, Volume 163, Issue 1, pp 35–45 | Cite as

Levels of antioxidants in rural and urban birds and their consequences

  • Anders Pape MøllerEmail author
  • Johannes Erritzøe
  • Filiz Karadas
Physiological ecology - Original Paper


Numerous animals have successfully invaded urban habitats, although the factors associated with invasion success remain poorly understood. Urban areas are characterized by warmer microclimates, higher levels of primary productivity, longer breeding seasons and higher levels of pollutants. All these factors should cause oxidative stress, favoring invasion by species that have access to high levels of antioxidants. We analyzed concentrations of two categories of dietary, fat-soluble antioxidants (total carotenoids, total vitamin E) in the liver, the main storage organ in birds. Individuals killed by cats had lower levels of vitamin E than individuals that died for other reasons, showing natural selection on stored antioxidants. Bird species that had successfully colonized urban areas had significantly higher levels of vitamin E and total carotenoids than species that did not succeed, and rural populations had higher concentrations of vitamin E and total carotenoids than urban populations of the same species. Interspecific differences in concentrations of fat-soluble antioxidants, and differences between rural and urban populations of the same species, were accounted for by diet, but also by time since urbanization and number of generations since urbanization. These findings suggest that antioxidants, and by implication the ability to cope with oxidative stress, have contributed to successful invasion of urban areas by birds, and that the concentration of these antioxidants has changed in response to the urban environment.


Carotenoids Condition Diet Invasion Predation 



Several colleagues kindly provided specimens, and two reviewers provided constructive criticism.

Supplementary material

442_2009_1525_MOESM1_ESM.doc (195 kb)
(DOC 195 kb)


  1. Batten LA (1973) Population dynamics of suburban blackbirds. Bird Study 20:251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bendich A (1989) Carotenoids and the immune response. J Nutr 119:112–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Biard C, Gil D, Karadas F, Saino N, Spottiswoode C, Surai PF, Møller AP (2009) Maternal effects mediated by antioxidants and the evolution of carotenoid-based signals in birds. Am Nat 174:696–708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blumstein DT (2006) Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear: how life history and natural history traits affect disturbance tolerance in birds. Anim Behav 71:389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonier F, Martin PR, Wingfield JC (2007) Urban birds have broader environmental tolerance. Biol Lett 3:670–673CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brauner EV, Forchhammer L, Møller P, Simonsen J, Glasius M, Wahlin P, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Loft S (2007) Exposure to ultrafine particles from ambient air and oxidative stress-induced DNA damage. Environ Health Perspect 115:1177–1182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown JCL, McClelland GB, Faure PA, Klaiman JM, Staples JF (2009) Examining the mechanisms responsible for lower ROS release rates in liver mitochondria from the long-lived house sparrow (Passer domesticus) and big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus) compared to the short-lived mouse (Mus musculus). Mech Age Dev 130:467–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2001) Model selection and multi-model inference. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Chew BP (1993) Role of carotenoids in the immune response. J Dairy Sci 76:2804–2811PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  11. Costantini D, Møller AP (2008) Carotenoids are minor antioxidants for birds. Funct Ecol 22:367–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costantini D, Møller AP (2009) Does immune response cause oxidative stress in birds? A meta-analysis. Comp Biochem Physiol B 153:339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cramp S, Perrins CM (eds) (1977–1994) The birds of the Western Palearctic. Vols 1–9. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. de Ayala RM, Martinelli R, Saino N (2007) Vitamin E supplementation enhances growth and condition of nestling barn swallows (Hirundo rustica). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:619–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Draper NR, Smith H (1981) Applied regression analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Eeva T, Lehikoinen E, Ronka M (1998) Air pollution fades the plumage of the great tit. Funct Ecol 12:607–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans KL, Gaston KJ, Sharp SP, McGowan A, Simeoni M, Hatchwell BJ (2009) Effects of urbanization on disease prevalence and age structure in blackbird Turdus merula populations. Oikos 118:774–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fløystrup A (1920) Fugleliv i Kjøbenhavn: Iagttagelser fra Østre Anlæg og Botanisk Have. Dansk Orn Foren Tidsskr 14:1–60Google Scholar
  20. Fløystrup A (1925) Fugleliv i Kjøbenhavn: Fortsatte iagttagelser fra Østre Anlæg og Botanisk Have. Dansk Orn Foren Tidsskr 19:1–18Google Scholar
  21. Garamszegi LZ, Møller AP (2009) Effects of sample size and intraspeciifc variation in phylogenetic comparative studies: a meta-analytic review. Biol Rev (in press)Google Scholar
  22. Garland T Jr, Harvey PH, Ives AR (1992) Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst Biol 41:18–32Google Scholar
  23. Gliwicz J, Goszczynski J, Luniak M (1994) Characteristic features of animal populations under synurbanization—the case of the blackbirds and the striped field mouse. Mem Zool 49:237–244Google Scholar
  24. Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM (eds) (1966–1997) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Aula, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  25. Gram C (1908) Fuglelivet i København og omegn for halvhundrede aar siden. Dansk Orn Foren Tidsskr 3:27–36Google Scholar
  26. Hackett SJ, Kimball RT, Reddy S, Bowie RCK, Braun EL, Braun MJ, Chojnowski JL, Cox WA, Han K-L, Harshman J, Huddleton CJ, Marks BD, Miglia KJ, Moore WA, Sheldon FH, Steadman DW, Witt CC, Yuri T (2008) A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science 320:1763–1768CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Halliwell BH, Gutteridge JMC (2007) Free radicals in biology and medicine. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Hartley RC, Kennedy MW (2004) Are carotenoids a red herring in sexual display? Trends Ecol Evol 19:253–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hõrak P, Lebreton J-D (1998) Survival of adult great tits in relation to sex and habitat: a comparison of urban and rural populations. Ibis 140:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hõrak P, Ots I, Vellau H, Spottiswoode C, Møller AP (2001) Carotenoid-based plumage coloration reflects hemoparasite infection and local survival in breeding great tits. Oecologia 126:166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hõrak P, Vellau H, Ots I, Møller AP (2002) Fat-soluble antioxidants in the eggs of great tits Parus major in relation to breeding habitat and laying sequence. Avian Science 2:123–130Google Scholar
  32. Isaksson C, Örnborg J, Stephensen E, Andersson S (2005) Plasma glutathione and carotenoid coloration as potential biomarkers of environmental stress in great tits. Ecohealth 2:138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Isaksson C, McLaughlin P, Monaghan P, Andersson S (2007) Carotenoid pigmentation does not reflect total non-enzymatic antioxidant activity in plasma of adult and nestling great tits, Parus major. Funct Ecol 21:1123–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Isaksson C, Johansson A, Andersson S (2008) Egg yolk carotenoids in relation to habitat and reproductive investment in the great tit Parus major. Physiol Biochem Zool 81:112–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Isaksson C, Sturve J, Almroth BC, Andersson S (2009) The impact of urban environment on oxidative damage (TBARS) and antioxidant systems in lungs and liver of great tits, Parus major. Environ Res 109:46–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. JMP (2000) JMP. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  37. Jokimäki J, Suhonen J, Inki K, Jokinen S (1996) Biogeographical comparison of winter bird assemblages in urban environments in Finland. J Biogeogr 23:379–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jones KE, Purvis A (1997) An optimum body size for mammals? Comparative evidence from bats. Funct Ecol 11:751–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jønsson KA, Fjeldså J (2006) A phylogenetic supertree of oscine passerine birds (Aves: Passeri). Zool Scr 35:149–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kim HW, Chew BP, Wong TS, Park JS, Weng BBC, Byrne KM, Hayek MG, Reinhart GA (2000) Modulation of humoral and cell-mediated immune responses by dietary lutein in cats. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 73:331–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Klausnitzer B (1989) Verstädterung von Tieren. Neue Brehm, Wittenberg LutherstadtGoogle Scholar
  42. Luniak M, Mulsow R (1988) Ecological parameters in urbanisation of the European blackbird. Acta Congr Int Orn 19:1787–1793Google Scholar
  43. Møller AP (2008) Flight distance of urban birds, predation and selection for urban life. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Møller AP (2009) Successful city dwellers: a comparative study of the ecological characteristics of urban birds in the Western Palearctic. Oecologia 159:849–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Møller AP, Erritzøe J (2000) Predation against birds with low immunocompetence. Oecologia 122:500–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Møller AP, Nielsen JT (2006) Prey vulnerability in relation to sexual coloration of prey. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Møller AP, Biard C, Blount JD, Houston DC, Ninni P, Saino N, Surai PF (2000) Carotenoid-dependent signals: indicators of foraging efficiency, immunocompetence or detoxification ability? Poult Avian Biol Rev 11:137–159Google Scholar
  48. Møller AP, Surai PF, Mousseau TA (2005) Antioxidants, radiation and mutation in barn swallows from Chernobyl. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Møller AP, Karadas F, Mousseau TA (2008) Antioxidants in eggs of great tits Parus major from Chernobyl and hatching success. J Comp Physiol B 178:735–743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied linear statistical models. Irwin, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  51. Pérez-Rodríguez L, Mougeot F, Alonso-Alvarez C, Blas J, Viñuela J, Bortolotti G (2008) Cell-mediated immune activation rapidly decreases plasma carotenoids but does not affect oxidative stress in red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa). J Exp Biol 211:2155–2161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Purvis A, Rambaut A (1995) Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC). Comp Appl Biosci 11:247–251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Saino N, Ferrari R, Romano M, Martinelli R, Møller AP (2003) Experimental manipulation of egg carotenoids affects immunity of barn swallow nestlings. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:2485–2489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shochat E, Warren PC, Faeth SH, McIntyre NE (2006) From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 21:186–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE (1990) Phylogeny and classification of birds, a study in molecular evolution. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  56. Sibley CG, Monroe BL Jr (1990) Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the world. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  57. Slagsvold T, Lifjeld JT (1985) Variation in plumage color of the great tit Parus major in relation to habitat, season and food. J Zool 206:321–328Google Scholar
  58. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Stephan B (1999) Die Amsel. Neue Brehm, Wittenberg-LutherstadtGoogle Scholar
  60. Stradi R (1995) Il colore del volo. Solei, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  61. Surai PF (2002) Natural antioxidants in avian nutrition and reproduction. Nottingham University Press, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  62. Surai PF, MacPherson A, Speake BK, Sparks NHC (1999) Designer egg evaluation in a controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 54:298–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anders Pape Møller
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Johannes Erritzøe
    • 3
  • Filiz Karadas
    • 4
  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Ecologie, Systématique et Evolution, CNRS UMR 8079Université Paris-SudOrsay CedexFrance
  2. 2.Center for Advanced StudyOsloNorway
  3. 3.Taps Old RectoryChristiansfeldDenmark
  4. 4.Department of Animal ScienceUniversity of Yüzüncü YilVanTurkey

Personalised recommendations