, Volume 162, Issue 3, pp 747–753 | Cite as

A non-trophic interaction chain links predators in different spatial niches

  • Renée P. Prasad
  • William E. SnyderEmail author
Community Ecology - Original Paper


Non-trophic interactions, driven by one species changing the behavior but not density of another species, appear to be as pervasive as those involving consumption. However, ecologists have only begun to explore non-trophic interactions in species-rich communities. We investigated interactions within a community including two predator–prey linkages separated in space: ground-active predatory beetles and their fly egg prey on the ground, and lady beetles and their aphid prey in plant foliage. In field and greenhouse experiments we found that ground-active predators preyed heavily on fly eggs except when both aphids and lady beetles were present. The aphids drop from the foliage to escape foraging lady beetles, and once on the ground apparently triggered ground-active predators to switch from attacking fly eggs to attacking aphids. This suggests that the first non-trophic interaction in the foliage, mediated by aphid antipredator behavior, in turn initiated and accentuated a second non-trophic interaction on the ground, mediated by prey-switching behavior by ground predators. Our results demonstrate that successive non-trophic interactions can be propagated along chains of more than three species, and can serve to link species that are otherwise spatially isolated.


Predator–prey interactions Antipredator behavior Herbivores Biodiversity Biological control 



This work was supported by grants from the Organic Farming Research Foundation, the United States Department of Agriculture’s Western Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program, and the Natural Resources Conservation Endowment at Washington State University. D. Finke, S. Steffan, G. Snyder, C. Straub and D. Gillespie provided valuable comments on preliminary drafts of the manuscript. This study complies with the current laws in the country in which it was performed.

Supplementary material

442_2009_1486_MOESM1_ESM.doc (182 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 182 kb)


  1. Borer ET, Anderson K, Blanchette CA, Broitman B, Cooper SD, Halpern BS, Seabloom EW, Shurin JB (2002) Topological approaches to food web analyses: a few modifications may improve our insights. Oikos 99:397–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Byrnes J, Stachowicz JJ, Hultgren KM, Hughes AR, Olyarkin SV, Thornber CS (2006) Predator diversity strengthens trophic cascades in kelp forests by modifying herbivore behaviour. Ecol Lett 9:61–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cronin JT, Haynes KJ, Dillemuth T (2004) Spider effects on planthopper mortality, dispersal, and spatial population dynamics. Ecology 85:2134–2143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crowder LB, Squires DD, Rice JA (1997) Non-additive effects of terrestrial and aquatic predators on juvenile estuarine fish. Ecology 78:1796–1804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doane JF, Chapman RK (1962) Oviposition preference of the cabbage maggot, Hylemya brassicae (Bouché). J Econ Entomol 55:137–138Google Scholar
  6. Goudard A, Loreau M (2008) Nontrophic interactions, biodiversity, and ecosystem functioning: an interaction web model. Am Nat 171:91–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Grabowski JH, Kimbro DL (2005) Predator-avoidance behavior extends trophic cascades to refuge habitats. Ecology 86:1312–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Halaj J, Wise DH (2001) Terrestrial trophic cascades: how much do they trickle? Am Nat 157:262–281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Harmon JP, Andow DA (2004) Indirect effects between shared prey: predictions for biological control. Biocontrol 49:605–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holt RD (1977) Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theor Popul Biol 12:197–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang C, Sih A (1990) Experimental studies on behaviorally mediated indirect interactions through a shared predator. Ecology 71:1515–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knight TM, McCoy MW, Chase JM, McCoy KA, Holt RD (2005) Trophic cascades across ecosystems. Nature 437:880–883CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lathrop RC, Johnson BM, Johnson TB, Vogelsang MT, Carpenter SR, Hrabik TR, Kitchell JF, Magnuson JJ, Rudstam LG, Stewart RS (2002) Stocking piscivores to improve fishing and water quality: a synthesis of the Lake Mendota biomanipulation project. Freshw Biol 47:2410–2424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Letourneau DK, Dyer LA, Vega GC (2004) Indirect effects of a top predator on a rainforest understory plant community. Ecology 85:2144–2152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Losey JE, Denno RF (1998) Positive predator-predator interactions: enhanced predation rates and synergistic suppression of aphid populations. Ecology 79:2143–2152Google Scholar
  16. Luttbeg B, Rowe L, Mangel M (2003) Prey state and experimental design affect relative size of trait- and density-mediated indirect effects. Ecology 84:1140–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McAllister MK, Roitberg BD (1987) Adaptive suicidal behavior in pea aphids. Nature 328:797–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Prasad RP, Snyder WE (2004) Predator interference limits fly egg biological control by a guild of ground-active beetles. Biol Control 31:428–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Prasad RP, Snyder WE (2006a) Polyphagy complicates conservation biological control that targets generalist predators. J Appl Ecol 43:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Prasad RP, Snyder WE (2006b) Diverse trait-mediated indirect interactions in a multi-predator, multi-prey community. Ecology 87:1131–1137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Preisser EL, Bolnick DI, Benard MF (2005) Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator–prey interactions. Ecology 86:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raimondi PT, Forde SE, Delph LF, Lively CM (2000) Processes structuring communities: evidence for trait-mediated indirect effects through induced polymorphisms. Oikos 91:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Relyea RA, Yurewicz KL (2002) Predicting community outcomes from pairwise interactions: integrating density- and trait-mediated effects. Oecologia 131:569–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmitz OJ (2008) Predators avoiding predation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:14749–14750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmitz OJ, Beckerman AP, O’Brien KM (1997) Behaviorally-mediated trophic cascades: the effect of predation risk on food web interactions. Ecology 78:1388–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmitz OJ, Krivan V, Ovadia O (2004) Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol Lett 7:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shurin JB, Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Anderson K, Blanchette CA, Broitman B, Cooper SD, Halpern BS (2002) A cross-ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades. Ecol Lett 5:785–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Siddon CE, Witman JD (2004) Behavioral indirect interactions: multiple predator effects and prey switching in the rocky subtidal. Ecology 85:2938–2945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Snyder WE, Snyder GB, Finke DL, Straub CS (2006) Predator biodiversity strengthens herbivore suppression. Ecol Lett 9:789–796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Soluk DA, Collins NC (1988) Synergistic interactions between fish and stoneflies: facilitation and interference among stream predators. Oikos 52:94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tscharntke T (1992) Cascade effects among 4 trophic levels: bird predation on galls affects density-dependent parasitism. Ecology 73:1689–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Werner EE, Peacor SD (2003) A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Werner EE, Peacor SD (2006) Lethal and nonlethal predator effects on a herbivore guild mediated by system productivity. Ecology 87:347–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wise DH (1981) Seasonal and yearly patterns in the densities of darkling beetles in a montane community. Environ Entomol 10:350–358Google Scholar
  35. Wissinger SA, McGrady J (1993) Intraguild predation and competition among larval dragonflies: direct and indirect effects on shared prey. Ecology 74:207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wootton JT (2002) Indirect effects in complex ecosystems: recent progress and future challenges. J Sea Res 48:157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yodzis P (1988) The indeterminacy of ecological interactions as perceived through perturbation experiments. Ecology 69:508–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.E. S. Cropconsult Ltd.SurreyCanada

Personalised recommendations