The effects of top–down versus bottom–up control on benthic coral reef community structure
- 1.6k Downloads
While climate change and associated increases in sea surface temperature and ocean acidification, are among the most important global stressors to coral reefs, overfishing and nutrient pollution are among the most significant local threats. Here we examined the independent and interactive effects of reduced grazing pressure and nutrient enrichment using settlement tiles on a coral-dominated reef via long-term manipulative experimentation. We found that unique assemblages developed in each treatment combination confirming that both nutrients and herbivores are important drivers of reef community structure. When herbivores were removed, fleshy algae dominated, while crustose coralline algae (CCA) and coral were more abundant when herbivores were present. The effects of fertilization varied depending on herbivore treatment; without herbivores fleshy algae increased in abundance and with herbivores, CCA increased. Coral recruits only persisted in treatments exposed to grazers. Herbivore removal resulted in rapid changes in community structure while there was a lag in response to fertilization. Lastly, re-exposure of communities to natural herbivore populations caused reversals in benthic community trajectories but the effects of fertilization remained for at least 2 months. These results suggest that increasing herbivore populations on degraded reefs may be an effective strategy for restoring ecosystem structure and function and in reversing coral–algal phase-shifts but that this strategy may be most effective in the absence of other confounding disturbances such as nutrient pollution.
KeywordsAlgae Nutrients Herbivory Phase-shifts Restoration
This research was supported by the Hawai’i Coral Reef Initiative grant no. NA870A0381. We thank Dr David Bellwood and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments that have helped to improve the manuscript. We would also like to thank Randall Kosaki, Brent Carman, William Walsh, Peter Hendricks, Robert Nishimoto, Lisa Wedding, Linda Preskitt, Anne Creason, Steven Cotton and Brian Zgliczynski for boat and dive support and help in the field.
- Adey WH, Vassar M (1975) Colonization, succession and growth rates of tropical crustose coralline algae (Rhodophyta, Cryptonemiales). Phycologia 14:55–69Google Scholar
- Boyer KE, Fong P, Armitage AR, Cohen RA (2004) Elevated nutrient content of tropical macroalgae increases rates of herbivory in coral, seagrass, and mangrove habitats. Coral Reefs 23:530–538Google Scholar
- Carpenter RC, Edmunds PJ (2006) Local and regional scale recovery of Diadema promotes recruitment of scleractinian corals. Ecol Lett 9:268–277Google Scholar
- Hixon MA, Brostoff WN (1985) Substrate characteristics, fish grazing and epibenthic reef assemblages off Hawaii. Bull Mar Sci 37:200–213Google Scholar
- Hoey AS, Bellwood DR (2007) Cross-shelf variation in the role of parrotfishes on the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs (online first)Google Scholar
- Hughes T, Szmant AM, Steneck R, Carpenter R, Miller S (1999) Algal blooms on coral reefs: what are the causes? Limnol Oceanogr 44:1583–1586Google Scholar
- Lapointe BE (1997) Nutrient thresholds for bottom-up control of macroalgal blooms on coral reefs in Jamaica and southeast Florida. Limnol Oceanogr 42:1119–1131Google Scholar
- Lapointe BE (1999) Simultaneous top–down and bottom–up forces control macroalgal blooms on coral reefs—(reply to the comment by Hughes et al.). Limnol Oceanogr 44:1586–1592Google Scholar
- Littler MM, Littler DS (1984) Models of tropical reef biogenesis: the contribution of algae. In: Round FE, Chapman DJ (eds) Progress in phycological research, vol 3. Biopress, Bristol, pp 323–364Google Scholar
- Smith JE, Smith CM, Hunter CL (2001) An experimental analysis of the effects of herbivory and nutrient enrichment on benthic community dynamics on a Hawaiian reef. Coral Reefs 19:332–342Google Scholar