Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 162, Issue 1, pp 117–125 | Cite as

Counterintuitive size patterns in bivoltine moths: late-season larvae grow larger despite lower food quality

  • Tiit TederEmail author
  • Toomas Esperk
  • Triinu Remmel
  • Anu Sang
  • Toomas Tammaru
Plant-Animal Interactions - Original Paper

Abstract

Within a season, successive generations of short-lived organisms experience different combinations of environmental parameters, such as temperature, food quality and mortality risk. Adult body size of e.g. insects is therefore expected to vary both as a consequence of proximate environmental effects as well as adaptive responses to seasonal cues. In this study, we examined intraspecific differences in body size between successive generations in 12 temperate bivoltine moths (Lepidoptera), with the ultimate goal to critically compare the role of proximate and adaptive mechanisms in determining seasonal size differences. In nearly all species, individuals developing late in the season (diapausing generation) attained a larger adult size than their conspecifics with the larval period early in the season (directly developing generation) despite the typically lower food quality in late summer. Rearing experiments conducted on one of the studied species, Selenia tetralunaria also largely exclude the possibility that the proximate effects of food quality and temperature are decisive in determining size differences between successive generations. Adaptive explanations appear likely instead: the larger body size in the diapausing generation may be adaptively associated with the lower bird predation pressure late in the season, and/or the likely advantage of large pupal size during overwintering.

Keywords

Phenology Phenotypic plasticity Predation risk Time stress Voltinism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful for the possibility to use the material accumulated through the Estonian Environmental Monitoring Programme, coordinated by Erki Õunap. We thank Rein Karulaas and Taavet Kukk for technical help. The study was supported by the Estonian Science Foundation (grants 6619, 7406 and 7522), the Estonian Ministry of Education and Science (targeted financing project SF0180122s08) as well as by the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (Center of Excellence FIBIR). All the experiments complied with the laws of Estonia.

References

  1. Abrams PA, Rowe L (1996) The effects of predation on the age and size of maturity of prey. Evolution 50:1052–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angilletta MJ, Dunham AE (2003) The temperature–size rule in ectotherms: simple evolutionary explanations may not be general. Am Nat 162:332–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Angilletta MJ, Steury TD, Sears MW (2004) Temperature, growth rate, and body size in ectotherms: fitting pieces of a life-history puzzle. Integr Comp Biol 44:498–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson D, Sibly RM (1997) Why are organisms usually bigger in colder environments? Making sense of a life history puzzle. Trends Ecol Evol 12:235–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayres MP, MacLean SF Jr (1987) Development of birch leaves and the growth energetics of Epirrita autumnata (Geometridae). Ecology 68:558–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benard MF (2004) Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in organisms with complex life histories. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:651–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berger D, Walters R, Gotthard K (2006) What keeps insects small? Size dependent predation on two species of butterfly larvae. Evol Ecol 20:575–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanckenhorn WU, Demont M (2004) Bergmann and converse Bergmann latitudinal clines in arthropods: two ends of a continuum? Integr Comp Biol 44:413–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brower LP (1989) Chemical defence in butterflies. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR (eds) The biology of butterflies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 109–134Google Scholar
  10. Cornell HV, Hawkins BA (1995) Survival patterns and mortality sources of herbivorous insects: some demographic trends. Am Nat 145:563–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Danks HV (2007) The elements of seasonal adaptations in insects. Can Entomol 139:1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. EMHI (Estonian Meteorological and Hydrological Institute) (2008) Mean temperature 1961–1990. http://www.emhi.ee/?ide=6,299,302
  13. Esperk T, Tammaru T, Nylin S (2007a) Intraspecific variability in number of larval instars in insects. J Econ Entomol 100:627–645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Esperk T, Tammaru T, Nylin S, Teder T (2007b) Achieving high sexual size dimorphism in insects: females add instars. Ecol Entomol 32:243–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer K, Fiedler K (2001) Sexual differences in life-history traits in the butterfly Lycaena tityrus: a comparison between direct and diapause development. Entomol Exp Appl 100:325–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer K, Fiedler K (2002) Reaction norms for age and size at maturity in response to temperature: a test of the compound interest hypothesis. Evol Ecol 16:333–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gotthard K (2000) Increased risk of predation as a cost of high growth rate: an experimental test in a butterfly. J Anim Ecol 69:896–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gotthard K (2001) Growth strategies of ectothermic animals in temperate environments. In: Atkinson D, Thorndyke M (eds) Environment and animal development: genes, life histories and plasticity. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford, pp 287–304Google Scholar
  19. Gotthard K, Nylin S, Wiklund C (1999) Seasonal plasticity in two satyrine butterflies: state-dependent decision making in relation to daylength. Oikos 84:453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Higgins L (2000) The interaction of season length and development time alters size at maturity. Oecologia 122:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iwasa Y, Ezoe H, Yamauchi A (1994) Evolutionarily stable seasonal timing of univoltine and bivoltine insects. In: Danks HV (ed) Insect life-cycle polymorphism: theory, evolution and ecological consequences for seasonality and diapause control. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 69–89Google Scholar
  22. Karl I, Fischer K (2008) Why get big in the cold? Towards a solution to a life-history puzzle. Oecologia 155:215–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Karlsson B, Wickman P-O (1989) The cost of prolonged life: an experiment on a nymphalid butterfly. Funct Ecol 3:399–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu Z, Gong P, Wu K, Wei W, Sun J, Li D (2007) Effects of larval host plants on over-wintering preparedness and survival of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Insect Physiol 53:1016–1026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mänd T, Tammaru T, Mappes J (2007) Size dependent predation risk in cryptic and conspicuous insects. Evol Ecol 21:485–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marttila O, Saarinen K, Haahtela T, Pajari M (1996) Suomen kiitäjät ja kehrääjät. Kirjayhtymä, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  28. Mikkola K, Jalas I (1977) Suomen perhoset. Yökköset 1. Otava, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  29. Mikkola K, Jalas I, Peltonen O (1985) Suomen perhoset. Mittarit 1. Tampereen kirjapaino Oy, TampereGoogle Scholar
  30. Mikkola K, Jalas I, Peltonen O (1989) Suomen perhoset. Mittarit 2. Hangon kirjapaino, HankoGoogle Scholar
  31. Nijhout HF (2003) Development and evolution of adaptive polyphenisms. Evol Dev 5:9–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Nylin S (1992) Seasonal plasticity in life-history traits—growth and development in Polygonia c-album (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Biol J Linn Soc 47:301–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nylin S, Svärd L (1991) Latitudinal patterns in the size of European butterflies. Holarctic Ecol 14:192–202Google Scholar
  34. Nylin S, Wickman P-O, Wiklund C (1989) Seasonal plasticity in growth and development of the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria (Satyrinae). Biol J Linn Soc 38:155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peckarsky BL, Taylor BW, Lytle DA, McIntosh AR, McPeek MA (2001) Variation in mayfly size at metamorphosis as a developmental response to risk of predation. Ecology 82:740–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Relyea RA (2007) Getting out alive: how predators affect the decision to metamorphose. Oecologia 152:389–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Remmel T, Tammaru T (2009) Size-dependent predation risk in tree-feeding insects with different colouration strategies: a field experiment. J Anim Ecol 78:973–980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Remmel T, Tammaru T, Mägi M (2009) Seasonal mortality trends in tree-feeding insects: a field experiment. Ecol Entomol 34:98–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roff DA (1980) Optimizing development time in a seasonal environment: the “ups and downs” of clinal variation. Oecologia 45:202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. SAS Institute (2008) SAS/STAT 9.2 user’s guide. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  41. Schroeder LA (1986) Changes in tree leaf quality and growth-performance of lepidopteran larvae. Ecology 67:1628–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scriber JM (1994) Climatic legacies and sex chromosomes: latitudinal patterns of voltinism, diapause, size, and host-plant selection in two species of swallowtail butterflies at their hybrid zone. In: Danks HV (ed) Insect life-cycle polymorphism: theory, evolution and ecological consequences for seasonality and diapause control. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 133–171Google Scholar
  43. Sillén-Tullberg B (1988) Evolution of gregariousness in aposematic butterfly larvae: a phylogenetic analysis. Evolution 42:293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stoks R (2001) Food stress and predator-induced stress shape developmental performance in a damselfly. Oecologia 127:222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Svensson I (1993) Fjärilkalender. KristianstadGoogle Scholar
  46. Tanaka K, Tsubaki Y (1984) Seasonal dimorphism, growth and food consumption in the swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xuthus L. Kontyû 52:390–398Google Scholar
  47. Tauber MJ, Tauber CA, Masaki S (1986) Seasonal adaptations of insects. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Asch M, Visser ME (2007) Phenology of forest caterpillars and their host trees: the importance of synchrony. Annu Rev Entomol 52:37–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Viidalepp J, Remm H (1996) Eesti liblikate määraja. Valgus, TallinnGoogle Scholar
  50. Werner EE, Anholt BR (1993) Ecological consequences of the trade of between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. Am Nat 142:242–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wiklund C, Fagerström T (1977) Why do males emerge before females? A hypothesis to explain the incidence of protandry in butterflies. Oecologia 31:153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wiklund C, Järvi T (1982) Survival of distasteful insects after being attacked by naive birds: a reappraisal of the theory of aposematic coloration evolving through individual selection. Evolution 36:998–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wiklund C, Nylin S, Forsberg J (1991) Sex-related variation in growth rate as a result of selection for large size and protandry in a bivoltine butterfly, Pieris napi. Oikos 60:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Windig JJ (1999) Trade-offs between melanization, development time and adult size in Inachis io and Araschnia levana (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)? Heredity 82:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Windig JJ, Lammar P (1999) Evolutionary genetics of seasonal polyphenism in the map butterfly Araschnia levana (Nymphalidae: Lepidoptera). Evol Ecol Res 1:875–894Google Scholar
  56. Zvereva EL (2002) Effects of host plant quality on overwintering success of the leaf beetle Chrysomela lapponica (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Eur J Entomol 99:189–195Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tiit Teder
    • 1
    Email author
  • Toomas Esperk
    • 1
  • Triinu Remmel
    • 1
  • Anu Sang
    • 1
  • Toomas Tammaru
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth SciencesUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations