Oecologia

, Volume 166, Issue 2, pp 531–541 | Cite as

Non-linear density-dependent effects of an intertidal ecosystem engineer

  • Christopher D. G. Harley
  • Jaclyn L. O’Riley
Community ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

Ecosystem engineering is an important process in a variety of ecosystems. However, the relationship between engineer density and engineering impact remains poorly understood. We used experiments and a mathematical model to examine the role of engineer density in a rocky intertidal community in northern California. In this system, the whelk Nucella ostrina preys on barnacles (Balanus glandula and Chthamalus dalli), leaving empty barnacle tests as a resource (favorable microhabitat) for other species. Field experiments demonstrated that N. ostrina predation increased the availability of empty tests of both barnacle species, reduced the density of the competitively dominant B. glandula, and indirectly increased the density of the competitively inferior C. dalli. Empty barnacle tests altered microhabitat humidity, but not temperature, and presumably provided a refuge from wave action. The herbivorous snail Littorina plena was positively associated with empty test availability in both observational comparisons and experimental manipulations of empty test availability, and L. plena density was elevated in areas with foraging N. ostrina. To explore the effects of variation in N. ostrina predation, we constructed a demographic matrix model for barnacles in which we varied predation intensity. The model predicted that number of available empty tests increases with predation intensity to a point, but declines when predation pressure was strong enough to severely reduce adult barnacle densities. The modeled number of available empty tests therefore peaked at an intermediate level of N. ostrina predation. Non-linear relationships between engineer density and engineer impact may be a generally important attribute of systems in which engineers influence the population dynamics of the species that they manipulate.

Keywords

Allogenic ecosystem engineering Empty barnacle tests Littorina plena Nucella ostrina Predation 

References

  1. Barnes M (2000) The use of intertidal barnacle shells. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 38:157–187Google Scholar
  2. Baxter PWJ, Getz WM (2005) A model-framed evaluation of elephant effects on tree and fire dynamics in African Savannas. Ecol Appl 15:1331–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behrens Yamada S, Boulding EG (1996) The role of highly mobile crab predators in the intertidal zonation of their gastropod prey. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 204:59–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertness MD, Leonard GH, Levine JM, Schmidt PR, Ingraham AO (1999) Testing the relative contribution of positive and negative interactions in rocky intertidal communities. Ecology 80:2711–2726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carriker MR (1981) Shell penetration and feeding by naticacean and muricacean predatory gastropods: a synthesis. Malacologia 20:403–422Google Scholar
  6. Castilla JC, Lagos NA, Cerda M (2004) Marine ecosystem engineering by the alien ascidian Pyura praeputialis on a mid-intertidal rocky shore. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 268:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chow V (1989) Intraspecific competition in a fluctuating population of Littorina plena Gould (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 130:147–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connell JH (1961) The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology 42:710–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connell JH (1970) A predator prey system in the marine intertidal region. I. Balanus glandula and several predatory species of Thais. Ecol Monogr 40:49–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connolly SR, Menge BA, Roughgarden J (2001) A latitudinal gradient in recruitment of intertidal invertebrates in the Northeast Pacific Ocean. Ecology 82:1799–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dayton PK (1971) Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol Monogr 41:351–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emson RH, Faller-Fritsch RJ (1976) An experimental investigation into the effect of crevice availability on abundance and size-structure in a population of Littorina rudis (Maton): Gastropoda: Prosobranchia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 23:285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faller-Fritsh RJ, Emson RH (1985) Causes and patterns of mortality in Littorina rudis (Maton) in relation to intraspecific variation: a review. In: Moore PG, Seed R (eds) The ecology of rocky coasts. Hodder and Stoughton, London, pp 157–177Google Scholar
  14. Farrell TM, Bracher D, Roughgarden J (1991) Cross-shelf transport causes recruitment to intertidal populations in central California. Limnol Oceanogr 36:279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaines SD, Roughgarden J (1985) Larval settlement rate: a leading determinant of structure in an ecological community of the marine intertidal zone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:3707–3711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glynn PW (1965) Community composition, structure, and interrelationships in the marine intertidal Endocladia muricata–Balanus glandula association in Monterey Bay, California. Beaufortia 12:1–198Google Scholar
  17. Gosselin LA, Bourget E (1989) The performance of an intertidal predator Thais lapillus, in relation to structural heterogeneity. J Anim Ecol 58:287–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gosselin LA, Chia FS (1994) Feeding habits of newly hatched juveniles of an intertidal predatory gastropod, Nucella emarginata (Deshayes). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 176:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gosselin LA, Qian P (1996) Early post-settlement mortality of an intertidal barnacle: a critical period for survival. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 135:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harley CDG (2003) Species importance and context: spatial and temporal variation in species interactions. In: Kareiva P, Levin SA (eds) The importance of species: perspectives on expendability and triage. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 44–68Google Scholar
  21. Harley CDG (2006) Effects of physical ecosystem engineering and herbivory on intertidal community structure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 317:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harley CDG (2008) Tidal dynamics, topographic orientation, and temperature-mediated mass mortalities on rocky shores. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 371:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harley CDG, Lopez JP (2003) The natural history, thermal physiology, and ecological impacts of the intertidal mesopredators, Oedoparena spp. (Diptera: Dryomyzidae). Invertebr Biol 122:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hatton JC, Smart NOE (1984) The effect of long-term exclusion of large herbivores on soil nutrient status in Murchison Falls National Park, Uganda. J Afr Ecol 22:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayworth AM, Quinn JF (1990) Temperature of limpets in the rocky intertidal zone: effects of caging and substratum. Limnol Oceanogr 35:967–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hutchings PA (1986) Biological destruction of coral reefs. Coral Reefs 4:239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ivlev VS (1961) Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  28. Jernakoff P (1986) Experimental investigation of interactions between the perennial red alga Gelidium pusillum and barnacles on a New South Wales rocky shore. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 28:259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones KMM, Boulding EG (1999) State-dependent habitat selection by an intertidal snail: the costs of selecting a physically stressful microhabitat. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 242:149–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1997) Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78:1946–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kimbro DL, Grosholz ED (2006) Disturbance influences oyster community richness and evenness, but not diversity. Ecology 87:2378–2388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laws RM (1970) Elephants as agents of habitat and landscape change in East Africa. Oikos 21:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lawton JH, Beddington JR, Bonser R (1974) Switching in invertebrate predators. In: Usher MB, Williamson MH (eds) Ecological stability. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 141–158Google Scholar
  35. Lenihan HS, Peterson CH (1998) How habitat degradation through fishery disturbance enhances impacts of hypoxia on oyster reefs. Ecol Appl 8:128–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lubchenco J (1978) Plant species diversity in a marine intertidal community: importance of herbivore preference and algal competitive abilities. Am Nat 112:23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McCormack SMD (1982) The maintenance of shore-level size gradients in an intertidal snail (Littorina sitkana). Oecologia 54:177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Orrock JL, Fletcher RJ Jr (2005) Changes in community size affect the outcome of competition. Am Nat 166:107–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Palmer AR (1983) Growth rate as a measure of food value in thaidid gastropods: assumptions and implications for prey morphology and distribution. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 73:95–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peterson CH, Bradley BP (1978) Estimating diet of a sluggish predator from field observations. J Fish Res Board Can 35:136–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ruesink JL (1998) Variation in per capita interaction strength: thresholds due to nonlinear dynamics and nonequilibrium conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:6843–6847PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schoppe S, Werding B (1996) The boreholes of the sea urchin genus Echinometra (Echinodermata: Echinoidea: Echinometridae) as a microhabitat in tropical South America. Mar Ecol Publ Sta Zool Napoli I 17:181–186Google Scholar
  43. Schubart CD, Basch LV, Miyasato G (1995) Recruitment of Balanus glandula Darwin (Crustacea: Cirripedia) into empty barnacle tests and its ecological consequences. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 186:143–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seed R, Suchanek TH (1992) Population and community ecology of Mytilus. The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics, and culture. In: Gosling E (ed) The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics, and culture. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 87–169Google Scholar
  45. Wieters EA, Navarrete SA (1998) Spatial variability in prey preferences of the intertidal whelks Nucella canaliculata and Nucella emarginata. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 222:133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher D. G. Harley
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jaclyn L. O’Riley
    • 1
  1. 1.Bodega Marine LaboratoryBodega BayUSA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations