Oecologia

, Volume 163, Issue 1, pp 1–11

Interactive effects of elevated carbon dioxide and environmental stresses on root mass fraction in plants: a meta-analytical synthesis using pairwise techniques

Concepts, Reviews, and Syntheses

Abstract

Rising atmospheric CO2 greatly enhances plant production, but its effect on biomass allocation, particularly in the presence of environmental stresses, is not well understood. Here, we used meta-analysis combined with pairwise techniques to examine root mass fraction (RMF; i.e., the fraction of root to total biomass) as affected by elevated CO2 and environmental stresses. Our results showed that lower soil fertility increased RMF and the magnitude was similar for ambient and elevated CO2-grown plants. Lower soil water also increased RMF, but to a greater extent at elevated than at ambient CO2. While CO2 enrichment had little effect on the magnitude of O3-caused reduction in RMF in herbaceous species, it alleviated the adverse effect of higher O3 on root production in woody species. These results demonstrate that CO2 has less pronounced effects on RMF than other environmental factors. Under abiotic stresses, e.g., drought and higher O3, elevated CO2-grown plants will likely increase biomass allocation below-ground. Because of the non-uniform changes in drought and O3 projected for different parts of the world, we conclude that elevated CO2 will have regional, but not global, effects on biomass allocation under various global change scenarios.

Keywords

Biomass allocation Drought Ozone Pairwise analysis Soil fertility 

Supplementary material

442_2010_1572_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (262 kb)
(PDF 262 kb)

References

  1. Aerts R (1997) Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 79:439–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2005) What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol 165:351–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ainsworth EA, Rosenberg MS, Wang XZ (2007) Meta-analysis: the past, present and future. New Phytol 176:742–745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen CP (2003) Source-sink balance and carbon allocation below ground in plants exposed to ozone. New Phytol 157:213–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BassiriRad H, Gutschick VP, Lussenhop J (2001) Root system adjustments: regulation of plant nutrient uptake and growth responses to elevated CO2. Oecologia 126:305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bazzaz FA (1990) The response of natural ecosystems to the rising global CO2 levels. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:167–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benfey PN (1999) Is the shoot a root with a view? Curr Opin Plant Biol 2:39–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernacchi CJ, Coleman JS, Bazzaz FA, McConnaughay KDM (2000) Biomass allocation in old-field annual species grown in elevated CO2 environments: no evidence for optimal partitioning. Global Change Biol 6:855–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Billings WD, Peterson KM, Luken JO, Mortenson DA (1984) Interaction of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide and soil nitrogen on the carbon balance of tundra microcosms. Oecologia 65:26–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brouwer R (1962) Distribution of dry matter in the plant. Neth J Agric Sci 10:361–376Google Scholar
  11. Brouwer R (1983) Functional equilibrium: sense or nonsense? Neth J Agric Sci 31:335–348Google Scholar
  12. Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgardner GA (1997) Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. Oecologia 111:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crist JW, Stout GJ (1929) Relation between top and root size in herbaceous plants. Plant Physiol 4:63–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cure JD (1986) Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: a literature survey. Agric For Meteorol 38:127–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Curtis PS, Wang XZ (1998) A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant growth, form, and physiology. Oecologia 113:299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Graaff MA, Van Groenigen KJ, Six J, Hungate B, Van Kessel C (2006) Interactions between plant growth and soil nutrient cycling under elevated CO2: a meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol 12:2077–2091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DeLucia EH et al (1999) Net primary production of a forest ecosystem with experimental CO2 enrichment. Science 284:1177–1179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Drake BG, Gonzalez-Meler MA, Long SP (1997) More efficient plants: a consequence of rising atmospheric CO2? Annu Rev Plant Phys Plant Mol Biol 48:609–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eamus D, Jarvis PG (1989) The direct effects of increase in the global atmospheric CO2 concentration on natural and commercial temperate trees and forests. In: Begon M, Fitter AH, Ford ED, Macfadyen A (eds) Adv Ecol Res, vol 19. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ericsson T (1995) Growth and shoot:root ratio of seedlings in relation to nutrient availability. Plant Soil 168–169:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Farrar JF (1992) The whole plant:carbon partitioning during development. In: Pollock CJ, Farrar JF, Gordon AJ (eds) Carbon partitioning within and between organisms. BIOS, Oxford, pp 163–179Google Scholar
  22. Farrar JF, Gunn S (1998) Allocation: allometry, acclimation—and alchemy? In: Lambers H, Poorter H, Van Vuren MMI (eds) Inherent variation in plant growth. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 183–198Google Scholar
  23. Gartner TB, Cardon ZG (2004) Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter. Oikos 104:230–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giardina CP, Binkley D, Ryan MG, Fownes JH, Senock RS (2004) Belowground carbon cycling in a humid tropical forest decreases with fertilization. Oecologia 139:545–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Giardina CP et al (2005) The response of belowground carbon allocation in forests to global change. In: Binkley D, Menyailo O et al (eds) Tree species effects on soils: implications for global change. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 119–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gifford RM, Evans LT (1981) Photosynthesis, carbon partitioning, and yield. Annu Rev Plant Phys 32:485–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grantz DA, Gunn S, Vu H-B (2006) O3 impacts on plant development: a meta-analysis of root/shoot allocation and growth. Plant Cell Environ 29:1193–1209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gurevitch J, Curtis PS, Jones MH (2001) Meta-analysis in ecology. Adv Ecol Res 32:199–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gutschick VP (2007) Plant acclimation to elevated CO2: from simple regularities to biogeographic chaos. Ecol Modell 200:433–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80:1150–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoosbeek MR, Vos JM, Meinders MBJ, Velthorst EJ, Scarascia-Mugnozza GE (2007) Free atmospheric CO2 enrichment (FACE) increased respiration and humification in the mineral soil of a popular plantation. Geoderma 138:204–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huang JG, Bergeron Y, Denneler B, Berninger F, Tardif J (2007) Response of forest trees to increased atmospheric CO2. Crit Rev Plant Sci 26:265–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hunt R, Lloyd PS (1987) Growth and partitioning. New Phytol 106(Suppl):235–249Google Scholar
  34. Hunt R, Nicholls AO (1986) Stress and the coarse control of growth and root–shoot partitioning in herbaceous plants. Oikos 47:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hunt R, Nicholls AO, Fathy SA (1987) Growth and root–shoot partitioning in eighteen British grasses. Oikos 50:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hyvonen R et al (2007) The likely impact of elevated [CO2], nitrogen deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in temperature and boreal forest ecosystems: a literature review. New Phytol 173:463–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. IPCC (2007) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Synthesis report: summary for policy makers. In: Climate change 2007. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  38. Jasienski M, Bazzaz FA (1999) The fallacy of ratios and the testability of models in biology. Oikos 84:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Keeling CD, Whorf TP, Wahlen M, Van Der Plicht J (1995) Interannual extremes in the rate of rise of atmospheric carbon dioxide since 1980. Nature 375:666–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kimball BA et al (1995) Productivity and water use of wheat under free-air CO2 enrichment. Global Change Biol 1:429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Körner C (1994) Biomass fraction in plants: a reconsideration of the definition based on plant functions. In: Roy J, Garnier E (eds) A whole plant perspective on carbon–nitrogen interactions. Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 173–185Google Scholar
  42. Körner C (2000) Biosphere responses to CO2 enrichment. Ecol Appl 10:1590–1619Google Scholar
  43. Körner C (2006) Plant CO2 responses: an issue of definition, time and resource supply. New Phytol 172:393–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Litton CM, Raich JW, Ryan MG (2007) Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Global Change Biol 13:2089–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Loehle C (1995) Anomalous responses of plants to CO2 enrichment. Oikos 73:181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Luo Y, Field CB, Mooney HA (1994) Predicting response of photosynthesis and root fraction to elevated [CO2]a: interactions among carbon, nitrogen, and growth. Plant Cell Environ 17:1195–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Luo Y et al (2004) Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. Bioscience 54:731–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luo Y, Hui D, Zhang DQ (2006) Elevated CO2 stimulates net accumulations of carbon and nitrogen in land ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Ecology 87:53–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Maestre FT, Reynolds JF (2006) Spatial heterogeneity in soil nutrient supply modulates nutrient and biomass responses to multiple global change drivers in model grassland communities. Global Change Biol 12:2431–2441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McGuire AD, Melillo JM, Joyce LA (1995) The role of nitrogen in the response of forest net primary production to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 26:473–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Melillo JM, Mcguire AD, Kicklighter DW, Moore B III, Vorosmarty CJ, Schloss AL (1993) Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature 363:234–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Meyer WB, Turner BLI (1992) Human population growth and global land-use/cover change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:39–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mokany K, Raison JR, Prokushkin AS (2006) Critical analysis of root: shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Global Change Biol 12:84–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Morgan PB, Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2003) How does elevated ozone impact soybean? A meta-analysis of photosynthesis, growth and yield. Plant Cell Environ 26:1317–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Morgan JA et al (2004) Water relations in grassland and desert ecosystems exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2. Oecologia 140:11–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Norby RJ (1994) Issues and perspectives for investigation root responses to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Plant Soil 165:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Norby RJ, Wullschleger SD, Gunderson CA, Johnson DW, Ceulemans R (1999) Tree responses to rising CO2 in field experiment: implications for the future forest. Plant Cell Environ 22:683–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Norby RJ et al (2005) Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:18052–18056CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Nowak RS, Ellsworth DS, Smith SD (2004) Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2: do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytol 162:253–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Palmroth S et al (2006) Aboveground sink strength in forests controls the allocation of carbon below ground and its [CO2]-induced enhancement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:19362–19367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Poorter H, Nagel O (2000) The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:595–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Raich JW, Russell AE, Kitayama K, Parton WJ, Vitousek PM (2006) Temperature influences carbon accumulation in moist tropical forests. Ecology 87:76–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Reynolds HL, D’Antonio C (1996) The ecological significance of plasticity in root weight ratio in response to nitrogen: opinion. Plant Soil 185:75–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reynolds JF, Thornley JHM (1982) A shoot:root partitioning model. Ann Bot 49:585–597Google Scholar
  65. Rogers HH, Prior SA, Runion GB, Mitchell RJ (1996) Root to shoot ratio of crops as influenced by CO2. Plant Soil 187:229–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rosenberg NJ, Adams DC, Gurevitch J (2000) MetaWin: Statistical software for meta-analysis. In: MetaWin: statistical software for meta-analysis, version 2.0 (edn). Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  67. Schimel DS (1995) Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle. Global Change Biol 1:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schlesinger WH (1977) Carbon balance in terrestrial detritus. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 8:51–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shipley B, Meziane D (2002) The balanced-growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation. Funct Ecol 16:326–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stulen I, den Hertog J (1993) Root growth and functioning under atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Vegetation 104(105):99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tang JJ, Chen J, Chen X (2006) Response of 12 weedy species to elevated CO2 in low-phosphorus-availability soil. Ecol Res 21:664–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thornley JHM (1972) A balanced quantitative model for root:shoot ratios in vegetative plants. Ann Bot 36:431–441Google Scholar
  73. Tubiello FN et al (2007) Crop response to elevated CO2 and world food supply: a comment on “Food for Thought…” by Long et al, Science 312: 1918–1921, 2006. Eur J Agron 26:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wang XZ (2007) Effects of species richness and elevated carbon dioxide on biomass accumulation: a synthesis using meta-analysis. Oecologia 152:595–605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Wilson JB (1988) A review of evidence on the control of shoot:root ratio, in relation to models. Ann Bot 61:433–449Google Scholar
  76. Wilson SD, Tilman D (1995) Competitive responses of eight old-field plant species in four environments. Ecology 76:1169–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wullschleger SD, Post WM, King AW (1995) On the potential for a CO2 fertilization effects in forests: estimates of the biotic growth factor based on 58 controlled-exposure studies. In: Woodwell GM, Mackenzie FT (eds) Biotic feedbacks in the global climatic system: will the warming feed the warming? Oxford University Press, New York, pp 85–107Google Scholar
  78. Wullschleger SD, Tschaplinski TJ, Norby RJ (2002) Plant water relations at elevated CO2: implications for water-limited environments. Plant Cell Environ 25:319–331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Zak DR, Pregitzer KS, Curtis PS, Teeri JA, Fogel R, Randlett DL (1993) Elevated atmospheric CO2 and feedback between carbon and nitrogen cycles. Plant Soil 151:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zak DR, Holmes WE, Pregitzer KS, King JS, Ellsworth DS, Kubiske ME (2007) Belowground competition and the response of developing forest communities to atmospheric CO2 and O3. Global Change Biol 13:2230–2238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ziska LH, Bunce JA (2007) Predicting the impact of changing CO2 on crop yields: some thoughts on food. New Phytol 175:607–618CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyIndiana University-Purdue University IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.Biology DepartmentSouthwestern UniversityGeorgetownUSA

Personalised recommendations