Oecologia

, Volume 163, Issue 4, pp 1079–1090

Variation in woody plant mortality and dieback from severe drought among soils, plant groups, and species within a northern Arizona ecotone

Global change ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

Vegetation change from drought-induced mortality can alter ecosystem community structure, biodiversity, and services. Although drought-induced mortality of woody plants has increased globally with recent warming, influences of soil type, tree and shrub groups, and species are poorly understood. Following the severe 2002 drought in northern Arizona, we surveyed woody plant mortality and canopy dieback of live trees and shrubs at the forest–woodland ecotone on soils derived from three soil parent materials (cinder, flow basalt, sedimentary) that differed in texture and rockiness. Our first of three major findings was that soil parent material had little effect on mortality of both trees and shrubs, yet canopy dieback of trees was influenced by parent material; dieback was highest on the cinder for pinyon pine (Pinus edulis) and one-seed juniper (Juniperus monosperma). Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) dieback was not sensitive to parent material. Second, shrubs had similar mortality, but greater canopy dieback, than trees. Third, pinyon and ponderosa pines had greater mortality than juniper, yet juniper had greater dieback, reflecting different hydraulic characteristics among these tree species. Our results show that impacts of severe drought on woody plants differed among tree species and tree and shrub groups, and such impacts were widespread over different soils in the southwestern U.S. Increasing frequency of severe drought with climate warming will likely cause similar mortality to trees and shrubs over major soil types at the forest–woodland ecotone in this region, but due to greater mortality of other tree species, tree cover will shift from a mixture of species to dominance by junipers and shrubs. Surviving junipers and shrubs will also likely have diminished leaf area due to canopy dieback.

Keywords

Climate change Water stress Juniperus Pinus edulis Pinus ponderosa 

References

  1. Abella SR (2008) Gambel oak growth forms: management opportunities for increasing ecosystem diversity. Res. Note RMRS-RN-37, US Dep of Agric, For Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Fort Collins, COGoogle Scholar
  2. Abella SR, Covington WW (2006) Forest ecosystems of an Arizona Pinus ponderosa landscape: multifactor classification and implications for ecological restoration. J Biogeogr 33:1368–1383. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01513.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams HD (2003) Tree growth response to climate for different species, elevations, and environments in northern Arizona. MS thesis, Northern Arizona University, FlagstaffGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams HD, Kolb TE (2004) Drought responses of conifers in ecotone forests of northern Arizona: tree ring growth and leaf δ13C. Oecologia 140:217–225. doi:10.1007/s00442-004-1585-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Adams HD, Kolb TE (2005) Tree growth response to drought and temperature in a mountain landscape in northern Arizona, USA. J Biogeogr 32:1629–1640. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01292.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Adams HD, Guardiola-Claramonte M, Barron-Gafford GA, Villegas JC, Breshears DD, Zou CB, Troch PA, Huxman TE (2009) Temperature sensitivity of drought-induced tree mortality protends increased regional die-off under global change-type drought. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 106:7063–7066. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901438106 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Allen CD (2007) Interactions across spatial scales among forest dieback, fire, and erosion in northern New Mexico landscapes. Ecology 10:797–808Google Scholar
  8. Allen CD, Breshears DD (1998) Drought-induced shift of a forest-woodland ecotone: rapid landscape response to climate variation. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 95:14839–14842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Allen MR, Frame DJ, Huntingford C, Jones CD, Lowe JA, Meinshausen M, Meinshausen N (2009a) Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne. Nature 458:1163–1166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell NG, Vennetier M, Kitzberger T, Rigling A, Breshears DD, Gonzales P, Hogg EH, Fensham R, Zhang Z, Castro J, Lim JH, Allard G, Running SW, Semerci A, Cobb NS (2009b) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For Ecol Manag 259:660–684. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Alley WA (1984) The Palmer drought severity index: limitation and assumptions. J Clim Appl Meteorol 23:1100–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Andreadis KM, Clark EA, Wood AW, Hamlet AF, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Twentieth-century drought in the conterminous United States. J Hydrometeorol 6:985–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barton AM (2002) Intense wildfire in southeastern Arizona: transformation of a Madrean oak–pine forest to oak woodland. For Ecol Manag 165:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brady NC (1974) The nature and properties of soils, 8th edn. McMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Bréda N, Huc R, Granier A, Dreyer E (2006) Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences. Ann For Sci 63:625–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Breshears DD (2006) The grassland-forest continuum: trends in ecosystem properties for woody plant mosaics? Front Ecol Env 4:96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Breshears DD, Allen CD (2002) The importance of rapid, disturbance-induced losses in carbon management and sequestration. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 11:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Breshears DD, Cobb NS, Rich PM, Price KP, Allen CD, Balice RG, Romme WH, Kastens JH, Floyd ML, Belnap J, Anderson JJ, Myers OB, Meyer CW (2005) Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 102:15144–15148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Breshears DD, Huxman TE, Adams HD, Zou CB, Davison JE (2008) Vegetation synchronously leans upslope as climate warms. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105:11591–11592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Breshears DD, Myers OB, Meyer CW, Barnes FJ, Zou CB, Allen CD, McDowell NG, Pockman WT (2009) Tree die-off in response to global change-type drought: mortality insights from a decade of plant water potential measurements. Front Ecol Env 7:185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chapin FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chapin FS, Randerson JT, Mcguire AD, Foley JA, Field CB (2008) Changing feedbacks in the climate-biosphere system. Front Ecol Env 6:313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Clausen J, Keck DD, Hiesey WM (1940) Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. The effects of varied environmental on Western American plants. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publiccation 520, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Cobb NS, Mopper S, Gehring CA, Caouette M, Christensen KM, Whitham TG (1997) Increased moth herbivory associated with environmental stress of pinyon pine at local and regional levels. Oecologia 109:389–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Colton HS (1932) Sunset crater: the effect of a volcanic eruption on the ancient Pueblo people. Geogr Rev 22:582–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Conover WJ, Iman RL (1981) Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and non-parametric statistics. Am Stat 35:124–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dai A, Trendberth KE, Qian T (2004) A global dataset of Palmer drought severity index for 1870–2002: relationship with soil moisture and effects of surface warming. J. Hydrometeorol 5:1117–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Davis SD, Ewers FW, Sperry JS, Portland KA, Crocker MC, Adams GC (2002) Shoot dieback during prolonged drought in Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae) chaparral of California: a possible case of hydraulic failure. Am J Bot 89:820–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dominguez F, Villegas JC, Breshears DD (2009) Spatial extent of the North American monsoon: increased cross-regional linkages via atmospheric pathways. Geophys Res Lett 36:L07401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fensham RJ, Fairfax RJ (2007) Drought-related tree death of savanna eucalypts: species susceptibility, soil conditions and root architecture. J Veg Sci 18:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Floyd ML, Clifford M, Cobb NS, Hanna D, Delph R, Ford P, Turner D (2009) Relationship of stand characteristics to drought-induced mortality in three Southwestern piñon–juniper woodlands. Ecol Appl 19:1223–1230. doi:10.1890/08-1265.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Franks PJ, Drake PL, Froend RH (2007) Anisohydric but isohydrodynamic: seasonally constant plant water potential gradient explained by a stomatal control mechanism incorporating variable plant hydraulic conductance. Plant Cell Environ 30:19–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gaylord ML, Kolb TE, Wallin KF, Wagner MR (2007) Seasonal dynamics of tree growth, physiology, and resin defenses in a northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Can J For Res 37:1173–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gehring CA, Whitham TG (1995) Duration of herbivore removal and environmental stress effect the ectomycorrhizae of pinyon pines. Ecology 76:2118–2123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gitlin AR, Sthultz CM, Bowker MA, Stumpf S, Paxton KL, Kennedy K, Muñoz A, Bailey JK, Whitham TG (2006) Mortality gradients within and among dominant plant populations as barometers of ecosystem change during extreme drought. Conserv Biol 20:1477–1486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hansen JE, Sato M, Ruedy R, Lo K, Lea DW, Medina-Elizade M (2006) Global temperature change. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103:14288–14293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hardin JW, Leopold DJ, White FM (2001) Textbook of dendrology. McGraw Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  38. Heim RH Jr (2002) A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States. Am Meteorol Soc 83:1149–1165Google Scholar
  39. Hillel D (2004) Introduction to environmental soil physics. Elsevier Academic Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  40. Holzschuh GM (2004) Chronosequence of chemical weathering of basaltic soil in San Francisco Volcanic Field, Arizona. MS thesis, Northern Arizona University, FlagstaffGoogle Scholar
  41. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA. Retrieved 20-Mar-2008, from http://www.ipcc-wg2.org/
  42. Johnsen TN (1962) One-seed juniper invasion of northern Arizona grasslands. Ecol Monogr 32:187–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kelly AE, Goulden ML (2008) Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105:11823–11826CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kintisch E (2009) Projections of climate change go from bad to worse, scientists report. Science 323:1546–1547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Kolb TE, McCormick LW, Simons EE, Jeffery DJ (1992) Impacts of pear thrips damage on root carbohydrate, sap, and crown characteristics of sugar maples in a Pennsylvania sugarbush. For Sci 38:381–392Google Scholar
  46. Krauch H (1922) The use of the diameter age charts in yield studies. J For 20:390–392Google Scholar
  47. Leiberg JB, Rixon TF, Dodwell A (1904) Forest conditions in the San Francisco mountains forest reserve, Arizona. US Geol Surv Prof Paper 22, Series H, For, 7. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  48. Lindsey AA (1951) Vegetation and habitats in a Southwestern volcanic area. Ecol Monogr 21:227–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Linton MJ, Sperry JS, Williams DG (1998) Limits to water transport in Juniperous osteosperma and Pinus edulis: implications for drought tolerance and regulation of transpiration. Funct Ecol 12:906–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Loehle C (2000) Forest ecotone response to climate change: sensitivity to temperature response functional forms. Can J For Res 30:1632–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell, MaldanGoogle Scholar
  52. Martínez-Vilalta J, Sala A, Piñol J (2004) The hydraulic architecture of Pinaceae—a review. Plant Ecol 171:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, Kolb T, Plaut J, Sperry J, West A, Williams DG, Yepez EA (2008) Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol 178:719–739. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. McDowell NG, Allen CD, Marshall L (2010) Growth, carbon-isotope discrimination, and drought-associated mortality across a Pinus ponderosa elevational transect. Glob Chang Biol 16:399–415. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01994.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Miller G, Ambos N, Boness P, Reyher D, Robertson G, Scalzone K, Steinke R, Subirge T (1995) Terrestrial ecosystems survey of the Coconino National Forest. USDA Forestry Service, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NMGoogle Scholar
  56. Montes-Helu M, Kolb TE, Dore S, Sullivan B, Hart S, Koch G, Hungate B (2009) Persistent effects of fire-induced vegetation change on energy partitioning and evapotranspiration in ponderosa pine forests. Agric For Meteorol 149:491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moore JA, Hamilton DA Jr, Xiao Y, Byrne J (2004) Bedrock type significantly affects individual tree mortality for various conifers in the inland Northwest USA. Can J For Res 34:31–42. doi:10.1139/X03-196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mopper S, Mitton JB, Whitham TG, Cobb NS, Christensen KM (1991) Genetic differentiation and heterozygosity in pinyon pine associated with resistance to herbivory and environmental stress. Evolution 45:989–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mueller RC, Scudder CM, Porter ME, Trotter RT III, Gejring CA, Whitham TG (2005) Differential tree mortality in response to severe drought: evidence for long-term vegetation shifts. J Ecol 93:1085–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Negrón JF, Wilson JL (2003) Attributes associated with probability of infestation by pinyon Ips, Ips confuses (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in pinyon pine, Pinus edulis. West North Am Nat 63:440–451Google Scholar
  61. Negrón JF, McMillin JD, Anhold JA, Coulson D (2009) Bark beetle-caused mortality in a drought-affected ponderosa pine landscape in Arizona, USA. For Ecol Manag 257:1353–1362. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Newman BD, Wilcox BP, Archer SR, Breshears DD, Dahm CN, Duffy CJ, McDowell NG, Phillips FM, Scanlon BR, Vivoni ER (2006) Ecohydrology of water-limited environments: a scientific vision. Water Resour Res 42:W06302. doi:10.1029/2005WR004141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. NOAA National Climatic Data Center (2008) Retrieved 10-Jun-2008, from http://www7.ncdc.noaa.gov/CDO/CDODivisionalSelect.jsp
  64. Noy-Meir I (1973) Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:25–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ogle K, Whitham TG, Cobb NS (2000) Tree-ring variation in pinyon predicts likelihood of death following severe drought. Ecology 81:3237–3243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pockman WT, Sperry JS (2000) Vulnerability to xylem cavitation and the distribution of Sonoran vegetation. Am J Bot 87:1287–1299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Potvin C, Roff DA (1993) Distribution-free and robust statistical methods: viable alternatives to parametric statistics. Ecology 74:1617–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Raffa KF, Aukema BH, Bentz BJ, Carroll AL, Hicke JA, Turner MG, Romme WH (2008) Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: the dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. Bioscience 58:501–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rehfeldt GE, Crokston NL, Warwell MV, Evans JS (2006) Empirical analysis of plant-climate relationships for the western United States. Int J Plant Sci 167:1123–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rood SB, Patino S, Coombs K, Tyree MT (2000) Branch sacrifice: cavitation-associated drought adaptation of riparian cottonwoods. Trees 14:248–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Salzer MW, Kipfmueller KF (2005) Reconstructed temperature and precipitation on a millennial timescale from tree-rings in the southern Colorado Plateau, USA. Clim Chang 70:465–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Savage M, Mast JN (2005) How resilient are southwestern ponderosa pine forests after crown fires? Can J For Res 35:967–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schultz HR (2003) Differences in hydraulic architecture account for nearisohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant Cell Environ 26:1393–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Seager R, Ting M, Held I, Kushnir Y, Lu J, Vecchi G, Huang HP, Harnik N, Leetmaa A, Lau NC, Li C, Velez J, Naik N (2007) Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in Southwestern North America. Science 316:1181–1184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Selmants PC, Hart SC (2008) Substrate age and tree islands influence carbon and nitrogen dynamics across a retrogressive semiarid chronosequence. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 22:1021. doi:10.1029/2007GB003062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shaw JD, Steed BE, De Blander LT (2005) Forest inventory and analysis (FIA) annual inventory answers the question: what is happening to pinyon-juniper woodlands? J For 103:280–285Google Scholar
  77. Simonin K, Kolb TE, Montes-Helu M, Koch GW (2006) Restoration thinning and influence of tree size and leaf area to sapwood area ratio on water relations of Pinus ponderosa. Tree Physiol 26:493–503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Sink S (2004) A photographic guide to Piñon and Juniper tree maturity classes. S & S Printing, Flagstaff. Retrieved 02-Mar-2009, from http://scottsink.com/Photoguide.pdf
  79. Solomon S, Plattner G-K, Knutti R, Friedlingstein P (2009) Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 106:1704–1709CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Sperry JS, Hacke UG, Oren R, Comstock JP (2002) Water deficits and hydraulic limits to leaf water supply. Plant Cell Environ 25:251–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Sthultz CM, Gehring CA, Whitham TG (2009) Deadly combination of genes and drought: increased mortality of herbivore-resistant trees in a foundation species. Glob Chang Biol 15:1949–1961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Swaty RL, Gehring CA, van Ert M, Theimer TC, Keim P, Whitham TG (1998) Temporal variation in temperature and rainfall differentially affects ectomycorrhizal colonization at two contrasting sites. New Phytol 139:733–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tardieu F, Simonneau T (1998) Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. J Exp Bot 49:419–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thompson WG (1940) A growth rate classification of southwestern ponderosa pine. J For 38:547–553Google Scholar
  85. van Mantgem PJ, Stephenson NL, Byrne JC, Daniels LD, Franklin JF, Fulé PZ, Harmon ME, Larson AJ, Smith JM, Taylor AH, Veblen TT (2009) Widespread increase of tree mortality rates in the Western United States. Science 323:521–524CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Waple AM, Lawrimore JH (2003) State of the climate in 2002. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 84:S1–S68Google Scholar
  87. Weiss JL, Castro CL, Overpeck J (2009) Distinguishing pronounced droughts in the Southwestern United States: seasonality and effects of warmer temperatures. J Clim 22:5918–5932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. West AG, Hultine KR, Jackson TL, Ehleringer JR (2007) Differential summer water use by Pinus edulis and Juniperus osteosperma reflects contrasting hydraulic characteristics. Tree Physiol 27:1711–1720PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. White AS (1985) Presettlement regeneration patterns in a Southwestern ponderosa pine stand. Ecology 66:589–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Williams JW, Jackson ST (2007) Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Front Ecol Env 5:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan F. Koepke
    • 1
  • Thomas E. Kolb
    • 1
  • Henry D. Adams
    • 2
  1. 1.School of ForestryNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations