The effects of plant defenses on herbivory can differ among spatial scales. This may be particularly common with indirect defenses, such as extrafloral nectaries (EFNs), that attract predatory arthropods and are dependent on predator distribution, abundance, and behavior. We tested the defensive effects of EFNs in quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) against damage by a specialist herbivore, the aspen leaf miner (Phyllocnistis populiella Cham.), at the scale of individual leaves and entire ramets (i.e., stems). Experiments excluding crawling arthropods revealed that the effects of aspen EFNs differed at the leaf and ramet scales. Crawling predators caused similar reductions in the percent leaf area mined on individual leaves with and without EFNs. However, the extent to which crawling predators increased leaf miner mortality and, consequently, reduced mining damage increased with EFN expression at the ramet scale. Thus, aspen EFNs provided a diffuse defense, reducing damage to leaves across a ramet regardless of leaf-scale EFN expression. We detected lower leaf miner damage and survival unassociated with crawling predators on EFN-bearing leaves, suggesting that direct defenses (e.g., chemical defenses) were stronger on leaves with than without EFNs. Greater direct defenses on EFN-bearing leaves may reduce the probability of losing these leaves and thus weakening ramet-scale EFN defense. Aspen growth was not related to EFN expression or the presence of crawling predators over the course of a single season. Different effects of aspen EFNs at the leaf and ramet scales suggest that future studies may benefit from examining indirect defenses simultaneously at multiple scales.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Many thanks are extended to S. Fischer, T. Fristoe, I. Lien, T. Miner, and S. Wilbur for their invaluable assistance in data collection; D. Sikes for assistance identifications and comments on an earlier version of this paper; G. Alpert and S. Cover for ant determinations; H. Proctor for mite determinations; M. Short and J. McIntyre for guidance with statistics; B. Young for insightful conversation; and L. Mortensen. This paper was improved thanks to extremely helpful comments made by three anonymous reviewers. Funding was provided by a National Science Foundation award (DEB 0543632) to D. Wagner and P. Doak.
Adjei-Maafo IK, Wilson LT, Thomson NJ, Blood PRB (1983) Effect of pest damage intensity on the growth, maturation, and yield of nectaried and nectariless cotton. Environ Entomol 12:353–358Google Scholar
Connor EF, Taverner MP (1997) The evolution and adaptive significance of the leaf-mining habit. Oikos 79:6–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Giusto B, Anstett MC, Dounias E, McKey DB (2001) Variation in the effectiveness of biotic defence: the case of an opportunistic ant–plant protection mutualism. Oecologia 129:367–375. doi:10.1007/s004420100734Google Scholar
Huntzinger M, Karban R, Young TP, Palmer TM (2004) Relaxation of induced indirect defenses of acacias following exclusion of mammalian herbivores. Ecology 85:609–614. doi:10.1890/03-3056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenward MG, Roger JH (1997) Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53:983–997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter MT, Rausher MD (2004) Natural selection on extrafloral nectar production in Chamaecrista fasciculata: the costs and benefits of a mutualism trait. Evolution 58:2657–2668. doi:10.1554/04-009PubMedGoogle Scholar
Shroff R, Vergara F, Muck A, Svatos A, Gershenzon J (2008) Nonuniform distribution of glucosinolates in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves has important consequences for plant defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:6196–6201. doi:10.1073/pnas.0711730105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner D, DeFoliart L, Doak P, Schneiderheinze J (2008) Impact of epidermal leaf mining by the aspen leaf miner (Phyllocnistis populiella) on the growth, physiology, and leaf longevity of quaking aspen. Oecologia 157:259–267. doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1067-1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooley SC, Donaldson JR, Gusse AC, Lindroth RL, Stevens MT (2007) Extrafloral nectaries in aspen (Populus tremuloides): heritable genetic variation and herbivore-induced expression. Ann Bot 100:1337–1346. doi:10.1093/aob/mcm220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young BD, Wagner D, Doak P, Clausen TP (2010) Within-plant distribution of phenolic glycosides and extrafloral nectaries in trembling aspen, Populus tremuloides. Am J Bot 97:601–610. doi:10.3732/ajb.0900281CrossRefGoogle Scholar