, Volume 161, Issue 2, pp 433–445 | Cite as

Size-mediated adaptive foraging: a host-selection strategy for insect parasitoids

  • Lee Mason Henry
  • Brian O. Ma
  • Bernard D. Roitberg
Behavioral Ecology - Original Paper


Foraging models are useful tools for generating predictions on predator–prey interactions, such as habitat or diet choice. However, the majority of studies attempting to explain adaptive behaviour using optimality criteria have assumed that there is no trait (e.g. size) variation among individual consumers or their prey. Hymenopteran parasitoids that attack the free-living stages of their host are an ideal system for studying the influence of body size on host selection because of the wide range of adult parasitoid sizes coupled with the defensive capabilities of their hosts. We report here our application of an experimentally parameterized host selection model to investigate the influence of parasitoid body size on the range of acceptable host instar classes. Using a demographic model, we compared the efficiency of parasitoids using an optimal host selection strategy against parasitoids using an indiscriminate host selection strategy over a range of different parasitoid body sizes. Net fitness accrual of parasitoids and the impact of host instar selection on aphid recruitment were assessed on different stage-structured aphid populations. Our results demonstrate that optimal host selection allows larger parasitoids to utilize a wider range of hosts. However, smaller parasitoids receive the greatest benefits from selecting hosts optimally by utilizing a restricted range of small, poorly defended hosts when they are abundant. We argue that the correlation between flexible host selection behaviour and adult body size may be a general phenomenon that applies to the majority of hymenopteran parasitoids that attack free-living, well-defended hosts. The potential of within-generation behavioural interactions to impact between-generation dynamics in host–parasitoid populations are discussed.


Acrythosiphon pisum Aphidius ervi Correlated phenotypes Optimal host selection 


  1. Beckerman AP, Uriarte M, Schimitz OJ (1997) Experimental evidence for a behavioural-mediated trophic cascade in a terrestrial food chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:1735–1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolker B, Holyoak M, Krivan V, Rowe L, Schmitz O (2003) Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology 84:1101–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Charnov EL (1976a) Optimal foraging: attack strategy of a mantid. Am Nat 110:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charnov EL (1976b) Optimal foraging, marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chau A, Mackauer M (2000) Host-instar selection in the aphid parasitoid Monoctonus paulensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Aphidiinae): a preference for small pea aphids. Europ J Entomol 97:347–353Google Scholar
  6. Chau A, Mackauer M (2001) Host-instar selection in the aphid parasitoid Monoctonus paulensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Aphidiinae): assessing costs and benefits. Can Entomol 133:549–564Google Scholar
  7. Colinet H, Salin C, Boivin G (2005) Host-age and fitness related traits in a koinobiont aphid parasitoid. Ecol Entomol 30:473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Comins HN, Hassell MP (1979) The dynamics of optimally foraging predators and parasitoids. J Anim Ecol 48:335–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dill LM (1987) Animal decision making and its ecological consequences: the future of aquatic ecology and behaviour. Can J Zool 65:803–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eijs IEM, van Alphen JJM (1999) Life history correlations: why are hymenopteran parasitoids an exception? Ecol Lett 2:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Field J (1992) Guild structure in solitary spider-hunting wasps (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) compared with null model predictions. Ecol Entomol 17:198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher DO, Dickman CR (1993) Body size–prey relationships in insectivorous marsupials: tests of three hypotheses. Ecology 74:1871–1883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fryxell JM, Lundberg P (1994) Diet choice and predator–prey dynamics. Evol Ecol 8:407–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gentry GL, Dyer LA (2002) On the conditional nature of neotropical caterpillar defenses against their enemies. Ecology 83:3108–3119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerling D, Roiberg BD, Mackauer M (1990) Instar-specific defense of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum—influence on oviposition success of the parasite Aphelinus asychis. J Insect Behav 4:501–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gurney WSC, Nisbet RM (1985) Fluctuation periodicity, generation separation, and the expression of larval competition. Theor Popul Biol 28:150–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harvey JA, Harvey IF, Thompson DJ (1994) Flexible larval growth allows use of a range of host sizes by a parasitoid wasp. Ecology 75:1420–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henry LM, Gillespie DR, Roitberg BD (2005) Does mother really know best? Oviposition preference reduces reproductive performance in the generalist parasitoid Aphidius ervi. Entomol Exp Appl 116:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henry LM, Roitberg BD, Gillespie DR (2006) Covariance of phenotypically plastic traits induces an adaptive shift in host selection behaviour. Proc R Soc B 273:2893–2899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hivonen H, Ranta E (1996) Prey to predator ratio influences efficiency of larval Aeshna juncea dragonflies. Oecologia 106:407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holling CS (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Entomol 91:385–398Google Scholar
  22. Karsai I, Somogyi K, Hardy ICW (2006) Body size, host choice and sex allocation in a spider-hunting pompilid wasp. Biol J Linn Soc 87:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kazmer DJ, Luck RF (1995) Field tests of the size-fitness relationship hypothesis in the egg parasitoid Trichogramma pretiosum. Ecology 76:412–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kouame KL, Mackauer M (1991) Influence of aphid size, age and behavior on host choice by the parasitoid wasp Ephedrus californicus—a test of host-size models. Oecologia 88:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krebs JR (1978) Optimal foraging: decision rules for predators. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 23–63Google Scholar
  26. Krebs JR, Ericksen JT, Weber MI, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal prey selection in the Great Tit (Parus major). Anim Behav 25:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kurczewski FE, Kurczewski EJ (1968) Host records for some North American Pompilidae (Hymenoptera) with a discussion of factors in prey selection. J Kansas Entomol Soc 41:1–33Google Scholar
  28. Luttbeg B, Schmitz OJ (2000) Predator and prey models with flexible individual behavior and imperfect information. Am Nat 155:669–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ma BO, Abrams PA, Brassil CE (2003) Dynamic versus instantaneous models of diet choice. Am Nat 162:668–684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mackauer M, Michaud JP, Volkl W (1996) Host choice by aphidiid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae): host recognition, host quality, and host value. Can Entomol 128:959–980Google Scholar
  31. Mangel M, Roitberg B (1992) Behavioral stabilization of parasite–host dynamics. Theor Popul Biol 42:308–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mittelbach GG (1981) Foraging efficiency and body size: a study of optimal diet and habitat use by bluegills. Ecology 62:1370–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mondor EB, Roitberg BD (2000) Individual behaviour and population dynamics: lessons from aphid parasitoids. Entomol Exp Appl 97:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morris RJ, Fellowes MDE (2002) Learning and natal host influence host preference, handling time and sex allocation behaviour in a pupal parasitoid. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:386–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pachepsky E, Nisbet RM, Murdoch WW (2008) Between discrete and continuous: consumer-resource dynamics with synchronized reproduction. Ecology 89:280–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peacor SD, Werner EE (2001) The contribution of trait-mediated indirect effects to the net effects of a predator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 27:3904–3908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Persson L, De Roos AM (2003) Adaptive habitat use in size-structured populations: linking individual behavior to population processes. Ecology 84:1129–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Persson L, Greenberg LG (1990) Optimal foraging and habitat shift of perch (Perca fluviatilis) in a resource gradient. Ecology 71:1699–1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Persson L, Leonardsson AM, De Roos AM, Gyllenberg M, Christensen B (1998) Ontogenetic scaling of foraging rates and the dynamics of a size-structered consumer resource model. Theor Popul Biol 54:270–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Petchey OL, Beckerman AP, Riede JO, Warren PH (2008) Size, foraging, and food web structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:4191–4196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peterson G, Hardy ICW (1996) The importance of being large: parasitoid intruder-owner contests and their implications for clutch size. Anim Behav 51:1363–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theories and tests. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roger C, Coderre D, Boivin G (2000) Differential prey utilization by the generalist predator Coleomegilla maculata lengi according to prey size and species. Entomol Exp Appl 94:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roitberg BD, Boivin G, Vet L (2001) Fitness, parasitoids and biological control: an opinion. Can Entomol 133:429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sequeira R, Mackauer M (1992) Quantitative genetics of body size and development time in the parasitoid wasp Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera, Aphidiidae). Can J Zool 70:1102–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sequeira R, Mackauer M (1993) Seasonal variation in body size and offspring sex-ratio in field populations of the parasitoid wasp, Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera, Aphiidae). Oikos 68:340–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sequeira R, Mackauer M (1994) Variation in selected life-history parameters of the parasitoid wasp, Aphidius ervi—influence of host developmental stage. Entomol Exp Appl 71:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Strohm E, Linsenmair KE (1997) Female size affects provisioning and sex allocation in a digger wasp. Anim Behav 54:23–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tsai JH, Wang JJ (2002) Host age choice for parasitism by Lysiphlebia mirzai and its effect on the development and reproduction of brown citrus aphid. Biocontrol 47:645–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vezina AF (1985) Empirical relationships between predator and prey size among terrestrial vertebrate predators. Oecologia 67:555–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Visser ME (1994) The importance of being large: the relationship between parasitoid size and fitness in females of the parasitoid Aphereta minuta (Hymenoptera: Branconidae). J Anim Ecol 63:963–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang XG, Messing RH (2004) Fitness consequences of body size-dependent host species selection in a generalist ectoparasitoid. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:513–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weisser WW (1994) Age-dependent foraging behavior and host-instar preference of the aphid parasitoid Lysiphlebus cardui. Entomol Exp Appl 70:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Werner EE, Mittelbach GG, Hall DJ, Gilliam JF (1983) Experimental tests of optimal habitat use in fish: the role of relative habitat profitability. Ecology 64:1525–1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee Mason Henry
    • 1
  • Brian O. Ma
    • 1
  • Bernard D. Roitberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations