Oecologia

, Volume 162, Issue 1, pp 23–33 | Cite as

Natural variation for drought-response traits in the Mimulus guttatus species complex

  • Carrie A. Wu
  • David B. Lowry
  • Laura I. Nutter
  • John H. Willis
Physiological Ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

Soil moisture is a key factor affecting plant abundance and distribution, both across and within species. In response to water limitation, plants have evolved numerous morphological, physiological, and phenological adaptations. In both well-watered and water-limited conditions, we identified considerable natural variation in drought-related whole-plant and leaf-level traits among closely related members of the Mimulus guttatus species complex that occupy a diversity of habitats in the field. The self-fertilizing Mimulus nasutus and serpentine-endemic Mimulus nudatus demonstrated the overall greatest tolerance to soil water limitation, exhibiting the smallest reduction in seed set relative to well-watered conditions. This may be due in part to early flowering, faster fruit development, and low stomatal density. In contrast, flowering of coastal M. guttatus was so delayed that it precluded any seed production in water-limited conditions. This range of phenotypic responses to soil water deficit in Mimulus, coupled with developing genomic resources, holds considerable promise for identifying genomic variation responsible for adaptive responses to soil water availability.

Keywords

Dehydration avoidance Drought escape Flowering time Monkeyflowers Water deficit 

Supplementary material

442_2009_1448_MOESM1_ESM.doc (900 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 900 kb)

References

  1. Ackerly DD, Dudley SA, Sultan SE, Schmitt J, Coleman JS, Linder CR, Sandquist DR, Geber MA, Evans AS, Dawson TE, Lechowicz MJ (2000) The evolution of plant ecophysiological traits: recent advances and future directions. BioScience 50:979–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angert AL, Huxman TE, Barron-Gafford GA, Gerst KL, Venable DL (2007) Linking growth-strategies to long-term population dynamics in a guild of desert annuals. J Ecol 95:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araus JL, Slafer GA, Reynolds MP, Royo C (2002) Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: what should we breed for? Ann Bot 89:925–940CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arntz AM, Delph LF (2001) Pattern and process: evidence for the evolution of photosynthetic traits in natural populations. Oecologia 127:455–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barr HD, Weatherley PE (1962) A reexamination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves. Aust J Biol Sci 15:413–428Google Scholar
  6. Bazzaz FA (1979) Physiological ecology of plant succession. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 10:351–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beardsley PM, Schoenig SE, Whittall JB, Olmstead RG (2004) Patterns of evolution in western North American Mimulus (Phrymaceae). Am J Bot 91:474–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell DR, Galen C, Wu CA (2005) Ecophysiology of first and second generation hybrids in a natural plant hybrid zone. Oecologia 144:214–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Canadell JG, Pataki DE, Pitelka LF (eds) (2007) Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing World. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought––from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol 30:239–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clausen J, Keck DD, Hiesey WM (1940) Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. Effects of varied environments on western North American plants. Carnegie Institute of Washington publication no. 520. Carnegie Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Corbin JD, Thomsen MA, Dawson TE, D’Antonio CM (2005) Summer water use by California coastal prairie grasses: fog, drought, and community composition. Oecologia 145:511–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cornwell WK, Grubb PJ (2003) Regional and local patterns in plant species richness with respect to resource availability. Oikos 100:417–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Culley TM, Dunbar-Wallis AK, Sakai AK, Weller SG, Mishio M, Campbell DR, Herzenach M (2006) Genetic variation of ecophysiological traits in two gynodioecious species of Schiedea (Caryophyllaceae). New Phytol 169:589–601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawson TE, Ehleringer JR (1993) Gender-specific physiology, carbon isotope discrimination, and habitat distribution in box elder, Acer negundo. Ecology 74:798–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dudley SA (1996) Differing selection on plant physiological traits in response to environmental water availability: a test of adaptive hypotheses. Evolution 50:92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eckhart VM, Geber MA, McGuire C (2004) Experimental studies of selection and adaptation in Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae). I. Sources of phenotypic variation across a subspecies border. Evolution 58:59–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ehleringer JR (1993) Carbon and water relations in desert plants: and isotopic perspective. In: Ehleringer JR, Hall AE, Farquhar GD (eds) Stable isotopes and plant carbon–water relations. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 155–172Google Scholar
  19. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:503–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fishman L, Willis JH (2008) Pollen limitation and natural selection on floral characters in the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. New Phytol 177:802–810CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fishman L, Kelly AJ, Willis JH (2002) Minor quantitative trait loci underlie floral traits associated with mating system divergence in Mimulus. Evolution 56:2138–2155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fox GA (1990) Drought and the evolution of flowering time in desert annuals. Am J Bot 77:1508–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Franke DM, Ellis AG, Dharjwa M, Freshwater M, Padron A, Weis AE (2006) A steep cline in flowering time for Brassica rapa in Southern California: population-level variation in the field and the greenhouse. Int J Plant Sci 167:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gardner M, Macnair M (2000) Factors affecting the co-existence of the serpentine endemic Mimulus nudatus Curran and its presumed progenitor, Mimulus guttatus Fischer ex DC. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 69:443–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garnier E, Cordonnier P, Guillerm JL, Sonié L (1997) Specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen concentration in annual and perennial grass species growing in Mediterranean old-fields. Oecologia 111:490–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Geber MA, Dawson TE (1990) Genetic variation in and covariation between leaf gas exchange, morphology, and development in Polygonum arenastrum, an annual plant. Oecologia 85:153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geber MA, Dawson TE (1997) Genetic variation in stomatal and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis in the annual plant, Polygonum arenastrum. Oecologia 109:535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gottlieb LD (2003) Rethinking classic examples of recent speciation in plants. New Phytol 161:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall MC, Willis JH (2006) Divergent selection on flowering time contributes to local adaptation in Mimulus guttatus populations. Evolution 60:2466–2477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hausman NJ, Juenger TE, Sen S, Stowe KA, Dawson TE, Simms EL (2005) Quantitative trait loci affecting δ13C and response to differential water availability in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 59:81–96Google Scholar
  31. Heschel MS, Riginos C (2005) Mechanisms of selection for drought stress tolerance and avoidance in Impatiens capensis. Am J Bot 92:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heschel MS, Donohue K, Hausmann N, Schmitt J (2002) Population differentiation and natural selection for water-use efficiency in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). Int J Plant Sci 163:907–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Heschel MS, Sultan SE, Glover S, Sloan D (2004) Population differentiation and plastic responses to drought stress in the generalist annual, Impatiens capensis. Oecologia 139:487–494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hughes R, Bachmann K, Smirnoff N, Macnair M (2001) The role of drought tolerance in serpentine tolerance in the Mimulus guttatus Fischer ex DC complex. S Afr J Sci 97:581–586Google Scholar
  35. Ingram J, Bartels D (1996) The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47:377–403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Juenger TE, McKay J, Hausmann N, Keurentjes JJB, Sen S, Stowe KA, Dawson TE, Simms EL, Richards JH (2005) Identification and characterization of QTL underlying whole-plant physiology in Arabidopsis thaliana: δ13C, stomatal conductance and transpiration efficiency. Plant Cell Environ 28:697–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kiang YT, Hamrick JL (1978) Reproductive isolation in the Mimulus guttatusM. nasutus complex. Am Midl Nat 100:269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Koornneef M, Alonso-Blanco C, Vreugdenhil D (2004) Naturally occurring genetic variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:141–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lambers H, Chapin FS, Pons TL (1998b) Plant physiological ecology. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Li Y, Johnson DA, Su Y, Cui J, Zhang T (2005) Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content of plants growing in sand dunes. Bot Bull Acad Sin 46:127–134Google Scholar
  41. Lowry DB, Rockwood RC, Willis JH (2008) Ecological reproductive isolation of coast and inland races of Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 62:2196–2214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lowry DB, Hall MC, Salt DE, Willis JH (2009) Genetic and physiological basis of adaptive salt tolerance divergence between coastal and inland Mimulus guttatus. New Phytol. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.209.02901.x
  43. Ludlow MM (1989) Strategies of response to water stress. In: Kreeb KH, Richter H, Minckley TM (eds) Structural and functional responses to environmental stress. SPB Academic, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  44. Ludwig F, Rosenthal DM, Johnston JA, Kane NC, Gross BL, Lexer C, Rieseberg LH, Donovan LA (2004) Selection on leaf ecophysiological traits in a desert hybrid Helianthus species and early-generation hybrids. Evolution 58:2682–2692PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Macnair MR, Gardner M (1998) The evolution of edaphic endemics. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH (eds) Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 157–171Google Scholar
  46. Maggio A, Zhu J, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA (2006) Osmogenetics: Aristotle to Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18:1542–1557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin NH, Willis JH (2007) Barriers to gene flow between the monkeyflowers Mimulus guttatus, M. nasutus and their hybrids. Evolution 61:68–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Masle J, Gilmore SR, Garquhar GD (2005) The ERECTA gene regulates plant transpiration efficiency in Arabidopsis. Nature 436:866–870CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. McKay JK, Bishop JG, Lin JZ, Sala A, Richards JH, Mitchell-Olds T (2001) Local adaptation across a climatic gradient despite small effective population size in the rare sapphire rockcress. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:1715–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McKay JK, Richeards JH, Mitchell-Olds T (2003) Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana. I. Pleiotropy contributes to genetic correlations among ecological traits. Mol Ecol 12:1137–1151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Mckay JK, Richards JH, Nemali KS, Sen S, Mitchel-Olds T, Boles S, Stahl EA, Wayne T, Juenger TE (2008) Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana. II. QTL analysis of a new mapping population, Kas-1 X Tsu-1. Evolution 62:3014–3026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Munns R (2002) Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ 25:239–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Murren CJ, Douglass L, Gibson A, Dudash MR (2006) Individual and combined effects of Ca/Mg ratio and water on trait expression in Mimulus guttatus. Ecology 87:2591–2606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Nagy ES, Rice KJ (1997) Local adaptation in two subspecies of an annual plant: implications for migration and gene flow. Evolution 51:1079–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pennell FW (1947) Some hitherto undescribed Scrophulariaceae of the Pacific states. Proc Acad Nat Sci 99:151–171Google Scholar
  56. Poorter H, Niinemets U, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Villar R (2009) Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. New Phytol 182:565–588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Reid CD, Maherali H, Johnson HB, Smith SD (2003) On the relationship between stomatal characters and atmospheric CO2. Geophys Res Lett 30: art. no. 1983Google Scholar
  58. Sakai AK, Weller SG, Wagner WL, Nepokroeff M, Culley TM (2006) Adaptive radiation and evolution of breeding systems in Schiedea (Caryophyllaceae), and endemic Hawaiian genus. Ann Mo Bot Gard 93:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schulze ED (1986) Carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange in response to drought in the atmosphere and in the soil. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 37:247–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sherrard ME, Maherali H (2006) The adaptive significance of drought escape in Avena barbata, an annual grass. Evolution 60:2478–2489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Simpson CG, Dean C (2002) Arabidopsis, the Rosetta stone of flowering time? Science 296:285–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Stanton ML, Roy BA, Thiede DA (2000) Evolution in stressful environments. I. Phenotypic variability, phenotypic selection, and response to selection in five distinct environmental stresses. Evolution 54:93–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Turesson G (1922) The genotypic response of the plant species to habitat. Hereditas 3:211–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vickery RK (1978) Case studies in the evolution of species complexes in Mimulus. Evol Biol 11:405–507Google Scholar
  65. Weinig C, Ungerer MC, Dorn LA, Kane NC, Toyonaga Y, Halldorsdottir SS, Mackay TFC, Purugganan MD, Schmitt J (2002) Novel loci control variation in reproductive timing in Arabidopsis thaliana in natural environments. Genetics 162:1875–1884PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Wu CA, Lowry DB, Cooley AM, Wright KM, Lee YW, Willis JH (2008) Mimulus is an emerging model system for the integration of ecological and genomic studies. Heredity 100:220–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Yu H, Chen X, Hong Y-Y, Wang Y, Xu P, Ke S-D, Liu H-Y, Zhu J-K, Oliver DJ, Xiang C-B (2008) Activated expression of an Arabidopsis HD-START protein confers drought tolerance with improved root system and reduced stomatal density. Plant Cell 20:1134–1151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carrie A. Wu
    • 1
    • 2
  • David B. Lowry
    • 1
  • Laura I. Nutter
    • 1
  • John H. Willis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of RichmondRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations