Oecologia

, Volume 160, Issue 4, pp 721–733

Pollination and reproduction of a self-incompatible forest herb in hedgerow corridors and forest patches

Plant-Animal interactions - Original Paper

Abstract

Habitat-corridors are assumed to counteract the negative impacts of habitat loss and fragmentation, but their efficiency in doing so depends on the maintenance of ecological processes in corridor conditions. For plants dispersing in linear habitats, one of these critical processes is the maintenance of adequate pollen transfer to insure seed production within the corridor. This study focuses on a common, self-incompatible forest herb, Trillium grandiflorum, to assess plant–pollinator interactions and the influence of spatial processes on plant reproduction in hedgerow corridors compared to forests. First, using pollen supplementation experiments over 2 years, we quantified the extent of pollen limitation in both habitats, testing the prediction of greater limitation in small hedgerow populations than in forests. While pollen limitation of fruit and seed set was common, its magnitude did not differ between habitats. Variations among sites, however, suggested an influence of landscape context on pollination services. Second, we examined the effect of isolation on plant reproduction by monitoring fruit and seed production, as well as pollinator activity and assemblage, in small flower arrays transplanted in hedgerows at increasing distances from forest and from each other. We detected no difference in the proportion of flowers setting fruit or in pollinator activity with isolation, but we observed some differences in pollinator assemblages. Seed set, on the other hand, declined significantly with increasing isolation in the second year of the study, but not in the first year, suggesting altered pollen transfer with distance. Overall, plants in hedgerow corridors and forests benefited from similar pollination services. In this system, plant–pollinator interactions and reproduction seem to be influenced more by variations in resource distribution over years and landscapes than by local habitat conditions.

Keywords

Functional connectivity Habitat corridor Plant–pollinator interaction Pollen limitation Trillium grandiflorum 

Supplementary material

442_2009_1347_MOESM1_ESM.doc (26 kb)
Supplementary tables (DOC 26 kb)

References

  1. Adler LS, Irwin RE (2006) Comparison of pollen transfer dynamics by multiple floral visitors: experiments with pollen and fluorescent dye. Ann Bot Lond 97:141–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ågren J (1996) Population size, pollinator limitation, and seed set in the self-incompatible herb Lythrum salicaria. Ecology 77:1779–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ågren J, Ehrlén J, Solbreck C (2008) Spatio-temporal variation in fruit production and seed predation in a perennial herb influenced by habitat quality and population size. J Ecol 96:334–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aizen MA, Harder LD (2007) Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality. Ecology 88:271–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alarcón R, Waser NM, Ollerton J (2008) Year-to-year variation in the topology of a plant-pollinator interaction network. Oikos 117:1796–1807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allen-Wardell G, Bernhardt P, Bitner R, Burquez A, Buchmann S, Cane J, Cox PA, Dalton V, Feinsinger P, Ingram M, Inouye D, Jones CE, Kennedy K, Kevan P, Koopowitz H, Medellin R, Medellin-Morales S, Nabhan GP, Pavlik B, Tepedino V, Torchio P, Walker S (1998) The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields. Conserv Biol 12:8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Artz DR, Waddington KD (2006) The effects of neighbouring tree islands on pollinator density and diversity, and on pollination of a wet prairie species, Asclepias lanceolata (Apocynaceae). J Ecol 94:597–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashman TL, Knight TM, Steets JA, Amarasekare P, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mazer SJ, Mitchell RJ, Morgan MT, Wilson WG (2004) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85:2408–2421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bélanger L, Grenier M, Deslandes S, Bossé D (1998) Conservation atlas of woodlands in the agricultural landscape. In: Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service. http://www.qc.ec.gc.ca/faune/atlas/atlas.html
  10. Bond WJ (1994) Do mutualisms matter: assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 344:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bosch M, Waser NM (1999) Effects of local density on pollination and reproduction in Delphinium nuttallianum and Aconitum columbianum (Ranunculaceae). Am J Bot 86:871–879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bosch M, Waser NM (2001) Experimental manipulation of plant density and its effect on pollination and reproduction of two confamilial montane herbs. Oecologia 126:76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brookes RH, Jesson LK, Burd M (2008) A test of simultaneous resource and pollen limitation in Stylidium armeria. New Phytol 179:557–565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Broyles SB, Shermanbroyles SL, Rogati P (1997) Evidence of outcrossing in Trillium erectum and Trillium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). J Hered 88:325–329Google Scholar
  15. Brunet J, Vonoheimb G (1998) Migration of vascular plants to secondary woodlands in southern Sweden. J Ecol 86:429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brys R, Jacquemyn H, De Bruyn L, Hermy M (2007) Pollination success and reproductive output in experimental populations of the self-incompatible Primula vulgaris. Int J Plant Sci 168:571–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burd M (1994) Bateman’s principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Bot Rev 60:83–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burd M (1995) Ovule packaging in stochastic pollination and fertilization environments. Evolution 49:100–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Campbell DR, Halama KJ (1993) Resource and pollen limitations to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population. Ecology 74:1043–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Case FW, Case RB (1997) Trilliums. Timber Press, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  21. Chacoff NP, Aizen MA (2006) Edge effects on flower-visiting insects in grapefruit plantations bordering premontane subtropical forest. J Appl Ecol 43:18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Colling G, Reckinger C, Matthies D (2004) Effects of pollen quantity and quality on reproduction and offspring vigor in the rare plant Scorzonera humilis (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 91:1774–1782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Corbit M, Marks PL, Gardescu S (1999) Hedgerows as habitat corridors for forest herbs in central New York, USA. J Ecol 87:220–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cranmer L (2004) The influence of linear landscape features on pollinator behaviour. PhD Thesis, University of Northampton, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Cunningham SA (2000) Depressed pollination in habitat fragments causes low fruit set. Proc R Soc Lond Bl 267:1149–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. de Blois S, Domon G, Bouchard A (2002) Landscape issues in plant ecology. Ecography 25:244–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Duncan DH, Nicotra AB, Wood JT, Cunningham SA (2004) Plant isolation reduces outcross pollen receipt in a partially self-compatible herb. J Ecol 92:977–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Environment Canada (2005) Climate data online. In: Environment Canada. http://climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca
  29. Ghazoul J (2005) Pollen and seed dispersal among dispersed plants. Biol Rev 80:413–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Groom MJ (1998) Allee effects limit population viability of an annual plant. Am Nat 151:487–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haddad NM, Bowne DR, Cunningham A, Danielson BJ, Levey DJ, Sargent S, Spira T (2003) Corridor use by diverse taxa. Ecology 84:609–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haig D, Westoby M (1988) On limits to seed production. Am Nat 131:757–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hanzawa FM, Kalisz S (1993) The relationship between age, size, and reproduction in Trillium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). Am J Bot 80:405–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Herrera CM (1995) Floral biology, microclimate, and pollination by ectothermic bees in an early-blooming herb. Ecology 76:218–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hines HM, Hendrix SD (2005) Bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) diversity and abundance in tallgrass prairie patches: effects of local and landscape floral resources. Environ Entomol 34:1477–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Holzschuh A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2008) Agricultural landscapes with organic crops support higher pollinator diversity. Oikos 117:354–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hosmer DWJ, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Irwin RE (2000) Morphological variation and female reproductive success in two sympatric Trillium species: evidence for phenotypic selection in Trillium erectum and Trillium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). Am J Bot 87:205–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Irwin RE (2001) Field and allozyme studies investigating optimal mating success in two sympatric spring-ephemeral plants, Trillium erectum and T. grandiflorum. Heredity 87:178–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Irwin RE, Brody AK (1998) Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: effects on pollinator behavior and plant fitness. Oecologia 116:519–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jules ES, Rathcke BJ (1999) Mechanisms of reduced Trillium recruitment along edges of old-growth forest fragments. Conserv Biol 13:784–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jules ES, Shahani P (2003) A broader ecological context to habitat fragmentation: why matrix habitat is more important than we thought. J Veg Sci 14:459–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kahmen A, Jules ES (2005) Assessing the recovery of a long-lived herb following logging: Trillium ovatum across a 424-year chronosequence. For Ecol Manag 210:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kalisz S, Hanzawa FM, Tonsor SJ, Thiede DA, Voigt S (1999) Ant-mediated seed dispersal alters pattern of relatedness in a population of Trillium grandiflorum. Ecology 80:2620–2634Google Scholar
  46. Kearns CA, Inouye DW, Waser NM (1998) Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:83–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kleijn D, van Langevelde F (2006) Interacting effects of landscape context and habitat quality on flower visiting insects in agricultural landscapes. Basic Appl Ecol 7:201–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Knight TM (2003) Floral density, pollen limitation, and reproductive success in Trillium grandiflorum. Oecologia 137:557–563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Knight TM, Steets JA, Vamosi JC, Mazer SJ, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mitchell RJ, Ashman TL (2005) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:467–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Knight TM, Steets JA, Ashman TL (2006) A quantitative synthesis of pollen supplementation experiments highlights the contribution of resource reallocation to estimates of pollen limitation. Am J Bot 93:271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kolb A (2005) Reduced reproductive success and offspring survival in fragmented populations of the forest herb Phyteuma spicatum. J Ecol 93:1226–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, Packer L, Potts SG, Roulston T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vazquez DP, Winfree R, Adams L, Crone EE, Greenleaf SS, Keitt TH, Klein AM, Regetz J, Ricketts TH (2007) Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett 10:299–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kreyer D, Oed A, Walther-Hellwig K, Frankl R (2004) Are forests potential landscape barriers for foraging bumblebees? Landscape scale experiments with Bombus terrestris agg. and Bombus pascuorum (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Biol Conserv 116:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kunin WE (1997) Population size and density effects in pollination: pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. J Ecol 85:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lamont BB, Klinkhamer PGL, Witkowski ETF (1993) Population fragmentation may reduce fertility to zero in Banksia goodii: a demonstration of the Allee effect. Oecologia 94:446–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Larson BMH, Barrett SCH (2000) A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biol J Linn Soc 69:503–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lennartsson T (2002) Extinction thresholds and disrupted plant-pollinator interactions in fragmented plant populations. Ecology 83:3060–3072Google Scholar
  58. Moody-Weis JM, Heywood JS (2001) Pollination limitation to reproductive success in the Missouri evening primrose, Oenothera macrocarpa (Onagraceae). Am J Bot 88:1615–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Petanidou T, Dennijs JCM, Oostermeijer JGB, Ellisadam AC (1995) Pollination ecology and patch-dependent reproductive success of the rare perennial Gentiana pneumonanthe L. New Phytol 129:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Price MV, Waser NM, Irwin RE, Campbell DR, Brody AK (2005) Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: a seven-year study. Ecology 86:2106–2116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  62. Ricketts T, Imhoff M (2003) Biodiversity, urban areas, and agriculture: locating priority ecoregions for conservation. Conserv Ecol 8:1. http://www.consecol.org/vol8/iss2/art1
  63. Ricketts TH, Regetz J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Bogdanski A, Gemmill-Herren B, Greenleaf SS, Klein AM, Mayfield MM, Morandin LA, Ochieng A, Viana BF (2008) Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns? Ecol Lett 11:499–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Roy V, de Blois S (2006) Using functional traits to assess the role of hedgerow corridors as environmental filters for forest herbs. Biol Conserv 130:592–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roy V, de Blois S (2008) Evaluating hedgerow corridors for the conservation of native forest herb diversity. Biol Conserv 141:298–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sage TL, Griffin SR, Pontieri V, Drobac P, Cole WW, Barrett SCH (2001) Stigmatic self-incompatibility and mating patterns in Trillium grandiflorum and Trillium erectum (Metanthiaceae). Ann Bot Lond 88:829–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. SAS Institute (2003) SAS 9.1 for windows. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  68. Saunders DA, Hobbs NT (1991) The role of corridors. Surrey Beatty, LondonGoogle Scholar
  69. Schmucki R, de Blois S (2009) Population structures and individual performances of Trillium grandiflorum in hedgerow and forest habitats. Plant Ecol 202:67–78. doi:10.1007/s11258-008-9460-8 Google Scholar
  70. Sih A, Baltus MS (1987) Patch size, pollinator behavior, and pollinator limitation in catnip. Ecology 68:1679–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Steffan-Dewenter I, Schiele S (2008) Do resources or natural enemies drive bee population dynamics in fragmented habitats? Ecology 89:1375–1387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Steffan-Dewenter I, Munzenberg U, Burger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2002) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Steffan-Dewenter I, Potts SG, Packer L (2005) Pollinator diversity and crop pollination services are at risk. Trends Ecol Evol 20:651–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Steven JC, Rooney TP, Boyle OD, Waller DM (2003) Density-dependent pollinator visitation and self-incompatibility in upper Great Lakes populations of Trillium grandiflorum. J Torrey Bot Soc 130:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Taki H, Kevan PG (2007) Does habitat loss affect the communities of plants and insects equally in plant-pollinator interactions? Preliminary findings. Biodivers Conserv 16:3147–3161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tewksbury JJ, Levey DJ, Haddad NM, Sargent S, Orrock JL, Weldon A, Danielson BJ, Brinkerhoff J, Damschen EI, Townsend P (2002) Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions in fragmented landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12923–12926PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tomimatsu H, Ohara M (2002) Effects of forest fragmentation on seed production of the understory herb Trillium camschatcense. Conserv Biol 16:1277–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tomimatsu H, Ohara M (2004) Edge effects on recruitment of Trillium camschatcense in small forest fragments. Biol Conserv 117:509–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Townsend PA, Levey DJ (2005) An experimental test of whether habitat corridors affect pollen transfer. Ecology 86:466–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wagenius S (2006) Scale dependence of reproductive failure in fragmented Echinacea populations. Ecology 87:931–941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wagenius S, Lonsdorf E, Neuhauser C (2007) Patch aging and the S-allee effect: breeding system effects on the demographic response of plants to habitat fragmentation. Am Nat 169:383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Waites AR, Ågren J (2004) Pollinator visitation, stigmatic pollen loads and among-population variation in seed set in Lythrum salicaria. J Ecol 92:512–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Walther-Hellwig K, Frankl R (2000) Foraging habitats and foraging distances of bumblebees, Bombus spp. (Hym., apidae), in an agricultural landscape. J Appl Entomol 124(29):9–306Google Scholar
  84. Waser NM (1978) Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 59:934–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Waser NM, Price MV (1991) Outcrossing distance effects in Delphinium nelsonii: pollen loads, pollen tubes, and seed set. Ecology 72:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Whigham DE (2004) Ecology of woodland herbs in temperate deciduous forests. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:583–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Williams NM, Kremen C (2007) Resource distributions among habitats determine solitary bee offspring production in a mosaic landscape. Ecol Appl 17:910–921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Williams NM, Minckley RL, Silveira FA (2001) Variation in native bee faunas and its implications for detecting community changes. Conserv Ecol 5:7Google Scholar
  89. Wilson P, Thomson JD (1991) Heterogeneity among floral visitors leads to discordance between removal and deposition of pollen. Ecology 72:1503–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant ScienceMacdonald Campus of McGill UniversitySte-Anne-de-BellevueCanada
  2. 2.McGill School of EnvironmentDowntown Campus of McGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations