Oecologia

, Volume 162, Issue 1, pp 35–48 | Cite as

Differential effects of nutrient-limited primary production on primary, secondary or tertiary consumers

  • Arne M. Malzahn
  • Florian Hantzsche
  • Katherina L. Schoo
  • Maarten Boersma
  • Nicole Aberle
Physiological Ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

Nutritional imbalances between predator and prey are the rule rather than the exception at the lower end of food webs. We investigated the role of different grazers in the propagation of nutritionally imbalanced primary production by using the same primary producers in a three-trophic-level food chain and a four-trophic-level food chain experimental setup. The three-trophic-level food chain consisted of a classic single-cell primary producer (Rhodomonas salina), a metazoan grazer (the copepod Acartia tonsa) and a top predator (the jellyfish Gonionemus vertens), while we added a protozoan grazer (Oxyrrhis marina) as primary consumer to the food chain to establish the four-trophic-level food chain. This setup allowed us to investigate how nutrient-limitation effects change from one trophic level to another, and to investigate the performance of two components of our experimental food chains in different trophic positions. Stoichiometry and fatty acid profiles of the algae showed significant differences between the nutrient-depleted [no N and no P addition (−P), respectively] and the nutrient-replete (f/2) treatments. The differences in stoichiometry could be traced when O. marina was the first consumer. Copepods feeding on these flagellates were not affected by the nutritional imbalance of their prey in their stoichiometry, their respiration rates nor in their developmental rates. In contrast, when copepods were the primary consumer, those reared on the −P algae showed significantly higher respiration rates along with significantly lower developmental rates. In neither of our two experimental food chains did the signals from the base of the food chains travel up to jelly fish, our top predator.

Keywords

Stoichiometry Copepods Jellyfish Food chain length Trophic transfer 

Supplementary material

442_2009_1458_MOESM1_ESM.doc (53 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (53KB)

References

  1. Andersen OK, Goldman JC, Caron DA, Dennett MR (1986) Nutrient cycling in a microflagellate food chain. 3. Phosphorus dynamics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 31:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen T, Elser JJ, Hessen DO (2004) Stoichiometry and population dynamics. Ecol Lett 7:884–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson TR, Pond DW (2000) Stoichiometric theory extended to micronutrients: comparison of the roles of essential fatty acids, carbon, and nitrogen in the nutrition of marine copepods. Limnol Oceanogr 45:1162–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson TR, Boersma M, Raubenheimer D (2004) Stoichiometry: linking elements to biochemicals. Ecology 85:1193–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Attrill MJ, Wright J, Edwards M (2007) Climate-related increases in jellyfish frequency suggest a more gelatinous future for the North Sea. Limnol Oceanogr 52:480–485Google Scholar
  6. Bakker C (1980) On the distribution of Gonionemus vertens A. Agassiz (Hydrozoa, Limnomedusae), a new species in the eelgrass beds of Lake Grevelingen (S.W. Netherlands). Hydrobiol Bull 14:186–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bec A, Martin-Creuzburg D, von Elert E (2006) Trophic upgrading of autotrophic picoplankton by the heterotrophic nanoflagellate Paraphysomonas sp. Limnol Oceanogr 51:1699–1707Google Scholar
  8. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ (1959) A rapid method for total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37:911–917PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Boechat IG, Adrian R (2005) Biochemical composition of algivorous freshwater ciliates: you are not what you eat. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53:393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Boersma M (2000) The nutritional quality of P-limited algae for Daphnia. Limnol Oceanogr 45:1157–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boersma M, Becker C, Malzahn AM, Vernooij S (2009) Food chain effects of nutrient limitation in primary producers. Mar Freshwater Res (in press)Google Scholar
  12. Chu FLE, Lund ED, Podbesek JA (2008) Quantitative significance of n-3 essential fatty acid contribution by heterotrophic protists in marine pelagic food webs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 354:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clemmesen C (1993) Improvements in the fluorimetric determination of the RNA and DNA content of individual marine fish larvae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 100:177-183Google Scholar
  14. Darchambeau F, Faerøvig PJ, Hessen DO (2003) How Daphnia copes with excess carbon in its food. Oecologia 136:335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denno RF, Fagan WF (2003) Might nitrogen limitation promote omnivory among carnivorous arthropods? Ecology 84:2522–2531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Desvilettes C, Bourdier G, Amblard C, Barth B (1997) Use of fatty acids for the assessment of zooplankton grazing on bacteria, protozoans and microalgae. Freshwater Biol 38:629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dickman EM, Newell JM, Gonzalez MJ, Vanni MJ (2008) Light, nutrients, and food-chain length constrain planktonic energy transfer efficiency across multiple trophic levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:18408–18412CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Diehl S, Feißel M (2000) Effects of enrichment on three-level food chains with omnivory. Am Nat 155:200–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Elser JJ, Hassett RP (1994) A stoichiometric analysis of the zooplankton-phytoplankton interaction in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Nature 370:211–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elser JJ et al (2000) Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs. Nature 408:578–580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Farkas T, Fodor E, Kitajka K, Halver JE (2001) Response of fish membranes to environmental temperature. Aquat Res 32:645–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Folch J, Lees M, Stanley GHS (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226:497–509PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Frost PC et al (2006) Threshold elemental ratios of carbon and phosphorus in aquatic consumers. Ecol Lett 9:774–779CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldman JG, Caron DA, Dennett MR (1987) Nutrient cycling in a microflagellate food chain. 4. Phytoplankton-microflagellate interactions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 38:75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grasshoff K, Kremling K, Erhardt M (1999) Methods of seawater analysis, 3rd edn. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  26. Grover JP, Chrzanowski TH (2006) Stoichiometry and growth kinetics in the “smallest zooplankton” phagotrophic flagellates. Arch Hydrobiol 167:467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guillard R, Ryther J (1962) Studies of marine planktonic diatoms. Can J Microbiol 8:229–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gulati RD, DeMott WR (1997) The role of food quality for zooplankton: remarks on the state-of-the-art, perspectives and priorities. Freshwater Biol 38:753–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hessen DO, Anderson TR (2008) Excess carbon in aquatic organisms and ecosystems: physiological, ecological, and evolutionary implications. Limnol Oceanogr 53:1685–1696Google Scholar
  30. Irigoien X, Head RN, Harris RP, Cummings D, Harbour D, Meyer-Harms B (2000) Feeding selectivity and egg production of Calanus helgolandicus in the English Channel. Limnol Oceanogr 45:44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jensen T, Hessen D (2007) Does excess dietary carbon affect respiration of Daphnia? Oecologia 152:191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Jindra M, Sehnal F (1990) Linkage between diet humidity, metabolic water production and heat dissipation in the larvae of Galleria mellonella. Insect Biochem 20:389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kagata H, Ohgushi T (2007) Carbon–nitrogen stoichiometry in the tritrophic food chain willow, leaf beetle, and predatory ladybird beetle. Ecol Res 22:671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Klausmeier CA, Litchman E, Daufresne T, Levin SA (2004) Optimal nitrogen-to-phosphorus stoichiometry of phytoplankton. Nature 429:171–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Le Pecq JB, Paoletti C (1966) A new fluorometric method for RNA and DNA determination. Anal Biochem 17:100–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee S-M (2001) Review of the lipid and essential fatty acid requirement of rockfish (Sebastes schlegeli). Aquat Res 32:8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lund ED, Chu FE, Harvey E, Adlof R (2008) Mechanism(s) of long chain n-3 essential fatty acid production in two species of heterotrophic protists: Oxyrrhis marina and Gyrodinium dominans. Mar Biol 155:23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lynam CP, Heath MR, Hay SJ, Brierley AS (2005) Evidence for impacts by jellyfish on North Sea herring recruitment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 298:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Malzahn AM, Aberle N, Clemmesen C, Boersma M (2007) Primary production under nutrient limitation indirectly affects larval fish condition. Limnol Oceanogr 52:2062–2071Google Scholar
  40. Mauchline J (1998) The biology of calanoid copepods. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  41. Mills CE (2001) Jellyfish blooms: are populations increasing globally in response to changing ocean conditions? Hydrobiologia 451:55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Müller-Navarra DC (1995) Biochemical versus mineral limitation in Daphnia. Limnol Oceanogr 40:1209–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Müller-Navarra DC (2008) Food web paradigms: the biochemical view on trophic interactions. Int Rev Hydrobiol 93:489–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Newsholme EA, Crabtree B (1976) Substrate cycles in metabolic regulation and in heat generation. Biochem Soc Symp 41:61–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Newsholme EA, Crabtree B, Higgins SJ, Thornton SD, Start C (1972) The activities of fructose diphosphatase in flight muscles from bumble-bee and the role of this enzyme in heat generation. Biochem J 128:89–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Paffenhoefer GA, Van Sant KB (1985) The feeding response of a marine planktonic copepod to quantity and quality of particles. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 27:55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peters J, Dutz J, Hagen W (2007) Role of essential fatty acids on the reproductive success of the copepod Temora longicornis in the North Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 341:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Plath K, Boersma M (2001) Mineral limitation of zooplankton: stoichiometric constraints and optimal foraging. Ecology 82:1260–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Purcell JE, Arai MN (2001) Interactions of pelagic cnidarians and ctenophores with fish: a review. Hydrobiologia 451:27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reitan KI, Rainuzzo JR, Oie G, Olsen Y (1997) A review of the nutritional effects of algae in marine fish larvae. Aquaculture 155:207–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rhee GY (1978) Effects of N:P atomic ratios and nitrate limitation on algal growth, cell composition, and nitrate uptake. Limnol Oceanogr 23:10–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schoo KL, Aberle N, Malzahn AM, Boersma M (2009) Does the nutrient stoichiometry of primary producers affect the secondary consumer Pleurobrachia pileus? Aquat Ecol (in press)Google Scholar
  53. Siron R, Giusti G, Berland B (1989) Changes in the fatty-acid composition of Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Dunaliella tertiolecta during growth and under phosphorus deficiency. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 55:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Staples JF, Koen EL, Laverty TM (2004) ‘Futile cycle’ enzymes in the flight muscles of North American bumblebees. J Exp Biol 207:749–754CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  56. Sterner RW et al (2008) Scale-dependent carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus seston stoichiometry in marine and freshwaters. Limnol Oceanogr 53:1169–1180Google Scholar
  57. Tocher DR (2003) Metabolism and functions of lipids and fatty acids in teleost fish. Rev Fish Sci 11:107–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Urabe J, Sterner RW (1996) Regulation of herbivore growth by the balance of light and nutrients. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:8465–8469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Vargas CA, Escribano R, Poulet S (2006) Phytoplankton food quality determines time windows for successful zooplankton reproductive pulses. Ecology 87:2992–2999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Watanabe T, Kitajima C, Fujita S (1983) Nutritional values of live organisms used in Japan for mass propagation of fish: a review. Aquaculture 34:115–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zanotto FP, Gouveia SM, Simpson SJ, Raubenheimer D, Calder PC (1997) Nutritional homeostasis in locusts: is there a mechanism for increased energy expenditure during carbohydrate overfeeding? J Exp Biol 200:2437–2448PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arne M. Malzahn
    • 1
    • 2
  • Florian Hantzsche
    • 2
    • 1
  • Katherina L. Schoo
    • 1
    • 3
  • Maarten Boersma
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nicole Aberle
    • 1
  1. 1.Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar- und MeeresforschungBiologische Anstalt HelgolandHelgolandGermany
  2. 2.GKSS-Research CentreInstitute for Coastal ResearchGeesthachtGermany
  3. 3.IFM-GEOMARLeibniz Institute for Marine SciencesKielGermany

Personalised recommendations