, Volume 162, Issue 2, pp 371–381

Effects of genotype identity and diversity on the invasiveness and invasibility of plant populations

  • Mark Vellend
  • Emily B. M. Drummond
  • Hiroshi Tomimatsu
Population ecology - Original Paper


Genetic diversity within species is a potentially important, but poorly studied, determinant of plant community dynamics. Here we report experiments testing the influence of genotype identity and genotypic diversity both on the invasibility of a foundation, matrix-forming species (Kentucky bluegrass, Poa pratensis), and on the invasiveness of a colonizing species (dandelion, Taraxacum officinale). Genotypes of Kentucky bluegrass in monoculture showed significant variation in productivity and resistance to dandelion invasion, but the productivity and invasion resistance of genotypic mixtures were not significantly different from those of genotypic monocultures. Indirect evidence suggested temporal shifts in the genotypic composition of mixtures. Dandelion genotypes in monoculture showed striking and significant variation in productivity and seed production, but there was no significant tendency for these variables in mixtures to deviate from null expectations based on monocultures. However, productivity and seed production of dandelion mixtures were consistently greater than those of the two least productive genotypes, and statistically indistinguishable from those of the three most productive genotypes, suggesting the possibility of greater invasiveness of genotypically diverse populations in the long run due to dominance by highly productive genotypes. In both experiments, the identity of genotypes was far more important than genetic diversity per se.


Community genetics Competition Genetic diversity Invasion Species interactions 

Supplementary material

442_2009_1480_MOESM1_ESM.doc (42 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 41 kb)
442_2009_1480_MOESM2_ESM.doc (26 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 25 kb)
442_2009_1480_MOESM3_ESM.doc (33 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOC 33 kb)
442_2009_1480_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (10 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 10 kb)
442_2009_1480_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (8 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (PDF 7 kb)
442_2009_1480_MOESM6_ESM.doc (50 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (DOC 50 kb)
442_2009_1480_MOESM7_ESM.doc (39 kb)
Supplementary material 7 (DOC 39 kb)


  1. Agashe D (2009) The stabilizing effect of intraspecific genetic variation on population dynamics in novel and ancestral habitats. Am Nat 174:255–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Booth RE, Grime JP (2003) Effects of genetic impoverishment on plant community diversity. J Ecol 91:721–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cardinale BJ, Srivastava DS, Duffy JE, Wright JP, Downing AL, Sankaran M, Jouseau C (2006) Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443:989–993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cardinale BJ, Wright JP, Cadotte MW, Carroll IT, Hector A, Srivastava DS, Weis JJ (2007) Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18123–18128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Crutsinger GM, Collins MD, Fordyce JA, Gompert Z, Nice CC, Sanders NJ (2006) Plant genotypic diversity predicts community structure and governs an ecosystem process. Science 313:966–968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Crutsinger GM, Souza L, Sanders NJ (2008) Intraspecific diversity and dominant genotypes resist plant invasions. Ecol Lett 11:16–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. De Meester L, Louette G, Duvivier C, Van Damme C, Michels E (2007) Genetic composition of resident populations influences establishment success of immigrant species. Oecologia 153:431–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2007) Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17:431–449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasion by plants and animals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Ford H (1981) Competitive relationships amongst apomictic dandelions. Biol J Linn Soc 15:355–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fridley JD, Grime JP, Bilton M (2007) Genetic identity of interspecific neighbours mediates plant responses to competition and environmental variation in a species-rich grassland. J Ecol 95:908–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hughes AR, Stachowicz JJ (2004) Genetic diversity enhances the resistance of a seagrass ecosystem to disturbance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:8998–9002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hughes AR, Inouye BD, Johnson MTJ, Underwood N, Vellend M (2008) Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol Lett 11:609–623CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson MTJ, Vellend M, Stinchcombe JR (2009) Evolution in plant populations as a driver of ecological changes in arthropod communities. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 364:1593–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. King LM (1993) Origins of genotypic variation in North American dandelions inferred from ribosomal DNA and chloroplast DNA restriction enzyme analysis. Evolution 47:136–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lavkulich LM (1978) Methods manual pedology laboratory. Dept of Soil Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  17. Lickfeldt DW, Voigt TB, Hamblin AM (2002) Composition and characteristics of blended Kentucky bluegrass stands. Hortic Sci 37:124–1126Google Scholar
  18. Loreau M, Hector A (2001) Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412:72–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P (2002) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: synthesis and perspectives. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Reader RJ, Jalili A, Grime JP, Spencer RE, Matthews N (1993) A comparative study of plasticity in seedling rooting depth in drying soil. J Ecol 81:543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reusch TBH, Ehlers A, Hämmerli A, Worm B (2005) Ecosystem recovery after climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2826–2831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Smithson JB, Lenné JM (1996) Varietal mixtures: a viable strategy for sustainable productivity in subsistence agriculture. Ann Appl Biol 128:127–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Solbrig OT (1971) The population biology of dandelions. Am Sci 59:686–694Google Scholar
  24. Srivastava DS, Vellend M (2005) Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: is it relevant to conservation? Annu Rev Ecol Syst 36:267–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tamm A, Kull K, Sammul M (2002) Classifying clonal growth forms based on vegetative mobility and ramet longevity: a whole community analysis. Evol Ecol 15:383–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tilman D, Wedin D, Knops J (1996) Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379:718–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tilman EA, Tilman D, Crawley MJ, Johnston AE (1999) Biological weed control via nutrient competition: potassium limitation of dandelions. Ecol Appl 9:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vavrek MC (1998) Within-population genetic diversity of Taraxacum officinale (Asteraceae): differential genotype response and effect on interspecific competition. Am J Bot 85:947–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vavrek MC, McGraw JB, Yang HS (1996) Within-population variation in demography of Taraxacum officinale: maintenance of genetic diversity. Ecology 77:2098–2107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vellend M (2006) The consequences of genetic diversity in competitive communities. Ecology 87:304–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Vellend M, Drummond EBM, Muir JL (2009) Ecological differentiation among genotypes of dandelions (Taraxacum officinale). Weed Sci 57:410–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weltzin JF, Muth NZ, Von Holle B, Cole PG (2003) Genetic diversity and invasibility: a test using a model system with a novel experimental design. Oikos 103:505–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yoshida T, Ellner SP, Jones LE, Bohannan BJM, Lenski RE, Hairston NG Jr (2007) Cryptic population dynamics: rapid evolution masks trophic interactions. PLoS Biol 5:1868–1879CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Vellend
    • 1
  • Emily B. M. Drummond
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Tomimatsu
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Botany and Zoology, Biodiversity Research CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations