Darkness as an ecological resource: the role of light in partitioning the nocturnal niche
Nocturnal behaviors that vary as a function of light intensity, either from the setting sun or the moon, are typically labeled as circadian or circalunar. Both of these terms refer to endogenous time-dependent behaviors. In contrast, the nightly reproductive and feeding behaviors of Vargula annecohenae, a bioluminescent ostracod (Arthropoda: Crustacea) fluctuate in response to light intensity, an exogenous factor that is not strictly time-dependent. We measured adult and juvenile activity of V. annecohenae throughout lunar cycles in January/February and June 2003. Overnight and nightly measurements of foraging and reproductive behavior of adult V. annecohenae indicated that activity was greatest when a critical “dark threshold” was reached and that the dark threshold for adult V. annecohenae is met when less than a third of the moon is visible or at the intensity of light 2–3 min before the start of nautical twilight when no moon is illuminated. Juvenile V. annecohenae were also nocturnally active but demonstrated little or no response to lunar illumination, remaining active even during brightly moonlit periods. In addition to light level, water velocity also influenced the behaviors of V. annecohenae, with fewer juveniles and adults actively foraging on nights when water velocity was high (>25 cm/s). Our data demonstrate that the strongest environmental factor influencing adult feeding and reproductive behaviors of V. annecohenae is the availability of time when illumination is below the critical dark threshold. This dependence on darkness for successful growth and reproduction allows us to classify darkness as a resource, in the same way that the term has been applied to time, space and temperature.
KeywordsBioluminescence Ostracod Dark threshold Lunar cycle
We thank our handling editor Charles Peterson and two anonymous reviewers whose comments helped to improve this manuscript and Suzanne Stapleton for assistance with figure revisions. We also thank Nelson G. Hairston Jr and Amy McCune for comments on project development and this manuscript. Paul Helfenstein was gracious in his assistance with the lunar model. We also are grateful for field assistance from Krystal Rypien, Michael Pipersburgh and Richie Williams and support from International Zoological Expeditions on Southwater Caye. Funding sources included the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Cornell University, the Mario Eunaudi Fund and the S. Ann and Robert R. Morley Research Fund. This research was completed in accordance with permits received from the Belize Department of Fisheries, Belize.
- Franke H-D (1986) The role of light and endogenous factors in the timing of the reproductive cycle of Typosyllis prolifera and some other polychaetes. Am Zool 26:433–445Google Scholar
- Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W (1995) DNA repair and mutagenesis. American Society of Microbiology Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Hastings JW, Morin JG (1991) Bioluminescence. In: Prosser CL (ed) Neural and integrative animal physiology [comparative animal physiology]. Wiley–Liss, Wilmington, pp 131–170Google Scholar
- Herring PJ (1990) Bioluminescent communication in the sea. In: Herring PJ, Cambell AK, Whitfield M, Maddock L (eds) Light and life in the sea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 245–264Google Scholar
- Magnuson JJ, Crowder LB, Mevick PA (1979) Temperature as an ecological resource. Am Zool 19:331–343Google Scholar
- Mitchell DL, Karentz D (1993) The induction and repair of DNA photodamage in the environment. In: Young AR, Bjorn LO, Moan J, Nultsch W (eds) Environmental UV photobiology. Plenum, New York, pp 345–377Google Scholar
- Morin JG (1983) Coastal bioluminescence: patterns and functions. Bull Mar Sci 33:787–817Google Scholar
- Morin JG, Cohen AC (1991) Bioluminescent displays, courtship, and reproduction in Ostracodes. In: Bauer R, Martin J (eds) Crustacean sexual biology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 1–16Google Scholar
- Rich C, Longcore T (2006) Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Rivers TJ, Morin JG (2009) Extreme plasticity of male mating behaviour in a marine bioluminescent ostracod. Anim Behav (in press)Google Scholar
- Widder EA (1999) Bioluminescence. In: Archer SN, et al. (eds) Adaptive mechanisms in the ecology of vision. Kluwer, Leiden, pp 555–581Google Scholar