, Volume 165, Issue 4, pp 827–835 | Cite as

Bird population declines due to radiation exposure at Chernobyl are stronger in species with pheomelanin-based coloration

  • Ismael GalvánEmail author
  • Timothy A. Mousseau
  • Anders P. Møller
Physiological ecology - Original Paper


Eumelanin and pheomelanin are the most common pigments providing color to the integument of vertebrates. While pheomelanogenesis requires high levels of a key intracellular antioxidant (glutathione, GSH), eumelanogenesis is inhibited by GSH. This implies that species that possess the molecular basis to produce large amounts of pheomelanin might be more limited in coping with environmental conditions that generate oxidative stress than species that produce eumelanin. Exposure to ionizing radiation produces free radicals and depletes antioxidant resources. GSH is particularly susceptible to radiation, so that species with large proportions of pheomelanic integument may be limited by the availability of GSH to combat oxidative stress and may thus suffer more from radiation effects. We tested this hypothesis in 97 species of birds censused in areas with varying levels of radioactive contamination around Chernobyl. After controlling for the effects of carotenoid-based color, body mass and similarity among taxa due to common phylogenetic descent, the proportion of pheomelanic plumage was strongly negatively related to the slope estimates of the relationship between abundance and radiation levels, while no effect of eumelanic color proportion was found. This represents the first report of an effect of the expression of melanin-based coloration on the capacity to resist the effects of ionizing radiation. Population declines were also stronger in species that exhibit carotenoid-based coloration and have large body mass. The magnitude of population declines had a relatively high phylogenetic signal, indicating that certain groups of birds, especially non-corvid passeriforms, are particularly susceptible to suffer from the effects of radioactive contamination due to phylogenetic inertia.


Eumelanin Glutathione Pheomelanin Plumage coloration Radioactive contamination 

Supplementary material

442_2010_1860_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (87 kb)
Online Resource 1 (PDF 86 kb)
442_2010_1860_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (59 kb)
Online Resource 2 (PDF 59 kb)


  1. Almasi B, Roulin A, Jenni-Eiermann S, Jenni L (2008) Parental investment and its sensitivity to corticosterone is linked to melanin-based coloration in barn owls. Horm Behav 54:217–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alström P, Olsson U, Lei F, Wang HT, Gao W, Sundberg P (2008) Phylogeny and classification of the Old World Emberizini (Aves, Passeriformes). Mol Phylogenet Evol 47:960–973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson ME (1998) Glutathione: an overview of biosynthesis and modulation. Chem Biol Interact 111–112:1–14Google Scholar
  4. Beauchamp G, Heeb P (2001) Social foraging and the evolution of white plumage. Evol Ecol Res 3:703–720Google Scholar
  5. Benedetto JP, Ortonne JP, Voulot C, Khatchadourian C, Prota G, Thivolet J (1981) Role of thiol compounds in mammalian melanin pigmentation. Part I. Reduced and oxidized glutathione. J Invest Dermatol 77:402–405Google Scholar
  6. Bibby CJ, Hill DA, Burgess ND, Mustoe S (2005) Bird census techniques. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Bristow Q (1978) The application of airborne gamma-ray spectrometry in the search for radioactive debris from the Russian satellite COSMOS 954. Curr Res Part B. Geol Surv Can Pap 78–1B:151–162Google Scholar
  8. Bump EA, Brown JM (1990) Role of glutathione in the radiation response of mammalian cells in vitro and in vivo. Pharmacol Therapeut 47:117–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cramp S, Simmons KEL (1977–1992) The birds of the western Palearctic, 6 vols. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Cramp S, Perrins CM (1993–1994) The birds of the western Palearctic, 3 vols. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Dauwe T, Eens M (2008) Melanin- and carotenoid-dependent signals of great tits (Parus major) relate differently to metal pollution. Naturwissenschaften 95:969–973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis KE (2008) Reweaving the tapestry: a supertree of birds. PhD thesis, University of GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  13. Diniz-Filho JAF, Torres NM (2002) Phylogenetic comparative methods and the geographic range size–body size relationship in new world terrestrial carnivora. Evol Ecol 16:351–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diniz-Filho JAF, De Sant’ana CER, Bini LM (1998) An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia. Evolution 52:1247–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elton C (1946) Competition and the structure of ecological communities. J Anim Ecol 15:54–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galván I (2008) The importance of white on black: unmelanized plumage proportion predicts display complexity in birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galván I, Alonso-Alvarez C (2008) An intracellular antioxidant determines the expression of a melanin-based signal in a bird. PLoS ONE 3:e3335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galván I, Alonso-Alvarez C (2009) The expression of melanin-based plumage is separately modulated by exogenous oxidative stress and a melanocortin. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:3089–3097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Galván I, Solano F (2009) The evolution of eu- and pheomelanic traits may respond to an economy of pigments related to environmental oxidative stress. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 22:339–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galván I, Negro JJ, Rodríguez A, Carrascal LM (2010) On showy dwarfs and sober giants: body size as a constraint for the evolution of bird plumage colouration (Submitted) Google Scholar
  22. Gaschak SP, Maklyuk YuA, Maksymenko AN, Maksymenko VM, Martynenko VI, Mousseau TA (2008) Radioactive contamination and abnormalities in small birds in the Chernobyl zone from 2003–2005. Rad Biol Radioecol 28:28–47 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  23. Grosso AR, Bastos-Silveira C, Coelho MM, Dias D (2006) Columba palumbus Cyt b-like Numt sequence: comparison with functional homologue and the use of universal primers. Folia Zool 55:131–144Google Scholar
  24. Harvey PH, Purvis A (1991) Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. Nature 351:619–624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holmes DJ, Flückigera R, Austad SN (2001) Comparative biology of aging in birds: an update. Exper Gerontol 36:869–883Google Scholar
  26. Hood GM (2010) PopTools version 3.2.3. Available at
  27. Hõrak P, Sild E, Soomets U, Sepp T, Kilk K (2010) Oxidative stress and information content of black and yellow plumage coloration: an experiment with greenfinches. J Exp Biol 213:2225–2233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ivaniota L, Dubchak AS, Tyshchenko VK (1998) Free radical oxidation of lipids and antioxidant system of blood in infertile women in a radioactive environment. Ukr Biochim Zh 70:132–135 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  29. Jackson JBC (1981) Interspecific competition and species’ distributions: The ghosts of theories and data past. Am Zool 21:889–901Google Scholar
  30. Knight JA (2000) Free radicals, antioxidants, and the immune system. Ann Clin Lab Sci 30:145–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lislevand T, Figuerola J, Székely T (2007) Avian body sizes in relation to fecundity, mating system, display behavior, and resource sharing. Ecology 88:1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lu SC (1999) Regulation of hepatic glutathione synthesis: current concepts and controversies. FASEB J 13:1169–1183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Martins EP, Diniz-Filho JAF, Housworth EA (2002) Adaptive constraints and the phylogenetic comparative method: a computer simulation test. Evolution 56:1–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. McGraw KJ, Wakamatsu K (2004) Melanin basis of ornamental feather colors in male zebra finches. Condor 106:686–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Møller AP (1983) Methods for monitoring bird populations in the Nordic countries. Nordic Council of Ministers, OsloGoogle Scholar
  36. Møller AP (2006) Senescence in relation to latitude and migration in birds. J Evol Biol 20:750–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Møller AP, Mousseau TA (2007a) Determinants of interspecific variation in population declines of birds after exposure to radiation at Chernobyl. J Appl Ecol 44:909–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Møller AP, Mousseau TA (2007b) Species richness and abundance of forest birds in relation to radiation at Chernobyl. Biol Lett 3:483–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Møller AP, Mousseau TA (2009) Reduced abundance of raptors in radioactively contaminated areas near Chernobyl. J Ornithol 150:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Møller AP, Mousseau TA (2010) Efficiency of bio-indicators for low-level radiation under field conditions. Ecol Indicators 11:424–430Google Scholar
  41. Møller AP, Biard C, Blount JD, Houston DC, Ninni P, Saino N, Surai PF (2000) Carotenoid-dependent signals: indicators of foraging efficiency, immunocompetence or detoxification ability? Poult Avian Biol Rev 11:137–159Google Scholar
  42. Møller AP, Erritzøe J, Karadas F, Mousseau TA (2010) Historical mutation rates predict susceptibility to radiation in Chernobyl birds. J Evol Biol (in press)Google Scholar
  43. Navarro J, Obrador E, Pellicer JA, Asensi M, Viña J, Estrela JM (1997) Blood glutathione as an index of radiation-induced oxidative stress in mice and humans. Free Radic Bio Med 22:1203–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Neyfakh EA, Alimbekova AI, Ivanenko GF (1998) Radiation-induced lipoperoxidative stress in children coupled with deficit of essential antioxidants. Biochemistry 63:977–987 MoscowPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Olson V, Owens IPF (2005) Interspecific variation in the use of carotenoid-based coloration in birds: diet, life history and phylogeny. J Evol Biol 18:1534–1546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Owens IPF, Hartley IR (1998) Sexual dimorphism in birds: why are there so many different forms of dimorphism? Proc R Soc Lond B 265:397–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ozeki H, Ito S, Wakamatsu K, Ishiguro I (1997) Chemical characterization of pheomelanogenesis starting from dihydroxyphenylalanine or tyrosine and cysteine. Effects of tyrosinase and cysteine concentrations and reaction time. Biochim Biophys Acta 1336:539–548PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ricklefs RE (2010) Evolutionary diversification, coevolution between populations and their antagonists, and the filling of niche space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:1265–1272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Riley PA (1994) Free radicals in biology: oxidative sress and the effects of ionizing radiation. Int J Radiat Biol 65:27–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roulin A, Gasparini J, Bize P, Ritschard M, Richner H (2008) Melanin-based colorations signal strategies to cope with poor and rich environments. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:507–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sanderson DCW, McLeod JJ, Ferguson JM (2001) A european bibliography on airborne gamma-ray spectrometry. J Environ Radioact 53:411–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shestopalov VM (1996) Atlas of Chernobyl exclusion zone. Ukrainian Academy of Science, KievGoogle Scholar
  53. Soltaninassab SR, Sekhar KR, Meredith MJ, Freeman ML (2000) Multi-faceted regulation of γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase. J Cell Physiol 182:163–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tella JL, Figuerola J, Negro JJ, Blanco G, Rodríguez-Estrella R, Forero MG, Blazquez MC, Green AJ, Hiraldo F (2004) Ecological, morphological and phylogenetic correlates of interspecific variation in plasma carotenoid concentration in birds. J Evol Biol 17:156–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Toral GM, Figuerola J, Negro JJ (2008) Multiple ways to become red: pigment identification in red feathers using spectrometry. Comp Biochem Physiol B 150:147–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vartanian LS, Gurevich S, Kozachenko AI, Nagler LG, Burlakova EB (2004) Age-related peculiarities of effect of low dose ionizing radiation on blood antioxidant enzyme system status in Chernobyl’s accident liquidation participant. Adv Gerontol 14:48–54 (in Russian)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Voelker G, Rohwer S, Bowie RCK, Outlaw DC (2007) Molecular systematics of a speciose, cosmopolitan songbird genus: Defining the limits of, and relationships among, the Turdus thrushes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 42:422–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Voříšek P, Klvanova A, Wotton S, Gregory RD (2010) A best practice guide for wild bird monitoring schemes. European Union, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  59. Wu G, Fang YZ, Yang S, Lupton JR, Turner ND (2004) Glutathione metabolism and its implications for health. J Nutr 134:489–492Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ismael Galván
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Timothy A. Mousseau
    • 3
  • Anders P. Møller
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Evolutionary EcologyEstación Biológica De Doñana (CSIC)SevillaSpain
  2. 2.Laboratoire d’Ecologie, Systématique et EvolutionCNRS UMR 8079 Université Paris-Sud 11Orsay CedexFrance
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations