure. Ecol Lett 7:958–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanski I, Saastamoinen M, Ovaskainen O (2006) Dispersal-related life-history trade-offs in a butterfly metapopulation. J Anim Ecol 75:91–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heino M, Hanski I (2001) Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. Am Nat 157:495–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hill JK, Thomas CD, Blakeley DS (1999a) Evolution of flight morphology in a butterfly that has recently expanded its geographic range. Oecologia 121:165–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill JK, Thomas CD, Lewis OT (1999b) Flight morphology in fragmented populations of a rare British butterfly, Hesperia comma. Biol Conserv 87:277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ide JY (2002) Seasonal changes in the territorial behaviour of the Satyrine butterfly Lethe diana are mediated by temperature. J Ethol 20:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kemp DJ, Rutowski RL (2001) Spatial and temporal patterns of territorial mate locating behaviour in Hypolimnas bolina (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J Nat Hist 35:1399–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kemp DJ, Wiklund C (2001) Fighting without weaponry: a review of male–male contest competition in butterflies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kemp DJ, Wiklund C, Van Dyck H (2006) Contest behaviour in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): seasonal phenotypic plasticity and the functional significance of flight performance. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:403–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuussaari M, Nieminen M, Hanski I (1996) An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia. J Anim Ecol 65:791–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lawson Handley LJ, Perrin N (2007) Advances in our understanding of mammalian sex-biased dispersal. Mol Ecol 16:1559–1578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marden JH, Cobb JR (2004) Territorial and mating success of dragonflies that vary in muscle power output and presence of gregarine gut parasites. Anim Behav 68:857–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marden JH, Rollins RA (1994) Assessment of energy reserves by damselflies engaged in aerial contests for mating territories. Anim Behav 48:1023–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martinez-Lendech N, Cordoba-Aguilar A, Serrano-Meneses MA (2007) Body size and fat reserves as possible predictors of male territorial status and contest outcome in the butterfly Eumaeus toxea Godart (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). J Ethol 25:195–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Merckx T, Van Dyck H (2005) Mate location behaviour of the butterfly Pararge aegeria in woodland and fragmented landscapes. Anim Behav 70:411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Niitepõld K (2010) Genotype by temperature interactions in the metabolic rate of the Glanville fritillary butterfly. J Exp Biol 213:1042–1048PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Niitepõld K et al (2009) Flight metabolic rate and Pgi genotype influence butterfly dispersal rate in the field. Ecology 90:2223–2232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orsini L, Wheat CW, Haag CR, Kvist J, Frilander MJ, Hanski I (2009) Fitness differences associated with Pgi SNP genotypes in the Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia). J Evol Biol 22:367–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Otronen M (1995) Energy reserves and mating success in males of the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria. Funct Ecol 9:683–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ovaskainen O et al (2008) Tracking butterfly movements with harmonic radar reveals an effect of population age on movement distance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19090–19095PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peixoto PEC, Benson WW (2008) Body mass and not wing length predicts territorial success in a tropical satyrine butterfly. Ethology 114:1069–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perrin N, Mazalov V (2000) Local competition, inbreeding, and the evolution of sex-biased dispersal. Am Nat 155:116–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Phillips BL, Brown GP, Webb JK, Shine R (2006) Invasion and the evolution of speed in toads. Nature 439:803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roff DA, Fairbairn DJ (2007) The evolution and genetics of migration in insects. Bioscience 57:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ronce O (2007) How does it feel to be like a rolling stone? Ten questions about dispersal evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:231–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Saastamoinen M (2007a) Life-history, genotypic, and environmental correlates of clutch size in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Ecol Entomol 32:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saastamoinen M (2007b) Mobility and lifetime fecundity in new versus old populations of the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Oecologia 153:569–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saastamoinen M (2008) Heritability of dispersal rate and other life history traits in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Heredity 100:39–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saastamoinen M, Hanski I (2008) Genotypic and environmental effects on flight activity and oviposition in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Am Nat 171:E701–E712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scott JA (1974) Mate-locating behavior of butterflies. Am Midl Nat 91:103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Singer MC, Hanski I (2004) Dispersal behavior and evolutionary metapopulation dynamics. In: Ehrlich PR, Hanski I (eds) On the wings of checkerspots: a model system for population biology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 181–198Google Scholar
  43. Van Dyck H, Matthysen E (1999) Habitat fragmentation and insect flight: a changing ‘design’ in a changing landscape? Trends Ecol Evol 14:172–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Dyck H, Matthysen E, Dhondt A (1997) Mate-locating strategies are related to relative body length and wing colour in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria. Ecol Entomol 22:116–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wahlberg N (2000) Comparative descriptions of the immature stages and ecology of five Finnish melitaeine butterfly species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Entomol Fenn 11:167–174Google Scholar
  46. Watt WB (1983) Adaptation at specific loci. II. Demographic and biochemical elements in the maintenance of the Colias PGI polymorphism. Genetics 103:691–724PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Watt WB, Wheat CW, Meyer EH, Martin JF (2003) Adaptation at specific loci. VII. Natural selection, dispersal and the diversity of molecular-functional variation patterns among butterfly species complexes (Colias: Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Mol Ecol 12:1265–1275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wickman PO (1992) Sexual selection and butterfly design—a comparative study. Evolution 46:1525–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wickman PO, Wiklund C (1983) Territorial defense and its seasonal decline in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria). Anim Behav 31:1206–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zera AJ, Denno RF (1997) Physiology and ecology of dispersal polymorphism in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 42:207–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zheng CZ, Ovaskainen O, Hanski I (2009) Modelling single nucleotide effects in phosphoglucose isomerase on dispersal in the Glanville fritillary butterfly: coupling of ecological and evolutionary dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 364:1519–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristjan Niitepõld
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anniina L. K. Mattila
    • 1
  • Philip J. Harrison
    • 1
  • Ilkka Hanski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiosciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of BiologyStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations