Oecologia

, Volume 164, Issue 1, pp 185–192 | Cite as

Ants provide nutritional and defensive benefits to the carnivorous plant Sarracenia minor

  • Daniel C. Moon
  • Anthony M. Rossi
  • Jacqueline Depaz
  • Lindsey McKelvey
  • Sheryl Elias
  • Emily Wheeler
  • Jamie Moon
Plant-Animal interactions - Original Paper

Abstract

Ants can have important, but sometimes unexpected, effects on the plants they associate with. For carnivorous plants, associating with ants may provide defensive benefits in addition to nutritional ones. We examined the effects of increased ant visitation and exclusion of insect prey from pitchers of the hooded pitcher plant Sarracenia minor, which has been hypothesized to be an ant specialist. Visitation by ants was increased by placing PVC pipes in the ground immediately adjacent to 16 of 32 pitcher plants, which created nesting/refuge sites. Insects were excluded from all pitchers of 16 of the plants by occluding the pitchers with cotton. Treatments were applied in a 2 × 2 factorial design in order to isolate the hypothesized defensive benefits from nutritional ones. We recorded visitation by ants, the mean number of ants captured, foliar nitrogen content, plant growth and size, and levels of herbivory by the pitcher plant mining moth Exyra semicrocea. Changes in ant visitation and prey capture significantly affected nitrogen content, plant height, and the number of pitchers per plant. Increased ant visitation independent of prey capture reduced herbivory and pitcher mortality, and increased the number of pitchers per plant. Results from this study show that the hooded pitcher plant derives a double benefit from attracting potential prey that are also capable of providing defense against herbivory.

Keywords

Ant-plant associations Carnivory Exyra semicrocea Indirect defense Pitcher plant 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Coastal Biology Program at the University of North Florida. The manuscript was significantly improved by the comments of Peter Stiling and three anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Altfeld L, Stiling P (2006) Argentine ants strongly affect some but not all common insects on Baccharis halimifolia. Environ Entomol 35:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atwater DZ, Butler J, Ellison A (2006) Spatial distribution and impacts of moth herbivory on northern pitcher plants. Northeast Nat 13:43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:817–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bronstein JL (1998) The contribution of ant-plant protection studies to our understanding of mutualism. Biotropica 30:150–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronstein JL, Alarcon R, Geber M (2006) The evolution of plant-insect mutualisms. New Phytol 172:412–428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapin CT, Pastor J (1995) Nutrient limitation in the northern pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea. Can J Bot 73:728–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke CM, Kitching RL (1995) Swimming ants and pitcher plants: a unique ant-plant interaction from Borneo. J Trop Ecol 11:589–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cresswell JE (1991) Capture rates and composition of insect prey of the pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea. Am Midl Nat 125:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cresswell JE (1992) The morphological correlates of prey capture and resource parasitism in pitchers of the carnivorous plant Sarracenia purpurea. Am Midl Nat 129:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellison AM, Gotelli N (2001) Evolutionary ecology of carnivorous plants. Trends Ecol Evol 16:623–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer RC, Wanek W, Richter A, Mayer V (2003) Do ants feed plants? A 15N labelling study of nitrogen fluxes from ants to plants in the mutualism of Pheidole and Piper. J Ecol 91:126–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fish D (1976) Insect-plant relationships of the insectivorous pitcher plant Sarracenia minor. Fla Entomol 59:199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Folkerts DR, Folkerts GW (1996) Aids for field identification of pitcher plant moths of the genus Exyra (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Entomol News 107:128–136Google Scholar
  14. Frederickson M, Gordon DM (2007) The devil to pay: a cost of mutualism with Myrmelachista schumanni ants in “devil’s gardens” is increased herbivory on Duroia hirsuta trees. Proc R Soc B 274:1117–1123PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaume L, Zacharias M, Grosbois V, Borges RM (2005) The fitness consequences of bearing domatia and having the right ant partner: experiments with protective and non-protective ants in a semi-myrmecophyte. Oecologia 145:76–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Givnish TJ (1989) Ecology and evolution of carnivorous plants. In: Abrahamson WG (ed) Plant-animal interactions. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 243–290Google Scholar
  17. Givnish TJ, Burkhardt EL, Happel RE, Weintraub JW (1984) Carnivory in the bromeliad Brocchinia reducta, with a cost/benefit model for the general restriction of carnivorous plants to sunny, moist, nutrient-poor habitats. Am Nat 124:479–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heard SB (1998) Capture rates of invertebrate prey by the pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea. Am Midl Nat 139:79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heil M, McKey D (2003) Protective ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:425–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones FM (1921) Pitcher plants and their moths the influence of insect-trapping plants on their insect associates. Nat Hist 21:296–316Google Scholar
  21. Letourneau DK (1998) Ants, stem-borers, and fungal pathogens: experimental tests of a fitness advantage in Piper ant-plants. Ecology 79:593–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merbach M, Zizka G, Fiala B, Merbach D, Booth WE, Maschwitz U (2007) Why a carnivorous plant cooperates with an ant: selective defense against pitcher destroying weevils in the myrmecophytic pitcher plant Nepenthes bicalcarata Hook.f. Ecotropica 13:45–56Google Scholar
  23. Meyer R, Walguarnery J, Beaulac D, Brown T, Hughes K (2001) Morphological differences among two populations of the hooded pitcher plant, Sarracenia minor, and its usefulness as an indicator species for bog and seepage savanna communities. Osprey J Ideas Inq 1:9–12Google Scholar
  24. Miller TEX (2007) Does having multiple partners weaken the benefits of facultative mutualism? A test with cacti and cactus-tending ants. Oikos 116:500–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller TE, Kneitel JM (2005) Pitcher-plant inquiline community as a prototypical metacommunity. In: Holyoak M, Holt R, Leibold M (eds) Metacommunities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 122–145Google Scholar
  26. Moon D, Rossi A, Stokes K, Moon J (2007) Effects of the pitcher plant mining moth Exyra semicrocea on the hooded pitcher plant Sarracenia minor. Am Midl Nat 159:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newell SJ, Nastase A (1998) Efficiency of insect capture by Sarracenia purpurea (Sarraceniaceae), the northern pitcher plant. Am J Bot 85:88–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Oliveira PS, Rico-Gray V, Diaz-Castelazo C, Castillo-Guevara C (1999) Interaction between ants, extrafloral nectaries and insect herbivores in Neotropical coastal sand dunes: herbivore deterrence by visiting ants increases fruit set in Opuntia stricta (Cactaceae). Funct Ecol 13:623–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Plummer GL, Kethley JB (1964) Foliar absorption of amino acids, peptides and other nutrients by the pitcher plant, Sarracenia flava. Bot Gaz 125:245–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rico-Gray V, Barber JT, Ellgaard EG, Thien LB, Toney JJ (1989) An unusual animal-plant interaction: feeding of Schomburgkia tibicinis (Orchidaceae) by ants. Am J Bot 76:603–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Risch SJ (1982) How Pheidole ants help Piper plants. Brenesia 19(20):545–548Google Scholar
  32. Rutter MT, Rausher MD (2004) Natural selection on extrafloral nectar production in Chamaecrista fasciulata: the costs and benefits of a mutualism trait. Evolution 58:2657–2668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rymal DE, Folkerts GW (1982) Insects associated with pitcher plants (Sarracenia: Sarraceniaceae), and their relationship to pitcher plant conservation: a review. J Ala Acad Sci 53:131–151Google Scholar
  34. Schnell DE (2002) Carnivorous plants of the United States and Canada. Timber Press, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  35. Solano PJ, Dejean A (2004) Ant-fed plants: comparison between three geophytic myrmecophytes. Biol J Linn Soc 83:433–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trager MD, Bruna EM (2006) Effects of plant age, experimental nutrient addition and ant occupancy on herbivory in a neotropical myrmecophyte. J Ecol 94:1156–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zachariades C, Midgley JJ (1999) Extrafloral nectaries of South African Proteaceae attract insects but do not reduce herbivory. Afr Entomol 7:67–76Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel C. Moon
    • 1
  • Anthony M. Rossi
    • 1
  • Jacqueline Depaz
    • 1
  • Lindsey McKelvey
    • 1
  • Sheryl Elias
    • 1
  • Emily Wheeler
    • 1
  • Jamie Moon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of North FloridaJacksonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations