Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 162, Issue 3, pp 733–745 | Cite as

Interaction intensity and importance along two stress gradients: adding shape to the stress-gradient hypothesis

  • Peter Christiaan le Roux
  • Melodie A. McGeoch
Community ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

The stress-gradient hypothesis (SGH) predicts that the community-wide prevalence of positive interactions, relative to negative interactions, is greater under more severe environmental conditions. Because the frequency of positive and negative interactions within a community is the aggregate of multiple pair-wise interactions, one approach to testing the SGH is to examine how pair-wise interactions vary along severity gradients. While the SGH suggests that the net outcome of an interaction should monotonically become more positive with increasing environmental severity, recent studies have suggested that the severity-interaction relationship (SIR) may rather be unimodal. We tested which of the proposed shapes of the SIR best fits the variation in the interaction between two species along two types of severity gradients on sub-Antarctic Marion Island. This was done by comparing the performance of the grass Agrostis magellanica in the presence and absence of the cushion plant Azorella selago, along both species’ entire altitudinal ranges (transects spanning 4–8 km), and along a shorter (transect = 0.4 km) wind exposure gradient. Along the altitudinal transects the relative intensity, but not the absolute intensity or the importance, of the Azorella selagoAgrostis magellanica interaction increased with altitude, consistently forming a plateau-shaped SIR with a positive asymptote. Thus, while the performance of Agrostis magellanica was negatively affected by Azorella selago at low altitudes, the grass benefited from growing on the cushion plant under greater environmental severity. Along the wind exposure gradient the intensity of the interaction also became more positive with increasing environmental severity for most performance measures. This suggests that the switch from a net negative to a net positive interaction can occur across both short and long distances. Therefore, this study provides strong evidence for a plateau-shaped SIR, and confirms that the SIR is unimodal along the particular non-resource severity gradients of this study.

Keywords

Biotic interactions Environmental gradient Facilitation Nurse plant Severity-interaction relationship 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Marion Burger, Natalie Haussmann, Mawethu Nyakatya and Tess Rautenbach are thanked for field assistance and two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments. Financial support was provided by the South African National Research Foundation, the South African National Antarctic Program (grant number 2069543 and SNA 2004070900002) and Stellenbosch University. This research complied with the current laws of South Africa.

Supplementary material

442_2009_1484_MOESM1_ESM.doc (572 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 572 kb)

References

  1. Agrawal AA et al (2007) Filling key gaps in population and community ecology. Front Ecol Environ 5:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthelme F, Michalet R, Saadou M (2007) Positive associations involving the tussock grass Panicum turgidum Forssk. in the Air-Tenere Reserve, Niger. J Arid Environ 68:348–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armas C, Ordiales R, Pugnaire FI (2004) Measuring plant interactions: a new comparative index. Ecology 85:2682–2686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin MP (2002) Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecol Model 157:101–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badano EI, Cavieres LA (2006) Impacts of ecosystem engineers on community attributes: effects of cushion plants at different elevations of the Chilean Andes. Divers Distrib 12:388–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badano EI, Villarroel E, Bustamante RO, Marquet PA, Cavieres LA (2007) Ecosystem engineering facilitates invasions by exotic plants in high-Andean ecosystems. J Ecol 95:682–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bate GC, Smith VR (1983) Photosynthesis and respiration in the sub-Antarctic tussock grass Poa cookii. New Phytol 95:533–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertness MD, Callaway RM (1994) Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9:191–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertness MD, Ewanchuk PJ (2002) Latitudinal and climate-driven variation in the strength and nature of biological interactions in New England salt marshes. Oecologia 132:392–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blake BJ (1996) Microclimate and prediction of photosynthesis at Marion Island. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Botany and Genetics, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  11. Boelhouwers J, Holness S, Sumner P (2003) The maritime sub-Antarctic: a distinct periglacial environment. Geomorphology 52:39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brooker RW, Callaghan TV (1998) The balance between positive and negative plant interactions and its relationship to environmental gradients: a model. Oikos 81:196–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brooker RW, Kikvidze Z (2008) Importance: an overlooked concept in plant interaction research. J Ecol 96:703–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brooker RW et al (2005) The importance of importance. Oikos 109:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brooker RW, Scott D, Palmer SCF, Swaine E (2006) Transient facilitative effects of heather on Scots pine along a grazing disturbance gradient in Scottish moorland. J Ecol 94:637–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brooker RW et al (2008) Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. J Ecol 96:18–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD (2003) Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol Evol 18:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Callaway RM et al (2002) Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417:844–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cavieres LA, Arroyo MTK, Peñaloza A, Molina-Montenegro MA, Torres C (2002) Nurse effect of Bolax gummifera cushion plants in the alpine vegetation of the Chilean Patagonian Andes. J Veg Sci 13:547–554Google Scholar
  20. Cavieres LA, Badano EI, Sierra-Almeida A, Molina-Montenegro MA (2007) Microclimatic modifications of cushion plants and their consequences for seedling survival of native and non-native herbaceous species in the High Andes of Central Chile. Arct Antarct Alp Res 39:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Choler P, Michalet R, Callaway RM (2001) Facilitation and competition on gradients in alpine plant communities. Ecology 82:3295–3308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. de Bustamante Simas A (2006) The betareg package: beta regression for modeling rates and proportions, version 1.2. Retrievable from http://www.cran.r-project.org
  23. Dullinger S et al (2007) Weak and variable relationships between environmental severity and small-scale co-occurrence in alpine plant communities. J Ecol 95:1284–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elmendorf SC, Moore KA (2007) Plant competition varies with community composition in an edaphically complex landscape. Ecology 88:2640–2650CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Eränen JK, Kozlov MV (2008) Increasing intraspecific facilitation in exposed environments: consistent results from mountain birch populations in two subarctic stress gradients. Oikos 117:1569–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eränen J, Kozlov M (2009) Interactions between mountain birch seedlings from differentiated populations in contrasting environments of subarctic Russia. Plant Ecol 200:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ferrari SLP, Cribari-Neto F (2004) Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. J Appl Stat 31:799–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaucherand S, Liancourt P, Lavorel S (2006) Importance and intensity of competition along a fertility gradient and across species. J Veg Sci 17:455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gómez-Aparicio L, Zamora R, Gómez JM, Hódar JA, Castro J, Baraza E (2004) Applying plant facilitation to forest restoration: A meta-analysis of the use of shrubs as nurse plants. Ecol Appl 14:1128–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grace J (1977) Plant response to wind. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Grace JB (1993) The effects of habitat productivity on competition intensity. Trends Ecol Evol 8:229–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Graff P, Aguiar MR, Chaneton EJ (2007) Shifts in positive and negative plant interactions along a grazing intensity gradient. Ecology 88:188–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hacker SD, Gaines SD (1997) Some implications of direct positive interactions for community species diversity. Ecology 78:1990–2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holzapfel C, Tielbörger K, Parag HA, Kigel J, Sternberg M (2006) Annual plant-shrub interactions along an aridity gradient. Basic Appl Ecol 7:268–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hugo EA, McGeoch MA, Marshall DJ, Chown SL (2004) Fine scale variation in microarthropod communities inhabiting the keystone species Azorella selago on Marion Island. Polar Biol 27:466–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huisman J, Olff H, Fresco LFM (1993) A hierarchical set of models for species response analysis. J Veg Sci 4:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huntley BJ (1971) Vegetation. In: van Zinderen Bakker EM Sr, Winterbottom JM, Dyer RA (eds) Marion and Prince Edward Islands: report on the South African biological and geological expeditions, 1965–1966. Balkema, Cape Town, pp 98–160Google Scholar
  38. Huntley BJ (1972) Notes on the ecology of Azorella selago Hook. f. S Afr J Bot 38:103–113Google Scholar
  39. Kadmon R, Tielbörger K (1999) Testing for source-sink population dynamics: an experimental approach exemplified with desert annuals. Oikos 86:417–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kawai T, Tokeshi M (2007) Testing the facilitation–competition paradigm under the stress-gradient hypothesis: decoupling multiple stress factors. Proc R Soc B 274:2503–2508CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. le Roux PC (2008) Climate and climate change. In: Chown SL, Froneman PW (eds) The Prince Edward Islands: land-sea interactions in a changing ecosystem. African SunMedia, Stellenbosch, pp 39–64Google Scholar
  42. le Roux PC, McGeoch MA (2004) The use of size as an estimator of age in the subantarctic cushion plant, Azorella selago (Apiaceae). Arct Antarct Alp Res 36:608–616Google Scholar
  43. le Roux PC, McGeoch MA (2008a) Changes in climate extremes, variability and signature on sub-Antarctic Marion Island. Climatic Change 86:309–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. le Roux PC, McGeoch MA (2008b) Rapid range expansion and community reorganization in response to warming. Glob Change Biol 14:2950–2962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. le Roux PC, McGeoch MA (2008c) Spatial variation in plant interactions across a severity gradient in the sub-Antarctic. Oecologia 155:831–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. le Roux PC, McGeoch MA, Nyakatya MJ, Chown SL (2005) Effects of simulated climate change on a keystone plant species in the sub-Antarctic. Glob Change Biol 11:1628–1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lindsey JK (2007) gnlm: generalized nonlinear regression models. Retrievable from http://popgen.unimaas.nl/~jlindsey/rcode.html
  48. Lortie CJ, Callaway RM (2006) Re-analysis of meta-analysis: support for the stress-gradient hypothesis. J Ecol 94:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Maestre FT, Cortina J (2004) Do positive interactions increase with abiotic stress? A test from a semi-arid steppe. Proc R Soc B 271:S331–S333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Valladares F, Lortie CJ (2009) Refining the stress-gradient hypothesis for competition and facilitation in plant communities. J Ecol 97:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. McGeoch MA, le Roux PC, Hugo AE, Nyakatya MJ (2008) Spatial variation in the terrestrial biotic system. In: Chown SL, Froneman PW (eds) The Prince Edward Islands: land-sea interactions in a changing ecosystem. African SunMedia, Stellenbosch, pp 245–276Google Scholar
  53. Michalet R et al (2006) Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped-back model of species richness in plant communities? Ecol Lett 9:767–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Molina-Montenegro MA, Torres C, Parra MJ, Cavieres LA (2000) Species association with the cushion Azorella trifurcata (Gaertn.) Hook. (Apiaceae) in the high Andes of central Chile. Gayana Bot 57:161–168Google Scholar
  55. Nyakatya MJ, McGeoch MA (2007) The microclimate associated with a keystone plant species (Azorella selago Hook. (Apiaceae)) on Marion Island. Polar Biol 31:139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Oksanen J, Minchin PR (2002) Continuum theory revisited: what shape are species responses along ecological gradients? Ecol Model 157:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pammenter NW, Drennan PM, Smith VR (1986) Physiological and anatomical aspects of photosynthesis of two Agrostis species at a sub-Antarctic island. New Phytol 102:143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pennings SC, Selig ER, Houser LT, Bertness MD (2003) Geographic variation in positive and negative interactions among salt marsh plants. Ecology 84:1527–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pugnaire FI, Luque MT (2001) Changes in plant interactions along a gradient of environmental stress. Oikos 93:42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  61. Sammul M, Kull K, Oksanen L, Veromann P (2000) Competition intensity and its importance: results of field experiments with Anthoxanthum odoratum. Oecologia 125:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schulze BR (1971) The climate of Marion Island. In: van Zinderen Bakker EM Sr, Winterbottom JM, Dyer RA (eds) Marion and Prince Edward Islands: report on the South African biological and geological expeditions, 1965–1966. Balkema, Cape Town, pp 16–31Google Scholar
  63. Smit C, Vandenberghe C, den Ouden J, Müller-Schärer H (2007) Nurse plants, tree saplings and grazing pressure: changes in facilitation along a biotic environmental gradient. Oecologia 152:265–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Smith VR (1987) The environment and biota of Marion Island. S Afr J Sci 83:211–220Google Scholar
  65. Smith VR (2008) Terrestrial and freshwater primary production and nutrient cycling. In: Chown SL, Froneman PW (eds) The Prince Edward Islands: land-sea interactions in a changing ecosystem. African SunMedia, Stellenbosch, pp 181–214Google Scholar
  66. Smith VR, French DD (1988) Patterns of variation in the climates, soils and vegetation of some sub-Antarctic and Antarctic islands. S Afr J Bot 54:35–46Google Scholar
  67. Smith VR, Mucina L (2006) Vegetation of Marion and Prince Edward Islands. In: Mucina L, Rutherford MC (eds) Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland, Strelitzia 19. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, pp 698–723Google Scholar
  68. Smith VR, Steenkamp M (1990) Climatic change and its ecological implications at a sub-Antarctic island. Oecologia 85:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smith VR, Steenkamp M, Gremmen NJM (2001) Terrestrial habitats on sub-Antarctic Marion Island: their vegetation, edaphic attributes, distribution and response to climate change. S Afr J Bot 67:641–654Google Scholar
  70. Smithson M, Verkuilen J (2006) A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychol Methods 11:54–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Tirado R, Pugnaire FI (2003) Shrub spatial aggregation and consequences for reproductive success. Oecologia 136:296–301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Tirado R, Pugnaire FI (2005) Community structure and positive interactions in constraining environments. Oikos 111:437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weigelt A, Jolliffe P (2003) Indices of plant competition. J Ecol 91:707–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Welden CW, Slauson WL (1986) The intensity of competition versus its importance: an overlooked distinction and some implications. Q Rev Biol 61:23–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Christiaan le Roux
    • 1
    • 2
  • Melodie A. McGeoch
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Conservation Ecology and EntomologyStellenbosch UniversityMatielandSouth Africa
  2. 2.Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and ZoologyStellenbosch UniversityMatielandSouth Africa
  3. 3.Cape Research CentreSouth African National Parks SteenbergSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations