, Volume 164, Issue 2, pp 431–444 | Cite as

Fungal endophytes of native grasses decrease insect herbivore preference and performance

  • Kerri M. Crawford
  • John M. Land
  • Jennifer A. Rudgers
Plant-Animal interactions - Original Paper


Endophytic fungal symbionts of grasses are well known for their protective benefit of herbivory reduction. However, the majority of studies on endophyte–grass symbioses have been conducted on economically important, agricultural species—particularly tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne)—raising the hypothesis that strong benefits are the product of artificial selection. We examined whether fungal endophytes found in natural populations of native grass species deterred insect herbivores. By testing several native grass–endophyte symbiota, we examined phylogenetic signals in the effects of endophytes on insects and compared the relative importance of herbivore and symbiotum identity in the outcome of the interactions. Preference was assessed using three herbivore species [Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera), Schistocerca americana (Orthoptera), Rhopalosiphum padi (Hemiptera)] and ten native symbiota, which spanned seven grass genera. We also assessed herbivore performance in a no choice experiment for five native symbiota against S. frugiperda. We compared greenhouse and laboratory trials with natural levels of herbivory measured in experimental field populations. In all cases, we included the agronomic grass species, L. arundinaceum, to compare with results from the native grasses. Both in the field and in experimental trials, herbivores showed a significant preference for endophyte-free plant material for the majority of native grasses, with up to three times lower herbivory for endophyte-symbiotic plants; however, the degree of response depended on the identity of the herbivore species. Endophyte presence also significantly reduced performance of S. frugiperda for the majority of grass species. In contrast, the endophyte in L. arundinaceum had few significant anti-herbivore effects, except for a reduction in herbivory at one of two field sites. Our results demonstrate that the mechanisms by which native symbionts deter herbivores are at least as potent as those in model agricultural systems, despite the absence of artificial selection.


Plant–herbivore interactions Herbivore defenses Native grasses Lolium arundinaceum Alkaloids 



We would like to thank S. Behmer and his lab for supplying the grasshoppers used in this experiment, and P. Nagabhyru and C. Schardl for providing loline data for our plant accessions. The Rice Undergraduate Honors Research in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology class of 2009 provided useful discussion, and S. Clement, A. Davitt, C. Schardl, and P. Nagabhyru provided insightful comments on the text. K. Clay, C. Rudolf, D. Saenz, and R. Thill provided logistical support at the field sites, and L. Albert, S. Hammer, E. Seifert, and S. Ziegler assisted with field data collection. KMC was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship and a Rice University Presidential Fellowship. JAR was supported by the endowed Godwin Professorship at Rice University and National Science Foundation DEB 054278.


  1. Afkhami ME, Rudgers JA (2009) Endophyte-mediated resistance to herbivores depends on herbivore identity in the wild grass Festuca subverticillata. Environ Entomol 38:1086–1095CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacon CW, White JF (1994) Stains, media, and procedures for analyzing endophytes. In: Bacon CW, White JF (eds) Biotechnology of endophytic fungi of grasses. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 47–56Google Scholar
  3. Ball DM, Pedersen JF, Lacefield GD (1993) The tall fescue endophyte. Am Sci 81:370–379Google Scholar
  4. Ball OJP, Coudron TA, Tapper BA, Davies E, Trently D, Bush LP, Gwinn KD, Popay AJ (2006) Importance of host plant species, Neotyphodium endophyte isolate, and alkaloids on feeding by Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. J Econ Entomol 99:1462–1473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbosa P, Krischik VA, Jones CG (1991) Microbial mediation of plant–herbivore interactions. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bazely DR, Vicari M, Emmerich S, Filip L, Lin D, Inman A (1997) Interactions between herbivores and endophyte-infected Festuca rubra from the Scottish islands of St Kilda, Benbecula and Rum. J Appl Ecol 34:847–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bieri AP, Härri SA, Vorburger C, Müller CB (2009) Aphid genotypes vary in their response to the presence of fungal endosymbionts in host plants. J Evol Biol 22:1775–1780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Boning RA, Bultman TL (1996) A test for constitutive and induced resistance by tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) to an insect herbivore: impact of the fungal endophyte, Acremonium coenophialum. Am Midl Nat 136:328–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brem D, Leuchtmann A (2001) Epichloe grass endophytes increase herbivore resistance in the woodland grass Brachypodium sylvaticum. Oecologia 126:522–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bultman TL, Conard NJ (1998) Effects of endophytic fungus, nutrient level, and plant damage on performance of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae). Environ Entomol 27:631–635Google Scholar
  11. Bultman TL, Bell G, Martin WD (2004) A fungal endophyte mediates reversal of wound-induced resistance and constrains tolerance in a grass. Ecology 85:679–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheplick GP, Clay K (1988) Acquired chemical defenses in grasses—the role of fungal endophytes. Oikos 52:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheplick GP, Faeth SH (2009) Ecology and evolution of the grass–endophyte symbiosis. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clay K (1990) Fungal endophytes of grasses. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:275–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clay K, Cheplick GP (1989) Effect of ergot alkaloids from fungal endophyte-infected grasses on fall armywork (Spodoptera frugiperda). J Chem Ecol 15:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clay K, Holah J (1999) Fungal endophyte symbiosis and plant diversity in successional fields. Sci 285:1742–1744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clay K, Schardl C (2002) Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses. Am Nat 160:S99–S127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Clay K, Hardy TN, Hammond AM (1985) Fungal endophytes of grasses and their effects on an insect herbivore. Oecologia 66:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clement SL, Lester DG, Wilson AD, Pike KS (1992) Behavior and performance of Diuraphis noxia (Homoptera: Aphididae) on fungal endophyte-infected and uninfected perennial ryegrass. J Econ Entomol 85:583–588Google Scholar
  20. Clement SL, Wilson AD, Lester DG, Davitt CM (1997) Fungal endophytes of wild barley and their effects on Diuraphis noxia population development. Entomol Exp Appl 82:275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clement SL, Elberson LR, Bosque-Perez NA, Schotzko DJ (2005) Detrimental and neutral effects of wild barley—Neotyphodium fungal endophyte associations on insect survival. Entomol Exp Appl 114:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dighton J, White JF Jr, Oudemans P (2005) The fungal community: its organization and role in the ecosystem. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dugassa-Gobena D, Raps A, Vidal S (1998) Influence of fungal endophytes on allelochemicals of their host plants and the behaviour of insects. Med Fac Landbouw Univ Gent 63:333–337Google Scholar
  24. Emery SM, Thompson D, Rudgers JA (2010) Variation in herbivory and drought tolerance between native populations and cultivars of Ammophila breviligulata, a dominant sand dune grass. Am Midl Nat 163:186–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Franche C, Lindstrom K, Elmerich C (2009) Nitrogen-fixing bacteria associated with leguminous and non-leguminous plants. Plant Soil 321:35–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gehring CA, Whitham TG (2002) Mycorrhizae–herbivore interactions: population and community consequences. In: van der Heijden MGA, Sanders IR (eds) Mycorrhizal ecology. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 295–320Google Scholar
  27. Gonthier DJ et al (2008) Stroma-forming endophyte Epichloe glyceriae provides wound-inducible herbivore resistance to its grass host. Oikos 117:629–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, van Elsas JD (2008) Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol 16:463–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hardy TN, Clay K, Hammond AM (1985) Fall armyworm (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae)—a laboratory bioassay and larval preference study for the fungal endophyte of perennial ryegrass. J Econ Entomol 78:571–575Google Scholar
  30. Hartley SE, Gange AC (2009) Impacts of plant symbiotic fungi on insect herbivores: Mutualism in a multitrophic context. Annu Rev Entomol 54:323–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Institute SAS (2009) The SAS system for Windows, release 9.1.3. SAS Institute. Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  32. Leuchtmann A (1992) Systematics, distribution, and host specificity of grass endophytes. Nat Toxins 1:150–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lopez JE, Faeth SH, Miller M (1995) Effect of endophytic fungi on herbivory by redlegged grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) on Arizona fescue. Environ Entomol 24:1576–1580Google Scholar
  34. Lyons PC, Evans JJ, Bacon CW (1990) Effects of the fungal endophyte Acremonium coenophialum on nitrogen accumulation and metabolism in tall fescue. Plant Physiol 92:726–732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Malinowski DP, Alloush GA, Belesky DP (2000) Leaf endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum modifies mineral uptake in tall fescue. Plant Soil 227:115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miles CO et al (1998) Endophytic fungi in indigenous Australasian grasses associated with toxicity to livestock. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:601–606PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Raloff J (2003) Cultivating weeds: Is your yard a menace to parks and wild lands? Sci News 163:232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rasband WS (2009) ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA,
  39. Rodriguez RJ, White JF, Arnold AE, Redman RS (2009) Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytol 182:314–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rudgers JA, Clay K (2007) Endophyte symbiosis with tall fescue: how strong are the impacts on communities and ecosystems? Fungal Biol Rev 21:107–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rudgers JA, Clay K (2008) An invasive plant-fungal mutualism reduces arthropod diversity. Ecol Lett 11:831–840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rudgers JA, Holah J, Orr SP, Clay K (2007) Forest succession suppressed by an introduced plant-fungal symbiosis. Ecology 88:18–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Saikkonen K, Helander M, Faeth SH, Schulthess F, Wilson D (1999) Endophyte-grass-herbivore interactions: the case of Neotyphodium endophytes in Arizona fescue populations. Oecologia 121:411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saikkonen K, Lehtonen P, Helander M, Koricheva J, Faeth SH (2006) Model systems in ecology: dissecting the endophyte-grass literature. Trends Plant Sci 11:428–443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schardl CL, Grossman RB, Nagabhyru P, Faulkner JR, Mallik UP (2007) Loline alkaloids: currencies of mutualism. Phytochem 68:980–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Siegel MR et al (1990) Fungal endophyte-infected grasses—alkaloid accumulation and aphid response. J Chem Ecol 16:3301–3315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sullivan TJ et al (2007) Symbiont-mediated changes in Lolium arundinaceum inducible defenses: evidence from changes in gene expression and leaf composition. New Phytol 176:673–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Tibbets TM, Faeth SH (1999) Neotyphodium endophytes in grasses: deterrents or promoters of herbivory by leaf-cutting ants? Oecologia 118:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tintjer T, Rudgers JA (2006) Grass-herbivore interactions altered by strains of a native endophyte. New Phytol 170:513–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerri M. Crawford
    • 1
  • John M. Land
    • 1
  • Jennifer A. Rudgers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyRice UniversityHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations