Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 165, Issue 3, pp 593–604 | Cite as

Do purely capital layers exist among flying birds? Evidence of exogenous contribution to arctic-nesting common eider eggs

  • Édith Sénéchal
  • Joël BêtyEmail author
  • H. Grant Gilchrist
  • Keith A. Hobson
  • Sarah E. Jamieson
Physiological ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

The strategy of relying extensively on stored resources for reproduction has been termed capital breeding and is in contrast to income breeding, where needs of reproduction are satisfied by exogenous (dietary) resources. Most species likely fall somewhere between these two extremes, and the position of an organism along this gradient can influence several key life-history traits. Common eiders (Somateria mollissima) are the only flying birds that are still typically considered pure capital breeders, suggesting that they depend exclusively on endogenous reserves to form their eggs and incubate. We investigated the annual and seasonal variation in contributions of endogenous and exogenous resources to egg formation in eiders breeding at the East Bay colony in the Canadian Arctic. We collected prey items along with females and their eggs during various stages of breeding and used two complementary analytical approaches: body reserve dynamics and stable isotope [δ13C, δ15N] mixing models. Indices of protein reserves remained stable from pre-laying to post-laying stages, while lipid reserves declined significantly during laying. Similarly, stable isotope analyses indicated that (1) exogenous nutrients derived from marine invertebrates strongly contributed to the formation of lipid-free egg constituents, and (2) yolk lipids were constituted mostly from endogenous lipids. We also found evidence of seasonal variation in the use of body reserves, with early breeders using proportionally more exogenous proteins to form each egg than late breeders. Based on these results, we reject the hypothesis that eiders are pure capital layers. In these flying birds, the fitness costs of a strict capital breeding strategy, such as temporary loss of flight capability and limitation of clutch and egg size, may outweigh benefits such as a reduction in egg predation rate.

Keywords

Capital breeding Somateria mollissima Nutrient allocation Stable isotopes Takeoff capabilities 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by (alphabetical order): Canadian Wildlife Service (Environment Canada), Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Network of Centers of Excellence of Canada ArcticNet, Northern Scientific Training Program (Indian and Northern Affairs Canada), Nunavut Wildlife Management Board, Polar Continental Shelf Project (PCSP), and Université du Québec à Rimouski. We also thank the East Bay crews for their valuable work in the field, F. Hartog and O. D’Amours for their diving expertise, and B. Boucher and R. Chabot for their help in marine invertebrate identification. B.X. Mora-Alvarez assisted with preparation of stable isotope samples which were analyzed by M. Stocki at the Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan. M. Fast provided useful comments on the final version of the manuscript. The Canadian Council on Animal Care has approved the study.

Supplementary material

442_2010_1853_MOESM1_ESM.doc (92 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 92 kb)

References

  1. Abraham KF, Ankney CD (1986) Summer birds of East Bay, Southampton Island, Northwest Territories. Canadian Field-Nat 100:180–185Google Scholar
  2. Andersson M, Waldeck P (2006) Reproductive tactics under severe egg predation: an eider’s dilemma. Oecologia 148:350–355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes C, Jennings S, Polunin NVC, Lancaster JE (2008) The importance of quantifying inherent variability when interpreting stable isotope field data. Oecologia 155:227–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bêty J, Gauthier G, Korpimäki E, Giroux JF (2002) Shared predators and indirect trophic interactions: lemming cycle and arctic-nesting geese. J Anim Ecol 71:88–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bêty J, Gauthier G, Giroux JF (2003) Body condition, migration, and timing of reproduction in snow geese: a test of the condition-dependent model of optimal clutch size. Am Nat 162:110–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond JC, Esler D, Hobson KA (2007) Isotopic evidence for sources of nutrients allocated to clutch formation by harlequin ducks. Condor 109:698–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bottitta GE, Nol E, Gilchrist HG (2003) Effects of experimental manipulation of incubation length on behavior and body mass of common eiders in the Canadian Arctic. Waterbirds 26:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown GP, Shine R (2002) Reproductive ecology of a tropical natricine snake, Tropidonophis mairii (Colubridae). J Zool 258:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carabel S, Godinez-Dominguez E, Verisimo P, Fernandez L, Freire J (2006) An assessment of sample processing methods for stable isotope analyses of marine food webs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 336:254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casas J, Pincebourde S, Mandon N, Vannier F, Poujol R, Giron D (2005) Lifetime nutrient dynamics reveal simultaneous capital and income breeding in a parasitoid. Ecology 86:545–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chastel O, Weimerskirch H, Jouventin P (1995) Body condition and seabird reproductive performance: a study of three petrel species. Ecology 76:2240–2246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chaulk KG, Robertson GJ, Montevecchi WA (2007) Landscape features and sea ice influence nesting common eider abundance and dispersion. Can J Zool 85:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christensen TK (2000) Female pre-nesting foraging and male vigilance in common eider Somateria mollissima. Bird Study 47:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drent RH, Daan S (1980) The prudent parent: energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea 68:225–252Google Scholar
  15. Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard JM, Jorgenson JT (1998) Mass- and density-dependent reproductive success and reproductive costs in a capital breeder. Am Nat 152:367–379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaston AJ, Gilchrist HG, Hipfner JM (2005) Climate change ice conditions and reproduction in an Arctic nesting marine bird: Brunnich’s guillemot (Uria lomvia L.). J Anim Ecol 74:832–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gauthier G, Bety J, Hobson KA (2003) Are greater snow geese capital breeders? New evidence from a stable-isotope model. Ecology 84:3250–3264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gorman KB, Esler D, Flint PL, Williams TD (2008) Nutrient-reserve dynamics during egg production by female greater scaup (Aythya marila): relationships with timing of reproduction. Auk 125:384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guillemette M (2001) Foraging before spring migration and before breeding in common eiders: Does hyperphagia occur? Condor 103:633–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guillemette M, Ouellet JF (2005a) Temporary flightlessness as a potential cost of reproduction in pre-laying common eiders Somateria mollissima. Ibis 147:301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guillemette M, Ouellet JF (2005b) Temporary flightlessness in pre-laying common eiders Somateria mollissima: are females constrained by excessive wing-loading or by minimal flight muscle ratio? Ibis 147:293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanssen SA, Engebretsen H, Erikstad KE (2002) Incubation start and egg size in relation to body reserves in the common eider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:282–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hario M, Hollmén TE (2004) The role of male mate-guarding in pre-laying common eiders Somateria m. mollissima in the northern Baltic Sea. Ornis Fennica 81:119–127Google Scholar
  24. Hobson KA (1995) Reconstructing avian diets using stable-carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis of egg components––patterns of isotopic fractionation and turnover. Condor 97:752–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hobson KA (2006) Using stable isotopes to quantitatively track endogenous and exogenous nutrient allocations to eggs of birds that travel to breed. Ardea 94:359–369Google Scholar
  26. Hobson KA, Clark RG (1992) Assessing avian diets using stable isotopes.1. Turnover of C-13 in tissues. Condor 94:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hobson KA, Atwell L, Wassenaar LI, Yerkes T (2004) Estimating endogenous nutrient allocations to reproduction in redhead ducks: a dual isotope approach using delta D and delta C-13 measurements of female and egg tissues. Funct Ecol 18:737–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hobson KA, Thompson JE, Evans MR, Boyd S (2005) Tracing nutrient allocation to reproduction in Barrow’s goldeneye. J Wildl Manag 69:1221–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Inger R, Bearhop S (2008) Applications of stable isotope analyses to avian ecology. Ibis 150:447–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson AL, Inger R, Bearhop S, Parnell A (2009) Erroneous behaviour of MixSIR, a recently published Bayesian isotope mixing model: a discussion of Moore & Semmens (2008). Ecol Lett 12:E1–E5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jamieson SE (2003) Endogenous reserve dynamics of northern common eiders (Somateria mollissiam borealis) wintering in Greenland. Masters thesis, University of New Brunswick, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  32. Jamieson SE, Gilchrist HG, Merkel FR, Falk K, Diamond AW (2006) An evaluation of methods used to estimate carcass composition of common eiders Somateria mollissima. Wildl Biol 12:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jardine TD, Chernoff E, Curry RA (2008) Maternal transfer of carbon and nitrogen to progeny of sea-run and resident brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65:2201–2210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jönsson KI (1997) Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction. Oikos 78:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klaassen M, Abraham KF, Jefferies RL, Vrtiska M (2006) Factors affecting the site of investment, and the reliance on savings for arctic breeders: the capital-income dichotomy revisited. Ardea 94:371–384Google Scholar
  36. Lepage D, Gauthier G, Menu S (2000) Reproductive consequences of egg-laying decisions in snow geese. J Anim Ecol 69:414–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis RJ, Kappeler PM (2005) Are Kirindy Sifaka capital or income breeders? It depends. Am J Primatol 67:365–369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Love OP, Gilchrist HG, Descamps S, Semeniuk CAD, Bêty J (2010) Pre-laying climatic cues can time reproduction to optimally match offspring hatching and ice conditions in an Arctic marine bird. Oecologia 164:277–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Meijer T, Drent R (1999) Re-examination of the capital and income dichotomy in breeding birds. Ibis 141:399–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moore JW, Semmens BX (2008) Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models. Ecol Lett 11:470–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mosbech A, Gilchrist G, Merkel F, Sonne C, Flagstad A, Nyegaard H (2006) Year-round movements of Northern common eiders Somateria mollissima borealis breeding in Arctic Canada and West Greenland followed by satellite telemetry. Ardea 94:651–665Google Scholar
  42. Ouellet J-F, Guillemette M, Blier PU (2008) Morphological and physiological aspects of takeoff aptitudes of female common eiders (Somateria mollissima) during the pre-laying period. Can J Zool 86:462–469Google Scholar
  43. Parker H, Holm H (1990) Patterns of nutrient and energy-expenditure in female common eiders nesting in the high Arctic. Auk 107:660–668Google Scholar
  44. Phillips DL (2001) Mixing models in analyses of diet using multiple stable isotopes: a critique. Oecologia 127:166–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Phillips DL, Gregg JW (2003) Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too many sources. Oecologia 136:261–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Robertson GJ (1995) Factors affecting nest-site selection and nesting success in the common eider Somateria-Mollissima. Ibis 137:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rowe L, Ludwig D, Schluter D (1994) Time, condition, and the seasonal decline of avian clutch size. Am Nat 143:698–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sedinger JS, Ankney CD, Alisauskas RT (1997) Refined methods for assessment of nutrient reserve use and regulation of clutch size. Condor 99:836–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Semmens BX, Moore JW, Ward EJ (2009) Improving Bayesian isotope mixing models: a response to Jackson et al. (2009). Ecol Lett 12:E6–E8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sénéchal E, Bêty J, Gilchrist GH (2011) Interactions between lay date, clutch size and post-laying energetic needs in a capital breeder. Behav Ecol (in press)Google Scholar
  51. Socha R, Sula J (2008) Differential allocation of protein resources to flight muscles and reproductive organs in the flightless wing-polymorphic bug, Pyrrhocoris apterus (L.) (Heteroptera). J Comp Physiol B 178:179–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Soreide JE, Tamelander T, Hop H, Hobson KA, Johansen I (2006) Sample preparation effects on stable C and N isotope values: a comparison of methods in Arctic marine food web studies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 328:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  54. Stephens PA, Boyd IL, McNamara JM, Houston AI (2009) Capital breeding and income breeding: their meaning, measurement, and worth. Ecology 90:2057–2067CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Stevens L (2000) Lipids and their metabolism. In: Avian biochemistry and molecular biology. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 54–60Google Scholar
  56. Swennen C, Ursem JCH, Duiven P (1993) Determinate laying and egg attendance in common eiders. Ornis Scandinavica 24:48–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Varpe O, Jorgensen C, Tarling GA, Fiksen O (2009) The adaptive value of energy storage and capital breeding in seasonal environments. Oikos 118:363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Watson MD, Robertson GJ, Cooke F (1993) Egg-laying time and laying interval in the common eider. Condor 95:869–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams TD (1999) Avian reproduction, overview. In: Encyclopedia of reproduction, vol 1. Academic Press, Toronto, pp 325–336Google Scholar
  60. Wolf N, Carleton SA, Martinez del Rio C (2009) Ten years of experimental animal isotopic ecology. Funct Ecol 23:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zera AJ, Potts J, Kobus K (1998) The physiology of life-history trade-offs: experimental analysis of a hormonally induced life-history trade-off in Gryllus assimilis. Am Nat 152:7–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Édith Sénéchal
    • 1
  • Joël Bêty
    • 1
    Email author
  • H. Grant Gilchrist
    • 2
  • Keith A. Hobson
    • 3
  • Sarah E. Jamieson
    • 4
  1. 1.Chaire de recherche du Canada en conservation des écosystèmes nordiques et Centre d’études nordiquesUniversité du Québec à RimouskiRimouskiCanada
  2. 2.National Wildlife Research Centre, Environment CanadaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Environment CanadaSaskatoonCanada
  4. 4.Department of Biological Sciences, Centre for Wildlife EcologySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations